CinderCloud Poland Wroclaw Unlimited Transfer Cloud VPS Test and Review
Today, we’re checking out the CinderCloud Poland Wroclaw Cloud VPS Server with unlimited data transfer. This server runs on a powerful Intel Xeon E312xx (Sandy Bridge, IBRS update) Processor and comes packed with 4 CPU cores, 4 GB of RAM, 80 GB of NVMe SSD storage, a 150 Mbps internet connection, and 1 IPv4 address.
Our review covers a bunch of tests to see how well it performs. We run the Basic Benchmark, Yabs, and Unix Benchmark to see how they handle essential tasks. Use the Global Node Test to check its network strength and measure how quickly it responds to the Global Ping Test.
For checking if we can stream media easily, there’s the Media Unlock Test. We’re also looking at how well it connects through CloudFlare and checking its web performance with tools like PageSpeed Insights and GTmetrix.
About CinderCloud
CinderCloud.com is a remarkable IT cloud infrastructure hosting service. It provides a platform for users to launch and configure Virtual Private Servers (VPS) and deploy their IT infrastructure.
Cloud hosting, like the one provided by CinderCloud, offers a significant advantage over traditional hosting methods. Unlike non-cloud packages, where you buy a defined block of resources on a single server, cloud hosting spreads these resources across multiple devices. This means your website is not tied to the fate of a single server, providing increased reliability and resilience.
If a server suffers a hardware problem, has a hard drive failure, or is hacked, websites hosted on traditional servers will go offline along with the server. However, your website remains online with cloud hosting as the resources are spread across multiple devices.
Additionally, upgrading resources on a cloud hosting platform is much easier than traditional hosting. It requires a few clicks from the hosting provider instead of shutting down a single server to install new hardware. This makes cloud hosting a leading service in the web hosting industry.
Official Website: https://www.CinderCloud.com
BasicBench: Server Profile, I/O Speed, Upload and Download Speed
CPU Model : Intel Xeon E312xx (Sandy Bridge, IBRS update)
CPU Cores : 4 @ 2593.748 MHz
CPU Cache : 16384 KB
AES-NI : ✓ Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ✗ Disabled
Total Disk : 78.7 GB (1.5 GB Used)
Total Mem : 3.8 GB (223.6 MB Used)
System uptime : 0 days, 17 hour 58 min
Load average : 0.11, 0.39, 0.27
OS : Debian GNU/Linux 11
Arch : x86_64 (64 Bit)
Kernel : 5.10.0-10-cloud-amd64
TCP CC : bbr
Virtualization : KVM
IPv4/IPv6 : ✓ Online / ✗ Offline
Organization : AS15851 Wroclaw Centre of Networking and Supercomputing
Location : Wrocław / PL
Region : Lower Silesia
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I/O Speed(1st run) : 190 MB/s
I/O Speed(2nd run) : 191 MB/s
I/O Speed(3rd run) : 194 MB/s
I/O Speed(average) : 191.7 MB/s
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Node Name Upload Speed Download Speed Latency
Speedtest.net 165.65 Mbps 167.39 Mbps 5.17 ms
Los Angeles, US 163.74 Mbps 170.08 Mbps 163.08 ms
Dallas, US 167.98 Mbps 160.61 Mbps 135.10 ms
Montreal, CA 167.56 Mbps 169.76 Mbps 106.92 ms
Paris, FR 166.28 Mbps 160.62 Mbps 29.81 ms
Amsterdam, NL 165.81 Mbps 158.95 Mbps 24.83 ms
Shanghai, CN 144.64 Mbps 168.19 Mbps 238.51 ms
Hongkong, CN 134.25 Mbps 165.94 Mbps 279.50 ms
Mumbai, IN 164.45 Mbps 163.98 Mbps 179.00 ms
Singapore, SG 136.88 Mbps 171.24 Mbps 349.24 ms
Tokyo, JP 150.29 Mbps 163.16 Mbps 246.50 ms
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Finished in : 5 min 44 sec
Timestamp : 2024-02-18 00:39:45 UTC
Updated 2024.02.23: Because they have upgraded storage bandwidth on all VPS servers from 200MB/s to 300MB/s, all new VPSes from now on will have 300 MB/s as well.
CPU Model : Intel Xeon E312xx (Sandy Bridge, IBRS update)
CPU Cores : 4 @ 2593.748 MHz
CPU Cache : 16384 KB
AES-NI : ✓ Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ✗ Disabled
Total Disk : 78.7 GB (2.0 GB Used)
Total Mem : 3.8 GB (257.4 MB Used)
System uptime : 5 days, 9 hour 47 min
Load average : 0.02, 0.01, 0.00
OS : Debian GNU/Linux 11
Arch : x86_64 (64 Bit)
Kernel : 5.10.0-10-cloud-amd64
TCP CC : bbr
Virtualization : KVM
IPv4/IPv6 : ✓ Online / ✗ Offline
Organization : AS15851 Wroclaw Centre of Networking and Supercomputing
Location : Wrocław / PL
Region : Lower Silesia
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I/O Speed(1st run) : 275 MB/s
I/O Speed(2nd run) : 283 MB/s
I/O Speed(3rd run) : 277 MB/s
I/O Speed(average) : 278.3 MB/s
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Finished in : 5 min 41 sec
Timestamp : 2024-02-22 16:28:48 UTC
YabsBench: Disk Speed, iperf3 Network Speed, Geekbench 6 Benchmark
Basic System Information:
---------------------------------
Uptime : 0 days, 18 hours, 5 minutes
Processor : Intel Xeon E312xx (Sandy Bridge, IBRS update)
CPU cores : 4 @ 2593.748 MHz
AES-NI : ✔ Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ❌ Disabled
RAM : 3.8 GiB
Swap : 0.0 KiB
Disk : 78.7 GiB
Distro : Debian GNU/Linux 11 (bullseye)
Kernel : 5.10.0-10-cloud-amd64
VM Type : KVM
IPv4/IPv6 : ✔ Online / ❌ Offline
IPv4 Network Information:
---------------------------------
ISP : WASK
ASN : AS15851 Wroclaw Centre of Networking and Supercomputing
Location : Wroclaw, Lower Silesia (02)
Country : Poland
fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50):
---------------------------------
Block Size | 4k (IOPS) | 64k (IOPS)
------ | --- ---- | ---- ----
Read | 45.13 MB/s (11.2k) | 205.68 MB/s (3.2k)
Write | 45.19 MB/s (11.2k) | 206.77 MB/s (3.2k)
Total | 90.32 MB/s (22.5k) | 412.45 MB/s (6.4k)
| |
Block Size | 512k (IOPS) | 1m (IOPS)
------ | --- ---- | ---- ----
Read | 196.33 MB/s (383) | 193.88 MB/s (189)
Write | 206.76 MB/s (403) | 206.79 MB/s (201)
Total | 403.10 MB/s (786) | 400.67 MB/s (390)
iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
---------------------------------
Provider | Location (Link) | Send Speed | Recv Speed | Ping
Clouvider | London, UK (10G) | 163 Mbits/sec | 159 Mbits/sec | 32.2 ms
Scaleway | Paris, FR (10G) | 163 Mbits/sec | 159 Mbits/sec | 28.9 ms
NovoServe | North Holland, NL (40G) | 164 Mbits/sec | 159 Mbits/sec | 20.4 ms
Uztelecom | Tashkent, UZ (10G) | 155 Mbits/sec | 154 Mbits/sec | 105 ms
Clouvider | NYC, NY, US (10G) | 154 Mbits/sec | 155 Mbits/sec | 96.5 ms
Clouvider | Dallas, TX, US (10G) | 148 Mbits/sec | 152 Mbits/sec | 129 ms
Clouvider | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 143 Mbits/sec | 150 Mbits/sec | 160 ms
Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
---------------------------------
Test | Value
|
Single Core | 449
Multi Core | 1511
Full Test | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/4959098
YABS completed in 18 min 31 sec
Updated 2024.02.23: Because they have upgraded storage bandwidth on all VPS servers from 200MB/s to 300MB/s, all new VPSes from now on will have 300 MB/s as well.
Basic System Information:
---------------------------------
Uptime : 5 days, 9 hours, 53 minutes
Processor : Intel Xeon E312xx (Sandy Bridge, IBRS update)
CPU cores : 4 @ 2593.748 MHz
AES-NI : ✔ Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ❌ Disabled
RAM : 3.8 GiB
Swap : 0.0 KiB
Disk : 78.7 GiB
Distro : Debian GNU/Linux 11 (bullseye)
Kernel : 5.10.0-10-cloud-amd64
VM Type : KVM
IPv4/IPv6 : ✔ Online / ❌ Offline
fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/sda1):
---------------------------------
Block Size | 4k (IOPS) | 64k (IOPS)
------ | --- ---- | ---- ----
Read | 50.02 MB/s (12.5k) | 310.01 MB/s (4.8k)
Write | 50.10 MB/s (12.5k) | 311.64 MB/s (4.8k)
Total | 100.13 MB/s (25.0k) | 621.65 MB/s (9.7k)
| |
Block Size | 512k (IOPS) | 1m (IOPS)
------ | --- ---- | ---- ----
Read | 295.89 MB/s (577) | 292.19 MB/s (285)
Write | 311.61 MB/s (608) | 311.65 MB/s (304)
Total | 607.51 MB/s (1.1k) | 603.84 MB/s (589)
YABS completed in 1 min 3 sec
UnixBench: CPU Performance, A score higher is better
Benchmark Run: Sun Feb 18 2024 01:25:28 - 01:53:37
4 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 28314396.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 3945.9 MWIPS (9.6 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 2341.3 lps (29.9 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 270337.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 72166.2 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 757711.6 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 394296.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 10796.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 1799.5 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 3162.1 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1346.8 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 250215.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 28314396.9 2426.3
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 3945.9 717.4
Execl Throughput 43.0 2341.3 544.5
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 270337.5 682.7
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 72166.2 436.0
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 757711.6 1306.4
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 394296.9 317.0
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 10796.0 27.0
Process Creation 126.0 1799.5 142.8
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 3162.1 745.8
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1346.8 2244.7
System Call Overhead 15000.0 250215.8 166.8
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 473.1
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Sun Feb 18 2024 01:53:37 - 02:21:49
4 CPUs in system; running 4 parallel copies of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 130697095.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 19146.9 MWIPS (9.3 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 9220.1 lps (29.7 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 427011.7 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 133233.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1379115.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 1812942.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 403078.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 21980.2 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 17375.8 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 2853.0 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 1056668.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 130697095.6 11199.4
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 19146.9 3481.3
Execl Throughput 43.0 9220.1 2144.2
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 427011.7 1078.3
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 133233.0 805.0
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1379115.0 2377.8
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1812942.4 1457.3
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 403078.7 1007.7
Process Creation 126.0 21980.2 1744.5
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 17375.8 4098.1
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 2853.0 4754.9
System Call Overhead 15000.0 1056668.2 704.4
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 2066.6
======= Script description and score comparison completed! =======
Looking Glass
None
Global Node Test
## CDN Speedtest
CacheFly : 12.47 MiB/s | 99.76 Mbps | ping 19.432ms
Gdrive : 4.59 KiB/s | 0.04 Mbps | ping 20.220ms
## North America Speedtest
Softlayer, Washington, USA : 6.20 MiB/s | 49.57 Mbps | ping 108.830ms
SoftLayer, San Jose, USA : 1.46 MiB/s | 11.72 Mbps | ping 169.759ms
SoftLayer, Dallas, USA : 0 B/s | N/A | ping error!
Vultr, New Jersey, USA : 6.68 MiB/s | 53.48 Mbps | ping 96.535ms
Vultr, Seattle, USA : 7.86 MiB/s | 62.88 Mbps | ping 153.388ms
Vultr, Dallas, USA : 398.06 KiB/s | 3.11 Mbps | ping 135.297ms
Vultr, Los Angeles, USA : 6.78 MiB/s | 54.23 Mbps | ping 167.087ms
Ramnode, New York, USA : 8.49 MiB/s | 67.89 Mbps | ping 93.405ms
Ramnode, Atlanta, USA : 7.39 MiB/s | 59.12 Mbps | ping 125.758ms
## Europe Speedtest
Vultr, London, UK : 17.87 MiB/s | 142.93 Mbps | ping 32.497ms
LeaseWeb, Frankfurt, Germany : 160.02 KiB/s | 1.25 Mbps | ping 24.771ms
Hetzner, Germany : 964 B/s | N/A | ping 24.926ms
Ramnode, Alblasserdam, NL : 18.00 MiB/s | 144.01 Mbps | ping 30.461ms
Vultr, Amsterdam, NL : 18.33 MiB/s | 146.66 Mbps | ping 20.268ms
EDIS, Stockholm, Sweden : 1.19 KiB/s | 0.01 Mbps | ping 39.469ms
OVH, Roubaix, France : 1.58 KiB/s | 0.01 Mbps | ping 30.544ms
Online, France : 17.92 MiB/s | 143.34 Mbps | ping 28.840ms
Prometeus, Milan, Italy : 1.78 KiB/s | 0.01 Mbps | ping 30.259ms
## Exotic Speedtest
Sydney, Australia : 3.42 MiB/s | 27.35 Mbps | ping 277.734ms
Lagoon, New Caledonia : 198 B/s | N/A | ping 327.559ms
Hosteasy, Moldova : 15.90 MiB/s | 127.18 Mbps | ping 57.843ms
Prima, Argentina : 257.64 KiB/s | 2.01 Mbps | ping error!
## Asia Speedtest
SoftLayer, Singapore : 820.31 KiB/s | 6.41 Mbps | ping 195.116ms
Linode, Tokyo, Japan : 2.44 MiB/s | 19.53 Mbps | ping 269.394ms
Linode, Singapore : 2.12 MiB/s | 16.93 Mbps | ping 334.372ms
Vultr, Tokyo, Japan : 5.01 MiB/s | 40.09 Mbps | ping 247.570ms
Benchmark finished in 143 seconds
Global Latency Test
Query: ping 212.127.73.213, interval: 5s, dense mode: no
Probing 212.127.73.213 – RIPENCC /19 AS15851 WASK-COM – Poland [business]
Media Unlock Test
** Test Starts At: Sun Feb 18 01:10:11 UTC 2024
** Checking Results Under IPv4
--------------------------------
** Your Network Provider: Wroclaw Centre of Networking and Supercomputing (212.127.*.*)
============[ Multination ]============
Dazn: Yes (Region: PL)
HotStar: No
Disney+: Yes (Region: PL)
Netflix: Yes (Region: PL)
YouTube Premium: Yes (Region: PL)
Amazon Prime Video: Yes (Region: PL)
TVBAnywhere+: Yes
iQyi Oversea Region: INTL
Viu.com: No
YouTube CDN: PIONIER in Poznan
Spotify Registration: No
Steam Currency: PLN
ChatGPT: Yes
Bing Region: PL
Instagram Licensed Audio: Yes
=======================================
No IPv6 Connectivity Found, Abort IPv6 Testing...
Testing Done!CloudFlare Internet Test
PageSpeed Insights
GTmetrix Performance
Admin Control Panel
The Admin Control Panel of CinderCloud.com is a crucial feature that enhances the user experience. It is a web-based interface that allows administrators and users to manage various server functionalities.
The control panel is designed to be user-friendly, catering to tech-savvy users and beginners. It offers many website management features like settings, backup, staging, etc. All these tasks can be performed with a simple click, making it a convenient tool for users.
One of the key advantages of CinderCloud’s Admin Control Panel is its flexibility. It allows users to manage multiple servers from a single place. This means that users can have multiple servers on a single machine or spread out across many and manage them all from one place.
Server Pricing
CinderCloud.com provides clear and transparent pricing. There are no hidden fees, and users are informed about all charges upfront. This pricing transparency helps users plan their expenses and avoid any unexpected costs.
Official Website: https://www.CinderCloud.com
Payments
CinderCloud.com offers a variety of payment methods to cater to the diverse needs of its users.
The platform is designed to provide a seamless payment experience, making it easy for users to pay for their services. It supports multiple payment gateways, allowing users to choose the one that best suits them. This flexibility in payment methods makes it convenient for users across different regions and with different banking preferences.
Moreover, CinderCloud.com ensures the security of its users’ financial information. It uses secure encryption methods to protect sensitive data during transactions. This commitment to security gives users peace of mind when making payments on the platform.
Coupon
They offer 50% discount code for all VPS plans: 50FREENOW
Customer Support
The customer support team at CinderCloud.com is equipped to handle a wide range of issues. Whether a user is facing a technical glitch, needs help with server management, or has a query about their service, the support team is ready to assist.
One of the standout features of CinderCloud.com’s customer support is its proactive approach. If a failure is reported by the customer or detected by their monitoring software, they immediately rectify it and restore the system’s proper operation. This proactive approach ensures minimal downtime and disruption to the user’s operations.
Moreover, CinderCloud.com’s customer support is not limited to just resolving issues. They also specialize in designing Proxmox-based public and private cloud platforms tailored to their customers’ business needs. They help their customers resolve any Proxmox-related issues, regardless of the operating system or deployment method on which the customer’s cloud is based.
Conclusion
Starting with the I/O performance, the server averaged 278.3 MB/s across three runs, positioning it to the “good” threshold for speed. On the other hand, network performance showed consistency across different global nodes, with upload and download speeds hovering around 165 Mbps and 170 Mbps, respectively, and latency varying significantly based on geographical distance from the server.
The Yabs performance benchmark painted a similar picture, with mixed read/write operations achieving an average of 400.67 MB/s on larger block sizes, categorizing it as “good” but not quite “excellent.” Geekbench scores for single and multi-core performance of 449 and 1511, respectively, suggest that while the server can handle standard operations, it might struggle with more intensive applications.
UnixBench scores provided a deeper dive into CPU performance, with a single copy run index score of 473.1 indicating decent capability, which scaled impressively in the multi-copy run to 2066.6. This showcases the server’s ability to harness its multicore architecture effectively, revealing a strength in handling parallel processes.
In conclusion, the CinderCloud Poland Wroclaw Cloud VPS delivers a balanced performance. While its I/O speed doesn’t break new ground, its network consistency and CPU capability make it a viable option for various tasks. Businesses looking for a server with reliable network performance and capable of efficient parallel processing might find this VPS meets their needs, albeit with some limitations in high-demand single-threaded applications.
Official Website: https://www.CinderCloud.com
Related Posts
