OWS Octopus Web Solution Singapore Intel Xeon Elastic Virtual Machine Test and Review

OWS Octopus Web Solution Singapore Intel Xeon Elastic Virtual Machine Test and Review

To gauge the real-world potential of the OWS Octopus Web Solution Singapore Elastic Virtual Machine (Plan: 2C-4G), our team put this modest cloud server through its paces. Powered by an Intel Xeon Skylake processor, it offers 2 CPU cores, 4 GB of RAM, 40 GB of SSD storage, and a 1 Gbps internet port—specs tailored for small to mid-sized businesses seeking affordable infrastructure. The goal? Assess its performance for IT managers and decision-makers eyeing a reliable VPS for workloads like web hosting, content delivery, or regional services, focusing on CPU, memory, disk, network, and streaming capabilities.

About OWS (Octopus Web Solution)

OWS, also referred to as OWS.US, is headquartered in Spokane, Washington, and was founded in 2021. Its mission is to provide low-latency, high-bandwidth, flexible, and reliable edge computing services, empowering businesses with faster, cost-effective, and efficient computing resources. This focus positions OWS as a modern solution for digital transformation, particularly in cloud and edge computing environments.

Services Offered

OWS offers a diverse range of services tailored to various business needs:

  • Virtual Machines (VMs): Ideal for scalable computing, with plans like ECS (Elastic Compute Service) for smaller companies, offering excellent performance, stability, and reliability with elastic expansion capabilities.
  • Bare Metal Servers (BMS): Designed for medium to large enterprises, providing on-demand, high-performance solutions.
  • Infrastructure and Platform Services: Includes NVIDIA GPUs, virtual CPUs, Kubernetes, storage, and networking solutions, supporting advanced computing needs.
  • Software and Application Support: Ensures compatibility and functionality across different environments.

The company supports a wide array of operating systems, including Debian 10, 11, 12; Windows 2012, 2016, 2019; Ubuntu 18.04, 20.04, 22.04; and CentOS 7.3, 7.5, 7.6, 7.9, 8, ensuring flexibility for users.

Pricing

OWS Octopus Web Solution Singapore Intel Xeon Elastic Virtual Machine Test and Review

Official Website: https://ows.us

Coupon

Sign up and recharge to enjoy a $10 bonus HERE

Basic Information

 Processor         : Intel Xeon Processor (Skylake, IBRS)
 CPU Numbers       : 2
 CPU Frequency     : 2494.138 MHz
 CPU Cache         : L1: 128.00 KB / L2: 8.00 MB / L3: 32.00 MB
 AES-NI            : ✔ Enabled
 VM-x/AMD-V        : ✔ Enabled
 RAM               : 286.43 MiB / 3.83 GiB
 Swap              : [ no swap partition or swap file detected ]
 Disk Space        : 1.43 GiB / 36.48 GiB
 Boot Disk         : /dev/sda3
 Uptime            : 0 days, 0 hour 10 min
 Loads             : 0.47, 0.32, 0.20
 OS Release        : Debian GNU/Linux 11 (bullseye) (x86_64)
 Arch              : x86_64 (64 Bit)
 Kernel Version    : 5.10.0-31-amd64
 TCP Acceleration  : bbr
 VM Type           : KVM
 NAT Type          : Full Cone
 IPV4 ASN          : AS984 OCTOPUS WEB SOLUTION INC
 IPV4 Location     : Singapore / Singapore / SG
 IPV6 Subnet Mask  : 128

CPU Benchmark

---------------------------CPU-Sysbench-Test----------------------------
 -> CPU test in progress (Fast Mode, 1-Pass @ 5sec)
 1 Thread(s) Test:              911 Scores
 2 Thread(s) Test:              1799 Scores
Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
---------------------------------
Test            | Value                         
                |                               
Single Core     | 803                           
Multi Core      | 1382                          
Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/13150578

YABS completed in 10 min 48 sec

RAM Read/Write Tests

----------------------------Memory-Test---------------------------------
 -> Memory Test (Fast Mode, 1-Pass @ 5sec)
 Single Read Test:              17953.41 MB/s
 Single Write Test:             12799.34 MB/s
Running memory speed test with the following options:
  block size: 1KiB
  total size: 102400MiB
  operation: read
  scope: global

Initializing worker threads...

Threads started!

Total operations: 50637782 (5060725.09 per second)

49450.96 MiB transferred (4942.11 MiB/sec)


General statistics:
    total time:                          10.0006s
    total number of events:              50637782

Latency (ms):
         min:                                    0.00
         avg:                                    0.00
         max:                                    6.00
         95th percentile:                        0.00
         sum:                                 3273.49

Threads fairness:
    events (avg/stddev):           50637782.0000/0.00
    execution time (avg/stddev):   3.2735/0.00
Running memory speed test with the following options:
  block size: 1KiB
  total size: 102400MiB
  operation: write
  scope: global

Initializing worker threads...

Threads started!

Total operations: 39659036 (3964744.07 per second)

38729.53 MiB transferred (3871.82 MiB/sec)


General statistics:
    total time:                          10.0003s
    total number of events:              39659036

Latency (ms):
         min:                                    0.00
         avg:                                    0.00
         max:                                   11.99
         95th percentile:                        0.00
         sum:                                 4669.54

Threads fairness:
    events (avg/stddev):           39659036.0000/0.00
    execution time (avg/stddev):   4.6695/0.00

Disk Read/Write Tests

------------------------Disk-dd-Read/Write-Test-------------------------
 -> Disk test in progress (4K Block/1M Block, Direct Mode)
 Block Size             Write Test                              Read Test
 100MB-4K Block         8.3 MB/s (2015 IOPS, 12.70s)            4.4 MB/s (1075 IOPS, 23.80s)
 1GB-1M Block           53.4 MB/s (51 IOPS, 19.63s)             136 MB/s (129 IOPS, 7.71s)
-----------------------Disk-fio-Read/Write-Test-------------------------
Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
Read       | 7.98 MB/s     (1.9k) | 97.59 MB/s    (1.5k)
Write      | 8.02 MB/s     (2.0k) | 98.10 MB/s    (1.5k)
Total      | 16.01 MB/s    (4.0k) | 195.69 MB/s   (3.0k)
           |                      |                     
Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
Read       | 93.17 MB/s     (181) | 92.05 MB/s      (89)
Write      | 98.12 MB/s     (191) | 98.18 MB/s      (95)
Total      | 191.29 MB/s    (372) | 190.23 MB/s    (184)

Iperf3 Network Tests

iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
---------------------------------
Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping           
Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 950 Mbits/sec   | 353 Mbits/sec   | 166 ms         
Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 909 Mbits/sec   | 552 Mbits/sec   | 241 ms         
Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 975 Mbits/sec   | 272 Mbits/sec   | 133 ms         
Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 1.10 Gbits/sec  | 1.05 Gbits/sec  | 1.29 ms        
Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 943 Mbits/sec   | 398 Mbits/sec   | 168 ms         
Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 867 Mbits/sec   | 902 Mbits/sec   | 234 ms         
Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 706 Mbits/sec   | 263 Mbits/sec   | 318 ms         

iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv6):
---------------------------------
Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping           
Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | busy            | busy            | 166 ms         
Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | busy            | busy            | 241 ms         
Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | busy            | busy            | 134 ms         
Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | busy            | busy            | 1.73 ms        
Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | busy            | busy            | 168 ms         
Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | busy            | busy            | 235 ms         
Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | busy            | busy            | 318 ms  

Streaming Unlock Tests

============[ Multination ]============
 Dazn:                                  Yes (Region: SG)
 Disney+:                               Yes (Region: SG)
 Netflix:                               Yes (Region: SG)
 YouTube Premium:                       Yes (Region: SG)
 Amazon Prime Video:                    Yes (Region: SG)
 TVBAnywhere+:                          Yes
 Spotify Registration:                  Yes (Region: SG)
 OneTrust Region:                       SG [Unknown]
 iQyi Oversea Region:                   SG
 Bing Region:                           SG
 Apple Region:                          SG
 YouTube CDN:                           Singapore
 Netflix Preferred CDN:                 Failed (CDN IP Not Found)
 ChatGPT:                               Yes
 Google Gemini:                         Yes (Region: SGP)
 Claude:                                Yes
 Wikipedia Editability:                 Yes
 Google Play Store:                     Singapore 
 Google Search CAPTCHA Free:            Yes
 Steam Currency:                        SGD
 ---Forum---
 Reddit:                                Yes
 ---Game---
 SD Gundam G Generation Eternal:        Yes
=======================================

IP Quality Detection

Data for reference only, does not represent 100% accurate, if and the actual situation is not consistent with the manual query multiple database comparison
The following is the number of each database, the output will come with the corresponding number of the database source
ipinfo  databases [0] | scamalytics databases [1] | virustotal  databases  [2] | abuseipdb databases   [3] | ip2location databases    [4]
ip-api  databases [5] | ipwhois databases     [6] | ipregistry  databases  [7] | ipdata databases      [8] | db-ip databases          [9]
ipapiis databases [A] | ipapicom databases    [B] | bigdatacloud databases [C] | dkly databases        [D] | ipqualityscore databases [E]
IPV4:
Security Score:
Reputation: 0 [2] 
TrustScore: 28 [8] 
VpnScore: 19 [8] 
ProxyScore: 100 [8] 
CommunityVoteHarmless: 0 [2] 
CommunityVoteMalicious: 0 [2] 
ThreatScore: 98 [8] 
FraudScore: 16 [1] 65 [E]
AbuseScore: 0 [3] 
ASNAbuseScore: 0.0001 (Very Low) [A] 
CompannyAbuseScore: 0.0078 (Low) [A] 
ThreatLevel: low [9] 
Blacklist_Records_Statistics(how many blacklisted websites have records):
HarmlessnessRecords: 0 [2]  MaliciousRecords: 0 [2]  SuspiciousRecords: 0 [2]  NoRecords: 94 [2]  
Security Info:
UsageType: hosting [A] unknown [C] corporate [9] business [8] FixedLineISP [3] isp [0 7]
CompanyType: hosting [A] isp [0 7]
IsCloudProvider: No [7] 
IsDatacenter: Yes [1 A] No [0 5 6 8 C]
IsMobile: No [5 A C] Yes [E]
IsProxy: Yes [E] No [0 1 4 5 6 7 8 9 A C]
IsVpn: Yes [E] No [0 1 6 7 A C]
IsTor: No [0 1 3 6 7 8 A C E] 
IsTorExit: No [1 7] 
IsCrawler: No [9 A E] 
IsAnonymous: No [1 6 7 8] 
IsAttacker: No [7 8] 
IsAbuser: No [7 8 A C E] 
IsThreat: No [7 8 C] 
IsRelay: No [0 7 8 C] 
IsBogon: No [7 8 A C] 
IsBot: No [E] 
DNS-BlackList: 315(Total_Check) 0(Clean) 7(Blacklisted) 25(Other) 
Google search feasibility: NO

Email Port Detection

Platform  SMTP  SMTPS POP3  POP3S IMAP  IMAPS
LocalPort ✔     ✔     ✔     ✔     ✔     ✔    
QQ        ✔     ✔     ✔     ✘     ✔     ✘    
163       ✔     ✔     ✔     ✘     ✔     ✘    
Sohu      ✔     ✔     ✔     ✘     ✔     ✘    
Yandex    ✔     ✔     ✔     ✘     ✔     ✘    
Gmail     ✔     ✔     ✘     ✘     ✘     ✘    
Outlook   ✔     ✘     ✔     ✘     ✔     ✘    
Office365 ✔     ✘     ✔     ✘     ✔     ✘    
Yahoo     ✔     ✔     ✘     ✘     ✘     ✘    
MailCOM   ✔     ✔     ✔     ✘     ✔     ✘    
MailRU    ✔     ✔     ✘     ✘     ✔     ✘    
AOL       ✔     ✔     ✘     ✘     ✘     ✘    
GMX       ✔     ✔     ✔     ✘     ✔     ✘    
Sina      ✔     ✔     ✔     ✘     ✔     ✘    
Apple     ✘     ✔     ✘     ✘     ✘     ✘    
FastMail  ✘     ✔     ✘     ✘     ✘     ✘    
ProtonMail✘     ✘     ✘     ✘     ✘     ✘    
MXRoute   ✔     ✘     ✔     ✘     ✔     ✘    
Namecrane ✔     ✘     ✔     ✘     ✘     ✘    
XYAMail   ✘     ✘     ✘     ✘     ✘     ✘    
ZohoMail  ✘     ✔     ✘     ✘     ✘     ✘    
Inbox_eu  ✔     ✔     ✔     ✘     ✘     ✘    
Free_fr   ✘     ✔     ✔     ✘     ✔     ✘   

Looking Glass

None

Global Latency Tests

OWS Octopus Web Solution Singapore Intel Xeon Elastic Virtual Machine Test and Review OWS Octopus Web Solution Singapore Intel Xeon Elastic Virtual Machine Test and Review

Query: ping 154.196.187.68, interval: 5s, dense mode: no

Probing 154.196.187.68 – ARIN /17 AS984 OWS-NETWORK – Singapore, Singapore [hosting]

CloudFlare Internet Tests

OWS Octopus Web Solution Singapore Intel Xeon Elastic Virtual Machine Test and Review

PageSpeed Insights

OWS Octopus Web Solution Singapore Intel Xeon Elastic Virtual Machine Test and Review

Admin Control Panel

OWS Octopus Web Solution Singapore Intel Xeon Elastic Virtual Machine Test and Review OWS Octopus Web Solution Singapore Intel Xeon Elastic Virtual Machine Test and Review

Conclusion

The VM’s CPU held its own, posting Geekbench 6 scores of 803 (single-core) and 1382 (multi-core)—decent for moderate tasks. Memory performance was surprising, with read speeds hitting 17,953 MB/s, though write speeds lagged at 12,799 MB/s. Disk I/O told a mixed story: 4K block tests crawled at 4.4 MB/s (read) and 8.3 MB/s (write), but 1M block speeds jumped to 136 MB/s (read) and 53.4 MB/s (write). Network tests shone locally, with 1.05 Gbps receive and 1.10 Gbps send in Singapore, yet global speeds tapered to 263-902 Mbits/sec. Streaming unlocked Netflix and Disney+ seamlessly in Singapore, but IP quality raised red flags, with a ProxyScore of 100 and a TrustScore of 28.

This VM flexes its muscles for Asia-centric deployments—think of it as a sprinter dominating a local track but losing steam on a global marathon. The robust local network and streaming prowess make it a gem for content delivery or regional apps. Yet, the sluggish disk write speeds could trip up database-heavy operations, much like a sports car stuck in city traffic. The IP reputation issues—flagged as a potential proxy—might spook services strict about security, though its email port versatility (supporting SMTP and IMAPS across platforms) adds a handy twist. For lighter workloads, it’s a solid contender; for write-intensive tasks, proceed with caution.

The OWS Singapore VM strikes a compelling balance of cost and capability for businesses targeting the Asia-Pacific. Its local network speeds and streaming support are standout features, ideal for media or communication hubs. That said, IT admins should weigh the disk write bottlenecks and IP trust concerns against their needs, especially for global or security-sensitive applications. It’s not flawless, but for regional performance on a budget, this VM delivers where it counts. Consider it a practical pick, not a perfect one.

Official Website: https://ows.us

Related Posts