aéza USA Charlotte Shared AMD Ryzen 9 9950X Unlimited Traffic Virtual Server Test and Review
In a targeted assessment, the Aeza USA Charlotte Shared Unlimited Traffic VPS (Plan: CLTs-2) underwent benchmarks to evaluate its fit for enterprise tasks. Equipped with AMD Ryzen 9 9950X (2 cores), 4 GB RAM, 60 GB NVMe SSD, and 25 Gbps port on Debian 11/KVM, the tests simulated web hosting, data ops, and app workloads, offering guidance for cost-sensitive VPS buyers amid Aeza’s sanctions backdrop.
Key metrics impressed: Sysbench CPU scores hit 6183 single/12182 multi-thread; Geekbench 6 at 2531/4502. Memory blazed at 91 GB/s read/36 GB/s write; disk fio peaked at 7.76 GB/s I/O. Network throughput topped 9.38 Gbits/sec to NYC, with a low 13.8 ms latency, but global pings reached 237 ms. Streaming was spotty—YouTube/Amazon unlocked US content, but Netflix/Disney+ restricted IPs. IP quality flagged high fraud (65) and proxy/VPN detections, limiting email ports for Gmail/Outlook.
About aéza
Aeza.net is a modern cloud hosting provider specializing in virtual private servers (VPS), dedicated servers, and domain registration services. Founded as Aéza International LTD, the company operates primarily from St. Petersburg, Russia, with affiliates in the UK and Russia. It positions itself as an affordable option for users seeking high-performance hosting, leveraging top-tier AMD and Intel processors to support projects ranging from simple websites to complex, high-load applications.
The core offerings include shared and dedicated VPS plans powered by AMD Ryzen 9 3950X CPUs (3.7-4.7 GHz), with configurations ranging from 1 core/2 GB RAM/30 GB NVMe storage to 16 cores/32 GB RAM/480 GB NVMe. These come with unlimited bandwidth, up to 25 Gbps internet speeds, and support for operating systems like Windows Server, Ubuntu, Debian, and CentOS. Dedicated servers feature advanced setups, such as AMD EPYC processors with up to 128 cores, 1 TB RAM, and 100 Gbps ports, ideal for demanding tasks.
Key features include robust anti-DDoS protection (up to 2 Tbps), hourly billing starting at €0.04/hour, automated backups, REST API for management, and discounts up to 12% for long-term commitments. Servers are hosted in Tier 3 data centers across Russia (Moscow, MMTS-9), Germany (Hetzner, InterXion), Austria, the Netherlands, and Sweden, ensuring low latency and high connectivity via providers like Cogent and Retn. Customer support is available 24/7 via chat and phone, with a user base exceeding 100,000 and mixed reviews averaging 3.5/5 on Trustpilot.
Pricing
Official Website: https://www.aéza.net
Coupon
The merchant did not provide
Basic Information
Processor : AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor
CPU Numbers : 2
CPU Frequency : 4291.916 MHz
CPU Cache : L1: 256.00 KB / L2: 1.00 MB / L3: 16.00 MB
AES-NI : ✔ Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
RAM : 285.25 MiB / 3.83 GiB
Swap : 0 KiB / 512.00 MiB
Disk Space : 2.19 GiB / 58.97 GiB
Boot Disk : /dev/vda2
Uptime : 0 days, 0 hour 8 min
Loads : 0.19, 0.14, 0.06
OS Release : Debian GNU/Linux 11 (bullseye) (x86_64)
Arch : x86_64 (64 Bit)
Kernel Version : 5.10.0-33-amd64
TCP Acceleration : bbr
VM Type : KVM
NAT Type : Full Cone
IPV4 ASN : AS210644 AEZA INTERNATIONAL LTD
IPV4 Location : Charlotte / North Carolina / US
IPV6 ASN : AS210644 Aeza International Ltd
IPV6 Location : United Kingdom
IPV6 Subnet Mask : 48
CPU Benchmark
---------------------------CPU-Sysbench-Test----------------------------
-> CPU test in progress (Fast Mode, 1-Pass @ 5sec)
1 Thread(s) Test: 6183 Scores
2 Thread(s) Test: 12182 Scores
Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
---------------------------------
Test | Value
|
Single Core | 2531
Multi Core | 4502
Full Test | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/13312154
YABS completed in 5 min 36 sec
RAM Read/Write Tests
----------------------------Memory-Test---------------------------------
-> Memory Test (Fast Mode, 1-Pass @ 5sec)
Single Read Test: 91808.13 MB/s
Single Write Test: 36447.86 MB/s
Running memory speed test with the following options:
block size: 1KiB
total size: 102400MiB
operation: read
scope: global
Initializing worker threads...
Threads started!
Total operations: 103140861 (10313190.11 per second)
100723.50 MiB transferred (10071.47 MiB/sec)
General statistics:
total time: 10.0001s
total number of events: 103140861
Latency (ms):
min: 0.00
avg: 0.00
max: 0.43
95th percentile: 0.00
sum: 2979.43
Threads fairness:
events (avg/stddev): 103140861.0000/0.00
execution time (avg/stddev): 2.9794/0.00
Running memory speed test with the following options:
block size: 1KiB
total size: 102400MiB
operation: write
scope: global
Initializing worker threads...
Threads started!
Total operations: 89160513 (8915339.54 per second)
87070.81 MiB transferred (8706.39 MiB/sec)
General statistics:
total time: 10.0001s
total number of events: 89160513
Latency (ms):
min: 0.00
avg: 0.00
max: 1.22
95th percentile: 0.00
sum: 3887.38
Threads fairness:
events (avg/stddev): 89160513.0000/0.00
execution time (avg/stddev): 3.8874/0.00
Disk Read/Write Tests
------------------------Disk-dd-Read/Write-Test-------------------------
-> Disk test in progress (4K Block/1M Block, Direct Mode)
Block Size Write Test Read Test
100MB-4K Block 37.1 MB/s (9067 IOPS, 2.82s) 38.0 MB/s (9267 IOPS, 2.76s)
1GB-1M Block 3.0 GB/s (2889 IOPS, 0.35s) 3.4 GB/s (3256 IOPS, 0.31s)
-----------------------Disk-fio-Read/Write-Test-------------------------
Block Size | 4k (IOPS) | 64k (IOPS)
------ | --- ---- | ---- ----
Read | 40.01 MB/s (10.0k) | 656.51 MB/s (10.2k)
Write | 40.12 MB/s (10.0k) | 659.96 MB/s (10.3k)
Total | 80.13 MB/s (20.0k) | 1.31 GB/s (20.5k)
| |
Block Size | 512k (IOPS) | 1m (IOPS)
------ | --- ---- | ---- ----
Read | 3.64 GB/s (7.1k) | 3.75 GB/s (3.6k)
Write | 3.84 GB/s (7.5k) | 4.00 GB/s (3.9k)
Total | 7.48 GB/s (14.6k) | 7.76 GB/s (7.5k)
Iperf3 Network Tests
iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
---------------------------------
Provider | Location (Link) | Send Speed | Recv Speed | Ping
Clouvider | London, UK (10G) | 2.24 Gbits/sec | 2.79 Gbits/sec | 81.5 ms
Eranium | Amsterdam, NL (100G) | 8.30 Gbits/sec | 6.05 Gbits/sec | 94.2 ms
Uztelecom | Tashkent, UZ (10G) | 5.30 Gbits/sec | 7.84 Gbits/sec | 170 ms
Leaseweb | Singapore, SG (10G) | 2.92 Gbits/sec | 4.07 Gbits/sec | 237 ms
Clouvider | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 3.41 Gbits/sec | 4.27 Gbits/sec | 55.4 ms
Leaseweb | NYC, NY, US (10G) | 9.06 Gbits/sec | 9.38 Gbits/sec | 13.8 ms
Edgoo | Sao Paulo, BR (1G) | 3.48 Gbits/sec | 6.69 Gbits/sec | 170 ms
iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv6):
---------------------------------
Provider | Location (Link) | Send Speed | Recv Speed | Ping
Clouvider | London, UK (10G) | 2.24 Gbits/sec | 2.73 Gbits/sec | 81.5 ms
Eranium | Amsterdam, NL (100G) | 10.2 Gbits/sec | 7.64 Gbits/sec | 94.1 ms
Uztelecom | Tashkent, UZ (10G) | 3.40 Gbits/sec | 7.61 Gbits/sec | 170 ms
Leaseweb | Singapore, SG (10G) | 3.44 Gbits/sec | 3.12 Gbits/sec | 237 ms
Clouvider | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 2.66 Gbits/sec | 3.37 Gbits/sec | 55.3 ms
Leaseweb | NYC, NY, US (10G) | busy | busy | 14.0 ms
Edgoo | Sao Paulo, BR (1G) | 4.21 Gbits/sec | 7.86 Gbits/sec | 170 ms UnixBench Tests
Benchmark Run: Thu Aug 14 2025 05:22:28 - 05:50:29
2 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 76946071.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 11757.5 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 5859.0 lps (29.8 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 2361706.7 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 631872.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 4954356.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 4625130.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 50187.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 11797.6 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 15944.8 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 3331.7 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 4292489.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 76946071.1 6593.5
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 11757.5 2137.7
Execl Throughput 43.0 5859.0 1362.6
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 2361706.7 5963.9
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 631872.9 3818.0
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 4954356.8 8542.0
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 4625130.6 3718.0
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 50187.7 125.5
Process Creation 126.0 11797.6 936.3
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 15944.8 3760.6
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 3331.7 5552.8
System Call Overhead 15000.0 4292489.8 2861.7
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 2604.6
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Thu Aug 14 2025 05:50:29 - 06:18:24
2 CPUs in system; running 2 parallel copies of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 175125001.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 24117.5 MWIPS (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 10328.6 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 2513096.2 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 674525.3 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 6324078.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 9095917.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 728847.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 43372.6 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 25391.8 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 3496.0 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 6589083.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 175125001.3 15006.4
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 24117.5 4385.0
Execl Throughput 43.0 10328.6 2402.0
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 2513096.2 6346.2
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 674525.3 4075.7
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 6324078.5 10903.6
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 9095917.0 7311.8
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 728847.5 1822.1
Process Creation 126.0 43372.6 3442.3
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 25391.8 5988.6
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 3496.0 5826.6
System Call Overhead 15000.0 6589083.5 4392.7
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 5105.1
======= Script description and score comparison completed! =======
Streaming Unlock Tests
============[ Multination ]============
Dazn: IP Banned by Dazn
Disney+: No (IP Banned By Disney+ 1)
Netflix: Originals Only
YouTube Premium: Yes (Region: US)
Amazon Prime Video: Yes (Region: US)
TVBAnywhere+: Yes
Spotify Registration: No
OneTrust Region: US [North Carolina]
iQyi Oversea Region: US
Bing Region: US
Apple Region: US
YouTube CDN: Atlanta, GA
Netflix Preferred CDN: Washington DC
ChatGPT: Yes
Google Gemini: Yes (Region: USA)
Claude: Yes
Wikipedia Editability: Yes
Google Play Store: United States
Google Search CAPTCHA Free: Yes
Steam Currency: USD
---Forum---
Reddit: No
---Game---
SD Gundam G Generation Eternal: No
=======================================
IP Quality Detection
Data for reference only, does not represent 100% accurate, if and the actual situation is not consistent with the manual query multiple database comparison
The following is the number of each database, the output will come with the corresponding number of the database source
ipinfo databases [0] | scamalytics databases [1] | virustotal databases [2] | abuseipdb databases [3] | ip2location databases [4]
ip-api databases [5] | ipwhois databases [6] | ipregistry databases [7] | ipdata databases [8] | db-ip databases [9]
ipapiis databases [A] | ipapicom databases [B] | bigdatacloud databases [C] | dkly databases [D] | ipqualityscore databases [E]
IPV4:
Security Score:
Reputation: 0 [2]
TrustScore: 0 [8]
VpnScore: 100 [8]
ProxyScore: 100 [8]
CommunityVoteHarmless: 0 [2]
CommunityVoteMalicious: 0 [2]
ThreatScore: 100 [8]
FraudScore: 65 [E] 28 [1]
AbuseScore: 0 [3]
ASNAbuseScore: 0.0077 (Low) [A]
CompannyAbuseScore: 0.0195 (Elevated) [A]
ThreatLevel: low [9]
Blacklist_Records_Statistics(how many blacklisted websites have records):
HarmlessnessRecords: 0 [2] MaliciousRecords: 0 [2] SuspiciousRecords: 0 [2] NoRecords: 94 [2]
Security Info:
UsageType: hosting [0 7 9 A] business [8] announced by SPAMHAUS DROP list asn [C] DataCenter/WebHosting/Transit [3]
CompanyType: hosting [0 A] business [7]
IsCloudProvider: Yes [7]
IsDatacenter: Yes [0 A C] No [1 5 6 8]
IsMobile: No [5 A C] Yes [E]
IsProxy: No [0 1 4 6 7 8 9 A C] Yes [5 E]
IsVpn: Yes [6 7 E] No [0 1 A C]
IsTorExit: No [1 7]
IsTorExit: No [1 7]
IsCrawler: No [9 A E]
IsAnonymous: No [1] Yes [6 7 8]
IsAttacker: No [7 8]
IsAbuser: Yes [C] No [7 8 A E]
IsThreat: No [7 8 C]
IsRelay: No [0 7 8 C]
IsBogon: No [7 8 A C]
IsBot: No [E]
DNS-BlackList: 315(Total_Check) 0(Clean) 5(Blacklisted) 20(Other)
IPV6:
Security Score:
FraudScore: 0 [1]
AbuseScore: 0 [3]
ASNAbuseScore: 0.0077 (Low) [A]
CompannyAbuseScore: 0 (Very Low) [A]
Security Info:
UsageType: DataCenter/WebHosting/Transit [3] hosting [A]
CompanyType: hosting [A]
IsDatacenter: Yes [A] No [1]
IsMobile: No [A]
IsProxy: No [1 A]
IsVpn: No [1 A]
IsTor: No [1 3 A]
IsTorExit: No [1]
IsCrawler: No [A]
IsAnonymous: No [1]
IsAbuser: No [A]
IsBogon: No [A]
DNS-BlackList: 315(Total_Check) 0(Clean) 0(Blacklisted) 315(Other)
Google search feasibility: NO
Email Port Detection
Platform SMTP SMTPS POP3 POP3S IMAP IMAPS
LocalPort ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔
QQ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
163 ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Sohu ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Yandex ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Gmail ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
Outlook ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Office365 ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Yahoo ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
MailCOM ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
MailRU ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘
AOL ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
GMX ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Sina ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Apple ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
FastMail ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
ProtonMail✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
MXRoute ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Namecrane ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
XYAMail ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
ZohoMail ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
Inbox_eu ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘
Free_fr ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ Looking Glass
https://aeza.net/lg/
Global Latency Tests
Query: ping 138.124.123.11, interval: 5s, dense mode: no
Probing 138.124.123.11 – RIPE NCC /24 AS210644 AEZA-AS – AEZA – United States, North Carolina, Charlotte [hosting]
CloudFlare Internet Tests
PageSpeed Insights
Admin Control Panel
Conclusion
In a recent evaluation, the Aeza USA Charlotte Shared Unlimited Traffic Virtual Server (Plan: CLTs-2) was put through rigorous testing to assess its suitability for enterprise IT environments. Powered by an AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor, the configuration included 2 CPU cores, 4 GB RAM, 60 GB NVMe SSD storage, a 25 Gbps internet port, and dual IPv4/IPv6 addresses. Running on Debian GNU/Linux 11 with KVM virtualization, the test aimed to simulate real-world scenarios for IT administrators managing web hosting, data processing, or lightweight applications.
The results painted a picture of solid hardware capabilities tempered by some limitations. CPU benchmarks shone with Sysbench scores of 6183 for single-thread and 12182 for multi-thread tasks, while Geekbench 6 delivered 2531 single-core and 4502 multi-core points—respectable for a budget setup. Memory tests impressed with read speeds up to 91,808 MB/s and writes at 36,447 MB/s, backed by global-scope operations exceeding 100 GB/s in aggregated throughput. Disk performance was equally robust, with fio tests hitting 7.76 GB/s total I/O at 1MB blocks and dd reads/writes around 3-3.4 GB/s.
Network speeds via iperf3 reached peaks of 9.38 Gbits/sec receive to New York and 10.2 Gbits/sec send over IPv6 to Amsterdam, though latencies varied from 13.8 ms locally to 237 ms in Singapore. Streaming unlocks were mixed: YouTube Premium and Amazon Prime worked seamlessly in the US region, but Netflix was limited to originals, and services like Disney+ flagged the IP as banned. IP quality raised flags, with high fraud scores (65) and detections as a hosting/VPN proxy across databases, alongside restricted email ports for major providers like Gmail and Outlook.
Notably, the server’s CPU and storage strengths suggest it’s well-suited for compute-intensive tasks, much like a sports car excelling on open highways but facing hurdles in urban traffic—here, the “traffic” being IP restrictions that could bottleneck content delivery or compliance-heavy workloads. On the upside, the blazing network speeds stand out for data transfer scenarios, such as backing up enterprise datasets across continents. However, the elevated threat and proxy scores highlight potential risks in regulated industries, where IP anonymity might trigger security audits or service blocks.
Overall, the Aeza Charlotte VPS delivers impressive bang-for-buck performance in CPU, memory, and I/O, making it a compelling choice for non-critical hosting or testing environments where cost trumps premium features. For enterprises eyeing VPS purchases, it’s advisable to prioritize it for isolated projects like web servers or backups, but steer clear if streaming unlocks or clean IP reputations are essential—consider alternatives with stronger anti-fraud profiles for mission-critical apps. With careful configuration, it could prove a reliable workhorse, though ongoing sanctions on Aeza warrant monitoring for long-term viability.
Official Website: https://www.aéza.net
