KhanWebHost United States Texas High-Performance KVM VPS Test and Review

Tests5~months ago~Published LetsHosting
887 0
KhanWebHost United States Texas High-Performance KVM VPS Test and Review

Today, we’re closely examining the KhanWebHost Texas VPS server. It runs on a powerful Intel Xeon E5-2699 v4 processor, boasting a configuration that includes 4 CPU cores, 6GB of RAM, 50GB of SSD storage, a 500 Mbps internet port, 1TB of bandwidth, and both IPv4 and IPv6 addresses.

We put this server through its paces with a series of tests. First, we ran standard benchmarks like Basic Benchmark, Yabs, and Unix Benchmark to measure its core performance. Then, we checked its network capabilities globally with the Global Node Test and gauged its response times with the Global Ping Test.

We used the Media Unlock Test for media streaming to see what content it could access. We evaluated its connection quality with the CloudFlare Internet Test. Lastly, website speeds were tested with tools like PageSpeed Insights and GTmetrix Performance.

About KhanWebHost

KhanWebHost is a web hosting service provider serving its customers for many years. It offers various hosting options to meet the needs of virtually any site, making it an exceptional hosting company to consider.

KhanWebHost’s KVM VPS (Kernel-based Virtual Machine Virtual Private Server) is a popular choice among users for its performance and affordability.

KVM VPS is a type of hosting that provides users with dedicated resources on a server, ensuring that their websites or applications run smoothly and efficiently. This is particularly beneficial for websites with high-traffic or resource-intensive applications.

One of the key features of KhanWebHost’s KVM VPS is its impressive speed and quality protection. Users have praised the service for its reliability and performance. This is crucial for maintaining the accessibility and functionality of a website.

Another standout feature of KhanWebHost’s KVM VPS is its affordability. Despite offering high-quality services, KhanWebHost keeps its prices competitive, making it an excellent choice for users looking for reliable hosting without breaking the bank.

Official Website: https://www.KhanWebHost.com

BasicBench: Server Profile, I/O Speed, Upload and Download Speed

 CPU Model          : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2699 v4 @ 2.20GHz
 CPU Cores          : 4 @ 2199.996 MHz
 CPU Cache          : 56320 KB
 AES-NI             : ✓ Enabled
 VM-x/AMD-V         : ✓ Enabled
 Total Disk         : 49.1 GB (2.3 GB Used)
 Total Mem          : 7.6 GB (243.2 MB Used)
 Total Swap         : 1024.0 MB (0 Used)
 System uptime      : 0 days, 22 hour 27 min
 Load average       : 0.09, 0.05, 0.92
 OS                 : Debian GNU/Linux 11
 Arch               : x86_64 (64 Bit)
 Kernel             : 5.10.0-23-amd64
 TCP CC             : bbr
 Virtualization     : KVM
 IPv4/IPv6          : ✓ Online / ✓ Online
 Organization       : AS918 DFDB LLC
 Location           : Spring / US
 Region             : Texas
----------------------------------------------------------------------
 I/O Speed(1st run) : 250 MB/s
 I/O Speed(2nd run) : 247 MB/s
 I/O Speed(3rd run) : 258 MB/s
 I/O Speed(average) : 251.7 MB/s
----------------------------------------------------------------------
 Node Name        Upload Speed      Download Speed      Latency     
 Speedtest.net    290.58 Mbps       420.58 Mbps         1.04 ms     
 Los Angeles, US  292.50 Mbps       365.65 Mbps         38.54 ms    
 Dallas, US       290.63 Mbps       150.36 Mbps         6.98 ms     
 Montreal, CA     292.99 Mbps       302.47 Mbps         53.47 ms    
 Paris, FR        288.08 Mbps       433.63 Mbps         114.60 ms   
 Amsterdam, NL    269.58 Mbps       267.85 Mbps         120.02 ms   
 Shanghai, CN     160.82 Mbps       7.78 Mbps           208.11 ms   
 Chongqing, CN    2.40 Mbps         0.25 Mbps           232.26 ms   
 Mumbai, IN       213.14 Mbps       405.30 Mbps         252.09 ms   
 Singapore, SG    232.79 Mbps       449.74 Mbps         208.64 ms   
 Tokyo, JP        205.60 Mbps       269.97 Mbps         136.30 ms   
----------------------------------------------------------------------
 Finished in        : 5 min 35 sec
 Timestamp          : 2024-02-18 00:30:21 EST

YabsBench: Disk Speed, iperf3 Network Speed, Geekbench 6 Benchmark

Basic System Information:
---------------------------------
Uptime     : 0 days, 22 hours, 35 minutes
Processor  : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2699 v4 @ 2.20GHz
CPU cores  : 4 @ 2199.996 MHz
AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
RAM        : 7.6 GiB
Swap       : 1024.0 MiB
Disk       : 48.1 GiB
Distro     : Debian GNU/Linux 11 (bullseye)
Kernel     : 5.10.0-23-amd64
VM Type    : KVM
IPv4/IPv6  : ✔ Online / ✔ Online

IPv6 Network Information:
---------------------------------
ISP        : Dfdb LLC
ASN        : AS918 DFDB LLC
Host       : KhanWebHost LTD
Location   : Spring, Texas (TX)
Country    : United States

fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50):
---------------------------------
Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
Read       | 29.27 MB/s    (7.3k) | 146.68 MB/s   (2.2k)
Write      | 29.28 MB/s    (7.3k) | 147.46 MB/s   (2.3k)
Total      | 58.56 MB/s   (14.6k) | 294.15 MB/s   (4.5k)
           |                      |                     
Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
Read       | 135.32 MB/s    (264) | 288.78 MB/s    (282)
Write      | 142.51 MB/s    (278) | 308.01 MB/s    (300)
Total      | 277.84 MB/s    (542) | 596.79 MB/s    (582)

iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
---------------------------------
Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping           
Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 269 Mbits/sec   | 154 Mbits/sec   | 107 ms         
Scaleway        | Paris, FR (10G)           | 257 Mbits/sec   | 381 Mbits/sec   | 108 ms         
NovoServe       | North Holland, NL (40G)   | busy            | 374 Mbits/sec   | 116 ms         
Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 246 Mbits/sec   | 197 Mbits/sec   | 210 ms         
Clouvider       | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 282 Mbits/sec   | 281 Mbits/sec   | 35.6 ms        
Clouvider       | Dallas, TX, US (10G)      | 288 Mbits/sec   | 400 Mbits/sec   | 15.7 ms        
Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 281 Mbits/sec   | 218 Mbits/sec   | 37.8 ms        

iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv6):
---------------------------------
Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping           
Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 267 Mbits/sec   | 130 Mbits/sec   | 106 ms         
Scaleway        | Paris, FR (10G)           | 262 Mbits/sec   | 372 Mbits/sec   | 108 ms         
NovoServe       | North Holland, NL (40G)   | 264 Mbits/sec   | 375 Mbits/sec   | 116 ms         
Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 237 Mbits/sec   | 180 Mbits/sec   | 204 ms         
Clouvider       | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 282 Mbits/sec   | 271 Mbits/sec   | 35.5 ms        
Clouvider       | Dallas, TX, US (10G)      | 287 Mbits/sec   | 361 Mbits/sec   | 8.09 ms        
Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 280 Mbits/sec   | 202 Mbits/sec   | 37.9 ms        

Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
---------------------------------
Test            | Value                         
                |                               
Single Core     | 565                           
Multi Core      | 1860                          
Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/4961534

YABS completed in 19 min 42 sec

UnixBench: CPU Performance, A score higher is better

Benchmark Run: Sat Feb 17 2024 22:54:10 - 23:22:17
4 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables       23229835.4 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone                     4767.7 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput                               1923.8 lps   (29.7 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks        266499.3 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks           80212.1 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks        765929.6 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput                              490112.2 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching                  51440.9 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation                               4029.1 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                   6329.9 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                   1774.5 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead                         286408.6 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values               BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0   23229835.4   1990.6
Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0       4767.7    866.9
Execl Throughput                                 43.0       1923.8    447.4
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0     266499.3    673.0
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0      80212.1    484.7
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0     765929.6   1320.6
Pipe Throughput                               12440.0     490112.2    394.0
Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0      51440.9    128.6
Process Creation                                126.0       4029.1    319.8
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4       6329.9   1492.9
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0       1774.5   2957.5
System Call Overhead                          15000.0     286408.6    190.9
                                                                   ========
System Benchmarks Index Score                                         637.9

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Sat Feb 17 2024 23:22:17 - 23:50:32
4 CPUs in system; running 4 parallel copies of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables       88813860.6 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone                    18817.6 MWIPS (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput                               6169.7 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks        382612.3 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks          128017.3 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks       1398950.4 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput                             1844931.1 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching                 313230.4 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation                              13467.1 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                  13254.6 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                   1812.8 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead                         997454.8 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values               BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0   88813860.6   7610.4
Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0      18817.6   3421.4
Execl Throughput                                 43.0       6169.7   1434.8
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0     382612.3    966.2
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0     128017.3    773.5
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0    1398950.4   2412.0
Pipe Throughput                               12440.0    1844931.1   1483.1
Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0     313230.4    783.1
Process Creation                                126.0      13467.1   1068.8
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4      13254.6   3126.1
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0       1812.8   3021.4
System Call Overhead                          15000.0     997454.8    665.0
                                                                   ========
System Benchmarks Index Score                                        1685.3

======= Script description and score comparison completed! ======= 

Looking Glass

Test IPv4: 64.112.124.13

Test IPv6: 2602:fbdf::2d7:fd78

Download Files: 10MB 100MB 1000MB

Global Node Test

 ## CDN Speedtest

 CacheFly :  46.27 MiB/s |  370.20 Mbps  | ping   6.657ms
 Gdrive   :   7.85 KiB/s |    0.06 Mbps  | ping   7.810ms


 ## North America Speedtest

 Softlayer, Washington, USA :  30.01 MiB/s |  240.06 Mbps  | ping  35.575ms
 SoftLayer, San Jose, USA   :  26.15 MiB/s |  209.24 Mbps  | ping  48.421ms
 SoftLayer, Dallas, USA     :       0 B/s |      N/A       | ping error!
 Vultr, New Jersey, USA     :  17.20 MiB/s |  137.60 Mbps  | ping  35.309ms
 Vultr, Seattle, USA        :  30.85 MiB/s |  246.84 Mbps  | ping  64.496ms
 Vultr, Dallas, USA         :  42.81 MiB/s |  342.47 Mbps  | ping   7.565ms
 Vultr, Los Angeles, USA    :       0 B/s |      N/A       | ping  37.879ms
 Ramnode, New York, USA     :  33.19 MiB/s |  265.55 Mbps  | ping  34.854ms
 Ramnode, Atlanta, USA      :  41.83 MiB/s |  334.62 Mbps  | ping  18.843ms


 ## Europe Speedtest

 Vultr, London, UK            :  18.62 MiB/s |  148.96 Mbps  | ping 108.513ms
 LeaseWeb, Frankfurt, Germany :  21.44 KiB/s |    0.17 Mbps  | ping 116.676ms
 Hetzner, Germany             :     289 B/s |      N/A       | ping 124.030ms
 Ramnode, Alblasserdam, NL    :  19.18 MiB/s |  153.42 Mbps  | ping 111.537ms
 Vultr, Amsterdam, NL         :  15.86 MiB/s |  126.88 Mbps  | ping 116.867ms
 EDIS, Stockholm, Sweden      :     500 B/s |      N/A       | ping 135.243ms
 OVH, Roubaix, France         :     347 B/s |      N/A       | ping 113.744ms
 Online, France               :  19.02 MiB/s |  152.12 Mbps  | ping 107.657ms
 Prometeus, Milan, Italy      :     358 B/s |      N/A       | ping 130.589ms


 ## Exotic Speedtest

 Sydney, Australia     :   4.46 MiB/s |   35.67 Mbps  | ping 257.336ms
 Lagoon, New Caledonia :     368 B/s |      N/A       | ping 263.673ms
 Hosteasy, Moldova     :   6.24 MiB/s |   49.90 Mbps  | ping 150.516ms
 Prima, Argentina      :   1.14 MiB/s |    9.11 Mbps  | ping error!


 ## Asia Speedtest

 SoftLayer, Singapore : 356.35 KiB/s |    2.78 Mbps  | ping 231.747ms
 Linode, Tokyo, Japan : 114.58 KiB/s |    0.90 Mbps  | ping 140.441ms
 Linode, Singapore    :   7.85 MiB/s |   62.79 Mbps  | ping 203.572ms
 Vultr, Tokyo, Japan  :  12.13 MiB/s |   97.04 Mbps  | ping 145.089ms


 Benchmark finished in 150 seconds

Global Latency Test

KhanWebHost United States Texas High-Performance KVM VPS Test and Review KhanWebHost United States Texas High-Performance KVM VPS Test and Review

Query: ping 64.112.124.99, interval: 5s, dense mode: no

Probing 64.112.124.99 – ARIN /24 AS918 DFDB-NET – United States

Media Unlock Test

 ** Test Starts At: Sun 18 Feb 2024 01:24:08 AM EST

 ** Checking Results Under IPv4 
--------------------------------
 ** Your Network Provider: KhanWebHost (64.112.*.*) 

============[ Multination ]============
 Dazn:                                  Yes (Region: US)
 HotStar:                               No
 Disney+:                               Yes (Region: US)
 Netflix:                               Yes (Region: US)
 YouTube Premium:                       Yes
 Amazon Prime Video:                    Yes (Region: US)
 TVBAnywhere+:                          Yes
 iQyi Oversea Region:                   US
 Viu.com:                               No
 YouTube CDN:                           Dallas, TX 
 Netflix Preferred CDN:                 Dallas, TX  
 Spotify Registration:                  No
 Steam Currency:                        USD
 ChatGPT:                               Yes
 Bing Region:                           US
 Instagram Licensed Audio:              Yes
=======================================


 ** Checking Results Under IPv6 
--------------------------------
 ** Your Network Provider:  (:::*:*) 

============[ Multination ]============
 Dazn:                                  Failed (Network Connection)
 HotStar:                               Yes (Region: US)
 Disney+:                               Available For [Disney+ PK] Soon
 Netflix:                               Yes (Region: US)
 YouTube Premium:                       Yes
 Amazon Prime Video:                    Unsupported
 TVBAnywhere+:                          Failed (Network Connection)
 iQyi Oversea Region:                   Failed
 Viu.com:                               Failed
 YouTube CDN:                           Dallas, TX 
 Netflix Preferred CDN:                 San Jose, CA  
 Spotify Registration:                  No
 Steam Currency:                        Failed (Network Connection)
 ChatGPT:                               Failed
 Bing Region:                           US
 Instagram Licensed Audio:              No
=======================================
Testing Done! 

CloudFlare Internet Test

KhanWebHost United States Texas High-Performance KVM VPS Test and Review

PageSpeed Insights

KhanWebHost United States Texas High-Performance KVM VPS Test and Review

GTmetrix Performance

KhanWebHost United States Texas High-Performance KVM VPS Test and Review

Admin Control Panel

KhanWebHost United States Texas High-Performance KVM VPS Test and Review

KhanWebHost’s KVM VPS also comes with a user-friendly dashboard. This allows users to easily manage their hosting environment, including system reinstallation and viewing logs and graphs. This ease of use is a significant advantage for beginners and experienced users.

Server Pricing

KhanWebHost United States Texas High-Performance KVM VPS Test and Review

Official Website: https://www.KhanWebHost.com

Payments

KhanWebHost offers a variety of payment options to cater to the diverse needs of its customers. They accept payments through Credit / Debit / Prepaid Cards, PayPal, and Wire Transfer. This flexibility in payment methods makes it convenient for customers from different regions and with different preferences to use their services.

Transparency in billing is one of the key features of KhanWebHost. They provide clear and detailed invoices, ensuring customers understand what they are paying for. Users appreciate this transparency, which helps avoid confusion or misunderstandings regarding the charges.

Coupon

The merchant did not provide

Customer Support

KhanWebHost’s tech support is another highlight. The support team is knowledgeable and responsive, ensuring a smooth user experience. This level of support can be crucial, especially for users who may not have extensive technical knowledge. Many users have praised the quick response times and friendly support.

Conclusion

Our testing revealed an average I/O speed of approximately 251.7 MB/s, positioning it in the “good” performance bracket, although it’s on the cusp of what would be considered “excellent.” Network assessments through various global locations showed varying upload and download speeds, notable for their high throughput in most regions except for significantly lower speeds in China, likely due to the greater internet restrictions. The Yabs performance benchmarks further underscored the server’s robust disk and read/write capabilities with mixed operations reaching up to nearly 600 MB/s, which is impressive.

Geekbench 6 offered insights into the CPU’s prowess, recording a single-core score of 565 and a multi-core score of 1860. These results firmly plant the CPU’s performance in the “good” category, demonstrating it has ample power for most tasks. The UnixBench scores further echoed the CPU’s efficiency and multitasking strength, particularly when running multiple tests in parallel, showcasing a system that performs well under pressure.

In conclusion, the KhanWebHost Texas VPS server is a robust hosting solution, ideal for businesses looking for a balanced blend of speed, reliability, and network performance. Its solid I/O speed, excellent network capabilities, and strong CPU performance make it a compelling choice for many web hosting needs. Whether for a high-traffic website, an e-commerce platform, or an online application, this server is up to the challenge, offering impressive performance that should satisfy most hosting requirements.

Official Website: https://www.KhanWebHost.com

Related Posts