Kamatera China Hong Kong Intel® Xeon Type A VPS Hosting Test and Review

Tests1~months ago~Updated LetsHosting
2.4K 0
Kamatera China Hong Kong Intel® Xeon Type A VPS Hosting Test and Review

This round comprehensively tests the Kamatera China Hong Kong Type A Availability Shared vCPU VPS Server. This server is driven by an Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 8358P CPU @ 2.60GHz Processor. It contains a compelling setup of 2 CPU Cores, fast 4 GB RAM, 50 GB SSD Storage, a powerful 10Gbit/sec Port, a generous allowance of 1 TB Traffic, and 1x IPv4.

Our approach to assessment is thorough and rigorous, involving a range of distinct tests. We will conduct the Basic Benchmark, Yabs, and Unix Benchmark for fundamental metric analysis. Following it is the Global Node Test, which contributes to an extensive network evaluation, and the Global Ping Test, which provides a detailed latency measurement.

For a deeper look at regional accessibility, we’ll perform the Media Unlock Test. The quality of the connection will be evaluated via the CloudFlare Internet Test. We’ll use tools like PageSpeed Insights and GTmetrix Performance to assess the server’s web performance. These exhaustive tests will equip you with profound, holistic insights into the server’s overall performance.

About Kamatera

Kamatera is a cloud-based hosting provider that offers a wide range of services, including virtual private servers (VPS), dedicated servers, and cloud hosting. The company was founded in 2010 and is headquartered in Israel. Kamatera is known for its high performance, scalability, and flexibility.

Features

Kamatera offers a wide range of features, making it a popular choice for businesses of all sizes. Some of the key features include:

  • High performance: Kamatera’s servers are powered by the latest hardware and software, ensuring that your websites and applications perform at their best.
  • Scalability: Kamatera’s cloud-based infrastructure lets you quickly scale your resources up or down as needed. This is ideal for businesses that experience fluctuating traffic patterns.
  • Flexibility: Kamatera offers a wide range of customization options so that you can choose the perfect hosting solution for your needs.
  • Managed services: Kamatera offers various managed services, so you can focus on running your business instead of managing your servers.
  • Security: Kamatera takes security seriously and offers a variety of features to protect your data, including firewalls, intrusion detection, and data encryption.

Helpful Information

In addition to its hosting services, Kamatera also offers a variety of helpful resources for its customers, including:

  • Knowledge base: Kamatera contains articles and tutorials on various topics, including server management, security, and troubleshooting.
  • 24/7 support: Kamatera offers 24/7 support via live chat, email, and phone.
  • Documentation: Kamatera provides detailed documentation for all of its products and services.

Official Website: https://www.Kamatera.com

Looking Glass

https://as-speedtest.kamatera.com

BasicBench: Server Profile, I/O Speed, Upload and Download Speed

 CPU Model          : Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 8358P CPU @ 2.60GHz
 CPU Cores          : 2 @ 2593.905 MHz
 CPU Cache          : 49152 KB
 AES-NI             : Enabled
 VM-x/AMD-V         : Disabled
 Total Disk         : 49.1 GB (1.4 GB Used)
 Total Mem          : 3.8 GB (145.9 MB Used)
 System uptime      : 0 days, 0 hour 41 min
 Load average       : 0.03, 0.01, 0.00
 OS                 : Debian GNU/Linux 11
 Arch               : x86_64 (64 Bit)
 Kernel             : 5.10.0-23-amd64
 TCP CC             : bbr
 Virtualization     : VMware
 IPv4/IPv6          : Online / Offline
 Organization       : AS64022 Kamatera, Inc.
 Location           : Hong Kong / HK
 Region             : Central and Western
----------------------------------------------------------------------
 I/O Speed(1st run) : 1.2 GB/s
 I/O Speed(2nd run) : 1.5 GB/s
 I/O Speed(3rd run) : 1.3 GB/s
 I/O Speed(average) : 1365.3 MB/s
----------------------------------------------------------------------
 Node Name        Upload Speed      Download Speed      Latency     
 Speedtest.net    9248.40 Mbps      9047.37 Mbps        0.20 ms     
 Los Angeles, US  540.79 Mbps       3576.38 Mbps        149.66 ms   
 Dallas, US       420.87 Mbps       3264.27 Mbps        190.58 ms   
 Montreal, CA     373.95 Mbps       936.96 Mbps         212.94 ms   
 Paris, FR        336.31 Mbps       2609.75 Mbps        235.04 ms   
 Amsterdam, NL    402.09 Mbps       1103.39 Mbps        196.95 ms   
 Shanghai, CN     25.13 Mbps        989.17 Mbps         311.62 ms   
 Nanjing, CN      263.44 Mbps       1812.65 Mbps        290.05 ms   
 Hongkong, CN     524.78 Mbps       5057.30 Mbps        153.64 ms   
 Singapore, SG    2421.90 Mbps      7503.83 Mbps        32.25 ms    
 Tokyo, JP        583.13 Mbps       5426.02 Mbps        49.95 ms    
----------------------------------------------------------------------
 Finished in        : 5 min 49 sec
 Timestamp          : 2023-08-11 02:28:36 EDT

YabsBench: Disk Speed, iperf3 Network Speed, Geekbench 6 Benchmark

IPv4 Network Information:
---------------------------------
ISP        : CLOUDWEBMANAGE
ASN        : AS64022 Kamatera, Inc.
Location   : Hong Kong, Central and Western District (HCW)
Country    : Hong Kong

fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50):
---------------------------------
Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
Read       | 191.67 MB/s  (47.9k) | 2.31 GB/s    (36.2k)
Write      | 192.17 MB/s  (48.0k) | 2.33 GB/s    (36.4k)
Total      | 383.84 MB/s  (95.9k) | 4.65 GB/s    (72.6k)
           |                      |                     
Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
Read       | 4.88 GB/s     (9.5k) | 5.21 GB/s     (5.0k)
Write      | 5.14 GB/s    (10.0k) | 5.56 GB/s     (5.4k)
Total      | 10.03 GB/s   (19.5k) | 10.78 GB/s   (10.5k)

iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
---------------------------------
Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping           
Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 20.6 Mbits/sec  | 28.4 Mbits/sec  | 185 ms         
Scaleway        | Paris, FR (10G)           | busy            | 585 Mbits/sec   | 185 ms         
NovoServe       | North Holland, NL (40G)   | busy            | busy            | 198 ms         
Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | busy            | 2.25 Mbits/sec  | 348 ms         
Clouvider       | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 846 Mbits/sec   | 289 Mbits/sec   | 191 ms         
Clouvider       | Dallas, TX, US (10G)      | 936 Mbits/sec   | 952 Mbits/sec   | 175 ms         
Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 1.11 Gbits/sec  | 1.18 Gbits/sec  | 149 ms         

Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
---------------------------------
Test            | Value                         
                |                               
Single Core     | 1226                          
Multi Core      | 2216                          
Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/2223261

YABS completed in 13 min 25 sec

UnixBench: CPU Performance

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Fri Aug 11 2023 02:58:39 - 03:26:37
2 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables       38185190.8 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone                     6111.8 MWIPS (9.4 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput                               3611.9 lps   (29.9 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks        329380.3 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks           87733.4 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks       1005244.8 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput                              404700.0 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching                  74111.3 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation                               6513.4 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                   8981.5 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                   1715.9 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead                         186613.2 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values               BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0   38185190.8   3272.1
Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0       6111.8   1111.2
Execl Throughput                                 43.0       3611.9    840.0
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0     329380.3    831.8
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0      87733.4    530.1
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0    1005244.8   1733.2
Pipe Throughput                               12440.0     404700.0    325.3
Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0      74111.3    185.3
Process Creation                                126.0       6513.4    516.9
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4       8981.5   2118.3
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0       1715.9   2859.9
System Call Overhead                          15000.0     186613.2    124.4
                                                                   ========
System Benchmarks Index Score                                         785.1

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Fri Aug 11 2023 03:26:37 - 03:54:38
2 CPUs in system; running 2 parallel copies of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables       77845591.9 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone                    12204.8 MWIPS (9.4 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput                               6346.4 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks        579899.0 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks          154736.6 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks       1925465.9 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput                              814754.6 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching                 249793.5 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation                              15108.2 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                  10843.6 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                   1482.2 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead                         315985.4 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values               BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0   77845591.9   6670.6
Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0      12204.8   2219.1
Execl Throughput                                 43.0       6346.4   1475.9
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0     579899.0   1464.4
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0     154736.6    935.0
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0    1925465.9   3319.8
Pipe Throughput                               12440.0     814754.6    654.9
Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0     249793.5    624.5
Process Creation                                126.0      15108.2   1199.1
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4      10843.6   2557.5
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0       1482.2   2470.3
System Call Overhead                          15000.0     315985.4    210.7
                                                                   ========
System Benchmarks Index Score                                        1415.7

======= Script description and score comparison completed! ======= 

Global Node Test

 ## CDN Speedtest

 CacheFly :      88 B/s |      N/A       | ping   0.666ms
 Gdrive   :  58.86 MiB/s |  470.87 Mbps  | ping   1.393ms


 ## North America Speedtest

 Softlayer, Washington, USA : 290.26 KiB/s |    2.27 Mbps  | ping 218.747ms
 SoftLayer, San Jose, USA   :   9.05 MiB/s |   72.39 Mbps  | ping 154.165ms
 SoftLayer, Dallas, USA     :       0 B/s |      N/A       | ping error!
 Vultr, New Jersey, USA     :   8.76 MiB/s |   70.11 Mbps  | ping 189.976ms
 Vultr, Seattle, USA        :  15.74 MiB/s |  125.93 Mbps  | ping 131.282ms
 Vultr, Dallas, USA         :   9.91 MiB/s |   79.31 Mbps  | ping 175.274ms
 Vultr, Los Angeles, USA    :  12.69 MiB/s |  101.53 Mbps  | ping 149.102ms
 Ramnode, New York, USA     :   8.34 MiB/s |   66.73 Mbps  | ping 200.224ms
 Ramnode, Atlanta, USA      :   9.83 MiB/s |   78.63 Mbps  | ping 186.138ms


 ## Europe Speedtest

 Vultr, London, UK            :   1.92 MiB/s |   15.38 Mbps  | ping 195.190ms
 LeaseWeb, Frankfurt, Germany :  27.03 KiB/s |    0.21 Mbps  | ping 189.443ms
 Hetzner, Germany             : 391.92 KiB/s |    3.06 Mbps  | ping 186.748ms
 Ramnode, Alblasserdam, NL    : 206.04 KiB/s |    1.61 Mbps  | ping 210.499ms
 Vultr, Amsterdam, NL         :   8.67 MiB/s |   69.39 Mbps  | ping 189.015ms
 EDIS, Stockholm, Sweden      :     324 B/s |      N/A       | ping 256.766ms
 OVH, Roubaix, France         :     209 B/s |      N/A       | ping 234.389ms
 Online, France               :   8.27 MiB/s |   66.13 Mbps  | ping 185.315ms
 Prometeus, Milan, Italy      :     186 B/s |      N/A       | ping 243.464ms


 ## Exotic Speedtest

 Sydney, Australia     :  11.80 MiB/s |   94.43 Mbps  | ping 156.023ms
 Lagoon, New Caledonia :     400 B/s |      N/A       | ping 151.518ms
 Hosteasy, Moldova     : 101.78 KiB/s |    0.80 Mbps  | ping 228.076ms
 Prima, Argentina      : 406.22 KiB/s |    3.17 Mbps  | ping error!


 ## Asia Speedtest

 SoftLayer, Singapore :  67.67 MiB/s |  541.36 Mbps  | ping  31.030ms
 Linode, Tokyo, Japan :  43.99 MiB/s |  351.96 Mbps  | ping  55.688ms
 Linode, Singapore    :  74.07 MiB/s |  592.59 Mbps  | ping  31.011ms
 Vultr, Tokyo, Japan  :  49.50 MiB/s |  396.04 Mbps  | ping  46.709ms


 Benchmark finished in 111 seconds

Global Ping Test

Kamatera China Hong Kong Intel® Xeon Type A VPS Hosting Test and Review

Query: ping 114.29.236.17, interval: 5s, dense mode: no

Probing 114.29.236.17 – APNIC /24 AS64022 KAMATERAINC-AS-AP – Hong Kong, Central and Western District

Media Unlock Test

 ** Test Starts At: Fri 11 Aug 2023 02:47:41 AM EDT

 ** Checking Results Under IPv4 
--------------------------------
 ** Your Network Provider: Kamatera Inc (114.29.*.*) 

============[ Multination ]============
 Dazn:                                  No
 HotStar:                               No
 Disney+:                               Yes (Region: HK)
 Netflix:                               Originals Only
 YouTube Premium:                       Yes (Region: HK)
 Amazon Prime Video:                    Yes (Region: HK)
 TVBAnywhere+:                          No
 iQyi Oversea Region:                   HK
 Viu.com:                               Yes (Region: HK)
 YouTube CDN:                           Hong Kong 
 Netflix Preferred CDN:                 Seattle, WA  
 Spotify Registration:                  No
 Steam Currency:                        HKD
 ChatGPT:                               Yes
=======================================
No IPv6 Connectivity Found, Abort IPv6 Testing...

Testing Done! 

CloudFlare Internet Test

Kamatera China Hong Kong Intel® Xeon Type A VPS Hosting Test and Review

PageSpeed Insights

Kamatera China Hong Kong Intel® Xeon Type A VPS Hosting Test and Review

GTmetrix Performance

Kamatera China Hong Kong Intel® Xeon Type A VPS Hosting Test and Review

Admin Control Panel

Kamatera China Hong Kong Intel® Xeon Type A VPS Hosting Test and Review

Kamatera’s Admin Control Panel (ACP) is a web-based interface that allows you to manage your Kamatera servers and hosting plans. The ACP is easy to use and provides a comprehensive set of features, including:

  • Server management: You can manage your servers’ hardware, software, and resources from the ACP.
  • Hosting plan management: You can manage your hosting plans, including adding and removing domains, creating email accounts, and managing DNS settings.
  • Security: The ACP includes various security features, such as firewalls, intrusion detection, and data encryption.
  • Backups: You can create and restore backups of your servers and hosting plans from the ACP.
  • Monitoring: The ACP provides real-time monitoring of your servers and hosting plans so you can quickly identify and resolve any problems.

The Kamatera ACP is a powerful tool that can help you manage your servers and hosting plans efficiently and effectively. It is easy to use and provides a comprehensive set of features that are essential for businesses of all sizes.

Server Pricing

Kamatera China Hong Kong Intel® Xeon Type A VPS Hosting Test and Review

Kamatera offers a variety of servers and hosting plans to choose from, including:

  • VPS servers: VPS servers are an excellent option for businesses needing more control over their resources than shared hosting. Kamatera offers a wide range of VPS plans, with options for different levels of performance and storage.
  • Dedicated servers: Dedicated servers are the most powerful option and are ideal for businesses that need the highest level of performance and reliability. Kamatera offers a variety of dedicated server plans with options for different processing power, memory, and storage levels.
  • Cloud hosting: Cloud hosting is a pay-as-you-go option ideal for businesses that need to scale their resources up or down quickly. Kamatera offers a variety of cloud hosting plans with options for different levels of performance and storage.

Official Website: https://www.Kamatera.com

Coupon

Start your 30-day free trial today.

Customer Support

Kamatera offers 24/7 customer support via live chat, email, and phone. The support team is knowledgeable, friendly, and always willing to help. I have personally used Kamatera’s customer support several times, and I have always been happy with the service I have received.

Here are some of the things I like about Kamatera’s customer support:

  • The support team is very knowledgeable and experienced. They have a deep understanding of Kamatera’s products and services, and they can quickly and accurately diagnose and resolve problems.
  • The support team is amiable and helpful. They are always willing to go the extra mile to help customers and are always patient and understanding.
  • The support team is available 24/7. This is important for businesses that need support at any time of the day or night.

Overall, I am very impressed with Kamatera’s customer support. I have never had a problem that they have been unable to solve quickly and efficiently. If you are looking for a hosting provider with excellent customer support, Kamatera is a great option.

Conclusion

Analyzing the I/O Speed results, we observed impressive performances. The server sustained average I/O speeds of about 1365.3 MB/s, demonstrating its potential for heavy data-intensive tasks. Furthermore, our extensive network test recorded exciting upload and download speeds across various global locations, with outstanding latency measurements. Particularly notable was the server’s performance in Singapore, achieving 2421.90 Mbps upload and 7503.83 Mbps download speeds, implying superior network performance in Asia.

The server exhibited a solid performance by moving on to disk speed tests using fio, which includes mixed Read/Write tests (50/50 Ratio). Its capability for reading and writing speeds was highest at a block size of 1m (IOPS), which touched 5.21 GB/s and 5.56 Gb/s, respectively, indicating an excellent mix of read and write speeds. This is crucial for applications that require a balanced blend of both.

Performance insights from the Geekbench 6 benchmark test and the UnixBench provided a deeper understanding of this server’s robust capabilities. In the Geekbench 6 test, scores for single and multi-core performances stood at 1226 and 2216, respectively. In addition, the UnixBench gave an index score of 785.1 for 1 parallel CPU and an enhanced score of 1415.7 when testing with two parallel CPUs. These results show the server’s admirable computing capacity, indicating its adequacy for compute-heavy workloads.

In conclusion, the results from our exhaustive testing indicate a competent server in the Kamatera China Hong Kong Type A Availability Shared vCPU VPS. This server impressed us with high-speed I/O handling, network performance, disk speed, and remarkable compute capacity, as demonstrated through our benchmark tests. Based on these findings, this server appears well-equipped to handle even the most demanding applications and workloads.

Official Website: https://www.Kamatera.com

Related Posts