Kuroit United States Tampa Powerful KVM VPS Server Test and Review
We recently put the Kuroit United States Tampa Powerful KVM VPS Server through a series of thorough tests to evaluate its performance across various metrics. The server utilizes an Intel Xeon CPU E5-2680 v3 @ 2.50GHz, paired with 2 CPU cores, 4 GB RAM, and 50 GB SSD storage, optimizing for robust handling of general and intensive tasks.
About Kuroit
Kuroit offers a wide range of services to cater to every need for cloud solutions. From starting with a website to computing dedicated servers for demanding backend applications, Kuroit has covered you. They offer web hosting, VPS, dedicated, and storage servers. These services are designed to provide solid, reliable, and high-performance solutions for businesses of all sizes.
Transitioning to their web hosting service, it’s perfect for individuals and businesses looking to start a website. Kuroit’s cPanel Web Hosting comes with one-click installs, daily backups, and 24/7 support. This means you can set up your website quickly and easily, and if you ever run into any issues, help is just a call away.
Next, let’s talk about their VPS servers. Powerful servers and KVM virtualization power these secure, reliable hosting solutions. What’s more, they’re located in more than 10 locations worldwide. This means you can choose a server location closest to your target audience, ensuring fast load times and a smooth user experience.
Moving on to their dedicated servers, these powerful, high-performance bare metal servers are designed for high computing needs. These servers are the perfect solution if your business requires a lot of computing power. They’re also available in a wide range of server locations worldwide.
Kuroit also offers servers with up to 20TB of enterprise HDD storage capacity. These servers come with high-capacity connectivity worldwide for quick backups. This means you can store large amounts of data and access it quickly and easily anywhere in the world.
Official Website: https://www.Kuroit.com
BasicBench: Server Profile, I/O Speed, Upload and Download Speed
CPU Model : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2680 v3 @ 2.50GHz
CPU Cores : 2 @ 2497.106 MHz
CPU Cache : 30720 KB
AES-NI : ✓ Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ✓ Enabled
Total Disk : 50.0 GB (2.4 GB Used)
Total Mem : 3.8 GB (331.7 MB Used)
System uptime : 0 days, 1 hour 40 min
Load average : 0.08, 0.17, 0.11
OS : Debian GNU/Linux 11
Arch : x86_64 (64 Bit)
Kernel : 5.10.0-20-amd64
TCP CC : bbr
Virtualization : KVM
IPv4/IPv6 : ✓ Online / ✓ Online
Organization : AS398395 Dot-Tech LLC
Location : Tampa / US
Region : Florida
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I/O Speed(1st run) : 247 MB/s
I/O Speed(2nd run) : 272 MB/s
I/O Speed(3rd run) : 228 MB/s
I/O Speed(average) : 249.0 MB/s
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Node Name Upload Speed Download Speed Latency
Speedtest.net 706.45 Mbps 8.96 Mbps 1.80 ms
Los Angeles, US 848.73 Mbps 550.78 Mbps 59.69 ms
Dallas, US 808.75 Mbps 606.92 Mbps 29.43 ms
Montreal, CA 809.31 Mbps 317.31 Mbps 53.52 ms
Amsterdam, NL 611.05 Mbps 533.94 Mbps 116.71 ms
Shanghai, CN 373.35 Mbps 150.23 Mbps 227.81 ms
Hongkong, CN 5.13 Mbps 0.17 Mbps 206.92 ms
Mumbai, IN 295.98 Mbps 497.72 Mbps 269.86 ms
Singapore, SG 75.36 Mbps 191.61 Mbps 234.94 ms
Tokyo, JP 469.96 Mbps 557.13 Mbps 168.14 ms
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Finished in : 5 min 35 sec
Timestamp : 2024-04-15 03:29:28 BST
YabsBench: Disk Speed, iperf3 Network Speed, Geekbench 6 Benchmark
Basic System Information:
---------------------------------
Uptime : 0 days, 1 hours, 51 minutes
Processor : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2680 v3 @ 2.50GHz
CPU cores : 2 @ 2497.106 MHz
AES-NI : ✔ Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
RAM : 3.8 GiB
Swap : 0.0 KiB
Disk : 50.0 GiB
Distro : Debian GNU/Linux 11 (bullseye)
Kernel : 5.10.0-20-amd64
VM Type : KVM
IPv4/IPv6 : ✔ Online / ✔ Online
IPv6 Network Information:
---------------------------------
ISP : Dot-Tech LLC
ASN : AS398395 Dot-Tech LLC
Host : Dot-Tech LLC Tampa
Location : Tampa, Florida (FL)
Country : United States
fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50):
---------------------------------
Block Size | 4k (IOPS) | 64k (IOPS)
------ | --- ---- | ---- ----
Read | 58.34 MB/s (14.5k) | 838.67 MB/s (13.1k)
Write | 58.45 MB/s (14.6k) | 843.08 MB/s (13.1k)
Total | 116.79 MB/s (29.1k) | 1.68 GB/s (26.2k)
| |
Block Size | 512k (IOPS) | 1m (IOPS)
------ | --- ---- | ---- ----
Read | 313.85 MB/s (612) | 1.07 GB/s (1.0k)
Write | 330.53 MB/s (645) | 1.14 GB/s (1.1k)
Total | 644.38 MB/s (1.2k) | 2.22 GB/s (2.1k)
iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
---------------------------------
Provider | Location (Link) | Send Speed | Recv Speed | Ping
Clouvider | London, UK (10G) | 725 Mbits/sec | 350 Mbits/sec | 99.6 ms
Eranium | Amsterdam, NL (10G) | 702 Mbits/sec | 557 Mbits/sec | 115 ms
Telia | Helsinki, FI (10G) | 719 Mbits/sec | 378 Mbits/sec | 139 ms
Uztelecom | Tashkent, UZ (10G) | 587 Mbits/sec | 339 Mbits/sec | 206 ms
Leaseweb | Singapore, SG (10G) | 513 Mbits/sec | 384 Mbits/sec | 225 ms
Clouvider | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 776 Mbits/sec | 499 Mbits/sec | 67.4 ms
Leaseweb | NYC, NY, US (10G) | 745 Mbits/sec | 644 Mbits/sec | 38.8 ms
Edgoo | Sao Paulo, BR (1G) | 513 Mbits/sec | 243 Mbits/sec | 143 ms
iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv6):
---------------------------------
Provider | Location (Link) | Send Speed | Recv Speed | Ping
Clouvider | London, UK (10G) | 765 Mbits/sec | 395 Mbits/sec | 99.8 ms
Eranium | Amsterdam, NL (10G) | 684 Mbits/sec | 541 Mbits/sec | 115 ms
Uztelecom | Tashkent, UZ (10G) | 443 Mbits/sec | 223 Mbits/sec | 206 ms
Leaseweb | Singapore, SG (10G) | 503 Mbits/sec | 324 Mbits/sec | 225 ms
Clouvider | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 742 Mbits/sec | 460 Mbits/sec | 67.2 ms
Leaseweb | NYC, NY, US (10G) | 723 Mbits/sec | 639 Mbits/sec | 38.7 ms
Edgoo | Sao Paulo, BR (1G) | 638 Mbits/sec | 327 Mbits/sec | 148 ms
Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
---------------------------------
Test | Value
|
Single Core | 667
Multi Core | 1077
Full Test | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/5724827
YABS completed in 21 min 21 sec
UnixBench: CPU Performance, A Score Higher is Better
Benchmark Run: Mon Apr 15 2024 04:01:39 - 04:29:44
2 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 28252726.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 4753.7 MWIPS (9.3 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 2085.7 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 386470.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 109308.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1063546.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 613480.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 97126.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 2320.8 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 3348.0 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 801.8 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 345804.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 28252726.0 2421.0
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 4753.7 864.3
Execl Throughput 43.0 2085.7 485.0
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 386470.8 975.9
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 109308.8 660.5
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1063546.8 1833.7
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 613480.5 493.2
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 97126.1 242.8
Process Creation 126.0 2320.8 184.2
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 3348.0 789.6
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 801.8 1336.4
System Call Overhead 15000.0 345804.7 230.5
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 656.7
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Mon Apr 15 2024 04:29:44 - 04:57:54
2 CPUs in system; running 2 parallel copies of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 54975099.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 9600.8 MWIPS (9.4 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 4178.8 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 653415.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 171838.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1838191.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 1191376.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 223927.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 9178.4 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 6492.2 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1157.4 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 662725.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 54975099.1 4710.8
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 9600.8 1745.6
Execl Throughput 43.0 4178.8 971.8
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 653415.9 1650.0
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 171838.8 1038.3
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1838191.4 3169.3
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1191376.7 957.7
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 223927.3 559.8
Process Creation 126.0 9178.4 728.4
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 6492.2 1531.2
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1157.4 1929.1
System Call Overhead 15000.0 662725.9 441.8
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 1294.4
======= Script description and score comparison completed! =======
Looking Glass
Test IPv4: 45.67.87.2
Test IPv6: 2602:ffc5:40a:1::a
Download Files: 10MB 100MB 1000MB
Global Node Test
## CDN Speedtest
CacheFly : 71.89 MiB/s | 575.13 Mbps | ping 7.128ms
Gdrive : 6.40 KiB/s | 0.05 Mbps | ping 14.112ms
## North America Speedtest
Softlayer, Washington, USA : 25.04 MiB/s | 200.28 Mbps | ping 36.534ms
SoftLayer, San Jose, USA : 0 B/s | N/A | ping error!
SoftLayer, Dallas, USA : 0 B/s | N/A | ping error!
Vultr, New Jersey, USA : 3.88 MiB/s | 31.05 Mbps | ping 42.934ms
Vultr, Seattle, USA : 26.46 MiB/s | 211.64 Mbps | ping 86.410ms
Vultr, Dallas, USA : 60.94 MiB/s | 487.51 Mbps | ping 31.696ms
Vultr, Los Angeles, USA : 32.72 MiB/s | 261.78 Mbps | ping 61.977ms
Ramnode, New York, USA : 60.17 MiB/s | 481.35 Mbps | ping 34.546ms
Ramnode, Atlanta, USA : 60.47 MiB/s | 483.79 Mbps | ping 20.517ms
## Europe Speedtest
Vultr, London, UK : 487.17 KiB/s | 3.81 Mbps | ping 111.040ms
LeaseWeb, Frankfurt, Germany : 41.47 KiB/s | 0.32 Mbps | ping 111.508ms
Hetzner, Germany : 267 B/s | N/A | ping 121.726ms
Ramnode, Alblasserdam, NL : 13.79 MiB/s | 110.34 Mbps | ping 114.975ms
Vultr, Amsterdam, NL : 16.78 MiB/s | 134.27 Mbps | ping 117.955ms
EDIS, Stockholm, Sweden : 469 B/s | N/A | ping 121.314ms
OVH, Roubaix, France : 452 B/s | N/A | ping 119.017ms
Online, France : 19.12 MiB/s | 152.92 Mbps | ping 110.214ms
Prometeus, Milan, Italy : 379 B/s | N/A | ping 114.450ms
## Exotic Speedtest
Sydney, Australia : 4.58 MiB/s | 36.60 Mbps | ping 249.354ms
Lagoon, New Caledonia : 251 B/s | N/A | ping 255.182ms
Hosteasy, Moldova : 11.40 MiB/s | 91.18 Mbps | ping 142.837ms
Prima, Argentina : 1.08 MiB/s | 8.65 Mbps | ping error!
## Asia Speedtest
SoftLayer, Singapore : 171.13 KiB/s | 1.34 Mbps | ping 245.833ms
Linode, Tokyo, Japan : 5.87 MiB/s | 46.93 Mbps | ping 164.852ms
Linode, Singapore : 3.09 MiB/s | 24.72 Mbps | ping 231.426ms
Vultr, Tokyo, Japan : 10.37 MiB/s | 82.92 Mbps | ping 170.641ms
Benchmark finished in 124 seconds
Global Latency Test
Query: ping 45.134.110.6, interval: 5s, dense mode: no
Probing 45.134.110.6 – RIPENCC /24 AS398395 DOT-TECH-LLC – United States, Florida, Tampa
Media Unlock Test
** Test Starts At: Mon 15 Apr 2024 03:16:07 AM BST
** Checking Results Under IPv4
--------------------------------
** Your Network Provider: Highland Networks (45.134.*.*)
============[ Multination ]============
Dazn: Yes (Region: US)
HotStar: No
Disney+: No
Netflix: Originals Only
YouTube Premium: Yes
Amazon Prime Video: Yes (Region: US)
TVBAnywhere+: Yes
iQyi Oversea Region: US
Viu.com: No
YouTube CDN: Dallas, TX
Netflix Preferred CDN: Miami, FL
Spotify Registration: No
Steam Currency: USD
ChatGPT: Yes
Bing Region: US
Instagram Licensed Audio: Yes
=======================================
** Checking Results Under IPv6
--------------------------------
** Your Network Provider: Dot-Tech LLC (2606:fc40:41:*:*)
============[ Multination ]============
Dazn: Failed (Network Connection)
HotStar: Yes (Region: US)
Disney+: Yes (Region: US)
Netflix: Yes (Region: US)
YouTube Premium: Yes
Amazon Prime Video: Unsupported
TVBAnywhere+: Failed (Network Connection)
iQyi Oversea Region: Failed
Viu.com: Failed
YouTube CDN: Dallas, TX
Netflix Preferred CDN: Miami, FL
Spotify Registration: No
Steam Currency: Failed (Network Connection)
ChatGPT: Failed
Bing Region: US
Instagram Licensed Audio: Yes
=======================================
Testing Done! CloudFlare Internet Test
PageSpeed Insights
GTmetrix Performance
Admin Control Panel
Kuroit’s Admin Control Panel is user-friendly and intuitive. It simplifies the management and configuration of your hosting environment. Whether you’re a seasoned tech expert or a beginner, you’ll find the control panel easy to navigate.
The control panel is not just about ease of use. It’s also about power and functionality. From server administration tasks to resource monitoring and application installations, the control panel has got it all.
Furthermore, the control panel allows you to install your VPS server easily. Select the operating system you wish to install from the VPS control panel. This means you can customize your server to your specific needs.
Server Pricing
Official Website: https://www.Kuroit.com
Payments
Kuroit accepts a wide range of payment methods. This includes Debit & Credit Cards, AliPay, iDEAL, and Buy now-Pay Later options. These diverse options cater to customers worldwide, ensuring everyone can access Kuroit’s services easily.
For those who prefer digital currencies, Kuroit has got you covered. They accept BTC & Other Coins through Coinbase. This shows Kuroit’s commitment to embracing modern technologies and providing flexibility to their customers.
Next, let’s talk about recurring payments. Kuroit uses Stripe for recurring payments. This means you can set up automatic payments for your services, ensuring uninterrupted service and convenience.
Furthermore, Kuroit also accepts payments through PayPal. They offer both PayPal subscriptions for recurring payments and PayPal Basic for single manual payments. This provides additional flexibility for customers who prefer using PayPal.
Lastly, Kuroit accepts bank transfers for those who prefer traditional methods. You can contact them for bank details. This ensures you can still access Kuroit’s services without a digital payment method.
Coupon
The merchant did not provide
Customer Support
Kuroit has received positive reviews for its customer support. Customers have praised the support team for their responsiveness and helpfulness. They have mentioned that the support team is always ready to assist with any issues, ensuring a smooth experience.
Moving on, Kuroit’s customer support is not just about resolving issues. It’s also about helping customers make the most of their services. The support team provides guidance and advice to help customers optimize Kuroit’s services.
Kuroit’s customer support is available 24/7. This means that you can contact the support team for assistance no matter when you encounter an issue.
Conclusion
Our I/O speed tests revealed average outcomes with readings like 247 MB/s in the first run and dropping to 228 MB/s in another, averaging 249 MB/s, which falls into the lower performance segment. The network performance, however, showcased stronger numbers, with upload speeds peaking at 848.73 Mbps in Los Angeles and download speeds varying widely from 0.17 Mbps in Hong Kong to 606.92 Mbps in Dallas. The latency was best near the server’s local nodes at around 1.80 ms but escalated significantly with farther nodes, reaching up to 269.86 ms in Mumbai.
The disk speed tests conducted with Yabs presented a mixed bag. We observed strong performance in larger block sizes where the server achieved up to 1.68 GB/s in combined read/write operations for 64k blocks and impressively reached up to 2.22 GB/s for 1m blocks. The Geekbench and UnixBench scores illustrated decent CPU performance with results like 667 in single-core and 1077 in multi-core, indicating that the server can handle moderate to demanding processing tasks.
In conclusion, the Kuroit Tampa Powerful KVM VPS server demonstrates good potential with excellent bandwidth and large-scale data handling capabilities. However, its performance in I/O operations suggests bottlenecks could affect tasks requiring high disk throughput. The machine holds well for general and networking-intensive operations, making it suitable for users whose applications can tolerate varied disk performance but require robust network and processing capabilities.
Official Website: https://www.Kuroit.com
Related Posts
