Datalix Germany Frankfurt AMD Ryzen 9 5950X DDoS Protection KVM Server Test and Review
The Datalix Germany Frankfurt DDoS Protection KVM Server (Ryzen GEN 2 Small) underwent a thorough performance evaluation to gauge its capabilities for enterprise IT needs. Powered by an AMD Ryzen 9 5950X processor with 1 core, 2 GB RAM, 20 GB NVMe SSD, and a 1 Gbps port, this server sits in Frankfurt, Germany, under AS58087. The testing aimed to measure its effectiveness across CPU-intensive tasks, memory operations, disk I/O, network throughput, and streaming accessibility.
About Datalix
Datalix.eu, a German hosting provider based in Frankfurt am Main, offers a variety of services including KVM and dedicated servers, web hosting, game servers, and Nextcloud hosting, with pricing starting at just €2.45 per month for KVM servers. Operating on a prepaid model with no long-term contracts, they provide flexibility and cost control, while their location ensures low latency for European users. Additional perks include a reseller program, free 24-hour test servers for Nextcloud and game servers, as well as robust security features such as DDoS protection and encryption, making Datalix.eu a cost-effective and reliable hosting option in Europe.
Pricing
Official Website: https://Datalix.eu
Coupon
The merchant did not provide
Basic Information
Processor : AMD Ryzen 9 5950X 16-Core Processor
CPU Numbers : 1
CPU Frequency : 3399.998 MHz
CPU Cache : L1: 128.00 KB / L2: 512.00 KB / L3: 16.00 MB
AES-NI : ✔ Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
RAM : 336.11 MiB / 1.94 GiB
Swap : [ no swap partition or swap file detected ]
Disk Space : 1.56 GiB / 19.52 GiB
Boot Disk : /dev/sda1
Uptime : 0 days, 0 hour 28 min
Loads : 0.27, 0.12, 0.04
OS Release : Debian GNU/Linux 11 (bullseye) (x86_64)
Arch : x86_64 (64 Bit)
Kernel Version : 5.10.0-28-cloud-amd64
TCP Acceleration : bbr
VM Type : KVM
NAT Type : Full Cone
IPV4 ASN : AS58087 Florian Kolb
IPV4 Location : Frankfurt am Main / Hesse / DE
IPV6 ASN : AS58087 Florian Kolb
IPV6 Location : Liechtenstein
IPV6 Subnet Mask : 64
CPU Benchmark
---------------------------CPU-Sysbench-Test----------------------------
-> CPU test in progress (Fast Mode, 1-Pass @ 5sec)
1 Thread(s) Test: 4257 Scores
Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
---------------------------------
Test | Value
|
Single Core | 1656
Multi Core | 1656
Full Test | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/13072273
YABS completed in 8 min 23 sec
RAM Read/Write Tests
----------------------------Memory-Test---------------------------------
-> Memory Test (Fast Mode, 1-Pass @ 5sec)
Single Read Test: 44392.53 MB/s
Single Write Test: 23419.43 MB/s
Running memory speed test with the following options:
block size: 1KiB
total size: 102400MiB
operation: read
scope: global
Initializing worker threads...
Threads started!
Total operations: 78945702 (7894173.38 per second)
77095.41 MiB transferred (7709.15 MiB/sec)
General statistics:
total time: 10.0001s
total number of events: 78945702
Latency (ms):
min: 0.00
avg: 0.00
max: 12.04
95th percentile: 0.00
sum: 3060.28
Threads fairness:
events (avg/stddev): 78945702.0000/0.00
execution time (avg/stddev): 3.0603/0.00
Running memory speed test with the following options:
block size: 1KiB
total size: 102400MiB
operation: write
scope: global
Initializing worker threads...
Threads started!
Total operations: 67337903 (6733389.04 per second)
65759.67 MiB transferred (6575.58 MiB/sec)
General statistics:
total time: 10.0001s
total number of events: 67337903
Latency (ms):
min: 0.00
avg: 0.00
max: 13.65
95th percentile: 0.00
sum: 4115.70
Threads fairness:
events (avg/stddev): 67337903.0000/0.00
execution time (avg/stddev): 4.1157/0.00
Disk Read/Write Tests
------------------------Disk-dd-Read/Write-Test-------------------------
-> Disk test in progress (4K Block/1M Block, Direct Mode)
Block Size Write Test Read Test
100MB-4K Block 50.5 MB/s (12.32 IOPS, 2.08s)) 32.8 MB/s (8010 IOPS, 3.20s)
1GB-1M Block 2.8 GB/s (2692 IOPS, 0.37s) 1.7 GB/s (1581 IOPS, 0.63s)
-----------------------Disk-fio-Read/Write-Test-------------------------
Block Size | 4k (IOPS) | 64k (IOPS)
------ | --- ---- | ---- ----
Read | 258.69 MB/s (64.6k) | 2.41 GB/s (37.7k)
Write | 259.37 MB/s (64.8k) | 2.43 GB/s (37.9k)
Total | 518.07 MB/s (129.5k) | 4.84 GB/s (75.7k)
| |
Block Size | 512k (IOPS) | 1m (IOPS)
------ | --- ---- | ---- ----
Read | 2.94 GB/s (5.7k) | 2.83 GB/s (2.7k)
Write | 3.10 GB/s (6.0k) | 3.02 GB/s (2.9k)
Total | 6.04 GB/s (11.8k) | 5.85 GB/s (5.7k)
Iperf3 Network Tests
iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
---------------------------------
Provider | Location (Link) | Send Speed | Recv Speed | Ping
Clouvider | London, UK (10G) | busy | 790 Mbits/sec | 13.7 ms
Eranium | Amsterdam, NL (100G) | 814 Mbits/sec | 799 Mbits/sec | 10.9 ms
Uztelecom | Tashkent, UZ (10G) | 763 Mbits/sec | 710 Mbits/sec | 94.1 ms
Leaseweb | Singapore, SG (10G) | 683 Mbits/sec | 625 Mbits/sec | --
Clouvider | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 511 Mbits/sec | 723 Mbits/sec | 145 ms
Leaseweb | NYC, NY, US (10G) | 771 Mbits/sec | 648 Mbits/sec | 82.5 ms
Edgoo | Sao Paulo, BR (1G) | 681 Mbits/sec | 695 Mbits/sec | 222 ms
iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv6):
---------------------------------
Provider | Location (Link) | Send Speed | Recv Speed | Ping
Clouvider | London, UK (10G) | 827 Mbits/sec | 781 Mbits/sec | 14.3 ms
Eranium | Amsterdam, NL (100G) | 833 Mbits/sec | 784 Mbits/sec | 6.60 ms
Uztelecom | Tashkent, UZ (10G) | 767 Mbits/sec | 741 Mbits/sec | 94.2 ms
Leaseweb | Singapore, SG (10G) | 696 Mbits/sec | 570 Mbits/sec | 159 ms
Clouvider | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 542 Mbits/sec | 708 Mbits/sec | 145 ms
Leaseweb | NYC, NY, US (10G) | 770 Mbits/sec | 731 Mbits/sec | 82.5 ms
Edgoo | Sao Paulo, BR (1G) | 648 Mbits/sec | 520 Mbits/sec | 222 ms UnixBench Tests
Benchmark Run: Tue Jul 29 2025 02:39:32 - 03:07:33
1 CPU in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 53570358.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 9735.3 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 5195.2 lps (29.8 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 788862.2 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 219724.2 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 2183172.7 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 1502400.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 222405.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 15222.3 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 11328.1 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1465.6 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 1482740.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 53570358.2 4590.4
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 9735.3 1770.1
Execl Throughput 43.0 5195.2 1208.2
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 788862.2 1992.1
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 219724.2 1327.6
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 2183172.7 3764.1
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1502400.4 1207.7
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 222405.9 556.0
Process Creation 126.0 15222.3 1208.1
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 11328.1 2671.7
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1465.6 2442.7
System Call Overhead 15000.0 1482740.8 988.5
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 1681.6
======= Script description and score comparison completed! =======
Streaming Unlock Tests
============[ Multination ]============
Dazn: IP Banned by Dazn
Disney+: No (IP Banned By Disney+ 1)
Netflix: Originals Only
YouTube Premium: Yes (Region: DE)
Amazon Prime Video: Yes (Region: DE)
TVBAnywhere+: Yes
Spotify Registration: Yes (Region: DE)
OneTrust Region: DE [Hesse]
iQyi Oversea Region: DE
Bing Region: DE (Risky)
Apple Region: DE
YouTube CDN: Frankfurt
Netflix Preferred CDN: Failed (CDN IP Not Found)
ChatGPT: Yes
Google Gemini: No
Claude: Yes
Wikipedia Editability: Yes
Google Play Store: Germany
Google Search CAPTCHA Free: Yes
Steam Currency: EUR
---Forum---
Reddit: No
---Game---
SD Gundam G Generation Eternal: No
=======================================
IP Quality Detection
Data for reference only, does not represent 100% accurate, if and the actual situation is not consistent with the manual query multiple database comparison
The following is the number of each database, the output will come with the corresponding number of the database source
ipinfo databases [0] | scamalytics databases [1] | virustotal databases [2] | abuseipdb databases [3] | ip2location databases [4]
ip-api databases [5] | ipwhois databases [6] | ipregistry databases [7] | ipdata databases [8] | db-ip databases [9]
ipapiis databases [A] | ipapicom databases [B] | bigdatacloud databases [C] | dkly databases [D] | ipqualityscore databases [E]
IPV4:
Security Score:
Reputation: 0 [2]
TrustScore: 3 [8]
VpnScore: 94 [8]
ProxyScore: 99 [8]
CommunityVoteHarmless: 0 [2]
CommunityVoteMalicious: 0 [2]
ThreatScore: 99 [8]
FraudScore: 8 [1] 0 [E]
AbuseScore: 0 [3]
ASNAbuseScore: 0.0418 (High) [A]
CompannyAbuseScore: 0 (Very Low) [A]
ThreatLevel: low [9]
Blacklist_Records_Statistics(how many blacklisted websites have records):
HarmlessnessRecords: 0 [2] MaliciousRecords: 0 [2] SuspiciousRecords: 0 [2] NoRecords: 94 [2]
Security Info:
UsageType: hosting [0 7] DataCenter/WebHosting/Transit [3] business [8 A] corporate [9] hosting - high probability [C]
CompanyType: hosting [0 A] isp [7]
IsCloudProvider: Yes [7]
IsDatacenter: No [5 6 8] Yes [0 1 A C]
IsMobile: Yes [E] No [5 A C]
IsProxy: No [0 1 4 5 6 7 8 9 A C E]
IsVpn: No [0 1 6 7 A C E]
IsTor: No [0 1 3 6 7 8 A C E]
IsTorExit: No [1 7]
IsCrawler: No [9 A E]
IsAnonymous: No [1 6 7 8]
IsAttacker: No [7 8]
IsAbuser: No [7 8 A C E]
IsThreat: No [7 8 C]
IsRelay: No [0 7 8 C]
IsBogon: No [7 8 A C]
IsBot: No [E]
DNS-BlackList: 314(Total_Check) 0(Clean) 5(Blacklisted) 24(Other)
IPV6:
Security Score:
FraudScore: 8 [1]
AbuseScore: 0 [3]
ASNAbuseScore: 0.0418 (High) [A]
CompannyAbuseScore: 0 (Very Low) [A]
Security Info:
UsageType: DataCenter/WebHosting/Transit [3] business [A]
CompanyType: hosting [A]
IsDatacenter: Yes [1 A]
IsMobile: No [A]
IsProxy: No [1 A]
IsVpn: No [1 A]
IsTor: No [1 3 A]
IsTorExit: No [1]
IsCrawler: No [A]
IsAnonymous: No [1]
IsAbuser: No [A]
IsBogon: No [A]
DNS-BlackList: 314(Total_Check) 0(Clean) 0(Blacklisted) 314(Other)
Google search feasibility: NO
Email Port Detection
Platform SMTP SMTPS POP3 POP3S IMAP IMAPS
LocalPort ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔
QQ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
163 ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Sohu ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Yandex ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Gmail ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
Outlook ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Office365 ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Yahoo ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
MailCOM ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
MailRU ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘
AOL ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
GMX ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Sina ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Apple ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
FastMail ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
ProtonMail✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
MXRoute ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Namecrane ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
XYAMail ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
ZohoMail ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
Inbox_eu ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘
Free_fr ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ Looking Glass
Server Location: Frankfurt, Germany
Test IPv4: 37.114.37.34
Test IPv6: 2a0e:97c0:3e3:158::1
Global Latency Tests
Query: ping 185.14.92.58, interval: 5s, dense mode: no
Probing 185.14.92.58 – RIPE NCC /24 AS58087 FLORIANKOLB – Germany [hosting]
CloudFlare Internet Tests
PageSpeed Insights
Admin Control Panel
Conclusion
The server delivered impressive numbers in several areas. CPU tests showed a Sysbench score of 4257 and a Geekbench 6 single-core score of 1656, curiously matched by its multi-core result. Memory performance stood out, with read speeds hitting 44,392.53 MB/s and writes at 23,419.43 MB/s. Disk tests revealed solid throughput, peaking at 2.83 GB/s for 1M block reads. Network speeds averaged 800 Mbits/sec in Europe, dipping globally as expected. Streaming unlocked Netflix originals and Amazon Prime Video, but IP bans blocked Disney+ and Dazn. IP quality checks flagged high VPN/proxy scores, hinting at reputation concerns.
This server shines in single-threaded tasks—think lightweight web servers or small databases—thanks to its robust CPU and stellar memory speeds. Disk performance supports data-heavy workloads with ease. Yet, the identical multi-core score raises eyebrows; it’s like a sports car stuck in traffic, unable to stretch its legs for parallel processing. Network reliability within Europe is a plus, but transcontinental lag is par for the course. The IP bans and high fraud scores suggest a hosting profile that might trip up services sensitive to anonymity, problematic for global streaming or email-heavy apps. For European-focused IT crews, though, it’s a gem worth considering.
The Datalix Ryzen GEN 2 Small punches above its weight for single-core and data-intensive tasks, making it a budget-friendly pick for European deployments. Its Frankfurt base ensures snappy regional connectivity, ideal for web hosting or app servers. However, multi-core limitations and IP reputation quirks could hinder broader use cases like streaming or multi-threaded workloads. IT admins targeting Europe with straightforward needs will find it a reliable workhorse. For those eyeing global reach or unrestricted service access, it’s worth a pause—check your priorities before hitting “buy.”
Official Website: https://Datalix.eu
