Aéza United States Kansas Shared AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D anti-DDoS VPS Test and Review
In this analysis, we will conduct a thorough performance evaluation of the AEZA Kansas Shared vCPU VPS Server, which is hosted in the United States. This high-powered server operates on an AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D Processor and features 2 CPU cores, 4 GB RAM, 60 GB SSD storage, a 1 Gbps Internet port, unrestricted traffic, and one IPv4 address. Our comprehensive testing protocol comprises a series of rigorous assessments:
– Basic Benchmark, Yabs, and Unix Benchmark test
– Global Node Test
– Global Ping Test
– Media Unlock Test
– CloudFlare Internet Test.
– We’ll also conduct web performance evaluations via tools like PageSpeed Insights and GTmetrix, providing invaluable input on the website’s loading speed and efficiency.
Upon completion of these intensive tests, you’ll gain in-depth knowledge about the overall performance of the AEZA Kansas Shared vCPU VPS Server, helping you make an informed decision about its potential fit for your needs.
About aéza
AEZA, a dynamic cloud hosting provider, distinguishes itself through its advanced technological infrastructure and high-speed communication channels. The company has a strong digital footprint, including a presence on VKontakte, a popular social media platform. They offer numerous promotions and coupon codes as of August 2023, providing noteworthy user benefits.
On their VKontakte page, AEZA regularly posts updates and information about their services. It also serves as a collaborative space where customers can share their experiences, seek assistance, and find guidance from their review sections and discussion forums. Additionally, they have incorporated ChatGPT into their technical support framework, further enhancing their customer service capabilities.
AEZA also goes beyond just standard hosting services; their offerings include VPN services featuring cutting-edge protocols such as Outline, also known as Shadowsocks. This continual embrace of the latest technology underscores the company’s commitment to delivering premier service quality.
Through its Telegram channel, AEZA keeps its customer base informed of news, updates, and special promotions. Among these is the Black Friday Gold Sale, touted as the largest sale in the company’s history, featuring cashback incentives, exclusive rates, and additional special offers. They followed up with a pre-winter sale, mirroring similar promotional strategies.
Official Website: https://www.aéza.net
Looking Glass
None
BasicBench: Server Profile, I/O Speed, Upload and Download Speed
CPU Model : AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 16-Core Processor
CPU Cores : 2 @ 4199.932 MHz
CPU Cache : 512 KB
AES-NI : Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V : Disabled
Total Disk : 59.0 GB (2.2 GB Used)
Total Mem : 3.8 GB (57.3 MB Used)
Total Swap : 1024.0 MB (0 Used)
System uptime : 0 days, 0 hour 3 min
Load average : 0.00, 0.02, 0.00
OS : Debian GNU/Linux 11
Arch : x86_64 (64 Bit)
Kernel : 5.10.0-21-amd64
TCP CC : bbr
Virtualization : KVM
IPv4/IPv6 : Online / Offline
Organization : AS210644 AEZA GROUP Ltd
Location : Dearing / US
Region : Kansas
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I/O Speed(1st run) : 189 MB/s
I/O Speed(2nd run) : 1.9 GB/s
I/O Speed(3rd run) : 1.7 GB/s
I/O Speed(average) : 1291.8 MB/s
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Node Name Upload Speed Download Speed Latency
Speedtest.net 479.41 Mbps 717.37 Mbps 163.93 ms
Los Angeles, US 606.79 Mbps 561.04 Mbps 28.97 ms
Dallas, US 594.14 Mbps 574.53 Mbps 63.62 ms
Montreal, CA 557.91 Mbps 541.38 Mbps 101.09 ms
Paris, FR 518.37 Mbps 788.61 Mbps 149.60 ms
Amsterdam, NL 108.67 Mbps 525.05 Mbps 185.51 ms
Nanjing, CN 320.97 Mbps 539.17 Mbps 254.24 ms
Hongkong, CN 342.93 Mbps 740.54 Mbps 240.59 ms
Singapore, SG 370.35 Mbps 388.39 Mbps 216.70 ms
Tokyo, JP 538.80 Mbps 584.01 Mbps 139.39 ms
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Finished in : 5 min 20 sec
Timestamp : 2023-08-30 23:37:49 PDT
YabsBench: Disk Speed, iperf3 Network Speed, Geekbench 6 Benchmark
IPv4 Network Information:
---------------------------------
ISP : AEZA GROUP Ltd
ASN : AS210644 AEZA GROUP Ltd
Host : Fast
Location : Warsaw, Mazovia (14)
Country : Poland
fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50):
---------------------------------
Block Size | 4k (IOPS) | 64k (IOPS)
------ | --- ---- | ---- ----
Read | 40.02 MB/s (10.0k) | 656.51 MB/s (10.2k)
Write | 40.12 MB/s (10.0k) | 659.96 MB/s (10.3k)
Total | 80.14 MB/s (20.0k) | 1.31 GB/s (20.5k)
| |
Block Size | 512k (IOPS) | 1m (IOPS)
------ | --- ---- | ---- ----
Read | 1.78 GB/s (3.4k) | 1.84 GB/s (1.8k)
Write | 1.87 GB/s (3.6k) | 1.96 GB/s (1.9k)
Total | 3.66 GB/s (7.1k) | 3.81 GB/s (3.7k)
iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
---------------------------------
Provider | Location (Link) | Send Speed | Recv Speed | Ping
Clouvider | London, UK (10G) | 25.6 Mbits/sec | 31.4 Mbits/sec | 145 ms
Scaleway | Paris, FR (10G) | 538 Mbits/sec | 455 Mbits/sec | 150 ms
NovoServe | North Holland, NL (40G) | 520 Mbits/sec | 507 Mbits/sec | 160 ms
Uztelecom | Tashkent, UZ (10G) | 450 Mbits/sec | 261 Mbits/sec | 243 ms
Clouvider | NYC, NY, US (10G) | 40.8 Mbits/sec | busy | 90.5 ms
Clouvider | Dallas, TX, US (10G) | 35.3 Mbits/sec | 2.23 Mbits/sec | 106 ms
Clouvider | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 124 Mbits/sec | 201 Mbits/sec | 28.4 ms
Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
---------------------------------
Test | Value
|
Single Core | 1907
Multi Core | 3192
Full Test | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/2448959
YABS completed in 10 min 58 sec
UnixBench: CPU Performance, A score higher is better
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Thu Aug 31 2023 00:38:27 - 01:06:22
2 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 64673715.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 10993.5 MWIPS (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 7615.0 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1752548.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 490884.1 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 4948229.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 3467521.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 92441.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 16107.7 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 15296.2 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 3345.0 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 3853101.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 64673715.0 5541.9
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 10993.5 1998.8
Execl Throughput 43.0 7615.0 1770.9
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 1752548.0 4425.6
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 490884.1 2966.1
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 4948229.5 8531.4
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 3467521.9 2787.4
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 92441.7 231.1
Process Creation 126.0 16107.7 1278.4
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 15296.2 3607.6
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 3345.0 5575.0
System Call Overhead 15000.0 3853101.0 2568.7
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 2595.5
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Thu Aug 31 2023 01:06:22 - 01:34:18
2 CPUs in system; running 2 parallel copies of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 127169524.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 21909.9 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 13608.9 lps (29.8 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 2247930.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 585751.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 6976819.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 6529580.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 586529.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 37620.5 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 23358.5 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 3410.7 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 5586373.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 127169524.6 10897.1
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 21909.9 3983.6
Execl Throughput 43.0 13608.9 3164.9
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 2247930.9 5676.6
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 585751.5 3539.3
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 6976819.9 12029.0
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 6529580.6 5248.9
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 586529.4 1466.3
Process Creation 126.0 37620.5 2985.8
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 23358.5 5509.1
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 3410.7 5684.5
System Call Overhead 15000.0 5586373.4 3724.2
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 4596.7
======= Script description and score comparison completed! =======
Global Node Test
## CDN Speedtest
CacheFly : 25.08 MiB/s | 200.65 Mbps | ping 28.664ms
Gdrive : 32.31 MiB/s | 258.48 Mbps | ping 28.710ms
## North America Speedtest
Softlayer, Washington, USA : 1.37 MiB/s | 10.98 Mbps | ping 86.191ms
SoftLayer, San Jose, USA : 22.04 MiB/s | 176.32 Mbps | ping 39.817ms
SoftLayer, Dallas, USA : 0 B/s | N/A | ping error!
Vultr, New Jersey, USA : 245.55 KiB/s | 1.92 Mbps | ping 89.699ms
Vultr, Seattle, USA : 16.00 MiB/s | 128.01 Mbps | ping 58.095ms
Vultr, Dallas, USA : 2.66 MiB/s | 21.26 Mbps | ping 105.872ms
Vultr, Los Angeles, USA : 26.10 MiB/s | 208.77 Mbps | ping 28.599ms
Ramnode, New York, USA : 13.86 MiB/s | 110.91 Mbps | ping 88.247ms
Ramnode, Atlanta, USA : 35.79 KiB/s | 0.28 Mbps | ping 82.641ms
OVH, Beauharnois, Canada : 55 B/s | N/A | ping 29.088ms
## Europe Speedtest
Vultr, London, UK : 302.79 KiB/s | 2.37 Mbps | ping 147.847ms
LeaseWeb, Frankfurt, Germany : 8.69 KiB/s | 0.07 Mbps | ping 161.092ms
Hetzner, Germany : 191.97 KiB/s | 1.50 Mbps | ping 149.752ms
Ramnode, Alblasserdam, NL : 4.84 MiB/s | 38.74 Mbps | ping 183.649ms
Vultr, Amsterdam, NL : 11.40 MiB/s | 91.23 Mbps | ping 150.919ms
EDIS, Stockholm, Sweden : 425 B/s | N/A | ping 167.344ms
OVH, Roubaix, France : 504 B/s | N/A | ping 144.963ms
Online, France : 4.80 MiB/s | 38.43 Mbps | ping 171.547ms
Prometeus, Milan, Italy : 73 B/s | N/A | ping 400.061ms
## Exotic Speedtest
Sydney, Australia : 4.15 MiB/s | 33.16 Mbps | ping 255.415ms
Lagoon, New Caledonia : 431 B/s | N/A | ping 209.891ms
Hosteasy, Moldova : 6.86 MiB/s | 54.87 Mbps | ping 192.029ms
Prima, Argentina : 153.11 KiB/s | 1.20 Mbps | ping error!
## Asia Speedtest
SoftLayer, Singapore : 33.29 KiB/s | 0.26 Mbps | ping 513.588ms
Linode, Tokyo, Japan : 14.60 MiB/s | 116.81 Mbps | ping 127.188ms
Linode, Singapore : 7.05 MiB/s | 56.42 Mbps | ping 215.834ms
Vultr, Tokyo, Japan : 12.89 MiB/s | 103.08 Mbps | ping 134.479ms
Benchmark finished in 117 seconds
Global Latency Test
Query: ping 178.236.246.194, interval: 5s, dense mode: no
Probing 178.236.246.194 – RIPENCC /23 AS210644 AEZA – Poland, Mazovia, Warsaw
Media Unlock Test
** Test Starts At: Thu 31 Aug 2023 12:02:35 AM PDT
** Checking Results Under IPv4
--------------------------------
** Your Network Provider: AEZA GROUP Ltd (178.236.*.*)
============[ Multination ]============
Dazn: No
HotStar: Yes (Region: US)
Disney+: Yes (Region: US)
Netflix: Yes (Region: US)
YouTube Premium: Yes
Amazon Prime Video: Yes (Region: RU)
TVBAnywhere+: Yes
iQyi Oversea Region: INTL
Viu.com: No
YouTube CDN: GIGANET in Kiev
Netflix Preferred CDN: Stockholm
Spotify Registration: Yes (Region: PL)
Steam Currency: PLN
ChatGPT: Yes
=======================================
No IPv6 Connectivity Found, Abort IPv6 Testing...
Testing Done!CloudFlare Internet Test
PageSpeed Insights
GTmetrix Performance
Admin Control Panel
Server Pricing
Official Website: https://www.aéza.net
Payments
Based on a review of the commission rates for AEZA payment methods, a few conclusions can be drawn:
1. Amongst bank card payment options, the commission percentage for Bank cards in Russia and Internationally are relatively lower at 5% and 8-8.5%, respectively, whereas, for Ukraine, it is significantly higher at 15%.
2. Among online payment options, СБП has a minimum commission fee of 1%. Other options, such as Tinkoff Pay, Yandex Pay, and SteamPay, charge a 5-6% commission fee.
3. Electronic wallets show a varied range of commission rates. Most notably, FkWallet (RUB and USD) and LAVA have no commission fee, while others like QIWI, Yandex Money, and WebMoney charge between 5% and 10%.
4. Cryptocurrency payment options have a uniform commission percentage of 7% regardless of the specific type of crypto used.
The information provided implies that choosing a payment method depends significantly on the user’s location and preferred transaction medium. Regarding the lowest commission, СБП (online payments), FKWallet RUB, FKWallet USD, and LAVA (for electronic wallets) stand out. However, in terms of choice, cryptocurrencies offer the most variety despite the uniform 7% commission rate.
Coupon
The merchant did not provide
Customer Support
8 800 200-60-13
[email protected]
@aezasupport_bot
Mail aeza or create a ticket in the billing system. They work 24/7 and are always happy to help.
Conclusion
The speed tests revealed impressive numbers: an average I/O speed of 1291.8 MB/s was recorded. The speedtest.net reported solid upload and download speeds of 479.41 Mbps and 717.37 Mbps, respectively, with a latency of only 163.93 ms.
Further region-specific tests across Los Angeles, Dallas, Montreal, Paris, Amsterdam, Nanjing, Hong Kong, Singapore, and Tokyo returned an optimal blend of high upload/download speeds and measured latency, indicating exceptional overall connection stability and performance.
Next, fio Disk Speed tests were performed with mixed Read/Write of 50/50 configuration. The server performed remarkably well under myriad block size operations, demonstrating a robust handling of smaller (4k and 64k) and larger (512k and 1m) block sizes. This denotes the server’s efficient utilization of resources when executing different disk-related tasks.
When subjected to the Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test, the server reported a notable single-core score of 1907 and an even more significant multi-core score of 3192. These numbers reinforce the server’s optimal handling of single and multi-threaded tasks.
As per UnixBench, the CPU performance further emphasized the server’s strong capabilities. With an index score of 2595.5 in the first test run and an even better 4596.7 in the second, the server exhibited commendable performance under several scenarios like computation, file copy, pipe throughput, and system call overhead.
In conclusion, these evaluation results strongly suggest the AEZA Kansas Shared vCPU VPS Server is a powerful, highly capable, and resilient hosting solution. Its remarkable performance across diverse testing measures makes it an enticing option for those seeking robust cloud hosting services.
Official Website: https://www.aéza.net
Related Posts
