MoonQube United States Ashburn Compute Qubes Cloud Server Test and Review

Tests5~months ago~Published LetsHosting
910 0
MoonQube United States Ashburn Compute Qubes Cloud Server Test and Review

In this review, we’re putting the MoonQube server based in Ashburn, USA, to the test. It’s got a powerful Intel Xeon Processor, 32 CPU cores, 64 GB of RAM, 1280 GB of NVMe SSD storage, 10 Gbps internet connection, 8 TB data transfer, and its unique IPv4 address.

We’ll put it through its paces with a series of tests: a ‘Basic Benchmark’ to get a general sense of performance, ‘Yabs’ and ‘Unix Benchmark’ to dig into the important details, a ‘Global Node Test’ to check out network reach, and a ‘Global Ping Test’ to see how quickly it responds.

Our team also checked if it can access content from different providers with the ‘Media Unlock Test,’ measure how well it connects with the ‘CloudFlare Internet Test,’ and rate web speed using tools like ‘PageSpeed Insights’ and ‘GTmetrix Performance.’

About MoonQube

MoonQube is a technology company established in 2023 and based in the United States. It specializes in providing various services that cater to the needs of businesses and individuals alike. These services range from Virtual Private Server (VPS) hosting to block storage, object storage, Kubernetes, web hosting, and domain hosting.

The company’s VPS hosting service is one of its key offerings. This service allows users to have their dedicated portion of a physical server, which provides them with the same capabilities and functionalities as a dedicated server but at a lower cost. This is particularly beneficial for businesses requiring high data security levels and control over their server environment.

In addition to VPS hosting, MoonQube also offers block storage services. This involves storing data in fixed-sized blocks within a storage area network (SAN). Each block acts as an individual hard drive configured by the storage administrator. This type of storage is ideal for applications that require high performance and low latency.

On the other hand, MoonQube’s object storage service is designed for storing large amounts of unstructured data. Unlike block storage, object storage includes metadata along with the data itself. This makes it easier to manage and analyze.

Another significant service provided by MoonQube is Kubernetes. Kubernetes is an open-source platform designed to automate containerized applications’ deployment, scaling, and management. It groups containers that make up an application into logical units for easy management and discovery.

Official Website: https://www.MoonQube.com

BasicBench: Server Profile, I/O Speed, Upload and Download Speed

 CPU Model          : Intel Xeon Processor (Icelake)
 CPU Cores          : 32 @ 2400.000 MHz
 CPU Cache          : 16384 KB
 AES-NI             : ✓ Enabled
 VM-x/AMD-V         : ✓ Enabled
 Total Disk         : 1.2 TB (1.5 GB Used)
 Total Mem          : 62.8 GB (369.1 MB Used)
 Total Swap         : 2.0 GB (0 Used)
 System uptime      : 0 days, 0 hour 26 min
 Load average       : 0.00, 0.01, 0.01
 OS                 : Debian GNU/Linux 11
 Arch               : x86_64 (64 Bit)
 Kernel             : 5.10.0-23-cloud-amd64
 TCP CC             : bbr
 Virtualization     : KVM
 IPv4/IPv6          : ✓ Online / ✗ Offline
 Organization       : AS54641 InMotion Hosting, Inc.
 Location           : Ashburn / US
 Region             : Virginia
----------------------------------------------------------------------
 I/O Speed(1st run) : 628 MB/s
 I/O Speed(2nd run) : 576 MB/s
 I/O Speed(3rd run) : 599 MB/s
 I/O Speed(average) : 601.0 MB/s
----------------------------------------------------------------------
 Node Name        Upload Speed      Download Speed      Latency     
 Speedtest.net    2243.57 Mbps      5764.47 Mbps        37.20 ms    
 Los Angeles, US  1357.31 Mbps      3299.71 Mbps        61.42 ms    
 Dallas, US       2627.96 Mbps      5383.65 Mbps        31.77 ms    
 Montreal, CA     929.69 Mbps       934.23 Mbps         13.24 ms    
 Paris, FR        1043.32 Mbps      5230.94 Mbps        77.29 ms    
 Amsterdam, NL    621.23 Mbps       5486.81 Mbps        82.36 ms    
 Shanghai, CN     346.33 Mbps       1743.93 Mbps        232.88 ms   
 Chongqing, CN    1.98 Mbps         0.13 Mbps           254.85 ms   
 Hongkong, CN     5.24 Mbps         0.20 Mbps           251.28 ms   
 Mumbai, IN       418.19 Mbps       3338.68 Mbps        195.96 ms   
 Singapore, SG    357.12 Mbps       3375.17 Mbps        235.73 ms   
 Tokyo, JP        452.13 Mbps       2989.41 Mbps        178.84 ms   
----------------------------------------------------------------------
 Finished in        : 6 min 10 sec
 Timestamp          : 2024-01-30 01:56:34 UTC

YabsBench: Disk Speed, iperf3 Network Speed, Geekbench 6 Benchmark

Basic System Information:
---------------------------------
Uptime     : 0 days, 0 hours, 34 minutes
Processor  : Intel Xeon Processor (Icelake)
CPU cores  : 32 @ 2400.000 MHz
AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
RAM        : 62.8 GiB
Swap       : 2.0 GiB
Disk       : 1.2 TiB
Distro     : Debian GNU/Linux 11 (bullseye)
Kernel     : 5.10.0-23-cloud-amd64
VM Type    : KVM
IPv4/IPv6  : ✔ Online / ❌ Offline

IPv4 Network Information:
---------------------------------
ISP        : InMotion Hosting
ASN        : AS54641 InMotion Hosting, Inc.
Host       : OpenMetal, Inc
Location   : Washington, District of Columbia (DC)
Country    : United States

fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50):
---------------------------------
Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
Read       | 200.68 MB/s  (50.1k) | 1.18 GB/s    (18.5k)
Write      | 201.21 MB/s  (50.3k) | 1.19 GB/s    (18.6k)
Total      | 401.90 MB/s (100.4k) | 2.37 GB/s    (37.1k)
           |                      |                     
Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
Read       | 1.40 GB/s     (2.7k) | 1.33 GB/s     (1.2k)
Write      | 1.47 GB/s     (2.8k) | 1.41 GB/s     (1.3k)
Total      | 2.88 GB/s     (5.6k) | 2.75 GB/s     (2.6k)

iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
---------------------------------
Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping           
Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 2.19 Gbits/sec  | 2.48 Gbits/sec  | 75.1 ms        
Scaleway        | Paris, FR (10G)           | 1.99 Gbits/sec  | 379 Mbits/sec   | 78.1 ms        
NovoServe       | North Holland, NL (40G)   | 1.88 Gbits/sec  | 2.09 Gbits/sec  | 87.6 ms        
Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 795 Mbits/sec   | 933 Mbits/sec   | 185 ms         
Clouvider       | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 8.08 Gbits/sec  | 3.91 Gbits/sec  | 6.55 ms        
Clouvider       | Dallas, TX, US (10G)      | 3.20 Gbits/sec  | 2.83 Gbits/sec  | 31.1 ms        
Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 2.84 Gbits/sec  | 2.59 Gbits/sec  | 59.8 ms        

Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
---------------------------------
Test            | Value                         
                |                               
Single Core     | 1396                          
Multi Core      | 10995                         
Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/4657931

YABS completed in 9 min 33 sec

UnixBench: CPU Performance, A score higher is better

Benchmark Run: Tue Jan 30 2024 02:28:07 - 02:56:12
32 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables       40685769.7 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone                     5664.1 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput                               5018.9 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks       1194021.1 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks          320982.1 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks       3073124.7 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput                             2235386.8 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching                 117322.2 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation                               9852.1 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                  13568.1 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                   6319.1 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead                        2559716.4 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values               BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0   40685769.7   3486.4
Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0       5664.1   1029.8
Execl Throughput                                 43.0       5018.9   1167.2
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0    1194021.1   3015.2
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0     320982.1   1939.5
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0    3073124.7   5298.5
Pipe Throughput                               12440.0    2235386.8   1796.9
Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0     117322.2    293.3
Process Creation                                126.0       9852.1    781.9
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4      13568.1   3200.0
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0       6319.1  10531.8
System Call Overhead                          15000.0    2559716.4   1706.5
                                                                   ========
System Benchmarks Index Score                                        1952.9

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Tue Jan 30 2024 02:56:12 - 02:56:12
32 CPUs in system; running 32 parallel copies of tests

======= Script description and score comparison completed! ======= 

Looking Glass

None

Global Node Test

 ## CDN Speedtest

 CacheFly : 617.28 MiB/s | 4938.27 Mbps  | ping   0.237ms
 Gdrive   :  20.66 KiB/s |    0.16 Mbps  | ping   1.074ms


 ## North America Speedtest

 Softlayer, Washington, USA : 146.44 MiB/s | 1171.49 Mbps  | ping   1.074ms
 SoftLayer, San Jose, USA   :  26.05 MiB/s |  208.37 Mbps  | ping  71.273ms
 SoftLayer, Dallas, USA     :       0 B/s |      N/A       | ping error!
 Vultr, New Jersey, USA     :  45.54 MiB/s |  364.30 Mbps  | ping   6.470ms
 Vultr, Seattle, USA        :  35.63 MiB/s |  285.00 Mbps  | ping  64.213ms
 Vultr, Dallas, USA         :  75.47 MiB/s |  603.77 Mbps  | ping  32.873ms
 Vultr, Los Angeles, USA    :  36.50 MiB/s |  291.97 Mbps  | ping  62.020ms
 Ramnode, New York, USA     : 106.44 MiB/s |  851.49 Mbps  | ping   5.328ms
 Ramnode, Atlanta, USA      : 101.02 MiB/s |  808.20 Mbps  | ping  11.401ms


 ## Europe Speedtest

 Vultr, London, UK            :  30.84 MiB/s |  246.69 Mbps  | ping  74.910ms
 LeaseWeb, Frankfurt, Germany :  61.17 KiB/s |    0.48 Mbps  | ping  83.663ms
 Hetzner, Germany             :     290 B/s |      N/A       | ping  90.137ms
 Ramnode, Alblasserdam, NL    :  26.21 MiB/s |  209.71 Mbps  | ping  88.350ms
 Vultr, Amsterdam, NL         :  27.01 MiB/s |  216.04 Mbps  | ping  83.163ms
 EDIS, Stockholm, Sweden      :     260 B/s |      N/A       | ping 111.460ms
 OVH, Roubaix, France         :     480 B/s |      N/A       | ping  80.865ms
 Online, France               :  29.03 MiB/s |  232.25 Mbps  | ping  77.454ms
 Prometeus, Milan, Italy      :     529 B/s |      N/A       | ping  94.004ms


 ## Exotic Speedtest

 Sydney, Australia     :   5.12 MiB/s |   40.95 Mbps  | ping 239.117ms
 Lagoon, New Caledonia :     245 B/s |      N/A       | ping 236.549ms
 Hosteasy, Moldova     :  10.98 MiB/s |   87.85 Mbps  | ping 120.641ms
 Prima, Argentina      : 720.58 KiB/s |    5.63 Mbps  | ping error!


 ## Asia Speedtest

 SoftLayer, Singapore : 575.97 KiB/s |    4.50 Mbps  | ping 232.897ms
 Linode, Tokyo, Japan :  12.07 MiB/s |   96.59 Mbps  | ping 164.550ms
 Linode, Singapore    :   6.64 MiB/s |   53.14 Mbps  | ping 229.278ms
 Vultr, Tokyo, Japan  :  10.06 MiB/s |   80.49 Mbps  | ping 170.673ms


 Benchmark finished in 90 seconds

Global Latency Test

MoonQube United States Ashburn Compute Qubes Cloud Server Test and Review MoonQube United States Ashburn Compute Qubes Cloud Server Test and Review

Query: ping 213.165.232.120, interval: 5s, dense mode: no

Probing 213.165.232.120 – ARIN /22 AS54641 IMH-IAD – United States

Media Unlock Test

 ** Test Starts At: Tue Jan 30 02:27:37 UTC 2024

 ** Checking Results Under IPv4 
--------------------------------
 ** Your Network Provider: InMotion Hosting (213.165.*.*) 

============[ Multination ]============
 Dazn:                                  Yes (Region: US)
 HotStar:                               No
 Disney+:                               No
 Netflix:                               Originals Only
 YouTube Premium:                       Yes
 Amazon Prime Video:                    Yes (Region: US)
 TVBAnywhere+:                          Yes
 iQyi Oversea Region:                   US
 Viu.com:                               No
 YouTube CDN:                           Washington DC 
 Netflix Preferred CDN:                 Washington DC  
 Spotify Registration:                  No
 Steam Currency:                        USD
 ChatGPT:                               Yes
 Bing Region:                           US
 Instagram Licensed Audio:              No
=======================================
No IPv6 Connectivity Found, Abort IPv6 Testing...

Testing Done!

CloudFlare Internet Test

MoonQube United States Ashburn Compute Qubes Cloud Server Test and Review

PageSpeed Insights

MoonQube United States Ashburn Compute Qubes Cloud Server Test and Review

GTmetrix Performance

MoonQube United States Ashburn Compute Qubes Cloud Server Test and Review

Admin Control Panel

MoonQube United States Ashburn Compute Qubes Cloud Server Test and Review

Here are some key features of the MoonQube admin console:

Control Panel: MoonQube uses Fleio as its control panel. Fleio is a modern control panel designed for cloud service providers, offering a user-friendly interface for managing cloud resources.

Admin REST API: MoonQube provides an Admin REST API. This allows users to interact with their MoonQube services programmatically, offering greater flexibility and automation capabilities.

Monitoring Charts: The admin console includes charts for CPU and network usage. This helps users track their services’ performance and make necessary adjustments.

Upgrade VPS: Users can upgrade their Virtual Private Server (VPS) directly from the admin console. This feature makes it easy for users to scale their services based on their needs.

Mobile-Friendly UI: The admin console has a mobile-friendly user interface. This allows users to manage their services conveniently from any device.

Firewall: MoonQube’s admin console includes a feature called Security Groups, which acts as a firewall. This helps in protecting the user’s services from unauthorized access.

For more detailed information, you may visit their official website or other reliable sources.

Server Pricing

MoonQube United States Ashburn Compute Qubes Cloud Server Test and Review

Official Website: https://www.MoonQube.com

Payments

MoonQube’s payment and billing system is designed to be flexible and user-friendly.

Payment Methods: MoonQube offers various payment options to cater to many customers. These include credit card and digital payment methods like PayPal.

Billing Procedures: MoonQube operates on a pay-as-you-go model, allowing users to only pay for the resources they use.

Account Credit: MoonQube offers a $25 credit for new users, indicating they likely have some form of account credit system.

Customer Support

MoonQube strongly emphasizes customer support, offering 24/7 live customer support. Customers can reach out to MoonQube’s support team at any time of the day or night and receive assistance with their issues or queries.

Live customer support is a valuable feature for any service provider, as it ensures that customers can get help when needed. This is particularly important for services like MoonQube, where customers may be running critical applications or services that require immediate attention in case of issues.

Conclusion

Starting with the Basic Bench tests, the server’s Input/Output (I/O) speed consistently hit over 600 MB/s across different runs, indicating a solid performance as this is above the 500 MB/s mark we consider good. Network strength was formidable at domestic nodes, with upload speeds peaking at 2627.96 Mbps and download speeds reaching a swift 5764.47 Mbps.

The results of diving into disk performance with the Yabs Performance Bench were encouraging. The server delivered read and write speeds well above 1 GB/s for larger block sizes, signifying excellent performance. Similarly, in the Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test, while our single-core result of 1396 is above the average mark, it doesn’t break into the ‘good’ category. However, the multi-core score of 10995 is robust, showcasing its capability of handling multi-threaded tasks efficiently.

UnixBench scores further supported the server’s strong CPU performance, with particularly high scores in the file copy tests and the System Benchmarks Index Score rounding off at an impressive 1952.9. It’s clear from these metrics that the server is more than capable of handling a range of processes simultaneously without taking a performance hit.

In conclusion, the MoonQube server in Ashburn offers exceptional performance for tasks that require intense read/write speeds and multi-core processing. The Basic Bench and UnixBench outcomes reflect a reliable and powerful service suitable for heavy computational tasks and high-speed data handling. Although global network performance varied, the server is robust and fast domestically. With its strong multi-core capabilities and high-speed storage, this server is an excellent choice for demanding applications and web services.

Official Website: https://www.MoonQube.com

Related Posts