Loading...

Onidel Netherlands Amsterdam AMD EPYC 7713 Hourly Billing VPS Test and Review

VPS Benchmarks13~hours ago~Published LetsHosting
14 0
Onidel Netherlands Amsterdam AMD EPYC 7713 Hourly Billing VPS Test and Review

The Onidel Netherlands Amsterdam Hourly Billing VPS (ONI-2) underwent a thorough performance evaluation to gauge its suitability for real-world business scenarios. Equipped with an AMD EPYC 7713 processor, 2GB RAM, 40GB SSD, and a 1Gbps network port, this VPS targets cost-conscious enterprises needing robust compute and storage capabilities. The testing aimed to measure key metrics—CPU power, memory efficiency, disk I/O, network stability, and streaming unlock potential—offering IT administrators and technical decision-makers actionable insights for procurement choices.

About Onidel

Onidel.com is a rising star in the cloud hosting world, delivering high-performance, affordable, and reliable solutions for individuals, developers, and businesses. Founded in Sydney, Australia, this privately owned, debt-free company is redefining cloud hosting with its customer-centric approach, cutting-edge technology, and global reach. With a mission to forge lasting partnerships, Onidel prioritizes user needs, offering a seamless experience backed by exceptional support and innovative features. Whether you’re launching a small project or scaling a business, Onidel’s cloud infrastructure is designed to empower you with flexibility and control.

What sets Onidel apart is its commitment to performance without the premium price tag. Their cloud virtual machines (VMs), starting at just $3.5 per month, are powered by AMD EPYC processors and ultra-fast NVMe block storage with triple data replication for unmatched reliability and speed. This ensures seamless performance for demanding workloads, from web hosting to complex applications. Onidel’s premium network, blending top-tier carriers, delivers low latency and optimized routing, guaranteeing a superior user experience across global locations, including Australia, Singapore, Vietnam, and the Netherlands, with plans for further expansion, like their recent Amsterdam data center.

A standout feature is Onidel’s in-house developed control panel, which offers advanced tools for effortless server management. Users can deploy custom ISOs, manage backups, and restore individual files without full system rollbacks, giving unparalleled control over data. The panel’s intuitive design caters to beginners and seasoned developers alike, making tasks like firewall configuration and bandwidth monitoring straightforward. Speaking of bandwidth, Onidel’s unique data transfer pooling allows customers with multiple servers to share allowances, maximizing flexibility. If limits are exceeded, excess usage is billed at a transparent A$0.01 per GB.

Pricing

Onidel Netherlands Amsterdam AMD EPYC 7713 Hourly Billing VPS Test and Review

Official Website: https://OnidelCloud.com

Coupon

The merchant did not provide

Basic Information

 Processor         : AMD EPYC 7713 64-Core Processor
 CPU Numbers       : 2
 CPU Frequency     : 1996.249 MHz
 CPU Cache         : L1: 256.00 KB / L2: 1.00 MB / L3: 16.00 MB
 AES-NI            : ✔ Enabled
 VM-x/AMD-V        : ✔ Enabled
 RAM               : 320.94 MiB / 3.79 GiB
 Swap              : [ no swap partition or swap file detected ]
 Disk Space        : 1.68 GiB / 39.21 GiB
 Boot Disk         : /dev/vda1
 Uptime            : 0 days, 0 hour 4 min
 Loads             : 0.63, 0.27, 0.11
 OS Release        : Debian GNU/Linux 11 (bullseye) (x86_64)
 Arch              : x86_64 (64 Bit)
 Kernel Version    : 5.10.0-32-amd64
 TCP Acceleration  : bbr
 VM Type           : KVM
 NAT Type          : Full Cone
 IPV4 ASN          : AS152900 Onidel Pty Ltd
 IPV4 Location     : Amsterdam / North Holland / NL
 IPV6 ASN          : AS152900 Onidel
 IPV6 Location     : United States
 IPV6 Subnet Mask  : 64

CPU Benchmark

---------------------------CPU-Sysbench-Test----------------------------
 -> CPU test in progress (Fast Mode, 1-Pass @ 5sec)
 1 Thread(s) Test:              3469 Scores
 2 Thread(s) Test:              6856 Scores
Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
---------------------------------
Test            | Value                         
                |                               
Single Core     | 1509                          
Multi Core      | 2684                          
Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/12672195

YABS completed in 7 min 2 sec

RAM Read/Write Tests

----------------------------Memory-Test---------------------------------
 -> Memory Test (Fast Mode, 1-Pass @ 5sec)
 Single Read Test:              39457.09 MB/s
 Single Write Test:             21838.29 MB/s
Running memory speed test with the following options:
  block size: 1KiB
  total size: 102400MiB
  operation: read
  scope: global

Initializing worker threads...

Threads started!

Total operations: 64517441 (6451162.80 per second)

63005.31 MiB transferred (6299.96 MiB/sec)


General statistics:
    total time:                          10.0001s
    total number of events:              64517441

Latency (ms):
         min:                                    0.00
         avg:                                    0.00
         max:                                    0.13
         95th percentile:                        0.00
         sum:                                 2797.97

Threads fairness:
    events (avg/stddev):           64517441.0000/0.00
    execution time (avg/stddev):   2.7980/0.00
Running memory speed test with the following options:
  block size: 1KiB
  total size: 102400MiB
  operation: write
  scope: global

Initializing worker threads...

Threads started!

Total operations: 54523654 (5451925.82 per second)

53245.76 MiB transferred (5324.15 MiB/sec)


General statistics:
    total time:                          10.0001s
    total number of events:              54523654

Latency (ms):
         min:                                    0.00
         avg:                                    0.00
         max:                                    0.12
         95th percentile:                        0.00
         sum:                                 3801.96

Threads fairness:
    events (avg/stddev):           54523654.0000/0.00
    execution time (avg/stddev):   3.8020/0.00

Disk Read/Write Tests

------------------------Disk-dd-Read/Write-Test-------------------------
 -> Disk test in progress (4K Block/1M Block, Direct Mode)
 Block Size             Write Test                              Read Test
 100MB-4K Block         47.9 MB/s (11.70 IOPS, 2.19s))          98.9 MB/s (24134 IOPS, 1.06s)
 1GB-1M Block           1.2 GB/s (1141 IOPS, 0.88s)             1.2 GB/s (1140 IOPS, 0.88s)
-----------------------Disk-fio-Read/Write-Test-------------------------
Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
Read       | 310.64 MB/s  (77.6k) | 1.09 GB/s    (17.1k)
Write      | 311.46 MB/s  (77.8k) | 1.10 GB/s    (17.2k)
Total      | 622.11 MB/s (155.5k) | 2.20 GB/s    (34.3k)
           |                      |                     
Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
Read       | 1.04 GB/s     (2.0k) | 1.03 GB/s     (1.0k)
Write      | 1.10 GB/s     (2.1k) | 1.10 GB/s     (1.0k)
Total      | 2.14 GB/s     (4.1k) | 2.13 GB/s     (2.0k)

Iperf3 Network Tests

iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
---------------------------------
Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping           
Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 1.07 Gbits/sec  | 1.02 Gbits/sec  | 6.57 ms        
Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 1.06 Gbits/sec  | 1.03 Gbits/sec  | 1.56 ms        
Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 995 Mbits/sec   | 965 Mbits/sec   | 86.1 ms        
Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 730 Mbits/sec   | 782 Mbits/sec   | 162 ms         
Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 588 Mbits/sec   | busy            | 155 ms         
Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 994 Mbits/sec   | 876 Mbits/sec   | 76.8 ms        
Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 838 Mbits/sec   | 816 Mbits/sec   | 212 ms         

iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv6):
---------------------------------
Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping           
Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 1.07 Gbits/sec  | 1.02 Gbits/sec  | 6.58 ms        
Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 1.07 Gbits/sec  | 1.02 Gbits/sec  | 1.53 ms        
Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 987 Mbits/sec   | 879 Mbits/sec   | 86.1 ms        
Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 881 Mbits/sec   | 778 Mbits/sec   | 162 ms         
Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 563 Mbits/sec   | 884 Mbits/sec   | 155 ms         
Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 994 Mbits/sec   | 828 Mbits/sec   | 77.0 ms        
Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 837 Mbits/sec   | 833 Mbits/sec   | 212 ms   

UnixBench Tests

Benchmark Run: Tue Jul 01 2025 06:38:53 - 07:06:53
2 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables       43220513.7 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone                     7209.0 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput                               3537.3 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks        501325.0 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks          127847.9 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks       1822110.5 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput                              934965.2 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching                  35114.4 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation                               6717.4 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                   9958.7 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                   1880.9 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead                        1015048.7 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values               BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0   43220513.7   3703.6
Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0       7209.0   1310.7
Execl Throughput                                 43.0       3537.3    822.6
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0     501325.0   1266.0
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0     127847.9    772.5
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0    1822110.5   3141.6
Pipe Throughput                               12440.0     934965.2    751.6
Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0      35114.4     87.8
Process Creation                                126.0       6717.4    533.1
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4       9958.7   2348.8
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0       1880.9   3134.9
System Call Overhead                          15000.0    1015048.7    676.7
                                                                   ========
System Benchmarks Index Score                                        1065.9

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Tue Jul 01 2025 07:06:53 - 07:34:55
2 CPUs in system; running 2 parallel copies of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables       84410247.7 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone                    14431.3 MWIPS (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput                               5789.3 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks        586699.7 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks          148003.9 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks       1978023.4 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput                             1842857.4 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching                 249523.8 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation                              13443.9 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                  14059.6 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                   1941.3 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead                        1729025.9 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values               BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0   84410247.7   7233.1
Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0      14431.3   2623.9
Execl Throughput                                 43.0       5789.3   1346.4
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0     586699.7   1481.6
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0     148003.9    894.3
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0    1978023.4   3410.4
Pipe Throughput                               12440.0    1842857.4   1481.4
Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0     249523.8    623.8
Process Creation                                126.0      13443.9   1067.0
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4      14059.6   3315.9
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0       1941.3   3235.5
System Call Overhead                          15000.0    1729025.9   1152.7
                                                                   ========
System Benchmarks Index Score                                        1829.7

======= Script description and score comparison completed! ======= 

Streaming Unlock Tests

============[ Multination ]============
 Dazn:                                  Failed (Error: )
 Disney+:                               No (IP Banned By Disney+ 1)
 Netflix:                               Originals Only
 YouTube Premium:                       Yes (Region: NL)
 Amazon Prime Video:                    Yes (Region: NL)
 TVBAnywhere+:                          Yes
 Spotify Registration:                  Yes (Region: NL)
 OneTrust Region:                       NL [North Holland]
 iQyi Oversea Region:                   INTL
 Bing Region:                           NL (Risky)
 Apple Region:                          NL
 YouTube CDN:                           Amsterdam
 Netflix Preferred CDN:                 Failed (CDN IP Not Found)
 ChatGPT:                               Yes
 Google Gemini:                         No
 Claude:                                No
 Wikipedia Editability:                 Yes
 Google Play Store:                     Netherlands 
 Google Search CAPTCHA Free:            Yes
 Steam Currency:                        EUR
 ---Forum---
 Reddit:                                No
 ---Game---
 SD Gundam G Generation Eternal:        No
=======================================

IP Quality Detection

Data for reference only, does not represent 100% accurate, if and the actual situation is not consistent with the manual query multiple database comparison
The following is the number of each database, the output will come with the corresponding number of the database source
ipinfo  databases [0] | scamalytics databases [1] | virustotal  databases  [2] | abuseipdb databases   [3] | ip2location databases    [4]
ip-api  databases [5] | ipwhois databases     [6] | ipregistry  databases  [7] | ipdata databases      [8] | db-ip databases          [9]
ipapiis databases [A] | ipapicom databases    [B] | bigdatacloud databases [C] | cheervision databases [D] | ipqualityscore databases [E]
IPV4:
Security Score:
Reputation: 0 [2] 
TrustScore: 17 [8] 
VpnScore: 94 [8] 
ProxyScore: 83 [8]
CommunityVoteHarmless: 0 [2] 
CommunityVoteMalicious: 0 [2] 
ThreatScore: 71 [8] 
FraudScore: 0 [1 E] 
AbuseScore: 0 [3] 
ASNAbuseScore: 0.0024 (Low) [A] 
CompannyAbuseScore: 0 (Very Low) [A] 
ThreatLevel: low [9] 
Blacklist_Records_Statistics(how many blacklisted websites have records):
HarmlessnessRecords: 0 [2]  MaliciousRecords: 0 [2]  SuspiciousRecords: 0 [2]  NoRecords: 94 [2]  
Security Info:
UsageType: DataCenter/WebHosting/Transit [3] business [8] hosting [0 7 A] corporate [9] unknown [C]
CompanyType: hosting [0 7] government [A]
IsCloudProvider: Yes [7 D] 
IsDatacenter: Yes [0 1 A] No [5 6 8 C]
IsMobile: Yes [E] No [5 A C]
IsProxy: No [0 1 4 5 6 7 8 9 A C D E] 
IsVpn: No [0 1 6 7 A C D E] 
IsTor: No [0 1 3 6 7 8 A C D E] 
IsTorExit: No [1 7 D] 
IsCrawler: No [9 A E] 
IsAnonymous: No [1 6 7 8 D] 
IsAttacker: No [7 8 D] 
IsAbuser: No [7 8 A C D E] 
IsThreat: No [7 8 C D] 
IsRelay: No [0 7 8 C D] 
IsBogon: No [7 8 A C D] 
IsBot: No [E] 
DNS-BlackList: 314(Total_Check) 0(Clean) 5(Blacklisted) 26(Other) 
IPV6:
Security Score:
FraudScore: 0 [1]
AbuseScore: 0 [3] 
ASNAbuseScore: 0.0024 (Low) [A]
CompannyAbuseScore: 0 (Very Low) [A] 
Security Info:
UsageType: DataCenter/WebHosting/Transit [3] hosting [A]
CompanyType: government [A] 
IsCloudProvider: Yes [D] 
IsDatacenter: Yes [1 A] 
IsMobile: No [A] 
IsProxy: No [1 A D] 
IsVpn: No [1 A D] 
IsTorExit: No [1 D] 
IsTorExit: No [1 D] 
IsCrawler: No [A] 
IsAnonymous: No [1 D] 
IsAttacker: No [D] 
IsAbuser: No [A D] 
IsThreat: No [D] 
IsRelay: No [D] 
IsBogon: No [A D] 
DNS-BlackList: 314(Total_Check) 0(Clean) 0(Blacklisted) 314(Other) 
Google search feasibility: NO

Email Port Detection

Platform  SMTP  SMTPS POP3  POP3S IMAP  IMAPS
LocalPort ✔     ✔     ✔     ✔     ✔     ✔    
QQ        ✘     ✔     ✔     ✘     ✔     ✘    
163       ✘     ✔     ✔     ✘     ✔     ✘    
Sohu      ✘     ✔     ✔     ✘     ✔     ✘    
Yandex    ✘     ✔     ✔     ✘     ✔     ✘    
Gmail     ✘     ✔     ✘     ✘     ✘     ✘    
Outlook   ✘     ✘     ✔     ✘     ✔     ✘    
Office365 ✘     ✘     ✔     ✘     ✔     ✘    
Yahoo     ✘     ✔     ✘     ✘     ✘     ✘    
MailCOM   ✘     ✔     ✔     ✘     ✔     ✘    
MailRU    ✘     ✔     ✘     ✘     ✔     ✘    
AOL       ✘     ✔     ✘     ✘     ✘     ✘    
GMX       ✘     ✔     ✔     ✘     ✔     ✘    
Sina      ✘     ✘     ✔     ✘     ✔     ✘    
Apple     ✘     ✔     ✘     ✘     ✘     ✘    
FastMail  ✘     ✔     ✘     ✘     ✘     ✘    
ProtonMail✘     ✘     ✘     ✘     ✘     ✘    
MXRoute   ✘     ✘     ✔     ✘     ✔     ✘    
Namecrane ✘     ✔     ✔     ✘     ✔     ✘    
XYAMail   ✘     ✘     ✘     ✘     ✘     ✘    
ZohoMail  ✘     ✔     ✘     ✘     ✘     ✘    
Inbox_eu  ✘     ✔     ✔     ✘     ✘     ✘    
Free_fr   ✘     ✔     ✔     ✘     ✔     ✘   

Looking Glass

None

Global Latency Tests

Onidel Netherlands Amsterdam AMD EPYC 7713 Hourly Billing VPS Test and Review Onidel Netherlands Amsterdam AMD EPYC 7713 Hourly Billing VPS Test and Review

Query: ping 185.232.84.201, interval: 5s, dense mode: no

Probing 185.232.84.201 – APNIC /24 AS152900 ONIDEL-AS-AP – The Netherlands [hosting]

CloudFlare Internet Tests

Onidel Netherlands Amsterdam AMD EPYC 7713 Hourly Billing VPS Test and Review

PageSpeed Insights

Onidel Netherlands Amsterdam AMD EPYC 7713 Hourly Billing VPS Test and Review

Admin Control Panel

Onidel Netherlands Amsterdam AMD EPYC 7713 Hourly Billing VPS Test and Review

Conclusion

The ONI-2 shines in raw compute power, scoring 3469 (single-thread) and 6856 (multi-thread) in Sysbench, with Geekbench 6 results of 1509 (single-core) and 2684 (multi-core). Memory performance impresses too, hitting read speeds of 39,457 MB/s and write speeds of 21,838 MB/s—plenty for most workloads. The SSD delivers solid results, with 4K read/write at 310.64 MB/s and 311.46 MB/s, and 1M block speeds topping 1.2 GB/s. Network tests show stable 1 Gbps+ speeds in Europe, though cross-continental performance drops (e.g., 730 Mbps to Singapore). Streaming unlock tests reveal mixed outcomes: Netflix and YouTube Premium work, but Disney+ and Gmail falter. IP quality flags a high VPN/proxy score, hinting at potential service restrictions.

Analysis: Strengths Meet Subtle

CaveatsWhat stands out is the ONI-2’s computational muscle—ideal for tasks like data processing or running lightweight VMs. The SSD’s zippy I/O makes it a fit for database-driven apps or web hosting, where quick access matters. However, the network’s dip in transatlantic tests suggests it’s less suited for globally distributed setups—think of it like a sports car stuck in city traffic, unable to stretch its legs. The IP quality issue is a wrinkle too; its high VPN/proxy rating could trip up services sensitive to such flags, as seen with Disney+ and Gmail blocks. For European-focused operations, though, it’s a compelling package.

Conclusion: A Solid Pick with Trade-Offs

The Onidel ONI-2 VPS punches above its weight in CPU, memory, and storage, making it a strong contender for compute-heavy or I/O-intensive workloads—think small-scale analytics or web servers. Yet, its network lag on long-haul connections and IP-related quirks mean it’s not a one-size-fits-all solution. Enterprises prioritizing regional performance will find it a cost-effective gem; those needing seamless global reach or unrestricted streaming might look elsewhere. Weigh your needs carefully—this VPS delivers where it counts, but it’s not without its limits.

Official Website: https://OnidelCloud.com

Related Posts