RackGenius USA Michigan AMD Ryzen 9 3900X Value KVM VPS Server Test and Review

VPS Benchmarks10~months ago~Updated LetsHosting
0
RackGenius USA Michigan AMD Ryzen 9 3900X Value KVM VPS Server Test and Review

The RackGenius USA Michigan Value KVM VPS (2GB plan) underwent a thorough evaluation to gauge its capabilities for enterprise IT administrators and technical decision-makers. Built on an AMD Ryzen 9 3900X 12-core processor, this VPS offers 2 CPU cores, 2 GB RAM, 25 GB SSD storage, and a 10Gbps shared uplink. The testing focused on real-world applicability, targeting workloads like web hosting, application servers, and development environments. The goal? To deliver a clear, data-driven snapshot of its performance across CPU, memory, disk I/O, network speed, and IP quality—key factors for IT pros weighing cost versus capability.

About RackGenius

RackGenius, established in 2020 and headquartered in the USA, has emerged as a notable player in the hosting industry, particularly for its offerings in Virtual Private Servers (VPS) and game hosting. This analysis provides a comprehensive overview of their services, features, and customer reception, drawing from various sources to ensure a thorough understanding.

Company Background

Founded in 2020, RackGenius employs a small team of four and operates primarily from the USA, with data centers located in the United States. Their focus on cloud hosting solutions positions them as a modern provider catering to both individual and business needs, especially in the gaming and VPS sectors.

Key Features and Reliability

RackGenius emphasizes high-performance hardware, including Ryzen 9 CPUs, DDR5 RAM, and Ultra-Fast NVMe SSDs, as highlighted on their official website. This suggests they aim to deliver fast and efficient hosting services. Their reliability is underscored by a 99.95% uptime commitment, which is notably high in the industry, and they achieve this through high-availability clusters and tools like Pacemaker and Corosync, partnered with redundancy-oriented data center operators like GTS. Security features include Zero Trust policies and IAM/LDAP/SAML Authentication, enhancing their appeal for users concerned with data protection.

Additional Features

RackGenius’s control panel, VirtFusion, is mobile-friendly and includes monitoring charts for CPU, network, disk, and memory, enhancing user management. They support IPv6, SSH keys setup, and reverse DNS, but do not offer hourly billing, DDoS protection, or backups as standard features, which might be a consideration for some users. Extra services like backups, block storage, and DDoS protection are available, suggesting they can be added for additional cost or customization.

Pricing

RackGenius USA Michigan AMD Ryzen 9 3900X Value KVM VPS Server Test and Review

Official Website: https://RackGenius.com

Coupon

The merchant did not provide

Basic Information

 Processor         : AMD Ryzen 9 3900X 12-Core Processor
 CPU Numbers       : 2
 CPU Frequency     : 3792.872 MHz
 CPU Cache         : L1: 128.00 KB / L2: 1.00 MB / L3: 128.00 MB
 AES-NI            : ✔ Enabled
 VM-x/AMD-V        : ✔ Enabled
 RAM               : 449.85 MiB / 1.90 GiB
 Swap              : 780 KiB / 512.00 MiB
 Disk Space        : 2.79 GiB / 24.87 GiB
 Boot Disk         : /dev/vda3
 Uptime            : 0 days, 2 hour 17 min
 Loads             : 0.58, 0.18, 0.05
 OS Release        : Debian GNU/Linux 11 (bullseye) (x86_64)
 Arch              : x86_64 (64 Bit)
 Kernel Version    : 5.10.0-20-amd64
 TCP Acceleration  : bbr
 VM Type           : KVM
 NAT Type          : Full Cone
 IPV4 ASN          : AS32002 RackGenius
 IPV4 Location     : Byron Center / Michigan / US
 IPV6 ASN          : AS32002 RACKGENI
 IPV6 Location     : Grand Rapids / Michigan / United States
 IPV6 Subnet Mask  : 64

CPU Benchmark

---------------------------CPU-Sysbench-Test----------------------------
 -> CPU test in progress (Fast Mode, 1-Pass @ 5sec)
 1 Thread(s) Test:              2006 Scores
 2 Thread(s) Test:              3954 Scores
Geekbench 6 test failed. Run manually to determine cause.

YABS completed in 0 sec

Geekbench 5 test failed. Run manually to determine cause.

YABS completed in 1 sec

Geekbench 4 test failed. Run manually to determine cause.

YABS completed in 0 sec

RAM Read/Write Tests

----------------------------Memory-Test---------------------------------
 -> Memory Test (Fast Mode, 1-Pass @ 5sec)
 Single Read Test:              53643.87 MB/s
 Single Write Test:             20573.95 MB/s
Running memory speed test with the following options:
  block size: 1KiB
  total size: 102400MiB
  operation: read
  scope: global

Initializing worker threads...

Threads started!

Total operations: 71303401 (7123104.38 per second)

69632.23 MiB transferred (6956.16 MiB/sec)


General statistics:
    total time:                          10.0006s
    total number of events:              71303401

Latency (ms):
         min:                                    0.00
         avg:                                    0.00
         max:                                    5.29
         95th percentile:                        0.00
         sum:                                 3311.30

Threads fairness:
    events (avg/stddev):           71303401.0000/0.00
    execution time (avg/stddev):   3.3113/0.00
Running memory speed test with the following options:
  block size: 1KiB
  total size: 102400MiB
  operation: write
  scope: global

Initializing worker threads...

Threads started!

Total operations: 59794781 (5978623.06 per second)

58393.34 MiB transferred (5838.50 MiB/sec)


General statistics:
    total time:                          10.0001s
    total number of events:              59794781

Latency (ms):
         min:                                    0.00
         avg:                                    0.00
         max:                                    3.50
         95th percentile:                        0.00
         sum:                                 4350.01

Threads fairness:
    events (avg/stddev):           59794781.0000/0.00
    execution time (avg/stddev):   4.3500/0.00

Disk Read/Write Tests

------------------------Disk-dd-Read/Write-Test-------------------------
 -> Disk test in progress (4K Block/1M Block, Direct Mode)
 Block Size             Write Test                              Read Test
 100MB-4K Block         9.4 MB/s (2304 IOPS, 11.11s)            12.3 MB/s (2998 IOPS, 8.54s)
 1GB-1M Block           491 MB/s (468 IOPS, 2.14s)              932 MB/s (889 IOPS, 1.12s)
-----------------------Disk-fio-Read/Write-Test-------------------------
Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
Read       | 293.24 MB/s  (73.3k) | 1.18 GB/s    (18.4k)
Write      | 294.02 MB/s  (73.5k) | 1.18 GB/s    (18.5k)
Total      | 587.27 MB/s (146.8k) | 2.36 GB/s    (36.9k)
           |                      |                     
Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
Read       | 1.11 GB/s     (2.1k) | 1.08 GB/s     (1.0k)
Write      | 1.17 GB/s     (2.2k) | 1.15 GB/s     (1.1k)
Total      | 2.28 GB/s     (4.4k) | 2.24 GB/s     (2.1k)

Iperf3 Network Tests

iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
---------------------------------
Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping           
Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 2.11 Gbits/sec  | 1.06 Gbits/sec  | 94.1 ms        
Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 3.24 Gbits/sec  | 2.20 Gbits/sec  | 94.5 ms        
Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 2.53 Gbits/sec  | busy            | 187 ms         
Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 1.22 Gbits/sec  | 2.08 Gbits/sec  | --             
Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 2.60 Gbits/sec  | 401 Mbits/sec   | 55.4 ms        
Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 5.33 Gbits/sec  | 1.87 Gbits/sec  | 27.7 ms        
Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 2.72 Gbits/sec  | 1.79 Gbits/sec  | 138 ms         

iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv6):
---------------------------------
Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping           
Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 1.88 Gbits/sec  | 1.59 Gbits/sec  | 94.2 ms        
Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 4.09 Gbits/sec  | 701 Mbits/sec   | 95.1 ms        
Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 1.42 Gbits/sec  | busy            | 188 ms         
Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 1.51 Gbits/sec  | 1.07 Gbits/sec  | --             
Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 1.36 Gbits/sec  | 311 Mbits/sec   | 55.3 ms        
Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 4.39 Gbits/sec  | 2.19 Gbits/sec  | 27.7 ms        
Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 2.69 Gbits/sec  | 324 Mbits/sec   | 137 ms   

UnixBench Tests

Benchmark Run: Sun Jul 13 2025 02:16:13 - 02:44:35
2 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables       32212318.5 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone                     7602.6 MWIPS (7.9 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput                               3762.7 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks        690293.8 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks          227551.1 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks       2380352.0 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput                             1301833.2 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching                 127172.8 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation                               6416.5 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                   6731.8 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                   1476.2 lpm   (60.3 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead                        1331709.9 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values               BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0   32212318.5   2760.3
Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0       7602.6   1382.3
Execl Throughput                                 43.0       3762.7    875.0
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0     690293.8   1743.2
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0     227551.1   1374.9
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0    2380352.0   4104.1
Pipe Throughput                               12440.0    1301833.2   1046.5
Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0     127172.8    317.9
Process Creation                                126.0       6416.5    509.2
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4       6731.8   1587.7
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0       1476.2   2460.3
System Call Overhead                          15000.0    1331709.9    887.8
                                                                   ========
System Benchmarks Index Score                                        1279.7

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Sun Jul 13 2025 02:44:35 - 03:14:22
2 CPUs in system; running 2 parallel copies of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables       30113314.8 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone                    10362.1 MWIPS (14.1 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput                               5983.6 lps   (29.7 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks        748834.0 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks          174300.5 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks       1793845.6 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput                             1955052.2 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching                 279923.6 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation                              10608.8 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                  10451.2 lpm   (60.1 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                   1457.1 lpm   (60.1 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead                        1739898.9 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values               BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0   30113314.8   2580.4
Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0      10362.1   1884.0
Execl Throughput                                 43.0       5983.6   1391.5
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0     748834.0   1891.0
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0     174300.5   1053.2
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0    1793845.6   3092.8
Pipe Throughput                               12440.0    1955052.2   1571.6
Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0     279923.6    699.8
Process Creation                                126.0      10608.8    842.0
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4      10451.2   2464.9
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0       1457.1   2428.6
System Call Overhead                          15000.0    1739898.9   1159.9
                                                                   ========
System Benchmarks Index Score                                        1593.4

======= Script description and score comparison completed! ======= 

Streaming Unlock Tests

============[ Multination ]============
 Dazn:                                  IP Banned by Dazn
 Disney+:                               No (IP Banned By Disney+ 1)
 Netflix:                               Yes (Region: US)
 YouTube Premium:                       Yes (Region: US)
 Amazon Prime Video:                    Yes (Region: US)
 TVBAnywhere+:                          Yes
 Spotify Registration:                  Yes (Region: US)
 OneTrust Region:                       US [Michigan]
 iQyi Oversea Region:                   US
 Bing Region:                           US (Risky)
 Apple Region:                          US
 YouTube CDN:                           Chicago, IL
 Netflix Preferred CDN:                 Failed (CDN IP Not Found)
 ChatGPT:                               Yes
 Google Gemini:                         Yes (Region: USA)
 Claude:                                Yes
 Wikipedia Editability:                 Yes
 Google Play Store:                     United States 
 Google Search CAPTCHA Free:            Yes
 Steam Currency:                        USD
 ---Forum---
 Reddit:                                Yes
 ---Game---
 SD Gundam G Generation Eternal:        No
=======================================

IP Quality Detection

Data for reference only, does not represent 100% accurate, if and the actual situation is not consistent with the manual query multiple database comparison
The following is the number of each database, the output will come with the corresponding number of the database source
ipinfo  databases [0] | scamalytics databases [1] | virustotal  databases  [2] | abuseipdb databases   [3] | ip2location databases    [4]
ip-api  databases [5] | ipwhois databases     [6] | ipregistry  databases  [7] | ipdata databases      [8] | db-ip databases          [9]
ipapiis databases [A] | ipapicom databases    [B] | bigdatacloud databases [C] | dkly databases        [D] | ipqualityscore databases [E]
IPV4:
Security Score:
Reputation: 0 [2] 
TrustScore: 61 [8] 
VpnScore: 34 [8] 
ProxyScore: 72 [8] 
CommunityVoteHarmless: 0 [2] 
CommunityVoteMalicious: 0 [2] 
ThreatScore: 11 [8]
FraudScore: 0 [1] 65 [E]
AbuseScore: 0 [3] 
ASNAbuseScore: 0.0117 (Elevated) [A] 
CompannyAbuseScore: 0.0469 (High) [A] 
ThreatLevel: low [9] 
Blacklist_Records_Statistics(how many blacklisted websites have records):
HarmlessnessRecords: 0 [2]  MaliciousRecords: 0 [2]  SuspiciousRecords: 0 [2]  NoRecords: 94 [2]  
Security Info:
UsageType: DataCenter/WebHosting/Transit [3] corporate [9] unknown [C] hosting [0 7 A]
CompanyType: business [A] hosting [0 7]
IsCloudProvider: Yes [7] 
IsDatacenter: No [5 6 8 C] Yes [0 1 A]
IsMobile: Yes [E] No [5 A C]
IsProxy: Yes [E] No [0 1 4 5 6 7 8 9 A C]
IsVpn: No [0 1 6 7 A C] Yes [E]
IsTor: No [0 1 3 6 7 8 A C E] 
IsTorExit: No [1 7]
IsCrawler: No [9 A E] 
IsAnonymous: No [1 6 7 8] 
IsAttacker: No [7 8] 
IsAbuser: No [7 8 A C E] 
IsThreat: No [7 8 C] 
IsRelay: No [0 7 8 C] 
IsBogon: No [7 8 A C] 
IsBot: No [E] 
DNS-BlackList: 314(Total_Check) 0(Clean) 4(Blacklisted) 19(Other) 
IPV6:
Security Score:
FraudScore: 0 [1]
AbuseScore: 0 [3] 
ASNAbuseScore: 0.0117 (Elevated) [A] 
CompannyAbuseScore: 0 (Very Low) [A] 
Security Info:
UsageType: hosting [A] DataCenter/WebHosting/Transit [3]
CompanyType: business [A] 
IsDatacenter: Yes [1 A] 
IsMobile: No [A] 
IsProxy: No [1 A] 
IsVpn: No [1 A] 
IsTor: No [1 3 A] 
IsTorExit: No [1] 
IsCrawler: No [A] 
IsAnonymous: No [1] 
IsAbuser: No [A]
IsBogon: No [A] 
DNS-BlackList: 314(Total_Check) 0(Clean) 0(Blacklisted) 314(Other) 
Google search feasibility: NO

Email Port Detection

Platform  SMTP  SMTPS POP3  POP3S IMAP  IMAPS
LocalPort ✔     ✔     ✔     ✔     ✔     ✔    
QQ        ✘     ✘     ✔     ✘     ✔     ✘    
163       ✘     ✘     ✔     ✘     ✔     ✘    
Sohu      ✘     ✘     ✔     ✘     ✔     ✘    
Yandex    ✘     ✘     ✘     ✘     ✘     ✘    
Gmail     ✘     ✘     ✘     ✘     ✘     ✘    
Outlook   ✘     ✘     ✔     ✘     ✔     ✘    
Office365 ✘     ✘     ✔     ✘     ✔     ✘    
Yahoo     ✘     ✘     ✘     ✘     ✘     ✘    
MailCOM   ✘     ✘     ✔     ✘     ✔     ✘    
MailRU    ✘     ✘     ✘     ✘     ✔     ✘    
AOL       ✘     ✘     ✘     ✘     ✘     ✘    
GMX       ✘     ✘     ✔     ✘     ✔     ✘    
Sina      ✘     ✘     ✔     ✘     ✔     ✘    
Apple     ✘     ✘     ✘     ✘     ✘     ✘    
FastMail  ✘     ✘     ✘     ✘     ✘     ✘    
ProtonMail✘     ✘     ✘     ✘     ✘     ✘    
MXRoute   ✘     ✘     ✔     ✘     ✔     ✘    
Namecrane ✘     ✘     ✔     ✘     ✔     ✘    
XYAMail   ✘     ✘     ✘     ✘     ✘     ✘    
ZohoMail  ✘     ✘     ✘     ✘     ✘     ✘    
Inbox_eu  ✘     ✘     ✔     ✘     ✘     ✘    
Free_fr   ✘     ✘     ✔     ✘     ✔     ✘   

Looking Glass

https://lg.rackgenius.com

Location: Grand Rapids, MI

Test IPv4: 185.165.44.2

Test IPv6: 2602:f964:1:2::a

Test Files: 100M Test File, 1GB Test File, 5GB Test File, 10GB Test File

Global Latency Tests

RackGenius USA Michigan AMD Ryzen 9 3900X Value KVM VPS Server Test and Review RackGenius USA Michigan AMD Ryzen 9 3900X Value KVM VPS Server Test and Review

Query: ping 185.165.44.39, interval: 5s, dense mode: no

Probing 185.165.44.39 – ARIN /24 AS32002 RACKGENI – United States, Michigan, Grand Rapids [residential]

CloudFlare Internet Tests

RackGenius USA Michigan AMD Ryzen 9 3900X Value KVM VPS Server Test and Review

PageSpeed Insights

RackGenius USA Michigan AMD Ryzen 9 3900X Value KVM VPS Server Test and Review

Admin Control Panel

RackGenius USA Michigan AMD Ryzen 9 3900X Value KVM VPS Server Test and Review RackGenius USA Michigan AMD Ryzen 9 3900X Value KVM VPS Server Test and Review

Conclusion

The VPS posted impressive numbers across the board. Sysbench CPU tests clocked a single-thread score of 2006 and a multi-thread score of 3954, showcasing its chops for both lightweight and parallel tasks. Memory performance was a highlight, with read speeds hitting 53,643.87 MB/s and write speeds at 20,573.95 MB/s—blazing fast for a budget-tier VPS. Disk I/O shone with SSD-backed speeds peaking at 1.18 GB/s for 64k-block reads and writes, while network tests via iperf3 revealed upload speeds up to 5.33 Gbits/sec (NYC) and downloads up to 2.20 Gbits/sec (Amsterdam), though results varied by region. Streaming unlocked Netflix and YouTube Premium in the US, but IP quality flagged as a datacenter address with a low fraud score, despite minor blacklisting in some databases.

What stands out here is the VPS’s raw power—CPU and memory performance rival higher-tier offerings, making it a gem for compute-heavy tasks like data crunching or small-scale virtualization. The SSD’s zippy I/O is a boon for database-driven apps, ensuring snappy data access. Network performance, however, is a mixed bag: stellar in North America, yet it drops off further afield—think of it like a sprinter who slows on a long track. The datacenter IP classification could trip up services picky about proxies, though its clean reputation mitigates blacklist risks. For media tasks, unlocking US streaming is a nice perk, but don’t expect miracles with restricted platforms like Disney+. IT admins in the US or nearby will see the most bang for their buck.

The RackGenius Michigan VPS punches above its weight, blending robust CPU, memory, and disk performance with a price that won’t break the bank. It’s a strong pick for web hosting, dev setups, or even light enterprise workloads—provided your users aren’t scattered globally. The network variability and datacenter IP quirks are worth noting, but for teams prioritizing performance over geographic reach, this VPS delivers. If you’re hunting for a reliable, no-fuss server with solid specs, RackGenius merits a spot on your shortlist—map your needs to its strengths first.

Official Website: https://RackGenius.com

Related Posts