Hosmatic Germany Frankfurt AMD EPYC KVM VPS Hosting Test and Review

Tests3~months ago~Updated LetsHosting
870 0
Hosmatic Germany Frankfurt AMD EPYC KVM VPS Hosting Test and Review

We recently reviewed the Hosmatic Germany Frankfurt VPS Hosting, sporting an AMD EPYC processor. This server includes a dual-core CPU, 4 GB of memory, 50 GB of SSD storage, a fast 1 Gbps internet connection, 1 TB of data transfer, and an IPv4 and IPv6 address.

Our review covered a range of tests: we started with some standard benchmarks to gauge basic performance, checked network reach and speed with worldwide tests and ping measurements, looked at content availability across different regions, tested connection quality via CloudFlare, and finally, we evaluated how well websites run using tools like PageSpeed Insights and GTmetrix.

About Hosmatic

Hosmatic is a platform that offers high-quality products at affordable prices. It’s a service designed to be easy to use, with no hidden costs. The company’s ethos is centered around providing a low-cost, high-quality product accessible to everyone.

The platform is designed to be user-friendly, allowing customers to order and get started. This ease of use is a key feature of Hosmatic, making it an attractive option for those seeking quality products without the hassle of complicated ordering processes or hidden fees.

In addition to its product offerings, Hosmatic also provides excellent customer service. You can easily contact their support team if you have a problem or a question. They offer multiple communication channels, including ticket creation in the dashboard, phone support, and email. Their support hours are extensive, with availability from Monday to Sunday.

Hosmatic’s commitment to customer service extends beyond just answering queries. Their team is almost always available to help you with any problem, demonstrating their dedication to ensuring a positive customer experience.

The company’s website, hosmatic.com, reflects its commitment to quality and customer service. It’s easy to navigate, with clear information about their products and how to order. The site also includes a contact page with detailed information on how to reach their support team.

Official Website: https://www.Hosmatic.com

BasicBench: Server Profile, I/O Speed, Upload and Download Speed

 CPU Model          : AMD EPYC Processor
 CPU Cores          : 2 @ 2844.656 MHz
 CPU Cache          : 512 KB
 AES-NI             : ✓ Enabled
 VM-x/AMD-V         : ✗ Disabled
 Total Disk         : 49.2 GB (1.9 GB Used)
 Total Mem          : 3.8 GB (77.7 MB Used)
 System uptime      : 0 days, 0 hour 6 min
 Load average       : 0.00, 0.02, 0.00
 OS                 : Debian GNU/Linux 11
 Arch               : x86_64 (64 Bit)
 Kernel             : 5.10.0-26-amd64
 TCP CC             : bbr
 Virtualization     : KVM
 IPv4/IPv6          : ✓ Online / ✓ Online
 Organization       : AS44486 Oliver Horscht is trading as "SYNLINQ"
 Location           : Frankfurt am Main / DE
 Region             : Hesse
----------------------------------------------------------------------
 I/O Speed(1st run) : 796 MB/s
 I/O Speed(2nd run) : 938 MB/s
 I/O Speed(3rd run) : 743 MB/s
 I/O Speed(average) : 825.7 MB/s
----------------------------------------------------------------------
 Node Name        Upload Speed      Download Speed      Latency     
 Speedtest.net    3197.60 Mbps      2982.26 Mbps        0.26 ms     
 Los Angeles, US  477.23 Mbps       2880.41 Mbps        169.92 ms   
 Dallas, US       568.40 Mbps       2921.53 Mbps        141.99 ms   
 Montreal, CA     624.95 Mbps       930.15 Mbps         90.04 ms    
 Paris, FR        3187.39 Mbps      3075.95 Mbps        10.70 ms    
 Amsterdam, NL    3228.74 Mbps      3051.28 Mbps        7.89 ms     
 Shanghai, CN     528.85 Mbps       2358.77 Mbps        155.31 ms   
 Hongkong, CN     401.94 Mbps       2741.97 Mbps        201.39 ms   
 Mumbai, IN       749.36 Mbps       3014.95 Mbps        106.11 ms   
 Singapore, SG    248.84 Mbps       2238.59 Mbps        311.66 ms   
 Tokyo, JP        322.82 Mbps       2682.27 Mbps        248.07 ms   
----------------------------------------------------------------------
 Finished in        : 5 min 21 sec
 Timestamp          : 2024-01-02 00:41:46 UTC

YabsBench: Disk Speed, iperf3 Network Speed, Geekbench 6 Benchmark

Basic System Information:
---------------------------------
Uptime     : 0 days, 0 hours, 16 minutes
Processor  : AMD EPYC Processor
CPU cores  : 2 @ 2844.656 MHz
AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ❌ Disabled
RAM        : 3.8 GiB
Swap       : 0.0 KiB
Disk       : 49.2 GiB
Distro     : Debian GNU/Linux 11 (bullseye)
Kernel     : 5.10.0-26-amd64
VM Type    : KVM
IPv4/IPv6  : ✔ Online / ✔ Online

IPv6 Network Information:
---------------------------------
ISP        : Oliver Horscht is trading as \"SYNLINQ\"
ASN        : AS44486 Oliver Horscht is trading as \"SYNLINQ\"
Host       : Hosmatic
Location   : Frankfurt am Main, Hesse (HE)
Country    : Germany

fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50):
---------------------------------
Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
Read       | 175.60 MB/s  (43.9k) | 1.66 GB/s    (25.9k)
Write      | 176.06 MB/s  (44.0k) | 1.67 GB/s    (26.0k)
Total      | 351.66 MB/s  (87.9k) | 3.33 GB/s    (52.0k)
           |                      |                     
Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
Read       | 2.50 GB/s     (4.9k) | 2.26 GB/s     (2.2k)
Write      | 2.64 GB/s     (5.1k) | 2.41 GB/s     (2.3k)
Total      | 5.15 GB/s    (10.0k) | 4.68 GB/s     (4.5k)

iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
---------------------------------
Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping           
Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 3.26 Gbits/sec  | 3.02 Gbits/sec  | 11.0 ms        
Scaleway        | Paris, FR (10G)           | busy            | 3.01 Gbits/sec  | 12.5 ms        
NovoServe       | North Holland, NL (40G)   | 3.30 Gbits/sec  | 3.09 Gbits/sec  | 8.89 ms        
Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 1.74 Gbits/sec  | 2.00 Gbits/sec  | 92.9 ms        
Clouvider       | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 1.78 Gbits/sec  | 2.03 Gbits/sec  | 84.6 ms        
Clouvider       | Dallas, TX, US (10G)      | 1.35 Gbits/sec  | 1.56 Gbits/sec  | 119 ms         
Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 1.02 Gbits/sec  | 1.19 Gbits/sec  | 144 ms         

iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv6):
---------------------------------
Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping           
Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 3.31 Gbits/sec  | 2.97 Gbits/sec  | 10.8 ms        
Scaleway        | Paris, FR (10G)           | 3.31 Gbits/sec  | 2.98 Gbits/sec  | 12.5 ms        
NovoServe       | North Holland, NL (40G)   | 3.32 Gbits/sec  | 2.97 Gbits/sec  | 7.09 ms        
Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 1.69 Gbits/sec  | 1.96 Gbits/sec  | 92.9 ms        
Clouvider       | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 1.80 Gbits/sec  | 1.90 Gbits/sec  | 84.7 ms        
Clouvider       | Dallas, TX, US (10G)      | 1.34 Gbits/sec  | 1.52 Gbits/sec  | 117 ms         
Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 1.04 Gbits/sec  | 1.22 Gbits/sec  | 144 ms         

Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
---------------------------------
Test            | Value                         
                |                               
Single Core     | 1401                          
Multi Core      | 2474                          
Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/4226648

YABS completed in 14 min 6 sec

UnixBench: CPU Performance, A Score Higher is Better

Benchmark Run: Tue Jan 02 2024 01:23:27 - 01:51:25
2 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables       45795323.9 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone                     8606.9 MWIPS (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput                               5393.7 lps   (29.8 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks        960235.7 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks          262015.2 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks       2256499.0 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput                             1749717.5 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching                  46876.4 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation                               9375.4 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                  12782.8 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                   2494.9 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead                        1573913.0 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values               BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0   45795323.9   3924.2
Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0       8606.9   1564.9
Execl Throughput                                 43.0       5393.7   1254.3
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0     960235.7   2424.8
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0     262015.2   1583.2
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0    2256499.0   3890.5
Pipe Throughput                               12440.0    1749717.5   1406.5
Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0      46876.4    117.2
Process Creation                                126.0       9375.4    744.1
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4      12782.8   3014.8
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0       2494.9   4158.1
System Call Overhead                          15000.0    1573913.0   1049.3
                                                                   ========
System Benchmarks Index Score                                        1545.4

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Tue Jan 02 2024 01:51:25 - 02:19:25
2 CPUs in system; running 2 parallel copies of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables       90685388.5 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone                    17006.9 MWIPS (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput                               8811.2 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks       1365562.6 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks          350315.5 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks       3779182.8 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput                             3347962.6 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching                 466280.2 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation                              24164.5 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                  18193.7 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                   2456.8 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead                        2746576.3 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values               BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0   90685388.5   7770.8
Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0      17006.9   3092.2
Execl Throughput                                 43.0       8811.2   2049.1
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0    1365562.6   3448.4
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0     350315.5   2116.7
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0    3779182.8   6515.8
Pipe Throughput                               12440.0    3347962.6   2691.3
Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0     466280.2   1165.7
Process Creation                                126.0      24164.5   1917.8
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4      18193.7   4291.0
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0       2456.8   4094.6
System Call Overhead                          15000.0    2746576.3   1831.1
                                                                   ========
System Benchmarks Index Score                                        2960.5

======= Script description and score comparison completed! ======= 

Looking Glass

Test IPv4: 45.155.76.207

Test IPv6: 2a0f:5707:aaef:253::1

Download Files: 100MB 1GB 10GB

Global Node Test

 ## CDN Speedtest

 CacheFly : 277.78 MiB/s | 2222.22 Mbps  | ping   0.382ms
 Gdrive   :       0 B/s |      N/A       | ping   0.818ms


 ## North America Speedtest

 Softlayer, Washington, USA :   2.21 MiB/s |   17.70 Mbps  | ping  91.385ms
 SoftLayer, San Jose, USA   :   3.42 MiB/s |   27.35 Mbps  | ping 145.921ms
 SoftLayer, Dallas, USA     :       0 B/s |      N/A       | ping error!
 Vultr, New Jersey, USA     : 716.30 KiB/s |    5.60 Mbps  | ping  84.735ms
 Vultr, Seattle, USA        :  12.50 MiB/s |  100.02 Mbps  | ping 152.799ms
 Vultr, Dallas, USA         :  14.76 MiB/s |  118.07 Mbps  | ping 123.543ms
 Vultr, Los Angeles, USA    :  12.78 MiB/s |  102.28 Mbps  | ping 147.033ms
 Ramnode, New York, USA     :  21.04 MiB/s |  168.32 Mbps  | ping  96.240ms
 Ramnode, Atlanta, USA      :  23.22 MiB/s |  185.74 Mbps  | ping  98.730ms


 ## Europe Speedtest

 Vultr, London, UK            : 164.47 MiB/s | 1315.79 Mbps  | ping  12.734ms
 LeaseWeb, Frankfurt, Germany : 440.05 KiB/s |    3.44 Mbps  | ping   7.314ms
 Hetzner, Germany             :   3.95 KiB/s |    0.03 Mbps  | ping   3.376ms
 Ramnode, Alblasserdam, NL    :  89.55 MiB/s |  716.38 Mbps  | ping   9.643ms
 Vultr, Amsterdam, NL         : 186.92 MiB/s | 1495.33 Mbps  | ping   7.086ms
 EDIS, Stockholm, Sweden      :   2.89 KiB/s |    0.02 Mbps  | ping  18.694ms
 OVH, Roubaix, France         :   4.52 KiB/s |    0.04 Mbps  | ping  10.475ms
 Online, France               : 185.18 MiB/s | 1481.44 Mbps  | ping  12.457ms
 Prometeus, Milan, Italy      :   2.93 KiB/s |    0.02 Mbps  | ping  12.580ms


 ## Exotic Speedtest

 Sydney, Australia     :   4.40 MiB/s |   35.20 Mbps  | ping 259.404ms
 Lagoon, New Caledonia :     295 B/s |      N/A       | ping 317.269ms
 Hosteasy, Moldova     :  48.52 MiB/s |  388.16 Mbps  | ping  37.519ms
 Prima, Argentina      : 260.54 KiB/s |    2.04 Mbps  | ping error!


 ## Asia Speedtest

 SoftLayer, Singapore :   1.54 MiB/s |   12.32 Mbps  | ping 191.116ms
 Linode, Tokyo, Japan :   4.42 MiB/s |   35.39 Mbps  | ping 238.078ms
 Linode, Singapore    :  12.21 MiB/s |   97.67 Mbps  | ping 157.671ms
 Vultr, Tokyo, Japan  :   3.29 MiB/s |   26.35 Mbps  | ping 228.341ms


 Benchmark finished in 99 seconds

Global Latency Test

Hosmatic Germany Frankfurt AMD EPYC KVM VPS Hosting Test and Review Hosmatic Germany Frankfurt AMD EPYC KVM VPS Hosting Test and Review

Query: ping 37.114.32.1, interval: 5s, dense mode: no

Probing 37.114.32.1 – RIPENCC /24 AS44486 SYNLINQ synlinq.de – Germany

Media Unlock Test

 ** Test Starts At: Tue Jan  2 01:04:01 UTC 2024

 ** Checking Results Under IPv4 
--------------------------------
 ** Your Network Provider: SYNLINQ (37.114.*.*) 

============[ Multination ]============
 Dazn:                                  Yes (Region: DE)
 HotStar:                               No
 Disney+:                               No
 YouTube Premium:                       Yes (Region: DE)
 Amazon Prime Video:                    Yes (Region: DE)
 TVBAnywhere+:                          Yes
 iQyi Oversea Region:                   DE
 Viu.com:                               No
 YouTube CDN:                           Prague 
 Netflix Preferred CDN:                 Frankfurt  
 Spotify Registration:                  No
 Steam Currency:                        EUR
 ChatGPT:                               Yes
 Bing Region:                           DE
=======================================


 ** Checking Results Under IPv6 
--------------------------------
 ** Your Network Provider: SYNLINQ (2a0f:5707:aaef:*:*) 

============[ Multination ]============
 Dazn:                                  Failed (Network Connection)
 HotStar:                               Failed (Network Connection)
 Disney+:                               No
 Netflix:                               Yes (Region: DE)
 YouTube Premium:                       Yes (Region: DE)
 Amazon Prime Video:                    Unsupported
 TVBAnywhere+:                          Failed (Network Connection)
 iQyi Oversea Region:                   Failed
 Viu.com:                               Failed
 YouTube CDN:                           Washington DC 
 Netflix Preferred CDN:                 Frankfurt  
 Spotify Registration:                  No
 Steam Currency:                        Failed (Network Connection)
 ChatGPT:                               Failed
 Bing Region:                           DE
=======================================
Testing Done! 

CloudFlare Internet Test

Hosmatic Germany Frankfurt AMD EPYC KVM VPS Hosting Test and Review

PageSpeed Insights

Hosmatic Germany Frankfurt AMD EPYC KVM VPS Hosting Test and Review

GTmetrix Performance

Hosmatic Germany Frankfurt AMD EPYC KVM VPS Hosting Test and Review

Admin Control Panel

Hosmatic Germany Frankfurt AMD EPYC KVM VPS Hosting Test and Review

Hosmatic’s admin dashboard is designed to be user-friendly and intuitive, allowing users to manage and order services when, where, and how they want. It provides a centralized location for users to control various aspects of their services.

One of the key features of the dashboard is the ability to connect a domain to a mail server. The process is straightforward and involves selecting your mail server in the dashboard, going to “Domains,” and following the steps to add your domain.

The dashboard also allows users to configure firewall settings for their root servers. This feature is divided into different sections, including firewall rules, where users can set rules for defined IPs/ports.

Server Pricing

Hosmatic Germany Frankfurt AMD EPYC KVM VPS Hosting Test and Review

View All Plans: https://www.Hosmatic.com

Coupon

The merchant did not provide

Payments

Hosmatic offers a variety of payment methods to cater to the diverse needs of its customers. Here are some of the payment methods they offer:

  • PayPal: This allows customers to pay quickly and easily with their PayPal account, using either a credit card or their bank account.
  • PaySafeCard: This method allows customers to pay anonymously with a PaySafeCard code.
  • GiroPay: Customers can pay their invoices quickly and easily with the help of GiroPay.
  • Klarna: Customers can pay for their purchases with Klarna using their online banking system.
  • Cryptocurrencies: Hosmatic also accepts popular cryptocurrencies.
  • GooglePay: Customers can make quick and easy payments with their Google Account.
  • Mastercard: Customers can make easy payments with their credit/debit card.
  • ApplePay: Customers can make quick and easy payments with their Apple ID.
  • SEPA: Customers can make fast payments by debit charge.
  • iDEAL: This is a popular payment method in the Netherlands.
  • EPS: This is a popular payment method in Austria.
  • Bancontact: This is a popular payment method in Belgium.
  • Przelewy24: This is a popular payment method in Poland.
  • WeChat Pay: This is a popular payment method in China.

In addition to these, Hosmatic also added PayPal as a payment option in August 2023. This gives customers the flexibility to continue to make their payments conveniently via SEPA direct debit or credit card or to take advantage of the benefits of PayPal.

Hosmatic also allows customers to top up their balance. To do this, customers need to go to the balance page on the dashboard.

One of the unique aspects of Hosmatic’s payment methods is their commitment to climate protection. They claim that there are no fees for any payment method, and by topping up or ordering on Hosmatic, customers are supporting Hosmatic and climate protection.

Customer Support

Hosmatic’s customer support is one of the key aspects that sets them apart. They have a team that is incredibly responsive and knowledgeable. They always go the extra mile to help resolve issues or answer customer questions. This shows their commitment to valuing their customers and ensuring a positive experience.

Customers can reach out to Hosmatic’s customer support through various channels. They can create a ticket in the dashboard and reach out via phone support(+49 761 45875530) or email. E-Mail information:

The support hours are extensive, with availability from Monday to Sunday. Support hours:

  • Mo – Fri: 09:00 – 21:00
  • Sat: 09:00 – 22:00
  • Sun: 10:00 – 20:00

Conclusion

Starting with the Basic Bench tests, we recorded the input/output (I/O) speeds over three runs and found an average of 825.7 MB/s, indicating swift data handling capabilities. On the network front, our server showed its strength with high upload speeds reaching up to 3.2 Gbps and download speeds hovering around the 3 Gbps mark across several locations worldwide, with low latency figures in most regions — notably just 0.26 milliseconds in the native Speedtest.net node.

The server didn’t shy away in the Yabs Performance Bench either, showcasing read and write speeds across various block sizes that many would find enviable. The disk speed tests revealed a total throughput that ranged from 351.66 MB/s with 4k blocks to an impressive 5.15 GB/s with 512k blocks. Geekbench 6 scores also painted a positive picture: a single-core score of 1401 and a multi-core score of 2474 reflect a server that can handle demanding tasks without sweat.

UnixBench scores increased even further when the CPU was tested for its performance. The second round of tests, running two parallel copies, showcased the server’s true potential with a system benchmark index score soaring to 2960.5, a significant increase from the already commendable 1545.4 seen with one parallel copy.

In conclusion, the Hosmatic Germany Frankfurt VPS server is a heavyweight contender in virtual private servers, especially for those requiring a workhorse in European regions. Its robust specs, backed by strong benchmarking scores, suggest a reliable and high-performing solution for various hosting needs.

Official Website: https://www.Hosmatic.com

Related Posts