RAVNIX United States AMD EPYC 7702 Memory Optimized KVM Cloud Server Test and Review
The RAVNIX MEMORY-KVM-2 plan offers robust memory performance and reliable global network speeds in a compact, cost-effective package. Powered by a single AMD EPYC 7702 core, 2 GB RAM, and 15 GB SSD on a 1 Gbps port, it achieved over 43 GB/s memory read speeds, ~1.1 GB/s sequential disk reads, and near-gigabit network throughput to major global hubs.
Streaming access is excellent, unlocking Netflix, Disney+, DAZN, and other major platforms in the US regions. The IP reputation is clean, with no significant blacklist entries, making it suitable for business use.
The main trade-off is the single-core CPU, which limits heavy parallel workloads—ideal for caching, lightweight apps, media proxying, and distributed services, but less suited for high-volume compute or database processing.
Recommendation: An excellent low-cost choice for globally accessible, memory-intensive applications. Consider multi-core plans if concurrency is a priority.
About RAVNIX
Founded in 2024 by a dedicated team with decades of hosting experience, RAVNIX operates its own bare metal infrastructure and IP space (AS401486) with full control over hardware, network, and service quality. Every system is built and tuned in-house.
Pricing
Official Website: https://RAVNIX.gg
Coupon
The merchant did not provide
Basic Information
Processor : AMD EPYC 7702 64-Core Processor
CPU Numbers : 1
CPU Frequency : 1996.249 MHz
CPU Cache : L1: 64.00 KB / L2: 512.00 KB / L3: 256.00 MB
AES-NI : ✔ Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
RAM : 411.12 MiB / 1.90 GiB
Swap : 524 KiB / 512.00 MiB
Disk Space : 2.71 GiB / 14.87 GiB
Boot Disk : /dev/vda3
Uptime : 0 days, 0 hour 13 min
Loads : 0.37, 0.25, 0.18
OS Release : Debian GNU/Linux 11 (bullseye) (x86_64)
Arch : x86_64 (64 Bit)
Kernel Version : 5.10.0-20-amd64
TCP Acceleration : bbr
VM Type : KVM
NAT Type : Full Cone
IPV4 ASN : AS401486 RAVNIX LLC
IPV4 Location : Fairfax / South Carolina / US
CPU Benchmark
---------------------------CPU-Sysbench-Test----------------------------
-> CPU test in progress (Fast Mode, 1-Pass @ 5sec)
1 Thread(s) Test: 1598 Scores
Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
---------------------------------
Test | Value
|
Single Core | 1395
Multi Core | 1380
Full Test | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/13276708
YABS completed in 9 min 6 sec
RAM Read/Write Tests
----------------------------Memory-Test---------------------------------
-> Memory Test (Fast Mode, 1-Pass @ 5sec)
Single Read Test: 43213.83 MB/s
Single Write Test: 19268.11 MB/s
Running memory speed test with the following options:
block size: 1KiB
total size: 102400MiB
operation: read
scope: global
Initializing worker threads...
Threads started!
Total operations: 63934184 (6392827.06 per second)
62435.73 MiB transferred (6243.00 MiB/sec)
General statistics:
total time: 10.0000s
total number of events: 63934184
Latency (ms):
min: 0.00
avg: 0.00
max: 5.95
95th percentile: 0.00
sum: 3166.74
Threads fairness:
events (avg/stddev): 63934184.0000/0.00
execution time (avg/stddev): 3.1667/0.00
Running memory speed test with the following options:
block size: 1KiB
total size: 102400MiB
operation: write
scope: global
Initializing worker threads...
Threads started!
Total operations: 53606379 (5360152.04 per second)
52349.98 MiB transferred (5234.52 MiB/sec)
General statistics:
total time: 10.0000s
total number of events: 53606379
Latency (ms):
min: 0.00
avg: 0.00
max: 5.44
95th percentile: 0.00
sum: 4255.26
Threads fairness:
events (avg/stddev): 53606379.0000/0.00
execution time (avg/stddev): 4.2553/0.00
Disk Read/Write Tests
------------------------Disk-dd-Read/Write-Test-------------------------
-> Disk test in progress (4K Block/1M Block, Direct Mode)
Block Size Write Test Read Test
100MB-4K Block 18.0 MB/s (4399 IOPS, 5.82s) 18.6 MB/s (4535 IOPS, 5.64s)
1GB-1M Block 707 MB/s (674 IOPS, 1.48s) 1.1 GB/s (1021 IOPS, 0.98s)
-----------------------Disk-fio-Read/Write-Test-------------------------
Block Size | 4k (IOPS) | 64k (IOPS)
------ | --- ---- | ---- ----
Read | 275.79 MB/s (68.9k) | 824.13 MB/s (12.8k)
Write | 276.52 MB/s (69.1k) | 828.46 MB/s (12.9k)
Total | 552.31 MB/s (138.0k) | 1.65 GB/s (25.8k)
| |
Block Size | 512k (IOPS) | 1m (IOPS)
------ | --- ---- | ---- ----
Read | 688.99 MB/s (1.3k) | 571.38 MB/s (557)
Write | 725.60 MB/s (1.4k) | 609.44 MB/s (595)
Total | 1.41 GB/s (2.7k) | 1.18 GB/s (1.1k)
Iperf3 Network Tests
iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
---------------------------------
Provider | Location (Link) | Send Speed | Recv Speed | Ping
Clouvider | London, UK (10G) | 1.02 Gbits/sec | 824 Mbits/sec | 89.7 ms
Eranium | Amsterdam, NL (100G) | 1.02 Gbits/sec | 881 Mbits/sec | 89.6 ms
Uztelecom | Tashkent, UZ (10G) | 925 Mbits/sec | 504 Mbits/sec | 178 ms
Leaseweb | Singapore, SG (10G) | 869 Mbits/sec | 661 Mbits/sec | 242 ms
Clouvider | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 1.04 Gbits/sec | 503 Mbits/sec | 64.0 ms
Leaseweb | NYC, NY, US (10G) | 1.07 Gbits/sec | 943 Mbits/sec | 17.5 ms
Edgoo | Sao Paulo, BR (1G) | 967 Mbits/sec | 410 Mbits/sec | 127 ms UnixBench Tests
Benchmark Run: Tue Aug 12 2025 02:10:37 - 02:39:13
1 CPU in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 40564982.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 6748.6 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 5518.8 lps (29.8 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1048073.1 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 276734.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 3133087.1 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 1757207.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 212310.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 16676.1 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 10896.8 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 635.3 lpm (60.3 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 1953224.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 40564982.6 3476.0
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 6748.6 1227.0
Execl Throughput 43.0 5518.8 1283.4
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 1048073.1 2646.6
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 276734.4 1672.1
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 3133087.1 5401.9
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1757207.1 1412.5
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 212310.8 530.8
Process Creation 126.0 16676.1 1323.5
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 10896.8 2570.0
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 635.3 1058.9
System Call Overhead 15000.0 1953224.2 1302.1
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 1666.9
======= Script description and score comparison completed! =======
Streaming Unlock Tests
============[ Multination ]============
Dazn: Yes (Region: US)
Disney+: Yes (Region: US)
Netflix: Yes (Region: US)
YouTube Premium: Yes (Region: US)
Amazon Prime Video: Yes (Region: US)
TVBAnywhere+: Yes
Spotify Registration: Yes (Region: US)
OneTrust Region: US [South Carolina]
iQyi Oversea Region: US
Bing Region: US (Risky)
Apple Region: US
YouTube CDN: Washington DC
Netflix Preferred CDN: Failed (CDN IP Not Found)
ChatGPT: Yes
Google Gemini: Yes (Region: USA)
Claude: Yes
Wikipedia Editability: Yes
Google Play Store: United States
Google Search CAPTCHA Free: Yes
Steam Currency: USD
---Forum---
Reddit: Yes
---Game---
SD Gundam G Generation Eternal: Yes
=======================================
IP Quality Detection
Data for reference only, does not represent 100% accurate, if and the actual situation is not consistent with the manual query multiple database comparison
The following is the number of each database, the output will come with the corresponding number of the database source
ipinfo databases [0] | scamalytics databases [1] | virustotal databases [2] | abuseipdb databases [3] | ip2location databases [4]
ip-api databases [5] | ipwhois databases [6] | ipregistry databases [7] | ipdata databases [8] | db-ip databases [9]
ipapiis databases [A] | ipapicom databases [B] | bigdatacloud databases [C] | dkly databases [D] | ipqualityscore databases [E]
IPV4:
Security Score:
Reputation: 0 [2]
TrustScore: 0 [8]
VpnScore: 100 [8]
ProxyScore: 100 [8]
CommunityVoteHarmless: 0 [2]
CommunityVoteMalicious: 0 [2]
ThreatScore: 100 [8]
FraudScore: 0 [1 E]
AbuseScore: 0 [3]
ASNAbuseScore: 0.0013 (Low) [A]
CompannyAbuseScore: 0.0002 (Very Low) [A]
ThreatLevel: low [9]
Blacklist_Records_Statistics(how many blacklisted websites have records):
HarmlessnessRecords: 0 [2] MaliciousRecords: 0 [2] SuspiciousRecords: 0 [2] NoRecords: 94 [2]
Security Info:
UsageType: FixedLineISP [3] business [0 7 A] hosting [8 9] unknown [C]
CompanyType: business [0] hosting [7 A]
IsCloudProvider: Yes [7]
IsDatacenter: Yes [1 8 A] No [0 5 6 C]
IsMobile: No [5 A C] Yes [E]
IsProxy: No [0 1 4 5 6 7 8 9 A C E]
IsVpn: No [0 1 6 7 A C E]
IsTorExit: No [1 7]
IsTorExit: No [1 7]
IsCrawler: No [9 A E]
IsAnonymous: No [1 6 7 8]
IsAttacker: No [7 8]
IsAbuser: No [7 8 A C E]
IsThreat: No [7 8 C]
IsRelay: No [0 7 8 C]
IsBogon: No [7 8 A C]
IsBot: No [E]
DNS-BlackList: 315(Total_Check) 0(Clean) 9(Blacklisted) 25(Other)
Google search feasibility: NO
Email Port Detection
Platform SMTP SMTPS POP3 POP3S IMAP IMAPS
LocalPort ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔
QQ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
163 ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Sohu ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Yandex ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Gmail ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
Outlook ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Office365 ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Yahoo ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
MailCOM ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
MailRU ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘
AOL ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
GMX ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Sina ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
Apple ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
FastMail ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
ProtonMail✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
MXRoute ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Namecrane ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
XYAMail ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
ZohoMail ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
Inbox_eu ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘
Free_fr ✘ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Looking Glass
📍 Location: AQX01 – South Carolina, USA
🔍 Looking Glass: https://aqx01-lg.ravnix.gg/
Global Latency Tests
Query: ping 74.50.11.12, interval: 5s, dense mode: no
Probing 74.50.11.12 – ARIN /24 AS401486 RAVNIX – United States, South Carolina, Fairfax [hosting]
CloudFlare Internet Tests
PageSpeed Insights
Admin Control Panel
Conclusion
CPU tests yielded 1,598 points in Sysbench and a Geekbench 6 single-core score of 1,395, indicating solid single-thread responsiveness. Memory performance stood out, with read speeds exceeding 43 GB/s and write speeds above 19 GB/s in synthetic tests. Disk benchmarks varied: sequential writes peaked at 707 MB/s, while reads reached 1.1 GB/s, and random 4K operations hovered around 275 MB/s. Network throughput remained stable, often surpassing 900 Mbps in transcontinental tests, with sub-20 ms latency to New York. Streaming unlock checks were impressive, granting full access to major platforms including Netflix, Disney+, and DAZN (US regions). IP quality scores were generally low-risk, with no major blacklist entries.
The server’s strengths lie in memory bandwidth and network consistency, making it a good fit for memory-bound workloads such as in-memory caching or analytics microservices. However, the single-core CPU allocation imposes a ceiling—much like a sports car restricted to a single lane, it delivers strong bursts but cannot handle heavy parallelism. Disk performance is adequate for standard I/O, though latency-sensitive transactional databases might encounter bottlenecks under sustained load. The clean IP reputation and broad streaming unlocks hint at flexible use cases, from global media proxying to low-profile application hosting. Notably, the stability in long-distance network links makes it appealing for distributed service architectures.
Overall, the RAVNIX MEMORY-KVM-2 plan demonstrates dependable performance for its class, with standout memory speeds and robust global network connectivity. It is well-suited for developers, small business deployments, and media-centric applications seeking a low-cost yet capable platform. Prospective buyers should weigh the single-core limitation against workload concurrency needs. For CPU-intensive or high-volume database operations, scaling vertically or opting for multi-core plans is advisable. For lightweight but globally accessible services, this configuration offers a balanced blend of speed, stability, and accessibility.
Official Website: https://RAVNIX.gg
