EVOXT France Paris AMD EPYC-Genoa 4.8 GHz+ Powerful Virtual Machine Test and Review
EVOXT’s France Paris VM-2, a virtual machine powered by an AMD EPYC-Genoa processor with 2 cores, 4 GB RAM, and 30 GB SSD storage, recently underwent a comprehensive performance test. Hosted in Paris, this KVM-based VM targets enterprises seeking reliable cloud server or VPS solutions. The evaluation aimed to gauge its capabilities across CPU, memory, disk, and network performance, while also exploring additional features such as streaming unlock potential and IP quality, key considerations for IT administrators and technical decision-makers weighing deployment options.
About EVOXT
EVOXT stands out as a hosting provider that combines affordability, performance, and user-friendliness. With shared hosting starting at $2.99/month, VPS plans with up to 6.0 GHz CPUs, a global server network, and privacy-focused features, it appeals to a broad audience. Their transparent pricing, 14-day money-back guarantee, and free backups further enhance their value proposition. For anyone seeking reliable, high-performance hosting without hidden costs, EVOXT is a compelling choice, as evidenced by industry benchmarks and user reviews.
Pricing
Official Website: https://www.Evoxt.com
Coupon
The merchant did not provide
Basic Information
Processor : AMD EPYC-Genoa Processor
CPU Numbers : 2
CPU Frequency : 4491.540 MHz
CPU Cache : L1: 128.00 KB / L2: 2.00 MB / L3: 64.00 MB
AES-NI : ✔ Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
RAM : 325.60 MiB / 3.84 GiB
Swap : [ no swap partition or swap file detected ]
Disk Space : 1.90 GiB / 29.42 GiB
Boot Disk : /dev/vda1
Uptime : 0 days, 6 hour 7 min
Loads : 1.53, 1.07, 0.63
OS Release : Debian GNU/Linux 11 (bullseye) (x86_64)
Arch : x86_64 (64 Bit)
Kernel Version : 5.10.0-8-amd64
TCP Acceleration : bbr
VM Type : KVM
NAT Type : Full Cone
IPV4 ASN : AS149440 Evoxt Enterprise
IPV4 Location : Saint-Denis / Île-de-France / FR
IPV6 ASN : AS149440 Evoxt Enterprise
IPV6 Location : Malaysia
IPV6 Subnet Mask : 128
CPU Benchmark
---------------------------CPU-Sysbench-Test----------------------------
-> CPU test in progress (Fast Mode, 1-Pass @ 5sec)
1 Thread(s) Test: 5674 Scores
2 Thread(s) Test: 7252 Scores
Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
---------------------------------
Test | Value
|
Single Core | 2456
Multi Core | 3462
Full Test | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/12911306
YABS completed in 5 min 59 sec
RAM Read/Write Tests
----------------------------Memory-Test---------------------------------
-> Memory Test (Fast Mode, 1-Pass @ 5sec)
Single Read Test: 66232.02 MB/s
Single Write Test: 34274.88 MB/s
Running memory speed test with the following options:
block size: 1KiB
total size: 102400MiB
operation: read
scope: global
Initializing worker threads...
Threads started!
Total operations: 104857600 (10865678.57 per second)
102400.00 MiB transferred (10611.01 MiB/sec)
General statistics:
total time: 9.6500s
total number of events: 104857600
Latency (ms):
min: 0.00
avg: 0.00
max: 12.09
95th percentile: 0.00
sum: 2641.35
Threads fairness:
events (avg/stddev): 104857600.0000/0.00
execution time (avg/stddev): 2.6414/0.00
Running memory speed test with the following options:
block size: 1KiB
total size: 102400MiB
operation: write
scope: global
Initializing worker threads...
Threads started!
Total operations: 88765859 (8876215.67 per second)
86685.41 MiB transferred (8668.18 MiB/sec)
General statistics:
total time: 10.0000s
total number of events: 88765859
Latency (ms):
min: 0.00
avg: 0.00
max: 14.41
95th percentile: 0.00
sum: 3834.90
Threads fairness:
events (avg/stddev): 88765859.0000/0.00
execution time (avg/stddev): 3.8349/0.00
Disk Read/Write Tests
------------------------Disk-dd-Read/Write-Test-------------------------
-> Disk test in progress (4K Block/1M Block, Direct Mode)
Block Size Write Test Read Test
100MB-4K Block 48.0 MB/s (11.71 IOPS, 2.19s)) 56.4 MB/s (13764 IOPS, 1.86s)
1GB-1M Block 2.1 GB/s (1962 IOPS, 0.51s) 2.4 GB/s (2304 IOPS, 0.43s)
-----------------------Disk-fio-Read/Write-Test-------------------------
Block Size | 4k (IOPS) | 64k (IOPS)
------ | --- ---- | ---- ----
Read | 524.38 MB/s (131.0k) | 2.16 GB/s (33.7k)
Write | 525.76 MB/s (131.4k) | 2.17 GB/s (33.9k)
Total | 1.05 GB/s (262.5k) | 4.33 GB/s (67.7k)
| |
Block Size | 512k (IOPS) | 1m (IOPS)
------ | --- ---- | ---- ----
Read | 2.49 GB/s (4.8k) | 2.48 GB/s (2.4k)
Write | 2.62 GB/s (5.1k) | 2.65 GB/s (2.5k)
Total | 5.12 GB/s (10.0k) | 5.14 GB/s (5.0k)
Iperf3 Network Tests
iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
---------------------------------
Provider | Location (Link) | Send Speed | Recv Speed | Ping
Clouvider | London, UK (10G) | 7.90 Gbits/sec | 3.43 Gbits/sec | 7.84 ms
Eranium | Amsterdam, NL (100G) | 8.78 Gbits/sec | 6.79 Gbits/sec | 8.73 ms
Uztelecom | Tashkent, UZ (10G) | 1.65 Gbits/sec | 384 Mbits/sec | 96.3 ms
Leaseweb | Singapore, SG (10G) | 5.72 Gbits/sec | 1.22 Gbits/sec | --
Clouvider | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 1.25 Gbits/sec | 934 Mbits/sec | 137 ms
Leaseweb | NYC, NY, US (10G) | 6.26 Gbits/sec | 1.20 Gbits/sec | 76.0 ms
Edgoo | Sao Paulo, BR (1G) | 1.60 Gbits/sec | 1.07 Gbits/sec | 223 ms
iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv6):
---------------------------------
Provider | Location (Link) | Send Speed | Recv Speed | Ping
Clouvider | London, UK (10G) | 6.88 Gbits/sec | busy | 7.81 ms
Eranium | Amsterdam, NL (100G) | 8.23 Gbits/sec | 7.69 Gbits/sec | 8.72 ms
Uztelecom | Tashkent, UZ (10G) | 2.20 Gbits/sec | 1.04 Gbits/sec | 96.2 ms
Leaseweb | Singapore, SG (10G) | 5.81 Gbits/sec | 1.48 Gbits/sec | --
Clouvider | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 1.27 Gbits/sec | 814 Mbits/sec | 135 ms
Leaseweb | NYC, NY, US (10G) | 4.38 Gbits/sec | 1.04 Gbits/sec | 75.8 ms
Edgoo | Sao Paulo, BR (1G) | 1.74 Gbits/sec | 620 Mbits/sec | 223 ms UnixBench Tests
Benchmark Run: Fri Jul 18 2025 04:40:05 - 05:08:00
2 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 73233395.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 11984.7 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 11073.1 lps (29.9 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 2369505.1 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 631653.7 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 4822465.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 3897454.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 294981.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 22176.6 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 20620.3 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 3691.7 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 4356295.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 73233395.5 6275.4
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 11984.7 2179.0
Execl Throughput 43.0 11073.1 2575.1
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 2369505.1 5983.6
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 631653.7 3816.6
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 4822465.5 8314.6
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 3897454.3 3133.0
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 294981.6 737.5
Process Creation 126.0 22176.6 1760.1
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 20620.3 4863.3
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 3691.7 6152.9
System Call Overhead 15000.0 4356295.0 2904.2
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 3397.2
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Fri Jul 18 2025 05:08:00 - 05:36:16
2 CPUs in system; running 2 parallel copies of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 130200324.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 23384.6 MWIPS (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 16390.0 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 2443754.6 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 695763.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5964209.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 7760327.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 937440.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 47645.0 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 31674.9 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 4408.1 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 6240548.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 130200324.2 11156.8
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 23384.6 4251.8
Execl Throughput 43.0 16390.0 3811.6
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 2443754.6 6171.1
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 695763.8 4204.0
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 5964209.8 10283.1
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 7760327.5 6238.2
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 937440.2 2343.6
Process Creation 126.0 47645.0 3781.3
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 31674.9 7470.5
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 4408.1 7346.8
System Call Overhead 15000.0 6240548.3 4160.4
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 5395.7
======= Script description and score comparison completed! =======
Streaming Unlock Tests
============[ Multination ]============
Dazn: IP Banned by Dazn
Disney+: No (IP Banned By Disney+ 1)
Netflix: Originals Only
YouTube Premium: Yes (Region: FR)
Amazon Prime Video: Yes (Region: FR)
TVBAnywhere+: Yes
Spotify Registration: Yes (Region: FR)
OneTrust Region: FR [Île-de-France]
iQyi Oversea Region: FR
Bing Region: US (Risky)
Apple Region: FR
YouTube CDN: Los Angeles, CA
Netflix Preferred CDN: Paris
ChatGPT: Yes
Google Gemini: No
Claude: Yes
Wikipedia Editability: Yes
Google Play Store: France
Google Search CAPTCHA Free: Yes
Steam Currency: EUR
---Forum---
Reddit: No
---Game---
SD Gundam G Generation Eternal: No
=======================================
IP Quality Detection
Data for reference only, does not represent 100% accurate, if and the actual situation is not consistent with the manual query multiple database comparison
The following is the number of each database, the output will come with the corresponding number of the database source
ipinfo databases [0] | scamalytics databases [1] | virustotal databases [2] | abuseipdb databases [3] | ip2location databases [4]
ip-api databases [5] | ipwhois databases [6] | ipregistry databases [7] | ipdata databases [8] | db-ip databases [9]
ipapiis databases [A] | ipapicom databases [B] | bigdatacloud databases [C] | dkly databases [D] | ipqualityscore databases [E]
IPV4:
Security Score:
Reputation: 0 [2]
TrustScore: 35 [8]
VpnScore: 97 [8]
ProxyScore: 41 [8]
CommunityVoteHarmless: 0 [2]
CommunityVoteMalicious: 0 [2]
ThreatScore: 55 [8]
FraudScore: 0 [1] 65 [E]
AbuseScore: 0 [3]
ASNAbuseScore: 0.0022 (Low) [A]
CompannyAbuseScore: 0.0022 (Low) [A]
ThreatLevel: low [9]
Blacklist_Records_Statistics(how many blacklisted websites have records):
HarmlessnessRecords: 0 [2] MaliciousRecords: 0 [2] SuspiciousRecords: 0 [2] NoRecords: 94 [2]
Security Info:
UsageType: hosting ASN [C] hosting [0 7 9 A] business [8] DataCenter/WebHosting/Transit [3]
CompanyType: hosting [0 A] isp [7]
IsCloudProvider: Yes [7 D]
IsDatacenter: No [5 6 8] Yes [0 1 A C]
IsMobile: No [5 A C] Yes [E]
IsProxy: No [0 1 4 5 6 7 8 9 A C D] Yes [E]
IsVpn: Yes [E] No [0 1 6 7 A C D]
IsTor: No [0 1 3 6 7 8 A C D E]
IsTorExit: No [1 7 D]
IsCrawler: No [9 A E]
IsAnonymous: No [1 6 7 8 D]
IsAttacker: No [7 8 D]
IsAbuser: No [7 8 A C D E]
IsThreat: No [7 8 C D]
IsRelay: No [0 7 8 C D]
IsBogon: No [7 8 A C D]
IsBot: No [E]
DNS-BlackList: 314(Total_Check) 0(Clean) 6(Blacklisted) 17(Other)
IPV6:
Security Score:
AbuseScore: 0 [3]
ASNAbuseScore: 0.0022 (Low) [A]
CompannyAbuseScore: 0 (Very Low) [A]
Security Info:
UsageType: DataCenter/WebHosting/Transit [3] hosting [A]
CompanyType: hosting [A]
IsDatacenter: Yes [A]
IsMobile: No [A]
IsProxy: No [A]
IsVpn: No [A]
IsTor: No [3 A]
IsCrawler: No [A]
IsAbuser: No [A]
IsBogon: No [A]
DNS-BlackList: 314(Total_Check) 0(Clean) 0(Blacklisted) 314(Other)
Google search feasibility: NO
Email Port Detection
Platform SMTP SMTPS POP3 POP3S IMAP IMAPS
LocalPort ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔
QQ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
163 ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Sohu ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Yandex ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Gmail ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
Outlook ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Office365 ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Yahoo ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
MailCOM ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
MailRU ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘
AOL ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
GMX ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Sina ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Apple ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
FastMail ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
ProtonMail✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
MXRoute ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Namecrane ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
XYAMail ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
ZohoMail ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
Inbox_eu ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘
Free_fr ✘ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ Looking Glass
None
Global Latency Tests
Query: ping 166.0.132.216, interval: 5s, dense mode: no
Probing 166.0.132.216 – APNIC /24 AS149440 EVOXTENTERPRISE-AS – France, Saint‑Denis [hosting]
CloudFlare Internet Tests
PageSpeed Insights
Admin Control Panel
Conclusion
The VM flexed its muscles with a Geekbench 6 single-core score of 2456 and a multi-core score of 3462, backed by a 4.49 GHz CPU frequency. Memory tests impressed with read speeds hitting 66.23 GB/s and writes at 34.27 GB/s. Disk performance stood out too, with fio tests showing 1.05 GB/s total throughput at 4K blocks and 5.14 GB/s at 1M blocks. Network speeds dazzled in Europe—8.78 Gbits/sec send and 6.79 Gbits/sec receive in Amsterdam—but tapered off globally, dipping to 1.25 Gbits/sec in Los Angeles. Streaming tests revealed mixed results: Netflix limited to originals, Disney+ blocked, though YouTube Premium worked flawlessly. IP quality raised eyebrows, with some databases flagging it as a VPN or proxy, hinting at potential security concerns.
These numbers tell a compelling story. The VM’s CPU and memory prowess make it a standout for compute-heavy tasks—think data analytics or web hosting with a European focus. Disk speeds suggest it can handle IOPS-intensive workloads like databases with ease. Network performance, however, is a tale of two continents: blazing fast in Europe, but less impressive for users in Asia or the Americas. Picture a sports car tearing through open highways but slowing in traffic—it’s powerful, yet geography matters. Streaming limitations and IP flags could trip up media or security-sensitive use cases, though for many enterprise applications, these might be minor hiccups.
The EVOXT France Paris VM-2 delivers where it counts: robust CPU, swift memory, and stellar local network performance. It’s an excellent fit for businesses targeting European audiences or needing raw computational grunt. That said, its global reach and streaming quirks warrant a pause for some. IT admins should weigh these trade-offs—strong in-region performance versus potential limitations elsewhere—before committing. For the right use case, this VM shines brightly.
Official Website: https://www.Evoxt.com
