Evoxt China Hong Kong High CPU Frequency Virtual Machine Test and Review
In this review, we will test Evoxt‘s China Hong Kong High CPU Frequency VPS Server. This server, backed by the power of the QEMU Virtual CPU version 2.5+ Processor, boasts significant specs: 2 CPU Cores, 4 GB RAM, 60 GB of SSD Storage, 2 TB of Traffic, 1x IPv4 and 1x IPv6.
Our comprehensive evaluation framework utilizes a series of stringent tests. These include the Basic Benchmark, Yabs, and Unix Benchmark for critical performance metrics. For an all-encompassing network review, we conduct the Global Node Test. The Global Ping Test is administered to gauge latency levels.
Access to regional content is assessed through the Media Unlock Test. The quality of the connection is scrutinized through the CloudFlare Internet Test. Web performance evaluations use industry-standard tools such as PageSpeed Insights and GTmetrix Performance. This intricate combination of exhaustive assessments will provide a well-rounded understanding of the server’s overall performance.
About Evoxt
Emerging as a dynamic force in the cloud service arena, Evoxt delivers high-frequency virtual machines at impressively competitive prices. Since its inception on January 20, 2020, Evoxt has quickly become a standout provider, offering high-caliber and performance-driven cloud solutions without the hefty price tag. Their virtual machines are distinguished in the market, delivering leading single-core CPU performance with the baseline CPU clock set at 3.5 GHz+.
Evoxt’s offerings are abundant and diverse. It delivers a broad range of operating systems along with 1-click apps, empowering you with the freedom to operate on your preferred OS. Their reach goes beyond borders; their virtual machines are accessible worldwide, served by infrastructures in five distinct countries. Supplementary features like a hefty 99.99% uptime, weekly offsite automatic backups, facile scalability, and state-of-the-art hardware elevate their service to a higher level.
Respecting privacy and fostering security, Evoxt implements KVM hypervisors to ensure optimal performance and carve out robust security. Their virtual machine environment is segregated to stymie unauthorized server access. Furthermore, they offer the fortification of an enterprise-grade layer 3 security firewall easily customizable according to individual needs, along with automatic server data backups, emphasizing server safety.
Official Website: https://www.Evoxt.com
Looking Glass
https://status.evoxt.com/status/evoxt
BasicBench: Server Profile, I/O Speed, Upload and Download Speed
CPU Model : QEMU Virtual CPU version 2.5+
CPU Cores : 4 @ 3593.248 MHz
CPU Cache : 512 KB
AES-NI : Disabled
VM-x/AMD-V : Disabled
Total Disk : 59.8 GB (2.9 GB Used)
Total Mem : 7.8 GB (78.6 MB Used)
System uptime : 0 days, 3 hour 12 min
Load average : 0.06, 0.07, 0.02
OS : Debian GNU/Linux 11
Arch : x86_64 (64 Bit)
Kernel : 5.10.0-8-amd64
TCP CC : bbr
Virtualization : KVM
IPv4/IPv6 : Online / Online
Organization : AS149440 Evoxt Enterprise
Location : Hong Kong / HK
Region : Central and Western
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I/O Speed(1st run) : 1.6 GB/s
I/O Speed(2nd run) : 1.8 GB/s
I/O Speed(3rd run) : 1.8 GB/s
I/O Speed(average) : 1774.9 MB/s
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Node Name Upload Speed Download Speed Latency
Speedtest.net 917.29 Mbps 919.01 Mbps 0.30 ms
Los Angeles, US 554.28 Mbps 703.62 Mbps 158.58 ms
Dallas, US 462.37 Mbps 684.95 Mbps 169.49 ms
Montreal, CA 365.64 Mbps 903.34 Mbps 203.60 ms
Paris, FR 413.99 Mbps 946.97 Mbps 200.99 ms
Amsterdam, NL 248.44 Mbps 666.72 Mbps 305.35 ms
Nanjing, CN 293.63 Mbps 2.15 Mbps 219.88 ms
Hongkong, CN 4.68 Mbps 5.10 Mbps 0.74 ms
Singapore, SG 881.24 Mbps 928.84 Mbps 36.82 ms
Tokyo, JP 773.85 Mbps 857.10 Mbps 100.69 ms
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Finished in : 5 min 5 sec
Timestamp : 2023-08-29 02:06:23 EDT
YabsBench: Disk Speed, iperf3 Network Speed, Geekbench 6 Benchmark
IPv6 Network Information:
---------------------------------
Location : Hong Kong, Central and Western District (HCW)
Country : Hong Kong
fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50):
---------------------------------
Block Size | 4k (IOPS) | 64k (IOPS)
------ | --- ---- | ---- ----
Read | 443.35 MB/s (110.8k) | 1.29 GB/s (20.2k)
Write | 444.52 MB/s (111.1k) | 1.30 GB/s (20.4k)
Total | 887.87 MB/s (221.9k) | 2.60 GB/s (40.7k)
| |
Block Size | 512k (IOPS) | 1m (IOPS)
------ | --- ---- | ---- ----
Read | 1.52 GB/s (2.9k) | 1.58 GB/s (1.5k)
Write | 1.60 GB/s (3.1k) | 1.69 GB/s (1.6k)
Total | 3.12 GB/s (6.1k) | 3.28 GB/s (3.2k)
iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
---------------------------------
Provider | Location (Link) | Send Speed | Recv Speed | Ping
Clouvider | London, UK (10G) | 16.3 Mbits/sec | 22.0 Mbits/sec | 222 ms
Scaleway | Paris, FR (10G) | 669 Mbits/sec | 260 Mbits/sec | 180 ms
NovoServe | North Holland, NL (40G) | 451 Mbits/sec | 356 Mbits/sec | 240 ms
Uztelecom | Tashkent, UZ (10G) | 644 Mbits/sec | 298 Mbits/sec | 389 ms
Clouvider | NYC, NY, US (10G) | 17.2 Mbits/sec | 21.9 Mbits/sec | 215 ms
Clouvider | Dallas, TX, US (10G) | 20.6 Mbits/sec | 28.7 Mbits/sec | 189 ms
Clouvider | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 24.7 Mbits/sec | 37.3 Mbits/sec | 161 ms
iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv6):
---------------------------------
Provider | Location (Link) | Send Speed | Recv Speed | Ping
Clouvider | London, UK (10G) | 15.6 Mbits/sec | 20.7 Mbits/sec | 222 ms
Scaleway | Paris, FR (10G) | 642 Mbits/sec | 241 Mbits/sec | 190 ms
NovoServe | North Holland, NL (40G) | 656 Mbits/sec | 509 Mbits/sec | 237 ms
Uztelecom | Tashkent, UZ (10G) | busy | 128 Mbits/sec | 388 ms
Clouvider | NYC, NY, US (10G) | 17.5 Mbits/sec | 23.2 Mbits/sec | 214 ms
Clouvider | Dallas, TX, US (10G) | 20.4 Mbits/sec | 29.3 Mbits/sec | 189 ms
Clouvider | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 24.5 Mbits/sec | 32.7 Mbits/sec | 160 ms
Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
---------------------------------
Test | Value
|
Single Core | 836
Multi Core | 2750
Full Test | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/2424182
YABS completed in 16 min 36 sec
UnixBench: CPU Performance, A score higher is better
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Tue Aug 29 2023 03:30:33 - 03:58:30
4 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 48188362.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 7887.7 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 6755.2 lps (29.8 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1698035.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 467513.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 3879563.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 2994131.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 121509.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 13689.3 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 16347.6 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 4600.5 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 3185454.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 48188362.1 4129.3
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 7887.7 1434.1
Execl Throughput 43.0 6755.2 1571.0
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 1698035.5 4288.0
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 467513.5 2824.9
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 3879563.9 6688.9
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 2994131.8 2406.9
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 121509.6 303.8
Process Creation 126.0 13689.3 1086.5
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 16347.6 3855.6
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 4600.5 7667.4
System Call Overhead 15000.0 3185454.7 2123.6
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 2405.8
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Tue Aug 29 2023 03:58:30 - 04:26:28
4 CPUs in system; running 4 parallel copies of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 192741005.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 31544.5 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 18640.8 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 863291.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 223481.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 2875608.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 11935981.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 941558.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 52331.4 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 38003.3 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 5394.0 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 7643742.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 192741005.4 16515.9
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 31544.5 5735.4
Execl Throughput 43.0 18640.8 4335.1
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 863291.5 2180.0
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 223481.0 1350.3
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 2875608.4 4957.9
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 11935981.8 9594.8
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 941558.5 2353.9
Process Creation 126.0 52331.4 4153.3
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 38003.3 8963.0
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 5394.0 8990.0
System Call Overhead 15000.0 7643742.9 5095.8
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 4976.7
======= Script description and score comparison completed! =======
Global Node Test
## CDN Speedtest
CacheFly : 87 B/s | N/A | ping 0.418ms
Gdrive : 0 B/s | N/A | ping 0.824ms
## North America Speedtest
Softlayer, Washington, USA : 290.78 KiB/s | 2.27 Mbps | ping 207.122ms
SoftLayer, San Jose, USA : 699.48 KiB/s | 5.46 Mbps | ping 164.659ms
SoftLayer, Dallas, USA : 0 B/s | N/A | ping error!
Vultr, New Jersey, USA : 4.87 MiB/s | 38.98 Mbps | ping 204.440ms
Vultr, Seattle, USA : 14.22 MiB/s | 113.74 Mbps | ping 134.881ms
Vultr, Dallas, USA : 9.73 MiB/s | 77.83 Mbps | ping 169.890ms
Vultr, Los Angeles, USA : 12.81 MiB/s | 102.46 Mbps | ping 153.533ms
Ramnode, New York, USA : 7.54 MiB/s | 60.35 Mbps | ping 201.252ms
Ramnode, Atlanta, USA : 9.07 MiB/s | 72.52 Mbps | ping 181.303ms
## Europe Speedtest
Vultr, London, UK : 7.34 MiB/s | 58.71 Mbps | ping 224.125ms
LeaseWeb, Frankfurt, Germany : 16.71 KiB/s | 0.13 Mbps | ping 250.029ms
Hetzner, Germany : 219.98 KiB/s | 1.72 Mbps | ping 266.631ms
Ramnode, Alblasserdam, NL : 3.10 MiB/s | 24.77 Mbps | ping 317.227ms
Vultr, Amsterdam, NL : 2.45 MiB/s | 19.57 Mbps | ping 317.339ms
EDIS, Stockholm, Sweden : 240 B/s | N/A | ping 263.057ms
OVH, Roubaix, France : 250 B/s | N/A | ping 170.128ms
Online, France : 4.62 MiB/s | 36.92 Mbps | ping 180.147ms
Prometeus, Milan, Italy : 52 B/s | N/A | ping 363.679ms
## Exotic Speedtest
Sydney, Australia : 15.64 MiB/s | 125.09 Mbps | ping 130.054ms
Lagoon, New Caledonia : 339 B/s | N/A | ping 148.674ms
Hosteasy, Moldova : 1.59 MiB/s | 12.74 Mbps | ping 219.749ms
Prima, Argentina : 120.48 KiB/s | 0.94 Mbps | ping error!
## Asia Speedtest
SoftLayer, Singapore : 38.84 MiB/s | 310.73 Mbps | ping 32.506ms
Linode, Tokyo, Japan : 26.41 MiB/s | 211.30 Mbps | ping 54.291ms
Linode, Singapore : 16.18 MiB/s | 129.46 Mbps | ping 75.741ms
Vultr, Tokyo, Japan : 44.27 MiB/s | 354.14 Mbps | ping 52.966ms
Benchmark finished in 120 seconds
Global Latency Test
Query: ping 166.88.141.80, interval: 5s, dense mode: no
Probing 166.88.141.80 – ARIN /24 AS9312 XTOM xTom – Hong Kong, Central and Western District
Media Unlock Test
** Test Starts At: Tue 29 Aug 2023 02:29:08 AM EDT
** Checking Results Under IPv4
--------------------------------
** Your Network Provider: xTom (166.88.*.*)
============[ Multination ]============
Dazn: No
HotStar: No
Disney+: No
Netflix: Originals Only
YouTube Premium: Yes (Region: HK)
Amazon Prime Video: Yes (Region: HK)
TVBAnywhere+: No
iQyi Oversea Region: HK
Viu.com: Yes (Region: HK)
YouTube CDN: Hong Kong
Netflix Preferred CDN: Hong Kong
Spotify Registration: Yes (Region: HK)
Steam Currency: HKD
ChatGPT: Yes
=======================================
** Checking Results Under IPv6
--------------------------------
** Your Network Provider: xTom (2400:8d60:6:*:*)
============[ Multination ]============
Dazn: Failed (Network Connection)
HotStar: No
Disney+: Yes (Region: HK)
Netflix: Originals Only
YouTube Premium: Yes (Region: HK)
Amazon Prime Video: Unsupported
TVBAnywhere+: Failed (Network Connection)
iQyi Oversea Region: Failed
Viu.com: Failed
YouTube CDN: Hong Kong
Netflix Preferred CDN: Hong Kong
Spotify Registration: Yes (Region: HK)
Steam Currency: Failed (Network Connection)
ChatGPT: Yes
=======================================
Testing Done! CloudFlare Internet Test
PageSpeed Insights
GTmetrix Performance
Get Started with Evoxt
Embarking on your journey with Evoxt is a breeze. Head to their website to promptly create an account. Once enrolled, you can explore and choose from an array of diverse operating systems and 1-click apps, allowing you to deploy a cloud virtual machine seamlessly.
Evoxt intuitively aids your navigation through their services with various informative guides. Whether you’re setting up a WordPress site, integrating a 1-Click app, or diving into their own Evoxt Related Guides, there’s a resource tailored to your needs.
And for that personal touch, Evoxt has a dedicated support team ready to offer assistance on-demand. You can contact them via Discord or Telegram – their star support shines through, even on weekends.
Deploy Applications
Evoxt simplifies the deployment of One-Click Applications, requiring little more than a visit to its website and a login into your account. Once inside, steer towards the One-Click Applications page and pick from the available applications. A guidance setup accompanies your choice, leading you through the deployment process, culminating in a single, decisive click.
Evoxt flaunts an extensive portfolio of One-Click Applications. From popular web applications user-friendly control panels, and immersive game servers, a single click is all it takes to deploy. Add renowned applications to your resources, such as WordPress (Apache), WordPress (Litespeed), Magento, Drupal, LAMP, LEMP, OpenLiteSpeed, Joomla, Prestashop, Chevereto, Nextcloud, Docker, Gitlab, and Bitwarden to name but a few.
Missing your go-to application on Evoxt? No worries. Just shoot them a request, and they’ll see what they can do. And the best part? The One-Click Applications don’t cost a single penny. Enjoy these key services at absolutely no charge.
Admin Control Panel
Evoxt’s virtual machine control panel is a unique blend of simplicity and robustness, allowing you to monitor your virtual machines’ details, status, and performance. The design layout is intuitive and user-centered, aimed to expedite the management procedure of your virtual machines. Below are some of its salient features:
Performance Monitoring: With the imaginative design of Evoxt’s control panel, acquiring and tracking your virtual machines’ details, functionalities, and operation capabilities becomes a walk in the park.
User-Friendly Interface: The control panel boasts an operator-friendly, intuitive scheme. This feature ensures effortless navigation, reducing the time spent managing your virtual machines.
IP Address Management: A noteworthy control panel feature is its capacity to shuffle around and reassign IP addresses amongst servers conveniently.
Security: Your server’s safety is non-negotiable at Evoxt. They employ multiple layers of enterprise-grade security measures, encompassing an isolation tactic for virtual environments, a grade 3 security firewall tailored for the enterprise level, and automated backups to ensure the integrity of your server data.
cPanel One-Click Installation: Evoxt streamlines the installation of cPanel on your virtual machine through their ‘one-click installation’ feature. cPanel is an acclaimed control panel for Linux web hosting, highlighting a user-friendly graphical interface that makes website and server management painless.
Clone Servers
Evoxt provides a convenient cloning service, allowing for smooth duplication of your virtual machines with a solitary click. Evoxt eliminates the tedious tasks of drive copying, file transferring, or utilizing SCP by extending this service free of charge.
The cloning action completely replicates the original virtual machine image, encapsulating all existing settings. The process is fully automated and typically concludes within a brisk 5-minute span. However, larger drives may command a slightly extended timeframe.
The system will enter a shutdown state to maintain integrity and prevent discrepancies during the cloning maneuver. You must refrain from powering up the Virtual Machine during this period, as it could potentially interrupt and compromise the cloning process.
Weekly Offsite Backup
Evoxt presents a complimentary Weekly Offsite Backup service for virtual machines—a level of convenience that brings peace of mind. This service, included in the Evoxt virtual machine package, automatically administers weekly backups of your virtual machines, saving them to remote servers. This ensures a dependable, secure, and safekeeping of your vital data.
The implementation of the backup process is a breeze, requiring no initial configuration. Backups are taken care of each Saturday without fail, and restoring from a backup is as straightforward as a single click. Resilience against data loss disasters is guaranteed, as the backups are kept entirely offsite, away from Evoxt’s servers or infrastructure.
Additionally, Evoxt offers premium backup plans featuring daily backups, an extra manual backup when necessary, and a provision for 5 backup rotation copies. Restoration of a backup typically takes approximately 5 minutes for every 20GB of disk space; interestingly, these backups do not contribute to your virtual machine’s disk space usage.
Server Pricing
Evoxt boasts an unrivaled single-core CPU performance in the industry, ensuring a base CPU clock of 3.5 GHz or greater. Their comprehensive plans are designed to cater to different geographical regions, with distinct schemes for the United States, the United Kingdom, Germany, Malaysia, and Hong Kong.
Extra IP addresses at $3/month per IP; Additional CPU cores at $3/month per vCore; Extra RAM at $2/month per GB; Enhanced monthly transfer options at $3/month per TB, or a region-specific charge of $9/month per TB for Hong Kong. Additionally, Evoxt also presents paid backup plans, with pricing contingent on the storage size of the VM.
Official Website: https://www.Evoxt.com
Payments
Evoxt utilizes account credits for seamless automatic payments. To enable this, navigate to the Evoxt dashboard and activate automatic renewal. Once activated, Evoxt’s efficient billing system will automatically debit your Evoxt account credits as your services approach their due date.
Evoxt currently facilitates two automatic top-up payment methods: credit cards and PayPal, each operating slightly different top-up procedures. If you opt for credit card automatic top-ups, the system will initiate an attempt to charge your credit card once your balance exceeds a predetermined threshold. For PayPal automatic top-ups, your account will be charged based on the amount you set and your chosen billing frequency.
Payment methods accepted by Evoxt include Credit Cards, Debit Cards, PayPal, Bitcoin, and USDt Tron. You are not limited to using these only for payments; you can also use them to top-up funds into your Evoxt account credits. Once topped up, the system automatically applies these credits toward any newly generated invoices. This makes for a convenient, hassle-free payment experience.
Coupon
The merchant did not provide
Customer Support
Boasting a dedicated support team, Evoxt ensures personal one-on-one assistance through Discord or Telegram, available even during weekends for comprehensive coverage. Besides direct interaction, you can also initiate communication by opening a support ticket.
This method is very useful for bug reports, enabling the support team to understand and tackle your issues systematically. They respond based on the priority level of your request, facilitating swift resolution for urgent matters.
You can contact them via email at [email protected] or their official Telegram handle @EvoxtOfficial. The team is poised to address your concerns and facilitate a smooth Evoxt experience swiftly.
Conclusion
Speed tests conducted across various worldwide nodes, including major global cities like Los Angeles, Dallas, Montreal, Paris, Amsterdam, Nanjing, Hong Kong, Singapore, and Tokyo, analyzed both upload and download speeds and latency.
The results demonstrated good internet connectivity performance coupled with minimal latency. However, it’s important to notice that upload and download speeds varied depending on geographical locations, with the connection being faster in closer regions such as Singapore and Tokyo for the Hong Kong VPS.
The tested server underwent disk speed tests, including I/O and fio Disk Speed Tests. The I/O speeds, on average, were recorded at 1774.9 MB/s, showcasing impressive read and write operations. Mixed Read/Write operations conducted in different block sizes further proved the efficiency of the server’s storage input/output operations.
Geekbench 6 Benchmark and UnixBench tests assessed the CPU performance of the server. The single-core score stood at 836, and the multi-core score at 2750. These results provide evidence of robust processing power rendered by the VPS server.
The UnixBench test, carried out in two phases — one with a single parallel copy and the other with multiple — yielded index scores of 2405.8 and 4976.7, respectively, indicating highly commendable CPU performance, particularly during multicore processes.
To sum up, the China Hong Kong High CPU Frequency VPS Server by Evoxt demonstrates excellent reliability with its high-performance CPU, speed, and disk I/O operations. With various test scores indicating efficient execution of various operations, it emerges as a highly competent solution for businesses and high-demand computing tasks.
Official Website: https://www.Evoxt.com
Related Posts
