Kuroit United States Tampa Powerful KVM VPS Server Test and Review

Tests1~months ago~Published LetsHosting
204 0
Kuroit United States Tampa Powerful KVM VPS Server Test and Review

We recently put the Kuroit United States Tampa Powerful KVM VPS Server through a series of thorough tests to evaluate its performance across various metrics. The server utilizes an Intel Xeon CPU E5-2680 v3 @ 2.50GHz, paired with 2 CPU cores, 4 GB RAM, and 50 GB SSD storage, optimizing for robust handling of general and intensive tasks.

About Kuroit

Kuroit offers a wide range of services to cater to every need for cloud solutions. From starting with a website to computing dedicated servers for demanding backend applications, Kuroit has covered you. They offer web hosting, VPS, dedicated, and storage servers. These services are designed to provide solid, reliable, and high-performance solutions for businesses of all sizes.

Transitioning to their web hosting service, it’s perfect for individuals and businesses looking to start a website. Kuroit’s cPanel Web Hosting comes with one-click installs, daily backups, and 24/7 support. This means you can set up your website quickly and easily, and if you ever run into any issues, help is just a call away.

Next, let’s talk about their VPS servers. Powerful servers and KVM virtualization power these secure, reliable hosting solutions. What’s more, they’re located in more than 10 locations worldwide. This means you can choose a server location closest to your target audience, ensuring fast load times and a smooth user experience.

Moving on to their dedicated servers, these powerful, high-performance bare metal servers are designed for high computing needs. These servers are the perfect solution if your business requires a lot of computing power. They’re also available in a wide range of server locations worldwide.

Kuroit also offers servers with up to 20TB of enterprise HDD storage capacity. These servers come with high-capacity connectivity worldwide for quick backups. This means you can store large amounts of data and access it quickly and easily anywhere in the world.

Official Website: https://www.Kuroit.com

BasicBench: Server Profile, I/O Speed, Upload and Download Speed

 CPU Model          : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2680 v3 @ 2.50GHz
 CPU Cores          : 2 @ 2497.106 MHz
 CPU Cache          : 30720 KB
 AES-NI             : ✓ Enabled
 VM-x/AMD-V         : ✓ Enabled
 Total Disk         : 50.0 GB (2.4 GB Used)
 Total Mem          : 3.8 GB (331.7 MB Used)
 System uptime      : 0 days, 1 hour 40 min
 Load average       : 0.08, 0.17, 0.11
 OS                 : Debian GNU/Linux 11
 Arch               : x86_64 (64 Bit)
 Kernel             : 5.10.0-20-amd64
 TCP CC             : bbr
 Virtualization     : KVM
 IPv4/IPv6          : ✓ Online / ✓ Online
 Organization       : AS398395 Dot-Tech LLC
 Location           : Tampa / US
 Region             : Florida
----------------------------------------------------------------------
 I/O Speed(1st run) : 247 MB/s
 I/O Speed(2nd run) : 272 MB/s
 I/O Speed(3rd run) : 228 MB/s
 I/O Speed(average) : 249.0 MB/s
----------------------------------------------------------------------
 Node Name        Upload Speed      Download Speed      Latency     
 Speedtest.net    706.45 Mbps       8.96 Mbps           1.80 ms     
 Los Angeles, US  848.73 Mbps       550.78 Mbps         59.69 ms    
 Dallas, US       808.75 Mbps       606.92 Mbps         29.43 ms    
 Montreal, CA     809.31 Mbps       317.31 Mbps         53.52 ms    
 Amsterdam, NL    611.05 Mbps       533.94 Mbps         116.71 ms   
 Shanghai, CN     373.35 Mbps       150.23 Mbps         227.81 ms   
 Hongkong, CN     5.13 Mbps         0.17 Mbps           206.92 ms   
 Mumbai, IN       295.98 Mbps       497.72 Mbps         269.86 ms   
 Singapore, SG    75.36 Mbps        191.61 Mbps         234.94 ms   
 Tokyo, JP        469.96 Mbps       557.13 Mbps         168.14 ms   
----------------------------------------------------------------------
 Finished in        : 5 min 35 sec
 Timestamp          : 2024-04-15 03:29:28 BST

YabsBench: Disk Speed, iperf3 Network Speed, Geekbench 6 Benchmark

Basic System Information:
---------------------------------
Uptime     : 0 days, 1 hours, 51 minutes
Processor  : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2680 v3 @ 2.50GHz
CPU cores  : 2 @ 2497.106 MHz
AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
RAM        : 3.8 GiB
Swap       : 0.0 KiB
Disk       : 50.0 GiB
Distro     : Debian GNU/Linux 11 (bullseye)
Kernel     : 5.10.0-20-amd64
VM Type    : KVM
IPv4/IPv6  : ✔ Online / ✔ Online

IPv6 Network Information:
---------------------------------
ISP        : Dot-Tech LLC
ASN        : AS398395 Dot-Tech LLC
Host       : Dot-Tech LLC Tampa
Location   : Tampa, Florida (FL)
Country    : United States

fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50):
---------------------------------
Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
Read       | 58.34 MB/s   (14.5k) | 838.67 MB/s  (13.1k)
Write      | 58.45 MB/s   (14.6k) | 843.08 MB/s  (13.1k)
Total      | 116.79 MB/s  (29.1k) | 1.68 GB/s    (26.2k)
           |                      |                     
Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
Read       | 313.85 MB/s    (612) | 1.07 GB/s     (1.0k)
Write      | 330.53 MB/s    (645) | 1.14 GB/s     (1.1k)
Total      | 644.38 MB/s   (1.2k) | 2.22 GB/s     (2.1k)

iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
---------------------------------
Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping           
Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 725 Mbits/sec   | 350 Mbits/sec   | 99.6 ms        
Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (10G)       | 702 Mbits/sec   | 557 Mbits/sec   | 115 ms         
Telia           | Helsinki, FI (10G)        | 719 Mbits/sec   | 378 Mbits/sec   | 139 ms         
Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 587 Mbits/sec   | 339 Mbits/sec   | 206 ms         
Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 513 Mbits/sec   | 384 Mbits/sec   | 225 ms         
Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 776 Mbits/sec   | 499 Mbits/sec   | 67.4 ms        
Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 745 Mbits/sec   | 644 Mbits/sec   | 38.8 ms        
Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 513 Mbits/sec   | 243 Mbits/sec   | 143 ms         

iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv6):
---------------------------------
Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping           
Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 765 Mbits/sec   | 395 Mbits/sec   | 99.8 ms        
Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (10G)       | 684 Mbits/sec   | 541 Mbits/sec   | 115 ms         
Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 443 Mbits/sec   | 223 Mbits/sec   | 206 ms         
Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 503 Mbits/sec   | 324 Mbits/sec   | 225 ms         
Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 742 Mbits/sec   | 460 Mbits/sec   | 67.2 ms        
Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 723 Mbits/sec   | 639 Mbits/sec   | 38.7 ms        
Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 638 Mbits/sec   | 327 Mbits/sec   | 148 ms         

Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
---------------------------------
Test            | Value                         
                |                               
Single Core     | 667                           
Multi Core      | 1077                          
Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/5724827

YABS completed in 21 min 21 sec

UnixBench: CPU Performance, A Score Higher is Better

Benchmark Run: Mon Apr 15 2024 04:01:39 - 04:29:44
2 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables       28252726.0 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone                     4753.7 MWIPS (9.3 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput                               2085.7 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks        386470.8 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks          109308.8 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks       1063546.8 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput                              613480.5 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching                  97126.1 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation                               2320.8 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                   3348.0 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                    801.8 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead                         345804.7 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values               BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0   28252726.0   2421.0
Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0       4753.7    864.3
Execl Throughput                                 43.0       2085.7    485.0
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0     386470.8    975.9
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0     109308.8    660.5
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0    1063546.8   1833.7
Pipe Throughput                               12440.0     613480.5    493.2
Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0      97126.1    242.8
Process Creation                                126.0       2320.8    184.2
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4       3348.0    789.6
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0        801.8   1336.4
System Call Overhead                          15000.0     345804.7    230.5
                                                                   ========
System Benchmarks Index Score                                         656.7

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Mon Apr 15 2024 04:29:44 - 04:57:54
2 CPUs in system; running 2 parallel copies of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables       54975099.1 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone                     9600.8 MWIPS (9.4 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput                               4178.8 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks        653415.9 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks          171838.8 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks       1838191.4 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput                             1191376.7 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching                 223927.3 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation                               9178.4 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                   6492.2 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                   1157.4 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead                         662725.9 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values               BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0   54975099.1   4710.8
Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0       9600.8   1745.6
Execl Throughput                                 43.0       4178.8    971.8
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0     653415.9   1650.0
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0     171838.8   1038.3
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0    1838191.4   3169.3
Pipe Throughput                               12440.0    1191376.7    957.7
Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0     223927.3    559.8
Process Creation                                126.0       9178.4    728.4
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4       6492.2   1531.2
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0       1157.4   1929.1
System Call Overhead                          15000.0     662725.9    441.8
                                                                   ========
System Benchmarks Index Score                                        1294.4

======= Script description and score comparison completed! ======= 

Looking Glass

Test IPv4: 45.67.87.2

Test IPv6: 2602:ffc5:40a:1::a

Download Files: 10MB 100MB 1000MB

Global Node Test

 ## CDN Speedtest

 CacheFly :  71.89 MiB/s |  575.13 Mbps  | ping   7.128ms
 Gdrive   :   6.40 KiB/s |    0.05 Mbps  | ping  14.112ms


 ## North America Speedtest

 Softlayer, Washington, USA :  25.04 MiB/s |  200.28 Mbps  | ping  36.534ms
 SoftLayer, San Jose, USA   :       0 B/s |      N/A       | ping error!
 SoftLayer, Dallas, USA     :       0 B/s |      N/A       | ping error!
 Vultr, New Jersey, USA     :   3.88 MiB/s |   31.05 Mbps  | ping  42.934ms
 Vultr, Seattle, USA        :  26.46 MiB/s |  211.64 Mbps  | ping  86.410ms
 Vultr, Dallas, USA         :  60.94 MiB/s |  487.51 Mbps  | ping  31.696ms
 Vultr, Los Angeles, USA    :  32.72 MiB/s |  261.78 Mbps  | ping  61.977ms
 Ramnode, New York, USA     :  60.17 MiB/s |  481.35 Mbps  | ping  34.546ms
 Ramnode, Atlanta, USA      :  60.47 MiB/s |  483.79 Mbps  | ping  20.517ms


 ## Europe Speedtest

 Vultr, London, UK            : 487.17 KiB/s |    3.81 Mbps  | ping 111.040ms
 LeaseWeb, Frankfurt, Germany :  41.47 KiB/s |    0.32 Mbps  | ping 111.508ms
 Hetzner, Germany             :     267 B/s |      N/A       | ping 121.726ms
 Ramnode, Alblasserdam, NL    :  13.79 MiB/s |  110.34 Mbps  | ping 114.975ms
 Vultr, Amsterdam, NL         :  16.78 MiB/s |  134.27 Mbps  | ping 117.955ms
 EDIS, Stockholm, Sweden      :     469 B/s |      N/A       | ping 121.314ms
 OVH, Roubaix, France         :     452 B/s |      N/A       | ping 119.017ms
 Online, France               :  19.12 MiB/s |  152.92 Mbps  | ping 110.214ms
 Prometeus, Milan, Italy      :     379 B/s |      N/A       | ping 114.450ms


 ## Exotic Speedtest

 Sydney, Australia     :   4.58 MiB/s |   36.60 Mbps  | ping 249.354ms
 Lagoon, New Caledonia :     251 B/s |      N/A       | ping 255.182ms
 Hosteasy, Moldova     :  11.40 MiB/s |   91.18 Mbps  | ping 142.837ms
 Prima, Argentina      :   1.08 MiB/s |    8.65 Mbps  | ping error!


 ## Asia Speedtest

 SoftLayer, Singapore : 171.13 KiB/s |    1.34 Mbps  | ping 245.833ms
 Linode, Tokyo, Japan :   5.87 MiB/s |   46.93 Mbps  | ping 164.852ms
 Linode, Singapore    :   3.09 MiB/s |   24.72 Mbps  | ping 231.426ms
 Vultr, Tokyo, Japan  :  10.37 MiB/s |   82.92 Mbps  | ping 170.641ms


 Benchmark finished in 124 seconds

Global Latency Test

Kuroit United States Tampa Powerful KVM VPS Server Test and Review Kuroit United States Tampa Powerful KVM VPS Server Test and Review

Query: ping 45.134.110.6, interval: 5s, dense mode: no

Probing 45.134.110.6 – RIPENCC /24 AS398395 DOT-TECH-LLC – United States, Florida, Tampa

Media Unlock Test

 ** Test Starts At: Mon 15 Apr 2024 03:16:07 AM BST

 ** Checking Results Under IPv4 
--------------------------------
 ** Your Network Provider: Highland Networks (45.134.*.*) 

============[ Multination ]============
 Dazn:                                  Yes (Region: US)
 HotStar:                               No
 Disney+:                               No
 Netflix:                               Originals Only
 YouTube Premium:                       Yes
 Amazon Prime Video:                    Yes (Region: US)
 TVBAnywhere+:                          Yes
 iQyi Oversea Region:                   US
 Viu.com:                               No
 YouTube CDN:                           Dallas, TX 
 Netflix Preferred CDN:                 Miami, FL  
 Spotify Registration:                  No
 Steam Currency:                        USD
 ChatGPT:                               Yes
 Bing Region:                           US
 Instagram Licensed Audio:              Yes
=======================================


 ** Checking Results Under IPv6 
--------------------------------
 ** Your Network Provider: Dot-Tech LLC (2606:fc40:41:*:*) 

============[ Multination ]============
 Dazn:                                  Failed (Network Connection)
 HotStar:                               Yes (Region: US)
 Disney+:                               Yes (Region: US)
 Netflix:                               Yes (Region: US)
 YouTube Premium:                       Yes
 Amazon Prime Video:                    Unsupported
 TVBAnywhere+:                          Failed (Network Connection)
 iQyi Oversea Region:                   Failed
 Viu.com:                               Failed
 YouTube CDN:                           Dallas, TX 
 Netflix Preferred CDN:                 Miami, FL  
 Spotify Registration:                  No
 Steam Currency:                        Failed (Network Connection)
 ChatGPT:                               Failed
 Bing Region:                           US
 Instagram Licensed Audio:              Yes
=======================================
Testing Done! 

CloudFlare Internet Test

Kuroit United States Tampa Powerful KVM VPS Server Test and Review

PageSpeed Insights

Kuroit United States Tampa Powerful KVM VPS Server Test and Review

GTmetrix Performance

Kuroit United States Tampa Powerful KVM VPS Server Test and Review

Admin Control Panel

Kuroit United States Tampa Powerful KVM VPS Server Test and Review

Kuroit’s Admin Control Panel is user-friendly and intuitive. It simplifies the management and configuration of your hosting environment. Whether you’re a seasoned tech expert or a beginner, you’ll find the control panel easy to navigate.

The control panel is not just about ease of use. It’s also about power and functionality. From server administration tasks to resource monitoring and application installations, the control panel has got it all.

Furthermore, the control panel allows you to install your VPS server easily. Select the operating system you wish to install from the VPS control panel. This means you can customize your server to your specific needs.

Server Pricing

Kuroit United States Tampa Powerful KVM VPS Server Test and Review

Official Website: https://www.Kuroit.com

Payments

Kuroit accepts a wide range of payment methods. This includes Debit & Credit Cards, AliPay, iDEAL, and Buy now-Pay Later options. These diverse options cater to customers worldwide, ensuring everyone can access Kuroit’s services easily.

For those who prefer digital currencies, Kuroit has got you covered. They accept BTC & Other Coins through Coinbase. This shows Kuroit’s commitment to embracing modern technologies and providing flexibility to their customers.

Next, let’s talk about recurring payments. Kuroit uses Stripe for recurring payments. This means you can set up automatic payments for your services, ensuring uninterrupted service and convenience.

Furthermore, Kuroit also accepts payments through PayPal. They offer both PayPal subscriptions for recurring payments and PayPal Basic for single manual payments. This provides additional flexibility for customers who prefer using PayPal.

Lastly, Kuroit accepts bank transfers for those who prefer traditional methods. You can contact them for bank details. This ensures you can still access Kuroit’s services without a digital payment method.

Coupon

The merchant did not provide

Customer Support

Kuroit has received positive reviews for its customer support. Customers have praised the support team for their responsiveness and helpfulness. They have mentioned that the support team is always ready to assist with any issues, ensuring a smooth experience.

Moving on, Kuroit’s customer support is not just about resolving issues. It’s also about helping customers make the most of their services. The support team provides guidance and advice to help customers optimize Kuroit’s services.

Kuroit’s customer support is available 24/7. This means that you can contact the support team for assistance no matter when you encounter an issue.

Conclusion

Our I/O speed tests revealed average outcomes with readings like 247 MB/s in the first run and dropping to 228 MB/s in another, averaging 249 MB/s, which falls into the lower performance segment. The network performance, however, showcased stronger numbers, with upload speeds peaking at 848.73 Mbps in Los Angeles and download speeds varying widely from 0.17 Mbps in Hong Kong to 606.92 Mbps in Dallas. The latency was best near the server’s local nodes at around 1.80 ms but escalated significantly with farther nodes, reaching up to 269.86 ms in Mumbai.

The disk speed tests conducted with Yabs presented a mixed bag. We observed strong performance in larger block sizes where the server achieved up to 1.68 GB/s in combined read/write operations for 64k blocks and impressively reached up to 2.22 GB/s for 1m blocks. The Geekbench and UnixBench scores illustrated decent CPU performance with results like 667 in single-core and 1077 in multi-core, indicating that the server can handle moderate to demanding processing tasks.

In conclusion, the Kuroit Tampa Powerful KVM VPS server demonstrates good potential with excellent bandwidth and large-scale data handling capabilities. However, its performance in I/O operations suggests bottlenecks could affect tasks requiring high disk throughput. The machine holds well for general and networking-intensive operations, making it suitable for users whose applications can tolerate varied disk performance but require robust network and processing capabilities.

Official Website: https://www.Kuroit.com

Related Posts