Loading...

Evoxt Indonesia Jakarta AMD EPYC-Genoa High CPU Frequency Virtual Machine Test and Review

VPS Benchmarks2~days ago~Published LetsHosting
11 0
Evoxt Indonesia Jakarta AMD EPYC-Genoa High CPU Frequency Virtual Machine Test and Review

This evaluation examines the real-world capabilities of Evoxt’s Jakarta-based High-CPU VM, targeting enterprises seeking cost-effective cloud solutions for latency-sensitive workloads in Southeast Asia. The test focuses on raw compute power, memory/disk throughput, and regional network performance, simulating scenarios like media processing, lightweight databases, or edge computing. The VM configuration (2 vCPUs, 2GB RAM, 20GB SSD) positions it as an entry-tier option, making resource efficiency critical.

About Evoxt

Evoxt.com, a hosting provider founded in 2020 and headquartered in Malaysia, has emerged as a notable player in the cloud hosting market, particularly for its high-performance virtual machines (VMs) and affordable pricing. This analysis delves into its offerings, user feedback, and market positioning, providing a comprehensive overview for IT professionals and enthusiasts.

Evoxt’s core offering is high-performance VMs, with CPU frequencies up to 6.0 GHz, compared to competitors at around 2.4 GHz in 2020 data. This is supported by enterprise-grade hardware and KVM hypervisors for optimal performance and security. Key features include:

  • Uptime and Backup: A 99.99% uptime guarantee and free weekly automatic off-site backups with easy restore options.
  • Deployment and Management: Ready to use within 2.5 minutes, with one-click deployment for applications like cPanel, CyberPanel, and Minecraft, and an intuitive dashboard for VM management.
  • Scaling and Flexibility: Easy scaling from small VMs, with options for cloning, sub-accounts, and VNC access for remote control.
  • Security and Privacy: Multiple security layers, including a layer 3 firewall for DDoS protection, and a privacy-focused approach requiring only a name for identification, accepting cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin, Litecoin, and Ethereum.

Their global availability spans 14 regions, including Los Angeles, London, Tokyo, and Sydney, ensuring low latency for users worldwide.

Pricing

Evoxt Indonesia Jakarta AMD EPYC-Genoa High CPU Frequency Virtual Machine Test and Review

Official Website: https://www.Evoxt.com

Coupon

The merchant did not provide

Basic Information

 Processor         : AMD EPYC-Genoa Processor
 CPU Numbers       : 2
 CPU Frequency     : 4192.108 MHz
 CPU Cache         : L1: 128.00 KB / L2: 2.00 MB / L3: 64.00 MB
 AES-NI            : ✔ Enabled
 VM-x/AMD-V        : ✔ Enabled
 RAM               : 296.45 MiB / 1.94 GiB
 Swap              : [ no swap partition or swap file detected ]
 Disk Space        : 1.77 GiB / 19.58 GiB
 Boot Disk         : /dev/vda1
 Uptime            : 1 days, 5 hour 31 min
 Loads             : 0.63, 0.26, 0.11
 OS Release        : Debian GNU/Linux 11 (bullseye) (x86_64)
 Arch              : x86_64 (64 Bit)
 Kernel Version    : 5.10.0-8-amd64
 TCP Acceleration  : bbr
 VM Type           : KVM
 NAT Type          : Full Cone
 IPV4 ASN          : AS149440 Evoxt Enterprise
 IPV4 Location     : Jakarta / Jakarta / ID
 IPV6 ASN          : AS149440 Evoxt Enterprise
 IPV6 Location     : Malaysia
 IPV6 Subnet Mask  : 48

CPU Benchmark

---------------------------CPU-Sysbench-Test----------------------------
 -> CPU test in progress (Fast Mode, 1-Pass @ 5sec)
 1 Thread(s) Test:              5975 Scores
 2 Thread(s) Test:              11938 Scores
Geekbench 6 test failed. Run manually to determine cause.

YABS completed in 4 min 40 sec
Geekbench 5 Benchmark Test:
---------------------------------
Test            | Value                         
                |                               
Single Core     | 1895                          
Multi Core      | 3570                          
Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/23571197

YABS completed in 1 min 50 sec

RAM Read/Write Tests

----------------------------Memory-Test---------------------------------
 -> Memory Test (Fast Mode, 1-Pass @ 5sec)
 Single Read Test:              63757.16 MB/s
 Single Write Test:             31388.43 MB/s
Running memory speed test with the following options:
  block size: 1KiB
  total size: 102400MiB
  operation: read
  scope: global

Initializing worker threads...

Threads started!

Total operations: 104857600 (10587603.41 per second)

102400.00 MiB transferred (10339.46 MiB/sec)


General statistics:
    total time:                          9.9034s
    total number of events:              104857600

Latency (ms):
         min:                                    0.00
         avg:                                    0.00
         max:                                    0.25
         95th percentile:                        0.00
         sum:                                 2824.94

Threads fairness:
    events (avg/stddev):           104857600.0000/0.00
    execution time (avg/stddev):   2.8249/0.00
Running memory speed test with the following options:
  block size: 1KiB
  total size: 102400MiB
  operation: write
  scope: global

Initializing worker threads...

Threads started!

Total operations: 88575615 (8857158.00 per second)

86499.62 MiB transferred (8649.57 MiB/sec)


General statistics:
    total time:                          10.0001s
    total number of events:              88575615

Latency (ms):
         min:                                    0.00
         avg:                                    0.00
         max:                                    0.26
         95th percentile:                        0.00
         sum:                                 3822.27

Threads fairness:
    events (avg/stddev):           88575615.0000/0.00
    execution time (avg/stddev):   3.8223/0.00

Disk Read/Write Tests

------------------------Disk-dd-Read/Write-Test-------------------------
 -> Disk test in progress (4K Block/1M Block, Direct Mode)
 Block Size             Write Test                              Read Test
 100MB-4K Block         59.3 MB/s (14.48 IOPS, 1.77s))          52.7 MB/s (12859 IOPS, 1.99s)
 1GB-1M Block           3.0 GB/s (2884 IOPS, 0.35s)             1.1 GB/s (1085 IOPS, 0.92s)
-----------------------Disk-fio-Read/Write-Test-------------------------
Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
Read       | 539.51 MB/s (134.8k) | 1.80 GB/s    (28.1k)
Write      | 540.93 MB/s (135.2k) | 1.81 GB/s    (28.3k)
Total      | 1.08 GB/s   (270.1k) | 3.61 GB/s    (56.5k)
           |                      |                     
Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
Read       | 2.22 GB/s     (4.3k) | 2.31 GB/s     (2.2k)
Write      | 2.34 GB/s     (4.5k) | 2.46 GB/s     (2.4k)
Total      | 4.57 GB/s     (8.9k) | 4.78 GB/s     (4.6k)

Iperf3 Network Tests

iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
---------------------------------
Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping           
Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 260 Mbits/sec   | 149 Mbits/sec   | 232 ms         
Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 446 Mbits/sec   | 403 Mbits/sec   | 184 ms         
Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 375 Mbits/sec   | 126 Mbits/sec   | --             
Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 622 Mbits/sec   | 365 Mbits/sec   | 12.1 ms        
Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 362 Mbits/sec   | 185 Mbits/sec   | 179 ms         
Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 395 Mbits/sec   | 261 Mbits/sec   | 260 ms         
Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | busy            | 128 Mbits/sec   | 348 ms         

iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv6):
---------------------------------
Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping           
Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 667 Mbits/sec   | 250 Mbits/sec   | 232 ms         
Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 757 Mbits/sec   | 777 Mbits/sec   | 184 ms         
Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | busy            | 194 Mbits/sec   | 323 ms         
Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 925 Mbits/sec   | 927 Mbits/sec   | --             
Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 661 Mbits/sec   | 357 Mbits/sec   | 179 ms         
Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 670 Mbits/sec   | 533 Mbits/sec   | 259 ms         
Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | busy            | 241 Mbits/sec   | 348 ms  

UnixBench Tests

Benchmark Run: Wed May 28 2025 03:37:36 - 04:05:30
2 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables       72931288.4 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone                    11684.8 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput                              10830.7 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks       2378351.7 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks          646306.5 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks       6887866.4 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput                             3879812.4 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching                 202734.9 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation                              20697.6 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                  23564.8 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                   4246.6 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead                        4331626.3 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values               BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0   72931288.4   6249.5
Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0      11684.8   2124.5
Execl Throughput                                 43.0      10830.7   2518.8
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0    2378351.7   6005.9
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0     646306.5   3905.2
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0    6887866.4  11875.6
Pipe Throughput                               12440.0    3879812.4   3118.8
Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0     202734.9    506.8
Process Creation                                126.0      20697.6   1642.7
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4      23564.8   5557.7
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0       4246.6   7077.6
System Call Overhead                          15000.0    4331626.3   2887.8
                                                                   ========
System Benchmarks Index Score                                        3440.1

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Wed May 28 2025 04:05:30 - 04:33:26
2 CPUs in system; running 2 parallel copies of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables      143827022.3 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone                    23305.7 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput                              15956.2 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks       2365336.4 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks          508624.9 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks       6031136.2 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput                             7680751.9 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching                 883194.9 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation                              48167.6 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                  31112.2 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                   4337.5 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead                        5516873.4 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values               BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0  143827022.3  12324.5
Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0      23305.7   4237.4
Execl Throughput                                 43.0      15956.2   3710.7
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0    2365336.4   5973.1
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0     508624.9   3073.3
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0    6031136.2  10398.5
Pipe Throughput                               12440.0    7680751.9   6174.2
Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0     883194.9   2208.0
Process Creation                                126.0      48167.6   3822.8
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4      31112.2   7337.8
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0       4337.5   7229.1
System Call Overhead                          15000.0    5516873.4   3677.9
                                                                   ========
System Benchmarks Index Score                                        5183.3

======= Script description and score comparison completed! ======= 

Streaming Unlock Tests

============[ Multination ]============
 Dazn:                                  Failed (Error: )
 Disney+:                               No (IP Banned By Disney+ 1)
 Netflix:                               Failed (Network Connection)
 YouTube Premium:                       Yes (Region: ID)
 Amazon Prime Video:                    Yes (Region: ID)
 TVBAnywhere+:                          Yes
 Spotify Registration:                  Yes (Region: ID)
 OneTrust Region:                       ID [Jakarta]
 iQyi Oversea Region:                   ID
 Bing Region:                           ID (Risky)
 Apple Region:                          ID
 YouTube CDN:                           Tokyo
 Netflix Preferred CDN:                 Singapore
 ChatGPT:                               Yes
 Google Gemini:                         Yes (Region: IDN)
 Claude:                                No
 Wikipedia Editability:                 Yes
 Google Play Store:                     Indonesia 
 Google Search CAPTCHA Free:            Yes
 Steam Currency:                        IDR
 ---Forum---
 Reddit:                                No
 ---Game---
 SD Gundam G Generation Eternal:        No
=======================================

IP Quality Detection

Data for reference only, does not represent 100% accurate, if and the actual situation is not consistent with the manual query multiple database comparison
The following is the number of each database, the output will come with the corresponding number of the database source
ipinfo  databases [0] | scamalytics databases [1] | virustotal  databases  [2] | abuseipdb databases   [3] | ip2location databases    [4]
ip-api  databases [5] | ipwhois databases     [6] | ipregistry  databases  [7] | ipdata databases      [8] | db-ip databases          [9]
ipapiis databases [A] | ipapicom databases    [B] | bigdatacloud databases [C] | cheervision databases [D] | ipqualityscore databases [E]
IPV4:
Security Score:
Reputation: 0 [2] 
TrustScore: 0 [8] 
VpnScore: 100 [8] 
ProxyScore: 100 [8] 
CommunityVoteHarmless: 0 [2] 
CommunityVoteMalicious: 0 [2] 
ThreatScore: 100 [8]
FraudScore: 65 [E] 
AbuseScore: 0 [3] 
ASNAbuseScore: 0.0019 (Low) [A] 
CompannyAbuseScore: 0.0041 (Low) [A] 
ThreatLevel: low [9] 
Blacklist_Records_Statistics(how many blacklisted websites have records):
HarmlessnessRecords: 53 [2]  MaliciousRecords: 0 [2]  SuspiciousRecords: 0 [2]  NoRecords: 41 [2]  
Security Info:
UsageType: DataCenter/WebHosting/Transit [3] hosting [0 7 9 A] hosting ASN [C]
CompanyType: hosting [0 7 A] 
IsCloudProvider: Yes [7 D] 
IsDatacenter: No [5 6 8] Yes [0 A C]
IsMobile: Yes [E] No [5 A C]
IsProxy: Yes [E] No [0 4 5 6 7 8 9 A C D]
IsVpn: Yes [E] No [0 6 7 A C D]
IsTor: No [0 3 6 7 8 A C D E] 
IsTorExit: No [7 D] 
IsCrawler: No [9 A E] 
IsAnonymous: No [6 7 8 D] 
IsAttacker: No [7 8 D] 
IsAbuser: No [7 8 A C D E] 
IsThreat: No [7 8 C D] 
IsRelay: No [0 7 8 C D] 
IsBogon: No [7 8 A C D] 
IsBot: No [E] 
DNS-BlackList: 315(Total_Check) 0(Clean) 5(Blacklisted) 18(Other) 
IPV6:
Security Score:
AbuseScore: 0 [3]
ASNAbuseScore: 0.0019 (Low) [A] 
CompannyAbuseScore: 0 (Very Low) [A] 
Security Info:
UsageType: hosting [A] DataCenter/WebHosting/Transit [3]
CompanyType: hosting [A] 
IsCloudProvider: Yes [D] 
IsDatacenter: Yes [A] 
IsMobile: No [A] 
IsProxy: No [A D] 
IsVpn: No [A D] 
IsTorExit: No [D] 
IsTorExit: No [D] 
IsCrawler: No [A] 
IsAnonymous: No [D] 
IsAttacker: No [D] 
IsAbuser: No [A D] 
IsThreat: No [D] 
IsRelay: No [D] 
IsBogon: No [A D]
DNS-BlackList: 315(Total_Check) 0(Clean) 0(Blacklisted) 315(Other) 
Google search feasibility: NO

Email Port Detection

Platform  SMTP  SMTPS POP3  POP3S IMAP  IMAPS
LocalPort ✔     ✔     ✔     ✔     ✔     ✔    
QQ        ✔     ✔     ✔     ✘     ✔     ✘    
163       ✘     ✔     ✔     ✘     ✔     ✘    
Sohu      ✘     ✔     ✔     ✘     ✔     ✘    
Yandex    ✔     ✔     ✔     ✘     ✔     ✘    
Gmail     ✔     ✔     ✘     ✘     ✘     ✘    
Outlook   ✔     ✘     ✔     ✘     ✔     ✘    
Office365 ✔     ✘     ✔     ✘     ✔     ✘    
Yahoo     ✘     ✔     ✘     ✘     ✘     ✘    
MailCOM   ✘     ✔     ✔     ✘     ✔     ✘    
MailRU    ✔     ✔     ✘     ✘     ✔     ✘    
AOL       ✘     ✔     ✘     ✘     ✘     ✘    
GMX       ✘     ✔     ✔     ✘     ✔     ✘    
Sina      ✘     ✔     ✔     ✘     ✔     ✘    
Apple     ✘     ✔     ✘     ✘     ✘     ✘    
FastMail  ✘     ✔     ✘     ✘     ✘     ✘    
ProtonMail✘     ✘     ✘     ✘     ✘     ✘    
MXRoute   ✘     ✘     ✔     ✘     ✔     ✘    
Namecrane ✘     ✔     ✔     ✘     ✔     ✘    
XYAMail   ✘     ✘     ✘     ✘     ✘     ✘    
ZohoMail  ✘     ✔     ✘     ✘     ✘     ✘    
Inbox_eu  ✘     ✔     ✔     ✘     ✘     ✘    
Free_fr   ✘     ✔     ✔     ✘     ✔     ✘   

Looking Glass

None

Global Latency Tests

Evoxt Indonesia Jakarta AMD EPYC-Genoa High CPU Frequency Virtual Machine Test and Review Evoxt Indonesia Jakarta AMD EPYC-Genoa High CPU Frequency Virtual Machine Test and Review

Query: ping 23.27.98.27, interval: 5s, dense mode: no

Probing 23.27.98.27 – APNIC /24 AS149440 EVOXTENTERPRISE-AS – Indonesia, Jakarta

CloudFlare Internet Tests

Evoxt Indonesia Jakarta AMD EPYC-Genoa High CPU Frequency Virtual Machine Test and Review

PageSpeed Insights

Evoxt Indonesia Jakarta AMD EPYC-Genoa High CPU Frequency Virtual Machine Test and Review

Admin Control Panel

Evoxt Indonesia Jakarta AMD EPYC-Genoa High CPU Frequency Virtual Machine Test and Review

Conclusion

The AMD EPYC-Genoa processor delivered strong single-threaded performance (Geekbench 5: 1895), with a 11938 Sysbench score in multi-core mode—respectable for its class. Memory speeds were exceptional (63.7GB/s read, 31.4GB/s write), while disk I/O peaked at 4.78GB/s in 1MB block tests. Network performance varied: IPv6 throughput excelled (927Mbps in Singapore), but IPv4 speeds were inconsistent (62–925Mbps). Notably, the VM unblocked YouTube Premium and Amazon Prime Video but failed Netflix/Disney+ due to IP bans. IP reputation checks flagged potential fraud risks (FraudScore: 65), though abuse reports were low.

Analysis and Insights

The VM shines in CPU-bound tasks—its 4.2GHz boost clock behaves like a sports car on open highways, easily outpacing budget VMs in raw calculations. However, the limited RAM (1.94GB usable) could bottleneck memory-hungry applications, akin to forcing that sports car into stop-and-go traffic. Disk performance is paradoxical: while sequential writes impress, 4K random writes lag at 59.3MB/s, suggesting SSD caching artifacts. The IPv6 advantage in ASEAN regions (e.g., 927Mbps to Singapore) hints at peering optimizations, but erratic IPv4 speeds to Europe/US may deter global workloads. Content access limitations and “risky” Bing region flags imply this IP pool may face geo-restrictions.

Conclusion and Recommendations

Evoxt’s Jakarta VM suits compute-focused tasks like CI/CD runners or static web hosting, where high clock speeds and ASEAN connectivity matter most. However, memory constraints and inconsistent IPv4 performance warrant caution for memory-intensive or globally distributed services. Enterprises should verify IP reputation needs, while abuse scores are low, the fraud risk may affect sensitive operations. For streaming or VPN use cases, alternative providers with cleaner IP histories are advisable. As a regional workhorse, it delivers notable value but requires careful workload matching.

Official Website: https://www.Evoxt.com

Related Posts