Loading...

noez.de Germany Frankfurt DDoS Protection Prepaid KVM vServer Test and Review

VPS Benchmarks5~hours ago~Published LetsHosting
17 0
noez.de Germany Frankfurt DDoS Protection Prepaid KVM vServer Test and Review

Noez.de offers prepaid KVM vServers with robust DDoS protection, targeting businesses and developers seeking flexible, contract-free solutions. This evaluation focused on the VPS KVM 1 NVMe Turbo plan (1 core, 2 GB RAM, 20 GB NVMe SSD, 1 Gbps port) to assess its suitability for small-scale enterprise applications, such as web hosting, development environments, or lightweight database management. The goal was to measure key performance metrics—CPU, memory, disk, network, and IP quality—to determine if the server delivers on its promise of high performance and reliability for cost-conscious IT administrators.

About noez.de

Noez.de, a German-based hosting provider that’s been making waves since 2012. If you’re hunting for affordable, reliable, and flexible hosting, this might just be your gem. Based in Frankfurt, Noez.de specializes in prepaid server solutions, meaning no long-term contracts or annoying paperwork—pay for what you need and go. They cater to everyone, from individual developers to small businesses, offering a range of services like virtual private servers (VPS), dedicated servers, and cloud hosting.

What makes Noez.de stand out? First, their pricing is super budget-friendly, with VPS plans starting as low as €1.29/month. You get modern hardware, SSD storage, and robust DDoS protection (up to 1 Tbps!) to keep your data safe. Their data centers in Germany ensure low latency and fast connectivity, especially for European users. Plus, they’re developer-friendly, with an easy-to-use control panel and API for seamless server management.

Noez.de also shines with flexibility. You can customize server configurations, scale up as your needs grow, and even test their vServer or VPN services for free for seven days. Payment options? They’ve got over 20, including Bitcoin, PayPal, and bank transfers, with no extra fees. They’re big on privacy, too, skipping KYC policies and supporting Tor access, which is a huge plus for users in restrictive regions.

Pricing

noez.de Germany Frankfurt DDoS Protection Prepaid KVM vServer Test and Review

Official Website: https://noez.de

Coupon

With the code dedi25, you save 25% on your first payment for dedicated servers. Save up to 20% with longer terms:

  • 3 months: -3%
  • 6 months: -5%
  • 12 months: -10%
  • 24 months: -20%

Basic Information

 Processor         : QEMU Virtual CPU version 2.5+
 CPU Numbers       : 1
 CPU Frequency     : 4291.908 MHz
 CPU Cache         : L1: 128.00 KB / L2: 512.00 KB / L3: 16.00 MB
 AES-NI            : ✘ Disabled
 VM-x/AMD-V        : ✘ Disabled
 RAM               : 325.06 MiB / 1.94 GiB
 Swap              : [ no swap partition or swap file detected ]
 Disk Space        : 1.95 GiB / 19.81 GiB
 Boot Disk         : /dev/sda1
 Uptime            : 0 days, 0 hour 30 min
 Loads             : 0.98, 0.81, 0.54
 OS Release        : Debian GNU/Linux 11 (bullseye) (x86_64)
 Arch              : x86_64 (64 Bit)
 Kernel Version    : 5.10.0-8-cloud-amd64
 TCP Acceleration  : bbr
 VM Type           : KVM
 NAT Type          : Full Cone
 IPV4 ASN          : AS12586 GHOSTnet GmbH
 IPV4 Location     : Frankfurt am Main / Hesse / DE
 IPV6 ASN          : AS12586 GHOSTnet
 IPV6 Location     : Germany
 IPV6 Subnet Mask  : 128

CPU Benchmark

---------------------------CPU-Sysbench-Test----------------------------
 -> CPU test in progress (Fast Mode, 1-Pass @ 5sec)
 1 Thread(s) Test:              5161 Scores
Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
---------------------------------
Test            | Value                         
                |                               
Single Core     | 1297                          
Multi Core      | 1319                          
Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/12600757

YABS completed in 10 min 26 sec

RAM Read/Write Tests

----------------------------Memory-Test---------------------------------
 -> Memory Test (Fast Mode, 1-Pass @ 5sec)
 Single Read Test:              50820.75 MB/s
 Single Write Test:             29226.59 MB/s
Running memory speed test with the following options:
  block size: 1KiB
  total size: 102400MiB
  operation: read
  scope: global

Initializing worker threads...

Threads started!

Total operations: 104857600 (11505557.72 per second)

102400.00 MiB transferred (11235.90 MiB/sec)


General statistics:
    total time:                          9.1131s
    total number of events:              104857600

Latency (ms):
         min:                                    0.00
         avg:                                    0.00
         max:                                    7.39
         95th percentile:                        0.00
         sum:                                 2776.59

Threads fairness:
    events (avg/stddev):           104857600.0000/0.00
    execution time (avg/stddev):   2.7766/0.00
Running memory speed test with the following options:
  block size: 1KiB
  total size: 102400MiB
  operation: write
  scope: global

Initializing worker threads...

Threads started!

Total operations: 68609215 (6860434.07 per second)

67001.19 MiB transferred (6699.64 MiB/sec)


General statistics:
    total time:                          10.0001s
    total number of events:              68609215

Latency (ms):
         min:                                    0.00
         avg:                                    0.00
         max:                                   11.43
         95th percentile:                        0.00
         sum:                                 3916.00

Threads fairness:
    events (avg/stddev):           68609215.0000/0.00
    execution time (avg/stddev):   3.9160/0.00

Disk Read/Write Tests

------------------------Disk-dd-Read/Write-Test-------------------------
 -> Disk test in progress (4K Block/1M Block, Direct Mode)
 Block Size             Write Test                              Read Test
 100MB-4K Block         13.9 MB/s (3388 IOPS, 7.56s)            13.9 MB/s (3397 IOPS, 7.53s)
 1GB-1M Block           3.2 GB/s (3053 IOPS, 0.33s)             5.6 GB/s (5310 IOPS, 0.19s)
-----------------------Disk-fio-Read/Write-Test-------------------------
Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
Read       | 12.16 MB/s    (3.0k) | 202.18 MB/s   (3.1k)
Write      | 12.16 MB/s    (3.0k) | 203.25 MB/s   (3.1k)
Total      | 24.32 MB/s    (6.0k) | 405.44 MB/s   (6.3k)
           |                      |                     
Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
Read       | 2.48 GB/s     (4.8k) | 2.96 GB/s     (2.8k)
Write      | 2.62 GB/s     (5.1k) | 3.16 GB/s     (3.0k)
Total      | 5.10 GB/s     (9.9k) | 6.13 GB/s     (5.9k)

Iperf3 Network Tests

iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
---------------------------------
Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping           
Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 157 Mbits/sec   | 152 Mbits/sec   | 11.6 ms        
Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 157 Mbits/sec   | 153 Mbits/sec   | 8.44 ms        
Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 150 Mbits/sec   | 149 Mbits/sec   | 86.8 ms        
Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | busy            | 131 Mbits/sec   | 152 ms         
Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | busy            | 145 Mbits/sec   | 134 ms         
Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 149 Mbits/sec   | 135 Mbits/sec   | 81.6 ms        
Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 132 Mbits/sec   | 86.6 Mbits/sec  | 186 ms         

iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv6):
---------------------------------
Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping           
Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | busy            | 151 Mbits/sec   | 11.7 ms        
Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 156 Mbits/sec   | 151 Mbits/sec   | 8.36 ms        
Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 148 Mbits/sec   | 147 Mbits/sec   | 86.6 ms        
Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | busy            | busy            | 152 ms         
Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | busy            | 142 Mbits/sec   | 149 ms         
Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 149 Mbits/sec   | busy            | 81.6 ms        
Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 132 Mbits/sec   | 129 Mbits/sec   | 186 ms  

UnixBench Tests

Benchmark Run: Thu Jun 26 2025 01:27:08 - 01:54:59
1 CPU in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables       96090087.3 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone                    12438.4 MWIPS (9.6 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput                              15273.7 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks       3013102.1 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks          786008.2 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks       9783569.5 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput                             4721311.3 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching                 482291.0 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation                              48274.2 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                  11863.9 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                   1937.6 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead                        3425369.0 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values               BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0   96090087.3   8233.9
Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0      12438.4   2261.5
Execl Throughput                                 43.0      15273.7   3552.0
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0    3013102.1   7608.8
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0     786008.2   4749.3
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0    9783569.5  16868.2
Pipe Throughput                               12440.0    4721311.3   3795.3
Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0     482291.0   1205.7
Process Creation                                126.0      48274.2   3831.3
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4      11863.9   2798.1
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0       1937.6   3229.3
System Call Overhead                          15000.0    3425369.0   2283.6
                                                                   ========
System Benchmarks Index Score                                        3953.6

======= Script description and score comparison completed! ======= 

Streaming Unlock Tests

============[ Multination ]============
 Dazn:                                  Yes (Region: DE)
 Disney+:                               Yes (Region: DE)
 Netflix:                               Yes (Region: DE)
 YouTube Premium:                       Yes (Region: DE)
 Amazon Prime Video:                    Yes (Region: DE)
 TVBAnywhere+:                          Yes
 Spotify Registration:                  Yes (Region: DE)
 OneTrust Region:                       DE [Hesse]
 iQyi Oversea Region:                   DE
 Bing Region:                           DE (Risky)
 Apple Region:                          DE
 YouTube CDN:                           Frankfurt
 Netflix Preferred CDN:                 Failed (CDN IP Not Found)
 ChatGPT:                               Yes
 Google Gemini:                         Yes (Region: DEU)
 Claude:                                No
 Wikipedia Editability:                 Yes
 Google Play Store:                     Germany 
 Google Search CAPTCHA Free:            Yes
 Steam Currency:                        EUR
 ---Forum---
 Reddit:                                Yes
 ---Game---
 SD Gundam G Generation Eternal:        Yes
=======================================

IP Quality Detection

Data for reference only, does not represent 100% accurate, if and the actual situation is not consistent with the manual query multiple database comparison
The following is the number of each database, the output will come with the corresponding number of the database source
ipinfo  databases [0] | scamalytics databases [1] | virustotal  databases  [2] | abuseipdb databases   [3] | ip2location databases    [4]
ip-api  databases [5] | ipwhois databases     [6] | ipregistry  databases  [7] | ipdata databases      [8] | db-ip databases          [9]
ipapiis databases [A] | ipapicom databases    [B] | bigdatacloud databases [C] | cheervision databases [D] | ipqualityscore databases [E]
IPV4:
Security Score:
Reputation: 0 [2] 
TrustScore: 68 [8] 
VpnScore: 20 [8] 
ProxyScore: 73 [8] 
CommunityVoteHarmless: 0 [2] 
CommunityVoteMalicious: 0 [2] 
ThreatScore: 3 [8] 
FraudScore: 0 [1] 
AbuseScore: 0 [3] 
ASNAbuseScore: 0.0002 (Very Low) [A] 
CompannyAbuseScore: 0 (Very Low) [A] 
ThreatLevel: low [9] 
Blacklist_Records_Statistics(how many blacklisted websites have records):
HarmlessnessRecords: 0 [2] MaliciousRecords: 0 [2]  SuspiciousRecords: 0 [2]  NoRecords: 94 [2]  
Security Info:
UsageType: business [8] hosting [0 7 9 A] DataCenter/WebHosting/Transit [3] unknown [C]
CompanyType: business [7] hosting [0 A]
IsCloudProvider: Yes [7 D] 
IsDatacenter: Yes [0 5 A] No [1 6 8 C]
IsMobile: No [5 A C] 
IsProxy: No [0 1 4 5 6 7 8 9 A C D] 
IsVpn: No [0 1 6 A C] Yes [7 D]
IsTor: No [0 1 3 6 7 8 A C D] 
IsTorExit: No [1 7 D] 
IsCrawler: No [9 A] 
IsAnonymous: No [1 6 8] Yes [7 D]
IsAttacker: No [7 8 D] 
IsAbuser: No [7 8 A C D] 
IsThreat: No [7 8 C D] 
IsRelay: No [0 7 8 C D] 
IsBogon: No [7 8 A C D] 
DNS-BlackList: 314(Total_Check) 0(Clean) 0(Blacklisted) 0(Other) 
IPV6:
Security Score:
FraudScore: 0 [1] 
AbuseScore: 0 [3]
ASNAbuseScore: 0.0002 (Very Low) [A] 
CompannyAbuseScore: 0 (Very Low) [A] 
Security Info:
UsageType: hosting [A] DataCenter/WebHosting/Transit [3]
CompanyType: hosting [A] 
IsCloudProvider: Yes [D] 
IsDatacenter: Yes [A] No [1]
IsMobile: No [A] 
IsProxy: No [1 A D] 
IsVpn: Yes [D] No [1 A]
IsTor: No [1 3 A D] 
IsTorExit: No [1 D] 
IsCrawler: No [A] 
IsAnonymous: Yes [D] No [1]
IsAttacker: No [D]
IsAbuser: No [A D] 
IsThreat: No [D] 
IsRelay: No [D] 
IsBogon: No [A D] 
DNS-BlackList: 314(Total_Check) 0(Clean) 0(Blacklisted) 314(Other) 
Google search feasibility: NO

Email Port Detection

Platform  SMTP  SMTPS POP3  POP3S IMAP  IMAPS
LocalPort ✔     ✔     ✔     ✔     ✔     ✔    
QQ        ✔     ✔     ✔     ✘     ✔     ✘    
163       ✔     ✔     ✔     ✘     ✔     ✘    
Sohu      ✔     ✔     ✔     ✘     ✔     ✘    
Yandex    ✔     ✔     ✔     ✘     ✔     ✘    
Gmail     ✔     ✔     ✘     ✘     ✘     ✘    
Outlook   ✔     ✘     ✔     ✘     ✔     ✘    
Office365 ✔     ✘     ✔     ✘     ✔     ✘    
Yahoo     ✔     ✔     ✘     ✘     ✘     ✘    
MailCOM   ✔     ✔     ✔     ✘     ✔     ✘    
MailRU    ✔     ✔     ✘     ✘     ✔     ✘    
AOL       ✔     ✔     ✘     ✘     ✘     ✘    
GMX       ✔     ✔     ✔     ✘     ✔     ✘    
Sina      ✔     ✘     ✔     ✘     ✔     ✘    
Apple     ✘     ✔     ✘     ✘     ✘     ✘    
FastMail  ✘     ✔     ✘     ✘     ✘     ✘    
ProtonMail✘     ✘     ✘     ✘     ✘     ✘    
MXRoute   ✔     ✘     ✔     ✘     ✔     ✘    
Namecrane ✔     ✔     ✔     ✘     ✔     ✘    
XYAMail   ✘     ✘     ✘     ✘     ✘     ✘    
ZohoMail  ✘     ✔     ✘     ✘     ✘     ✘    
Inbox_eu  ✔     ✔     ✔     ✘     ✘     ✘    
Free_fr   ✘     ✔     ✔     ✘     ✔     ✘   

Looking Glass

5.230.69.215

Global Latency Tests

noez.de Germany Frankfurt DDoS Protection Prepaid KVM vServer Test and Review noez.de Germany Frankfurt DDoS Protection Prepaid KVM vServer Test and Review

Query: ping 5.230.111.227, interval: 5s, dense mode: no

Probing 5.230.111.227 – RIPE NCC /15 AS12586 ASGHOSTNET – Germany [hosting]

CloudFlare Internet Tests

noez.de Germany Frankfurt DDoS Protection Prepaid KVM vServer Test and Review

PageSpeed Insights

noez.de Germany Frankfurt DDoS Protection Prepaid KVM vServer Test and Review

Admin Control Panel

noez.de Germany Frankfurt DDoS Protection Prepaid KVM vServer Test and Review

Conclusion

The QEMU Virtual CPU (4.29 GHz) delivered solid single-core performance, scoring 1297 on Geekbench 6, with a multi-core score of 1319, reflecting its single-core limitation. Memory tests showed impressive read speeds of 50.82 GB/s and write speeds of 29.23 GB/s, ideal for memory-intensive tasks. Disk performance was exceptional, with NVMe SSD achieving read/write speeds up to 5.6 GB/s and 3.2 GB/s, respectively, and IOPS peaking at 5310 for 1MB blocks. Network tests revealed consistent IPv4/IPv6 speeds around 150 Mbits/sec globally, with low latency (8.44 ms to Amsterdam). Streaming unlock tests confirmed access to major platforms like Netflix and Disney+ in Germany, and IP quality checks indicated low fraud/abuse scores, ensuring clean connectivity.

Analysis and Insights

The server’s NVMe storage and memory performance are standout features, making it a strong contender for I/O-heavy workloads like small databases or content management systems. However, the single-core CPU, while adequate for lightweight tasks, may struggle under high-concurrency scenarios, akin to a sports car stuck in city traffic—powerful but constrained by design. Network speeds, capped at 150 Mbits/sec despite a 1 Gbps port, suggest potential throttling or oversubscription, which could impact latency-sensitive applications. The clean IP reputation and streaming compatibility are significant advantages for media or VPN use cases, though limited email port support (e.g., Gmail’s POP3S/IMAPS blocked) may hinder mail server applications.

Conclusion

Noez.de’s KVM VPS Turbo offers compelling value for small-scale projects, with blazing-fast NVMe storage and reliable DDoS protection at a budget-friendly price. It’s well-suited for developers or businesses running low-to-moderate compute tasks, such as web servers or staging environments. However, IT managers needing multi-core performance or higher network throughput should consider upgrading to a higher-tier plan. The prepaid model and 7-day trial make it a low-risk option. For those prioritizing storage speed and IP quality over raw CPU power, this VPS is a worthy choice.

Official Website: https://noez.de

Related Posts