Enzonix Germany Nuremberg AMD Ryzen 9 5950X Powered KVM NVMe VPS Test and Review
We recently tested the Enzonix Germany Nuremberg Powered KVM NVMe VPS (Plan: VPS | 2GB). The server is powered by an AMD Ryzen 9 5950X 16-Core Processor, with the following configuration: 1 Core CPU/2 GB RAM/30 GB SSD Storage/1 Gbit Network Speed/20 TB Traffic/1x IPv4 Address.
About Enzonix
Enzonix.com provides a wide range of services, including VPS, VDS, and web hosting, designed to cater to everyone from individuals to large businesses. With servers strategically located in New York City and Germany, Enzonix emphasizes top-tier performance and reliability, boasting an impressive 99.99% uptime. Their standout features include budget-friendly pricing, free offers to attract new users, and a user-friendly VPS panel that simplifies management, perfect for those less tech-savvy.
Enzonix sets itself apart by blending affordability with high performance, making it a compelling choice in a competitive market. They provide support via tickets and Discord, ensuring help is accessible when needed. However, some users have noted slower support response times, though compensation is often offered as a remedy. Whether you’re launching a personal site or scaling a business, Enzonix delivers reliable hosting backed by powerful servers. Curious to explore more? Visit enzonix.com
Pricing
| Plan | Price | CPU | Memory | vCore | NVMe Storage | Public Bandwidth | Network Speed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VPS | 1GB | 3 Months @ $6.00 | 3.5GHz+ EPYC/Ryzen | 1GB | 1 | 30GB | 10TB | 1Gbit |
| VPS | 2GB | 1 Month @ $3.50 | 3.5GHz+ EPYC/Ryzen | 2GB | 1 | 30GB | 20TB | 1Gbit |
| VPS | 4GB | 1 Month @ $5.50 | 3.5GHz+ EPYC/Ryzen | 4GB | 2 | 80GB | 20TB | 1Gbit |
| VPS | 6GB | 1 Month @ $8.00 | 3.5GHz+ EPYC/Ryzen | 6GB | 3 | 200GB | 20TB | 2.5Gbit |
| VPS | 8GB | 1 Month @ $10.00 | 3.5GHz+ EPYC/Ryzen | 8GB | 3 | 250GB | 20TB | 2.5Gbit |
| VPS | 16GB | 1 Month @ $18.00 | 3.5GHz+ EPYC/Ryzen | 16GB | 6 | 350GB | 20TB | 2.5Gbit |
| VPS | 32GB | 1 Month @ $36.00 | 3.5GHz+ EPYC/Ryzen | 32GB | 8 | 500GB | 20TB | 2.5Gbit |
| VPS | 64GB | 1 Month @ $70.00 | 3.5GHz+ EPYC/Ryzen | 64GB | 8 | 1TB | 50TB | 5Gbit |
Official Website: https://Enzonix.com
Coupon
The merchant did not provide
Basic Information
Processor : AMD Ryzen 9 5950X 16-Core Processor
CPU Numbers : 1
CPU Frequency : 3393.624 MHz
CPU Cache : L1: 64.00 KB / L2: 512.00 KB / L3: 64.00 MB
AES-NI : ✔ Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
RAM : 436.28 MiB / 1.90 GiB
Swap : [ no swap partition or swap file detected ]
Disk Space : 2.57 GiB / 34.87 GiB
Boot Disk : /dev/vda3
Uptime : 0 days, 0 hour 13 min
Loads : 1.49, 0.80, 0.40
OS Release : Debian GNU/Linux 11 (bullseye) (x86_64)
Arch : x86_64 (64 Bit)
Kernel Version : 5.10.0-20-amd64
TCP Acceleration : bbr
VM Type : KVM
NAT Type : Full Cone
IPV4 ASN : AS208208 Marco Lingl trading as Cyberse GmbH & Co. KG
IPV4 Location : Nürnberg / Bavaria / DE
GB6 Benchmark
Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
---------------------------------
Test | Value
|
Single Core | 1260
Multi Core | 1497
Full Test | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/11703588
YABS completed in 9 min 52 sec
RAM Read/Write Tests
----------------------------Memory-Test---------------------------------
-> Memory Test (Fast Mode, 1-Pass @ 5sec)
Single Read Test: 54423.91 MB/s
Single Write Test: 24139.46 MB/s
Running memory speed test with the following options:
block size: 1KiB
total size: 102400MiB
operation: read
scope: global
Initializing worker threads...
Threads started!
Total operations: 45860020 (4584145.87 per second)
44785.18 MiB transferred (4476.70 MiB/sec)
General statistics:
total time: 10.0036s
total number of events: 45860020
Latency (ms):
min: 0.00
avg: 0.00
max: 9.44
95th percentile: 0.00
sum: 2809.51
Threads fairness:
events (avg/stddev): 45860020.0000/0.00
execution time (avg/stddev): 2.8095/0.00
Running memory speed test with the following options:
block size: 1KiB
total size: 102400MiB
operation: write
scope: global
Initializing worker threads...
Threads started!
Total operations: 69614201 (6961136.60 per second)
67982.62 MiB transferred (6797.98 MiB/sec)
General statistics:
total time: 10.0000s
total number of events: 69614201
Latency (ms):
min: 0.00
avg: 0.00
max: 14.78
95th percentile: 0.00
sum: 3842.37
Threads fairness:
events (avg/stddev): 69614201.0000/0.00
execution time (avg/stddev): 3.8424/0.00
Disk Read/Write Tests
------------------------Disk-dd-Read/Write-Test-------------------------
-> Disk test in progress (4K Block/1M Block, Direct Mode)
Block Size Write Test Read Test
100MB-4K Block 55.8 MB/s (13.61 IOPS, 1.88s)) 60.8 MB/s (14844 IOPS, 1.72s)
1GB-1M Block 1.2 GB/s (1155 IOPS, 0.87s) 1.3 GB/s (1259 IOPS, 0.79s)
-----------------------Disk-fio-Read/Write-Test-------------------------
Block Size | 4k (IOPS) | 64k (IOPS)
------ | --- ---- | ---- ----
Read | 308.40 MB/s (77.1k) | 919.81 MB/s (14.3k)
Write | 309.22 MB/s (77.3k) | 924.65 MB/s (14.4k)
Total | 617.62 MB/s (154.4k) | 1.84 GB/s (28.8k)
| |
Block Size | 512k (IOPS) | 1m (IOPS)
------ | --- ---- | ---- ----
Read | 978.85 MB/s (1.9k) | 954.64 MB/s (932)
Write | 1.03 GB/s (2.0k) | 1.01 GB/s (994)
Total | 2.00 GB/s (3.9k) | 1.97 GB/s (1.9k)
Iperf3 Network Tests
iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
---------------------------------
Provider | Location (Link) | Send Speed | Recv Speed | Ping
Clouvider | London, UK (10G) | 1.14 Gbits/sec | 1.00 Gbits/sec | 19.3 ms
Eranium | Amsterdam, NL (100G) | 1.15 Gbits/sec | 1.01 Gbits/sec | 9.76 ms
Uztelecom | Tashkent, UZ (10G) | 1.07 Gbits/sec | 721 Mbits/sec | 87.9 ms
Leaseweb | Singapore, SG (10G) | 980 Mbits/sec | 709 Mbits/sec | --
Clouvider | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 1.00 Gbits/sec | 496 Mbits/sec | 144 ms
Leaseweb | NYC, NY, US (10G) | 1.06 Gbits/sec | 812 Mbits/sec | 88.0 ms
Edgoo | Sao Paulo, BR (1G) | 920 Mbits/sec | 101 Mbits/sec | 209 ms
YABS completed in 3 min 9 sec
UnixBench Tests
Benchmark Run: Sun Apr 27 2025 01:38:40 - 02:07:22
1 CPU in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 61718094.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 10890.6 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 6776.6 lps (29.8 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1690640.3 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 394850.6 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 3137190.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 2070583.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 209211.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 11293.5 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 12482.7 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1992.6 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 4304932.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 61718094.3 5288.6
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 10890.6 1980.1
Execl Throughput 43.0 6776.6 1576.0
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 1690640.3 4269.3
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 394850.6 2385.8
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 3137190.8 5408.9
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 2070583.9 1664.5
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 209211.6 523.0
Process Creation 126.0 11293.5 896.3
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 12482.7 2944.0
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1992.6 3321.0
System Call Overhead 15000.0 4304932.3 2870.0
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 2281.7
======= Script description and score comparison completed! =======
Streaming Unlock Tests
============[ Multination ]============
Dazn: Failed (Error: )
Disney+: No (IP Banned By Disney+ 1)
Netflix: Originals Only
YouTube Premium: Yes (Region: DE)
Amazon Prime Video: Yes (Region: US)
TVBAnywhere+: Yes
Spotify Registration: No
OneTrust Region: DE [Bavaria]
iQyi Oversea Region: US
Bing Region: DE
Apple Region: US
YouTube CDN: Frankfurt
Netflix Preferred CDN: Failed (CDN IP Not Found)
ChatGPT: Yes
Google Gemini: No
Claude: No
Wikipedia Editability: Yes
Google Play Store: Germany
Google Search CAPTCHA Free: Yes
Steam Currency: EUR
---Forum---
Reddit: No
---Game---
SD Gundam G Generation Eternal: No
=======================================
IP Quality Detection
Data for reference only, does not represent 100% accurate, if and the actual situation is not consistent with the manual query multiple database comparison
The following is the number of each database, the output will come with the corresponding number of the database source
ipinfo databases [0] | scamalytics databases [1] | virustotal databases [2] | abuseipdb databases [3] | ip2location databases [4]
ip-api databases [5] | ipwhois databases [6] | ipregistry databases [7] | ipdata databases [8] | db-ip databases [9]
ipapiis databases [A] | ipapicom databases [B] | bigdatacloud databases [C] | cheervision databases [D] | ipqualityscore databases [E]
IPV4:
Security Score:
Reputation: 0 [2]
TrustScore: 0 [8]
VpnScore: 100 [8]
ProxyScore: 100 [8]
CommunityVoteHarmless: 0 [2]
CommunityVoteMalicious: 0 [2]
ThreatScore: 100 [8]
FraudScore: 65 [E] 0 [1]
AbuseScore: 0 [3]
ASNAbuseScore: 0.0056 (Low) [A]
CompannyAbuseScore: 0.0007 (Low) [A]
ThreatLevel: low [9]
Blacklist_Records_Statistics(how many blacklisted websites have records):
HarmlessnessRecords: 0 [2] MaliciousRecords: 0 [2] SuspiciousRecords: 0 [2] NoRecords: 94 [2]
Security Info:
UsageType: hosting ASN [C] DataCenter/WebHosting/Transit [3] hosting [0 7 8 9 A]
CompanyType: hosting [0 A] business [7]
IsCloudProvider: Yes [7 D]
IsDatacenter: No [1 5 6] Yes [0 8 A C]
IsMobile: No [5 A C] Yes [E]
IsProxy: No [0 1 4 5 6 7 8 9 A C D] Yes [E]
IsVpn: No [0 1 6 7 A C D] Yes [E]
IsTor: No [0 1 3 6 7 8 A C D E]
IsTorExit: No [1 7 D]
IsCrawler: No [9 A E]
IsAnonymous: No [1 6 7 8 D]
IsAttacker: No [7 8 D]
IsAbuser: No [7 8 A C D E]
IsThreat: No [7 8 C D]
IsRelay: No [0 7 8 C D]
IsBogon: No [7 8 A C D]
IsBot: No [E]
DNS-BlackList: 313(Total_Check) 0(Clean) 6(Blacklisted) 150(Other)
Google search feasibility: NO
Email Port Detection
Platform SMTP SMTPS POP3 POP3S IMAP IMAPS
LocalPort ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔
QQ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
163 ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Sohu ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Yandex ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Gmail ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
Outlook ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Office365 ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Yahoo ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
MailCOM ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
MailRU ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘
AOL ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
GMX ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Sina ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Apple ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
FastMail ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
ProtonMail✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
MXRoute ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Namecrane ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
XYAMail ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
ZohoMail ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
Inbox_eu ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘
Free_fr ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ Looking Glass
Test IPv4: 69.42.220.128
Location: Nuremburg, DE, Datacenter: North C
Global Latency Tests
Query: ping 69.42.220.143, interval: 5s, dense mode: no
Probing 69.42.220.143 – RIPE NCC /24 AS208208 CYBERSE – Marco – Germany, Bavaria, Nuremberg [hosting]
CloudFlare Internet Tests
PageSpeed Insights
Admin Control Panel
Conclusion
To gauge the real-world capabilities of modern VPS offerings, we conducted a comprehensive performance evaluation of the Enzonix KVM NVMe VPS, hosted in Nuremberg, Germany. The specific configuration under scrutiny was the ‘VPS | 2GB’ plan, featuring a single core derived from a potent AMD Ryzen 9 5950X processor, paired with 2GB of RAM and 30GB of fast NVMe storage, all connected via a 1 Gbit network port. The objective was to assess its suitability for typical workloads encountered by IT administrators, such as web hosting, development environments, or lightweight backend services, providing actionable insights for potential adopters looking for value-driven performance in the European market.
1. Test Results Overview
The test results painted a picture of strong underlying hardware tempered by plan limitations. The single Ryzen 9 5950X core delivered a respectable Geekbench 6 single-core score of 1260, though the multi-core score (1497) reflects the single-core allocation. Memory performance was notably strong, with benchmark tools reporting read speeds exceeding 44 GB/s and write speeds surpassing 67 GB/s under specific test conditions. Disk I/O, leveraging NVMe storage, showed excellent random performance (around 300 MB/s with 77k IOPS for 4k blocks via fio) and impressive sequential throughput (approaching 1 GB/s). Network tests consistently demonstrated the ability to saturate the 1 Gbit port to well-connected European nodes, while maintaining decent, albeit latency-impacted, speeds to North America and Asia. Streaming service compatibility, however, was mixed, and the IP address exhibited typical datacenter/hosting flags, including a moderate FraudScore.
2. Analysis and Insights
These findings suggest the Enzonix 2GB VPS offers significant punch, particularly for specific applications. The high single-core CPU performance and blazing NVMe speeds make it a compelling candidate for I/O-bound tasks or applications primarily reliant on single-thread efficiency, such as certain types of web servers, databases, or build processes. The network performance is quite solid and reliable for its tier. However, the single vCore allocation acts as a distinct bottleneck for heavily multi-threaded applications; it’s somewhat like having a high-performance sports car restricted to city driving – the raw potential of the Ryzen chip is certainly present, but capped by the plan’s resource limits. Furthermore, the IP address profile and limited streaming unlock firmly place it in the server category, making it less ideal for use cases requiring residential IP characteristics or broad media consumption. The restricted outbound email ports are a standard, sensible precaution against spam originating from the platform.
3. Conclusion and Recommendations
In conclusion, the Enzonix Nuremberg 2GB VPS presents a strong value proposition within its price bracket, particularly excelling in single-core compute and storage performance, thanks to the capable Ryzen CPU and NVMe drive. Its network connectivity proved robust for general server tasks. For IT administrators and technical users seeking cost-effective solutions for development/testing environments, lightweight web applications, personal VPNs (acknowledging the IP reputation), or workloads benefiting from strong single-thread speed and rapid disk access, this plan warrants serious consideration. However, those requiring substantial multi-tasking power, extensive streaming service compatibility, or an IP address free from common hosting/proxy flags should likely explore higher-tier plans or alternative providers. It delivers impressive foundational hardware, best utilized when the workload aligns directly with its specific performance strengths.
Official Website: https://Enzonix.com
Related Posts
Copyright ©2023-2025 LetsHosting.com All Rights Reserved, and made with 💙 in New York.
Please visit DigitalOcean.com, our reliable hosting provider.