CinderCloud Poland Wroclaw Unlimited Transfer Cloud VPS Test and Review

Tests5~months ago~Updated LetsHosting
809 0
CinderCloud Poland Wroclaw Unlimited Transfer Cloud VPS Test and Review

Today, we’re checking out the CinderCloud Poland Wroclaw Cloud VPS Server with unlimited data transfer. This server runs on a powerful Intel Xeon E312xx (Sandy Bridge, IBRS update) Processor and comes packed with 4 CPU cores, 4 GB of RAM, 80 GB of NVMe SSD storage, a 150 Mbps internet connection, and 1 IPv4 address.

Our review covers a bunch of tests to see how well it performs. We run the Basic Benchmark, Yabs, and Unix Benchmark to see how they handle essential tasks. Use the Global Node Test to check its network strength and measure how quickly it responds to the Global Ping Test.

For checking if we can stream media easily, there’s the Media Unlock Test. We’re also looking at how well it connects through CloudFlare and checking its web performance with tools like PageSpeed Insights and GTmetrix.

About CinderCloud

CinderCloud.com is a remarkable IT cloud infrastructure hosting service. It provides a platform for users to launch and configure Virtual Private Servers (VPS) and deploy their IT infrastructure.

Cloud hosting, like the one provided by CinderCloud, offers a significant advantage over traditional hosting methods. Unlike non-cloud packages, where you buy a defined block of resources on a single server, cloud hosting spreads these resources across multiple devices. This means your website is not tied to the fate of a single server, providing increased reliability and resilience.

If a server suffers a hardware problem, has a hard drive failure, or is hacked, websites hosted on traditional servers will go offline along with the server. However, your website remains online with cloud hosting as the resources are spread across multiple devices.

Additionally, upgrading resources on a cloud hosting platform is much easier than traditional hosting. It requires a few clicks from the hosting provider instead of shutting down a single server to install new hardware. This makes cloud hosting a leading service in the web hosting industry.

Official Website: https://www.CinderCloud.com

BasicBench: Server Profile, I/O Speed, Upload and Download Speed

 CPU Model          : Intel Xeon E312xx (Sandy Bridge, IBRS update)
 CPU Cores          : 4 @ 2593.748 MHz
 CPU Cache          : 16384 KB
 AES-NI             : ✓ Enabled
 VM-x/AMD-V         : ✗ Disabled
 Total Disk         : 78.7 GB (1.5 GB Used)
 Total Mem          : 3.8 GB (223.6 MB Used)
 System uptime      : 0 days, 17 hour 58 min
 Load average       : 0.11, 0.39, 0.27
 OS                 : Debian GNU/Linux 11
 Arch               : x86_64 (64 Bit)
 Kernel             : 5.10.0-10-cloud-amd64
 TCP CC             : bbr
 Virtualization     : KVM
 IPv4/IPv6          : ✓ Online / ✗ Offline
 Organization       : AS15851 Wroclaw Centre of Networking and Supercomputing
 Location           : Wrocław / PL
 Region             : Lower Silesia
----------------------------------------------------------------------
 I/O Speed(1st run) : 190 MB/s
 I/O Speed(2nd run) : 191 MB/s
 I/O Speed(3rd run) : 194 MB/s
 I/O Speed(average) : 191.7 MB/s
----------------------------------------------------------------------
 Node Name        Upload Speed      Download Speed      Latency     
 Speedtest.net    165.65 Mbps       167.39 Mbps         5.17 ms     
 Los Angeles, US  163.74 Mbps       170.08 Mbps         163.08 ms   
 Dallas, US       167.98 Mbps       160.61 Mbps         135.10 ms   
 Montreal, CA     167.56 Mbps       169.76 Mbps         106.92 ms   
 Paris, FR        166.28 Mbps       160.62 Mbps         29.81 ms    
 Amsterdam, NL    165.81 Mbps       158.95 Mbps         24.83 ms    
 Shanghai, CN     144.64 Mbps       168.19 Mbps         238.51 ms   
 Hongkong, CN     134.25 Mbps       165.94 Mbps         279.50 ms   
 Mumbai, IN       164.45 Mbps       163.98 Mbps         179.00 ms   
 Singapore, SG    136.88 Mbps       171.24 Mbps         349.24 ms   
 Tokyo, JP        150.29 Mbps       163.16 Mbps         246.50 ms   
----------------------------------------------------------------------
 Finished in        : 5 min 44 sec
 Timestamp          : 2024-02-18 00:39:45 UTC

Updated 2024.02.23: Because they have upgraded storage bandwidth on all VPS servers from 200MB/s to 300MB/s, all new VPSes from now on will have 300 MB/s as well.

 CPU Model          : Intel Xeon E312xx (Sandy Bridge, IBRS update)
 CPU Cores          : 4 @ 2593.748 MHz
 CPU Cache          : 16384 KB
 AES-NI             : ✓ Enabled
 VM-x/AMD-V         : ✗ Disabled
 Total Disk         : 78.7 GB (2.0 GB Used)
 Total Mem          : 3.8 GB (257.4 MB Used)
 System uptime      : 5 days, 9 hour 47 min
 Load average       : 0.02, 0.01, 0.00
 OS                 : Debian GNU/Linux 11
 Arch               : x86_64 (64 Bit)
 Kernel             : 5.10.0-10-cloud-amd64
 TCP CC             : bbr
 Virtualization     : KVM
 IPv4/IPv6          : ✓ Online / ✗ Offline
 Organization       : AS15851 Wroclaw Centre of Networking and Supercomputing
 Location           : Wrocław / PL
 Region             : Lower Silesia
----------------------------------------------------------------------
 I/O Speed(1st run) : 275 MB/s
 I/O Speed(2nd run) : 283 MB/s
 I/O Speed(3rd run) : 277 MB/s
 I/O Speed(average) : 278.3 MB/s
----------------------------------------------------------------------
 Finished in        : 5 min 41 sec
 Timestamp          : 2024-02-22 16:28:48 UTC

YabsBench: Disk Speed, iperf3 Network Speed, Geekbench 6 Benchmark

Basic System Information:
---------------------------------
Uptime     : 0 days, 18 hours, 5 minutes
Processor  : Intel Xeon E312xx (Sandy Bridge, IBRS update)
CPU cores  : 4 @ 2593.748 MHz
AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ❌ Disabled
RAM        : 3.8 GiB
Swap       : 0.0 KiB
Disk       : 78.7 GiB
Distro     : Debian GNU/Linux 11 (bullseye)
Kernel     : 5.10.0-10-cloud-amd64
VM Type    : KVM
IPv4/IPv6  : ✔ Online / ❌ Offline

IPv4 Network Information:
---------------------------------
ISP        : WASK
ASN        : AS15851 Wroclaw Centre of Networking and Supercomputing
Location   : Wroclaw, Lower Silesia (02)
Country    : Poland

fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50):
---------------------------------
Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
Read       | 45.13 MB/s   (11.2k) | 205.68 MB/s   (3.2k)
Write      | 45.19 MB/s   (11.2k) | 206.77 MB/s   (3.2k)
Total      | 90.32 MB/s   (22.5k) | 412.45 MB/s   (6.4k)
           |                      |                     
Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
Read       | 196.33 MB/s    (383) | 193.88 MB/s    (189)
Write      | 206.76 MB/s    (403) | 206.79 MB/s    (201)
Total      | 403.10 MB/s    (786) | 400.67 MB/s    (390)

iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
---------------------------------
Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping           
Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 163 Mbits/sec   | 159 Mbits/sec   | 32.2 ms        
Scaleway        | Paris, FR (10G)           | 163 Mbits/sec   | 159 Mbits/sec   | 28.9 ms        
NovoServe       | North Holland, NL (40G)   | 164 Mbits/sec   | 159 Mbits/sec   | 20.4 ms        
Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 155 Mbits/sec   | 154 Mbits/sec   | 105 ms         
Clouvider       | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 154 Mbits/sec   | 155 Mbits/sec   | 96.5 ms        
Clouvider       | Dallas, TX, US (10G)      | 148 Mbits/sec   | 152 Mbits/sec   | 129 ms         
Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 143 Mbits/sec   | 150 Mbits/sec   | 160 ms         

Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
---------------------------------
Test            | Value                         
                |                               
Single Core     | 449                           
Multi Core      | 1511                          
Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/4959098

YABS completed in 18 min 31 sec

Updated 2024.02.23: Because they have upgraded storage bandwidth on all VPS servers from 200MB/s to 300MB/s, all new VPSes from now on will have 300 MB/s as well.

Basic System Information:
---------------------------------
Uptime     : 5 days, 9 hours, 53 minutes
Processor  : Intel Xeon E312xx (Sandy Bridge, IBRS update)
CPU cores  : 4 @ 2593.748 MHz
AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ❌ Disabled
RAM        : 3.8 GiB
Swap       : 0.0 KiB
Disk       : 78.7 GiB
Distro     : Debian GNU/Linux 11 (bullseye)
Kernel     : 5.10.0-10-cloud-amd64
VM Type    : KVM
IPv4/IPv6  : ✔ Online / ❌ Offline

fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/sda1):
---------------------------------
Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
Read       | 50.02 MB/s   (12.5k) | 310.01 MB/s   (4.8k)
Write      | 50.10 MB/s   (12.5k) | 311.64 MB/s   (4.8k)
Total      | 100.13 MB/s  (25.0k) | 621.65 MB/s   (9.7k)
           |                      |                     
Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
Read       | 295.89 MB/s    (577) | 292.19 MB/s    (285)
Write      | 311.61 MB/s    (608) | 311.65 MB/s    (304)
Total      | 607.51 MB/s   (1.1k) | 603.84 MB/s    (589)

YABS completed in 1 min 3 sec

UnixBench: CPU Performance, A score higher is better

Benchmark Run: Sun Feb 18 2024 01:25:28 - 01:53:37
4 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables       28314396.9 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone                     3945.9 MWIPS (9.6 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput                               2341.3 lps   (29.9 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks        270337.5 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks           72166.2 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks        757711.6 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput                              394296.9 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching                  10796.0 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation                               1799.5 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                   3162.1 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                   1346.8 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead                         250215.8 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values               BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0   28314396.9   2426.3
Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0       3945.9    717.4
Execl Throughput                                 43.0       2341.3    544.5
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0     270337.5    682.7
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0      72166.2    436.0
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0     757711.6   1306.4
Pipe Throughput                               12440.0     394296.9    317.0
Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0      10796.0     27.0
Process Creation                                126.0       1799.5    142.8
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4       3162.1    745.8
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0       1346.8   2244.7
System Call Overhead                          15000.0     250215.8    166.8
                                                                   ========
System Benchmarks Index Score                                         473.1

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Sun Feb 18 2024 01:53:37 - 02:21:49
4 CPUs in system; running 4 parallel copies of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables      130697095.6 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone                    19146.9 MWIPS (9.3 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput                               9220.1 lps   (29.7 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks        427011.7 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks          133233.0 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks       1379115.0 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput                             1812942.4 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching                 403078.7 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation                              21980.2 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                  17375.8 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                   2853.0 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead                        1056668.2 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values               BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0  130697095.6  11199.4
Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0      19146.9   3481.3
Execl Throughput                                 43.0       9220.1   2144.2
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0     427011.7   1078.3
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0     133233.0    805.0
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0    1379115.0   2377.8
Pipe Throughput                               12440.0    1812942.4   1457.3
Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0     403078.7   1007.7
Process Creation                                126.0      21980.2   1744.5
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4      17375.8   4098.1
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0       2853.0   4754.9
System Call Overhead                          15000.0    1056668.2    704.4
                                                                   ========
System Benchmarks Index Score                                        2066.6

======= Script description and score comparison completed! ======= 

Looking Glass

None

Global Node Test

 ## CDN Speedtest

 CacheFly :  12.47 MiB/s |   99.76 Mbps  | ping  19.432ms
 Gdrive   :   4.59 KiB/s |    0.04 Mbps  | ping  20.220ms


 ## North America Speedtest

 Softlayer, Washington, USA :   6.20 MiB/s |   49.57 Mbps  | ping 108.830ms
 SoftLayer, San Jose, USA   :   1.46 MiB/s |   11.72 Mbps  | ping 169.759ms
 SoftLayer, Dallas, USA     :       0 B/s |      N/A       | ping error!
 Vultr, New Jersey, USA     :   6.68 MiB/s |   53.48 Mbps  | ping  96.535ms
 Vultr, Seattle, USA        :   7.86 MiB/s |   62.88 Mbps  | ping 153.388ms
 Vultr, Dallas, USA         : 398.06 KiB/s |    3.11 Mbps  | ping 135.297ms
 Vultr, Los Angeles, USA    :   6.78 MiB/s |   54.23 Mbps  | ping 167.087ms
 Ramnode, New York, USA     :   8.49 MiB/s |   67.89 Mbps  | ping  93.405ms
 Ramnode, Atlanta, USA      :   7.39 MiB/s |   59.12 Mbps  | ping 125.758ms


 ## Europe Speedtest

 Vultr, London, UK            :  17.87 MiB/s |  142.93 Mbps  | ping  32.497ms
 LeaseWeb, Frankfurt, Germany : 160.02 KiB/s |    1.25 Mbps  | ping  24.771ms
 Hetzner, Germany             :     964 B/s |      N/A       | ping  24.926ms
 Ramnode, Alblasserdam, NL    :  18.00 MiB/s |  144.01 Mbps  | ping  30.461ms
 Vultr, Amsterdam, NL         :  18.33 MiB/s |  146.66 Mbps  | ping  20.268ms
 EDIS, Stockholm, Sweden      :   1.19 KiB/s |    0.01 Mbps  | ping  39.469ms
 OVH, Roubaix, France         :   1.58 KiB/s |    0.01 Mbps  | ping  30.544ms
 Online, France               :  17.92 MiB/s |  143.34 Mbps  | ping  28.840ms
 Prometeus, Milan, Italy      :   1.78 KiB/s |    0.01 Mbps  | ping  30.259ms


 ## Exotic Speedtest

 Sydney, Australia     :   3.42 MiB/s |   27.35 Mbps  | ping 277.734ms
 Lagoon, New Caledonia :     198 B/s |      N/A       | ping 327.559ms
 Hosteasy, Moldova     :  15.90 MiB/s |  127.18 Mbps  | ping  57.843ms
 Prima, Argentina      : 257.64 KiB/s |    2.01 Mbps  | ping error!


 ## Asia Speedtest

 SoftLayer, Singapore : 820.31 KiB/s |    6.41 Mbps  | ping 195.116ms
 Linode, Tokyo, Japan :   2.44 MiB/s |   19.53 Mbps  | ping 269.394ms
 Linode, Singapore    :   2.12 MiB/s |   16.93 Mbps  | ping 334.372ms
 Vultr, Tokyo, Japan  :   5.01 MiB/s |   40.09 Mbps  | ping 247.570ms


 Benchmark finished in 143 seconds

Global Latency Test

CinderCloud Poland Wroclaw Unlimited Transfer Cloud VPS Test and Review CinderCloud Poland Wroclaw Unlimited Transfer Cloud VPS Test and Review

Query: ping 212.127.73.213, interval: 5s, dense mode: no

Probing 212.127.73.213 – RIPENCC /19 AS15851 WASK-COM – Poland [business]

Media Unlock Test

 ** Test Starts At: Sun Feb 18 01:10:11 UTC 2024

 ** Checking Results Under IPv4 
--------------------------------
 ** Your Network Provider: Wroclaw Centre of Networking and Supercomputing (212.127.*.*) 

============[ Multination ]============
 Dazn:                                  Yes (Region: PL)
 HotStar:                               No
 Disney+:                               Yes (Region: PL)
 Netflix:                               Yes (Region: PL)
 YouTube Premium:                       Yes (Region: PL)
 Amazon Prime Video:                    Yes (Region: PL)
 TVBAnywhere+:                          Yes
 iQyi Oversea Region:                   INTL
 Viu.com:                               No
 YouTube CDN:                           PIONIER in Poznan 
 Spotify Registration:                  No
 Steam Currency:                        PLN
 ChatGPT:                               Yes
 Bing Region:                           PL
 Instagram Licensed Audio:              Yes
=======================================
No IPv6 Connectivity Found, Abort IPv6 Testing...

Testing Done!

CloudFlare Internet Test

CinderCloud Poland Wroclaw Unlimited Transfer Cloud VPS Test and Review

PageSpeed Insights

CinderCloud Poland Wroclaw Unlimited Transfer Cloud VPS Test and Review

GTmetrix Performance

CinderCloud Poland Wroclaw Unlimited Transfer Cloud VPS Test and Review

Admin Control Panel

CinderCloud Poland Wroclaw Unlimited Transfer Cloud VPS Test and Review

The Admin Control Panel of CinderCloud.com is a crucial feature that enhances the user experience. It is a web-based interface that allows administrators and users to manage various server functionalities.

The control panel is designed to be user-friendly, catering to tech-savvy users and beginners. It offers many website management features like settings, backup, staging, etc. All these tasks can be performed with a simple click, making it a convenient tool for users.

One of the key advantages of CinderCloud’s Admin Control Panel is its flexibility. It allows users to manage multiple servers from a single place. This means that users can have multiple servers on a single machine or spread out across many and manage them all from one place.

Server Pricing

CinderCloud Poland Wroclaw Unlimited Transfer Cloud VPS Test and Review

CinderCloud.com provides clear and transparent pricing. There are no hidden fees, and users are informed about all charges upfront. This pricing transparency helps users plan their expenses and avoid any unexpected costs.

Official Website: https://www.CinderCloud.com

Payments

CinderCloud.com offers a variety of payment methods to cater to the diverse needs of its users.

The platform is designed to provide a seamless payment experience, making it easy for users to pay for their services. It supports multiple payment gateways, allowing users to choose the one that best suits them. This flexibility in payment methods makes it convenient for users across different regions and with different banking preferences.

Moreover, CinderCloud.com ensures the security of its users’ financial information. It uses secure encryption methods to protect sensitive data during transactions. This commitment to security gives users peace of mind when making payments on the platform.

Coupon

They offer 50% discount code for all VPS plans: 50FREENOW

Customer Support

The customer support team at CinderCloud.com is equipped to handle a wide range of issues. Whether a user is facing a technical glitch, needs help with server management, or has a query about their service, the support team is ready to assist.

One of the standout features of CinderCloud.com’s customer support is its proactive approach. If a failure is reported by the customer or detected by their monitoring software, they immediately rectify it and restore the system’s proper operation. This proactive approach ensures minimal downtime and disruption to the user’s operations.

Moreover, CinderCloud.com’s customer support is not limited to just resolving issues. They also specialize in designing Proxmox-based public and private cloud platforms tailored to their customers’ business needs. They help their customers resolve any Proxmox-related issues, regardless of the operating system or deployment method on which the customer’s cloud is based.

Conclusion

Starting with the I/O performance, the server averaged 278.3 MB/s across three runs, positioning it to the “good” threshold for speed. On the other hand, network performance showed consistency across different global nodes, with upload and download speeds hovering around 165 Mbps and 170 Mbps, respectively, and latency varying significantly based on geographical distance from the server.

The Yabs performance benchmark painted a similar picture, with mixed read/write operations achieving an average of 400.67 MB/s on larger block sizes, categorizing it as “good” but not quite “excellent.” Geekbench scores for single and multi-core performance of 449 and 1511, respectively, suggest that while the server can handle standard operations, it might struggle with more intensive applications.

UnixBench scores provided a deeper dive into CPU performance, with a single copy run index score of 473.1 indicating decent capability, which scaled impressively in the multi-copy run to 2066.6. This showcases the server’s ability to harness its multicore architecture effectively, revealing a strength in handling parallel processes.

In conclusion, the CinderCloud Poland Wroclaw Cloud VPS delivers a balanced performance. While its I/O speed doesn’t break new ground, its network consistency and CPU capability make it a viable option for various tasks. Businesses looking for a server with reliable network performance and capable of efficient parallel processing might find this VPS meets their needs, albeit with some limitations in high-demand single-threaded applications.

Official Website: https://www.CinderCloud.com

Related Posts