OneProvider OneCloud Albania Tiranë AMD EPYC Hourly Billing Instance Test and Review
The OneProvider OneCloud Albania instance, a pay-by-the-hour offering anchored in Tirana, presents itself as an economical entry point for lightweight workloads targeting European users. Our evaluation aimed to assess whether this AMD EPYC-powered configuration—2 vCPU cores, 2GB RAM, and 40GB SSD—could deliver reliable performance for dev/test environments, microservices, or low-traffic edge applications without breaking the bank.
About OneProvider
OneProvider is a Canadian hosting company founded in 2005 that has grown into a global provider of dedicated, virtual, and colocation hosting services. Headquartered in Laval, Quebec, it distinguishes itself by offering infrastructure in more than 145 locations worldwide. Through partnerships with over 80 upstream providers and access to 100+ datacenters, OneProvider enables businesses to deploy servers close to their customers, ensuring reduced latency and improved performance across continents.
A major strength of OneProvider lies in its comprehensive range of services. Clients can choose from high-performance dedicated servers, flexible virtual servers, or colocation solutions for their own hardware. These offerings are designed to meet the needs of startups, enterprises, and organizations requiring scalable infrastructure. To simplify management, OneProvider developed OnePanel™, a proprietary control panel that consolidates monitoring, port management, billing, and support into a single interface, eliminating the complexity of juggling multiple providers.
Performance and reliability are central to OneProvider’s value proposition. With unmetered bandwidth, resilient connectivity, and global redundancy, the company ensures uptime and scalability for mission-critical workloads. Its international reach and centralized management make it especially appealing to businesses expanding globally, offering a streamlined way to unify infrastructure across diverse regions. In short, OneProvider combines worldwide presence, versatile hosting options, and user-friendly management tools to deliver a complete hosting solution.
Pricing
Official Website: https://www.OneProvider.com
Coupon
The merchant did not provide
Basic Information
Processor : AMD EPYC Processor
CPU Numbers : 2
CPU Frequency : 2249.998 MHz
CPU Cache : L1: 192.00 KB / L2: 1.00 MB / L3: 16.00 MB
AES-NI : ✔ Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ✘ Disabled
RAM : 287.98 MiB / 1.92 GiB
Swap : 0 KiB / 512.00 MiB
Disk Space : 2.61 GiB / 39.26 GiB
Boot Disk : /dev/vda1
Uptime : 0 days, 0 hour 8 min
Loads : 0.17, 0.13, 0.08
OS Release : Debian GNU/Linux 11 (bullseye) (x86_64)
Arch : x86_64 (64 Bit)
Kernel Version : 5.10.0-23-amd64
TCP Acceleration : bbr
VM Type : Microsoft Hyper-V
NAT Type : Full Cone
IPV4 ASN : AS136258 BrainStorm Network, Inc
IPV4 Location : Tirana / Tirana / AL
IPV6 ASN : AS136258 BrainStorm Network, Inc
IPV6 Location : Canada
IPV6 Subnet Mask : 128
CPU Benchmark
----------------------------CPU-Sysbench-Test----------------------------
-> CPU test in progress (Fast Mode, 1-Pass @ 5sec)
1 Thread(s) Test: 1621 Scores
2 Thread(s) Test: 3222 Scores
Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
---------------------------------
Test | Value
|
Single Core | 1383
Multi Core | 2473
Full Test | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/14987447
YABS completed in 7 min 23 sec
RAM Read/Write Tests
-------------------------------Memory-Test-------------------------------
-> Memory Test (Fast Mode, 1-Pass @ 5sec)
Single Read Test: 43043.03 MB/s
Single Write Test: 19265.13 MB/s
Running memory speed test with the following options:
block size: 1KiB
total size: 102400MiB
operation: read
scope: global
Initializing worker threads...
Threads started!
Total operations: 65023804 (6501759.28 per second)
63499.81 MiB transferred (6349.37 MiB/sec)
General statistics:
total time: 10.0001s
total number of events: 65023804
Latency (ms):
min: 0.00
avg: 0.00
max: 0.13
95th percentile: 0.00
sum: 3182.98
Threads fairness:
events (avg/stddev): 65023804.0000/0.00
execution time (avg/stddev): 3.1830/0.00
Running memory speed test with the following options:
block size: 1KiB
total size: 102400MiB
operation: write
scope: global
Initializing worker threads...
Threads started!
Total operations: 54416587 (5441138.35 per second)
53141.20 MiB transferred (5313.61 MiB/sec)
General statistics:
total time: 10.0001s
total number of events: 54416587
Latency (ms):
min: 0.00
avg: 0.00
max: 2.21
95th percentile: 0.00
sum: 4274.22
Threads fairness:
events (avg/stddev): 54416587.0000/0.00
execution time (avg/stddev): 4.2742/0.00
Disk Read/Write Tests
-------------------------Disk-dd-Read/Write-Test-------------------------
-> Disk test in progress (4K Block/1M Block, Direct Mode)
Block Size Write Test Read Test
100MB-4K Block 49.8 MB/s (12.16 IOPS, 2.11s)) 60.1 MB/s (14684 IOPS, 1.74s)
1GB-1M Block 425 MB/s (405 IOPS, 2.47s) 3.1 GB/s (2939 IOPS, 0.34s)
------------------------Disk-fio-Read/Write-Test-------------------------
Block Size | 4k (IOPS) | 64k (IOPS)
------ | --- ---- | ---- ----
Read | 87.87 MB/s (21.9k) | 94.12 MB/s (1.4k)
Write | 88.10 MB/s (22.0k) | 94.62 MB/s (1.4k)
Total | 175.97 MB/s (43.9k) | 188.75 MB/s (2.9k)
| |
Block Size | 512k (IOPS) | 1m (IOPS)
------ | --- ---- | ---- ----
Read | 224.04 MB/s (437) | 283.45 MB/s (276)
Write | 235.95 MB/s (460) | 302.33 MB/s (295)
Total | 460.00 MB/s (897) | 585.79 MB/s (571)
Iperf3 Network Tests
iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
---------------------------------
Provider | Location (Link) | Send Speed | Recv Speed | Ping
Clouvider | London, UK (10G) | 4.26 Gbits/sec | 2.67 Gbits/sec | 38.5 ms
Eranium | Amsterdam, NL (100G) | 5.18 Gbits/sec | 5.50 Gbits/sec | 32.6 ms
Uztelecom | Tashkent, UZ (10G) | 5.04 Gbits/sec | 3.93 Gbits/sec | 119 ms
Leaseweb | Singapore, SG (10G) | busy | 3.79 Gbits/sec | 174 ms
Clouvider | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 883 Mbits/sec | 111 Mbits/sec | 174 ms
Leaseweb | NYC, NY, US (10G) | 5.19 Gbits/sec | 4.06 Gbits/sec | 110 ms
Edgoo | Sao Paulo, BR (1G) | 1.51 Gbits/sec | 1.70 Gbits/sec | 209 ms
iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv6):
---------------------------------
Provider | Location (Link) | Send Speed | Recv Speed | Ping
Clouvider | London, UK (10G) | 4.28 Gbits/sec | 1.78 Gbits/sec | 38.5 ms
Eranium | Amsterdam, NL (100G) | 7.34 Gbits/sec | 5.04 Gbits/sec | 32.7 ms
Uztelecom | Tashkent, UZ (10G) | 4.54 Gbits/sec | 3.39 Gbits/sec | 113 ms
Leaseweb | Singapore, SG (10G) | 3.10 Gbits/sec | 4.12 Gbits/sec | 186 ms
Clouvider | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 986 Mbits/sec | 527 Mbits/sec | 168 ms
Leaseweb | NYC, NY, US (10G) | 6.81 Gbits/sec | 4.58 Gbits/sec | 110 ms
Edgoo | Sao Paulo, BR (1G) | 2.61 Gbits/sec | 267 Mbits/sec | 209 ms UnixBench Tests
Benchmark Run: Tue Nov 11 2025 22:10:35 - 22:38:34
2 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 40105253.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 7234.3 MWIPS (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 5631.4 lps (29.9 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1010808.7 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 269889.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 2912416.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 1784111.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 147441.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 8793.3 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 11575.8 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 2195.5 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 1964211.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 40105253.6 3436.6
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 7234.3 1315.3
Execl Throughput 43.0 5631.4 1309.6
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 1010808.7 2552.5
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 269889.8 1630.8
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 2912416.9 5021.4
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1784111.2 1434.2
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 147441.9 368.6
Process Creation 126.0 8793.3 697.9
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 11575.8 2730.1
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 2195.5 3659.2
System Call Overhead 15000.0 1964211.6 1309.5
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 1703.5
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Tue Nov 11 2025 22:38:34 - 23:06:33
2 CPUs in system; running 2 parallel copies of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 80102534.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 14456.1 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 7899.8 lps (29.6 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 777722.1 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 208276.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 2326607.7 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 3506701.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 411217.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 21862.2 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 16857.0 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 2287.8 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 2983619.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 80102534.7 6864.0
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 14456.1 2628.4
Execl Throughput 43.0 7899.8 1837.2
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 777722.1 1963.9
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 208276.0 1258.5
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 2326607.7 4011.4
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 3506701.6 2818.9
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 411217.0 1028.0
Process Creation 126.0 21862.2 1735.1
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 16857.0 3975.7
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 2287.8 3813.0
System Call Overhead 15000.0 2983619.8 1989.1
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 2462.9
======= Script description and score comparison completed! =======
Streaming Unlock Tests
============[ Multination ]============
Dazn: IP Banned by Dazn
Disney+: No (IP Banned By Disney+ 1)
Netflix: Yes (Region: )
YouTube Premium: Yes (Region: CA)
Amazon Prime Video: Yes (Region: AL)
TVBAnywhere+: Yes
Spotify Registration: No
OneTrust Region: AL [Tirana]
iQyi Oversea Region: INTL
Bing Region: WW (Risky)
Apple Region: AL
YouTube CDN: Frankfurt
Netflix Preferred CDN: Bucharest
ChatGPT: Yes
Google Gemini: Yes (Region: CAN)
Claude: Yes
Wikipedia Editability: No
Google Play Store: Canada
Google Search CAPTCHA Free: Yes
Steam Currency: EUR
---Forum---
Reddit: No
---Game---
SD Gundam G Generation Eternal: No
=======================================
IP Quality Detection
Data for reference only, does not represent 100% accurate, if and the actual situation is not consistent with the manual query multiple database comparison
The following is the tag of each database, the output will come with the corresponding number of the database source
ipinfo databases [0] | scamalytics databases [1] | virustotal databases [2] | abuseipdb databases [3] | ip2location databases [4]
ip-api databases [5] | ipwhois databases [6] | ipregistry databases [7] | ipdata databases [8] | db-ip databases [9]
ipapiis databases [A] | ipapicom databases [B] | bigdatacloud databases [C] | dkly databases [D] | ipqualityscore databases [E]
ipintel databases [F] | ipfighter databases [G] | fraudlogix databases [H] |
IPV4:
Security Score:
Reputation: 0 [2]
TrustScore: 0 [8]
VpnScore: 100 [8]
ProxyScore: 100 [8]
CommunityVoteHarmless: 0 [2]
CommunityVoteMalicious: 0 [2]
ThreatScore: 100 [8]
FraudScore: 65 [E]
AbuseScore: 0 [3]
ASNAbuseScore: 0.008 (Low) [A]
CompannyAbuseScore: 0.0195 (Elevated) [A]
ThreatLevel: low [9]
Blacklist_Records_Statistics(how many blacklisted websites have records):
HarmlessnessRecords: 0 [2] MaliciousRecords: 0 [2] SuspiciousRecords: 0 [2] NoRecords: 95 [2]
Security Info:
UsageType: hosting [0 3 7 A C] business [8] residential [9]
CompanyType: hosting [0 7] business [A]
IsCloudProvider: Yes [7 D]
IsDatacenter: Yes [0 5 6 A C G] No [8]
IsMobile: No [A C G] Yes [5 E]
IsProxy: No [0 4 5 6 7 8 9 A C D] Yes [E G]
IsVpn: Yes [E G] No [0 6 7 A C D]
IsTorExit: No [7 D]
IsTorExit: No [7 D]
IsCrawler: No [9 A E]
IsAnonymous: No [6 7 D] Yes [8]
IsAttacker: No [7 8 D]
IsAbuser: No [7 8 A C D E]
IsThreat: No [7 8 C D]
IsRelay: No [0 7 8 C D]
IsBogon: No [7 8 A C D]
IsBot: No [E]
DNS-BlackList: 314(Total_Check) 0(Clean) 4(Blacklisted) 19(Other)
IPV6:
Security Score:
AbuseScore: 0 [3]
ASNAbuseScore: 0.008 (Low) [A]
CompannyAbuseScore: 0 (Very Low) [A]
Security Info:
UsageType: hosting [3 A]
CompanyType: hosting [A]
IsDatacenter: Yes [A G]
IsMobile: No [A G]
IsProxy: Yes [G] No [A]
IsVpn: Yes [G] No [A]
IsTor: No [3 A]
IsCrawler: No [A]
IsAbuser: No [A]
IsBogon: No [A]
DNS-BlackList: 314(Total_Check) 0(Clean) 0(Blacklisted) 314(Other)
Google search feasibility: NO
Email Port Detection
Platform SMTP SMTPS POP3 POP3S IMAP IMAPS
LocalPort ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔
QQ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
163 ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Sohu ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Yandex ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Gmail ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
Outlook ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Office365 ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Yahoo ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
MailCOM ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
MailRU ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘
AOL ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
GMX ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Sina ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Apple ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
FastMail ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
ProtonMail✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
MXRoute ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Namecrane ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
XYAMail ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
ZohoMail ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
Inbox_eu ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘
Free_fr ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Looking Glass
None
Global Latency Tests
Query: ping 185.186.77.26, interval: 5s, dense mode: no
Probing 185.186.77.26 – APNIC /24 AS136258 ONEPROVIDER-AS – Albania, Tirana [hosting]
CloudFlare Internet Tests
PageSpeed Insights
Admin Control Panel
Conclusion
Test results paint a picture of stark contrasts. The CPU posted modest but respectable scores: 3,222 on Sysbench (dual-thread) and a Geekbench 6 multi-core mark of 2,473, placing it squarely in the entry-level bracket. Memory performance, however, was a welcome surprise—clocking 63 GB/s read and 53 GB/s write speeds, essentially saturating the virtual interface. Disk I/O held its own with 22k IOPS on 4K random operations and a blistering 3.1 GB/s sequential read throughput, though writes topped out at a more pedestrian 425 MB/s.
Network tests revealed strong European connectivity (5+ Gbps to London and Amsterdam) but noticeable transatlantic fatigue, with Los Angeles crawling at 883 Mbps downstream. IP reputation emerged as the Achilles’ heel—IPv4 flagged as a VPN/proxy with a FraudScore of 65, while IPv6 geolocation bizarrely pointed to Canada, casting shadows on deliverability and geofencing accuracy.
The memory subsystem shines like a sports car on an open highway, rarely the bottleneck in this configuration. Yet the dual-core CPU allocation acts like a city speed limit—adequate for containerized microservices or CI/CD runners, but ill-suited for parallel build pipelines or CPU-bound analytics. The IP quality issues loom larger: blacklisted on several Disney+ and Dazn databases, and effectively barred from Gmail, Office 365, and major mail providers, this instance resembles a storefront with a questionable address—functional, but untrusted. Hyper-V virtualization without AMD-V passthrough further constrains nested virtualization use cases, a potential dealbreaker for certain lab scenarios.
For teams seeking a low-cost European sandbox or a staging environment that won’t rack up bills, this Tirana instance offers genuine value—provided you steer clear of email-reliant applications and streaming-centric workloads. The network performance within Europe makes it a viable candidate for region-specific APIs or latency-sensitive services targeting that geography. Yet the tarnished IP reputation and hypervisor limitations demand careful consideration. In essence, it’s a capable workhorse for the right chore, but not a jack-of-all-trades.
Official Website: https://www.OneProvider.com
