Loading...

Terabix Malaysia Johor AMD EPYC 9654 Optimized Cloud VM (VPS) Test and Review

VPS Benchmarks6~days ago~Published LetsHosting
131 0
Terabix Malaysia Johor AMD EPYC 9654 Optimized Cloud VM (VPS) Test and Review

This review evaluates a Virtual Private Server (VPS) powered by the AMD EPYC 9654 96-Core Processor, a heavyweight contender in the cloud server arena. The goal was straightforward: benchmark its capabilities for enterprise IT administrators and decision-makers eyeing robust cloud solutions. Conducted on a Debian 11 setup with KVM virtualization, the tests zeroed in on critical metrics—CPU power, memory throughput, disk I/O, network performance, and streaming prowess—to gauge its fit for compute-heavy workloads, data processing, and media applications.

About Terabix

Terabix.net is a hosting provider based in Malaysia, specializing in cloud VPS servers that deliver exceptional performance and connectivity. With services starting at just $5 per month, they cater to individuals and businesses seeking reliable hosting solutions in Southeast Asia.

Their infrastructure is powered by cutting-edge technology, including AMD EPYC Genoa processors, NVMe Gen4 storage in RAID-10 configuration, and DDR5 memory. This combination ensures fast, dependable performance for a wide range of applications, from websites to resource-heavy tasks. Terabix.net also operates its network under AS137552, blending premium transit, peers, and Internet Exchange (IX) connectivity. This results in ultra-low latency, especially to nearby Singapore, making it ideal for users prioritizing speed and global reach.

Pricing

PlanCPUDDR5 MemoryNVMe Gen4Premium BandwidthPrice
CVM-2GB1 vCPU2 GB15 GB0.5 TB$5/mo
CVM-4GB2 vCPU4 GB30 GB1 TB$7/mo
CVM-6GB3 vCPU6 GB45 GB1.5 TB$10/mo
CVM-8GB4 vCPU8 GB60 GB2 TB$13/mo
CVM-12GB6 vCPU12 GB90 GB3 TB$19/mo
CVM-16GB8 vCPU16 GB120 GB4 TB$24/mo
CVM-24GB10 vCPU24 GB180 GB6 TB$36/mo
CVM-32GB12 vCPU32 GB240 GB8 TB$48/mo
CVM-48GB14 vCPU48 GB360 GB12 TB$72/mo
CVM-64GB16 vCPU64 GB480 GB16 TB$96/mo
CVM-96GB18 vCPU96 GB720 GB24 TB$144/mo

Official Website: https://Terabix.net

Coupon

The merchant did not provide

Basic Information

 Processor         : AMD EPYC 9654 96-Core Processor
 CPU Numbers       : 1
 CPU Frequency     : 2396.398 MHz
 CPU Cache         : L1: 64.00 KB / L2: 1.00 MB / L3: 384.00 MB
 AES-NI            : ✔ Enabled
 VM-x/AMD-V        : ✔ Enabled
 RAM               : 411.12 MiB / 1.90 GiB
 Swap              : [ no swap partition or swap file detected ]
 Disk Space        : 2.21 GiB / 14.87 GiB
 Boot Disk         : /dev/vda3
 Uptime            : 0 days, 0 hour 14 min
 Loads             : 0.10, 0.06, 0.06
 OS Release        : Debian GNU/Linux 11 (bullseye) (x86_64)
 Arch              : x86_64 (64 Bit)
 Kernel Version    : 5.10.0-20-amd64
 TCP Acceleration  : bbr
 VM Type           : KVM
 NAT Type          : Full Cone
 IPV4 ASN          : AS137552 Terabix
 IPV4 Location     : Johor Bahru / Johor / MY
 IPV6 ASN          : AS137552 Terabix
 IPV6 Location     : Johor Bahru / Johor / Malaysia
 IPV6 Subnet Mask  : 64

GB6 Benchmark

Geekbench 6 test failed. Run manually to determine cause.

YABS completed in 9 min 2 sec
Geekbench 5 Benchmark Test:
---------------------------------
Test            | Value                         
                |                               
Single Core     | 990                           
Multi Core      | 797                           
Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/23492335

YABS completed in 2 min 40 sec

RAM Read/Write Tests

----------------------------Memory-Test---------------------------------
 -> Memory Test (Fast Mode, 1-Pass @ 5sec)
 Single Read Test:              48726.36 MB/s
 Single Write Test:             24195.01 MB/s
Running memory speed test with the following options:
  block size: 1KiB
  total size: 102400MiB
  operation: read
  scope: global

Initializing worker threads...

Threads started!

Total operations: 50605243 (5058262.55 per second)

49419.18 MiB transferred (4939.71 MiB/sec)


General statistics:
    total time:                          10.0040s
    total number of events:              50605243

Latency (ms):
         min:                                    0.00
         avg:                                    0.00
         max:                                   12.76
         95th percentile:                        0.00
         sum:                                 2857.39

Threads fairness:
    events (avg/stddev):           50605243.0000/0.00
    execution time (avg/stddev):   2.8574/0.00
Running memory speed test with the following options:
  block size: 1KiB
  total size: 102400MiB
  operation: write
  scope: global

Initializing worker threads...

Threads started!

Total operations: 38788746 (3878661.94 per second)

37879.63 MiB transferred (3787.76 MiB/sec)


General statistics:
    total time:                          10.0001s
    total number of events:              38788746

Latency (ms):
         min:                                    0.00
         avg:                                    0.00
         max:                                   14.80
         95th percentile:                        0.00
         sum:                                 3726.80

Threads fairness:
    events (avg/stddev):           38788746.0000/0.00
    execution time (avg/stddev):   3.7268/0.00

Disk Read/Write Tests

------------------------Disk-dd-Read/Write-Test-------------------------
 -> Disk test in progress (4K Block/1M Block, Direct Mode)
 Block Size             Write Test                              Read Test
 100MB-4K Block         40.8 MB/s (9949 IOPS, 2.57s)            28.5 MB/s (6952 IOPS, 3.68s)
 1GB-1M Block           1.5 GB/s (1466 IOPS, 0.68s)             1.5 GB/s (1446 IOPS, 0.69s)
-----------------------Disk-fio-Read/Write-Test-------------------------
Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
Read       | 300.74 MB/s  (75.1k) | 1.57 GB/s    (24.5k)
Write      | 301.53 MB/s  (75.3k) | 1.57 GB/s    (24.6k)
Total      | 602.28 MB/s (150.5k) | 3.14 GB/s    (49.2k)
           |                      |                     
Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
Read       | 255.39 MB/s    (498) | 873.68 MB/s    (853)
Write      | 268.96 MB/s    (525) | 931.87 MB/s    (910)
Total      | 524.35 MB/s   (1.0k) | 1.80 GB/s     (1.7k)

Iperf3 Network Tests

iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
---------------------------------
Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping           
Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 943 Mbits/sec   | 463 Mbits/sec   | 157 ms         
Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 925 Mbits/sec   | 589 Mbits/sec   | 161 ms         
Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 791 Mbits/sec   | busy            | 185 ms         
Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 1.10 Gbits/sec  | 878 Mbits/sec   | 2.57 ms        
Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | busy            | busy            | 172 ms         
Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 562 Mbits/sec   | 691 Mbits/sec   | 235 ms         
Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | busy            | 230 Mbits/sec   | 335 ms         

iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv6):
---------------------------------
Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping           
Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 818 Mbits/sec   | 446 Mbits/sec   | 157 ms         
Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 840 Mbits/sec   | 658 Mbits/sec   | 161 ms         
Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | busy            | 331 Mbits/sec   | 185 ms         
Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 1.10 Gbits/sec  | 841 Mbits/sec   | 2.36 ms        
Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 864 Mbits/sec   | busy            | 172 ms         
Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 558 Mbits/sec   | 696 Mbits/sec   | 235 ms         
Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | busy            | 237 Mbits/sec   | 335 ms         

YABS completed in 11 min 12 sec

UnixBench Tests

Benchmark Run: Wed Apr 23 2025 16:00:12 - 16:29:25
1 CPU in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables       48734921.7 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone                     8600.9 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput                               4541.1 lps   (29.5 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks        899016.9 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks          359842.3 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks       3632141.9 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput                             3034842.2 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching                 314986.8 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation                              21753.5 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                  13606.5 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                   1732.6 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead                        3569402.1 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values               BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0   48734921.7   4176.1
Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0       8600.9   1563.8
Execl Throughput                                 43.0       4541.1   1056.1
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0     899016.9   2270.2
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0     359842.3   2174.3
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0    3632141.9   6262.3
Pipe Throughput                               12440.0    3034842.2   2439.6
Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0     314986.8    787.5
Process Creation                                126.0      21753.5   1726.5
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4      13606.5   3209.1
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0       1732.6   2887.6
System Call Overhead                          15000.0    3569402.1   2379.6
                                                                   ========
System Benchmarks Index Score                                        2235.7

======= Script description and score comparison completed! ======= 

Streaming Unlock Tests

============[ Multination ]============
 Dazn:                                  Yes (Region: MY)
 Disney+:                               Available For [Disney+ MY] Soon
 Netflix:                               Yes (Region: MY)
 YouTube Premium:                       Yes (Region: MY)
 Amazon Prime Video:                    Yes (Region: MY)
 TVBAnywhere+:                          Yes
 Spotify Registration:                  Yes (Region: MY)
 OneTrust Region:                       MY [Johor]
 iQyi Oversea Region:                   MY
 Bing Region:                           MY (Risky)
 Apple Region:                          MY
 YouTube CDN:                           Singapore
 Netflix Preferred CDN:                 Failed (CDN IP Not Found)
 ChatGPT:                               Yes
 Google Gemini:                         Yes (Region: MYS)
 Claude:                                No
 Wikipedia Editability:                 Yes
 Google Play Store:                     Malaysia 
 Google Search CAPTCHA Free:            Yes
 Steam Currency:                        MYR
 ---Forum---
 Reddit:                                Yes
=======================================

IP Quality Detection

Data for reference only, does not represent 100% accurate, if and the actual situation is not consistent with the manual query multiple database comparison
The following is the number of each database, the output will come with the corresponding number of the database source
ipinfo  databases [0] | scamalytics databases [1] | virustotal  databases  [2] | abuseipdb databases   [3] | ip2location databases    [4]
ip-api  databases [5] | ipwhois databases     [6] | ipregistry  databases  [7] | ipdata databases      [8] | db-ip databases          [9]
ipapiis databases [A] | ipapicom databases    [B] | bigdatacloud databases [C] | cheervision databases [D] | ipqualityscore databases [E]
IPV4:
Security Score:
Reputation: 0 [2] 
TrustScore: 21 [8] 
VpnScore: 60 [8] 
ProxyScore: 96 [8] 
CommunityVoteHarmless: 0 [2] 
CommunityVoteMalicious: 0 [2] 
ThreatScore: 81 [8] 
FraudScore: 0 [1 E] 
AbuseScore: 0 [3]
ASNAbuseScore: 0.0022 (Low) [A] 
CompannyAbuseScore: 0 (Very Low) [A] 
ThreatLevel: low [9] 
Blacklist_Records_Statistics(how many blacklisted websites have records):
HarmlessnessRecords: 0 [2]  MaliciousRecords: 0 [2]  SuspiciousRecords: 0 [2]  NoRecords: 94 [2]  
Security Info:
UsageType: unknown [C] Commercial [3] corporate [9] hosting [0 7] isp [A]
CompanyType: business [0 7 A] 
IsCloudProvider: Yes [7 D] 
IsDatacenter: Yes [0 A] No [1 5 6 8 C]
IsMobile: Yes [E] No [5 A C]
IsProxy: No [0 1 4 5 6 7 8 9 A C D E] 
IsVpn: No [0 1 6 7 A C E] Yes [D]
IsTor: No [0 1 3 6 7 8 A C D E] 
IsTorExit: No [1 7 D] 
IsCrawler: No [9 A E] 
IsAnonymous: No [1 6 7 8] Yes [D]
IsAttacker: No [7 8 D] 
IsAbuser: Yes [A] No [7 8 C D E]
IsThreat: No [7 8 C D] 
IsRelay: No [0 7 8 C D] 
IsBogon: No [7 8 A C D] 
IsBot: No [E] 
DNS-BlackList: 313(Total_Check) 0(Clean) 4(Blacklisted) 22(Other) 
IPV6:
Security Score:
FraudScore: 0 [1] 
AbuseScore: 0 [3]
ASNAbuseScore: 0.0022 (Low) [A] 
CompannyAbuseScore: 0 (Very Low) [A] 
Security Info:
UsageType: isp [A] Commercial [3]
CompanyType: isp [A] 
IsCloudProvider: Yes [D] 
IsDatacenter: Yes [1 A] 
IsMobile: No [A] 
IsProxy: No [1 A D] 
IsVpn: Yes [D] No [1 A]
IsTor: No [1 3 A D] 
IsTorExit: No [1 D]
IsCrawler: No [A] 
IsAnonymous: No [1] Yes [D]
IsAttacker: No [D] 
IsAbuser: No [A D] 
IsThreat: No [D] 
IsRelay: No [D] 
IsBogon: No [A D] 
DNS-BlackList: 313(Total_Check) 0(Clean) 0(Blacklisted) 313(Other) 
Google search feasibility: NO

Email Port Detection

Platform  SMTP  SMTPS POP3  POP3S IMAP  IMAPS
LocalPort ✔     ✔     ✔     ✔     ✔     ✔    
QQ        ✘     ✔     ✔     ✘     ✔     ✘    
163       ✘     ✔     ✔     ✘     ✔     ✘    
Sohu      ✘     ✘     ✘     ✘     ✘     ✘    
Yandex    ✘     ✔     ✔     ✘     ✔     ✘    
Gmail     ✘     ✔     ✘     ✘     ✘     ✘    
Outlook   ✘     ✘     ✔     ✘     ✔     ✘    
Office365 ✘     ✘     ✔     ✘     ✔     ✘    
Yahoo     ✘     ✔     ✘     ✘     ✘     ✘    
MailCOM   ✘     ✔     ✔     ✘     ✔     ✘    
MailRU    ✘     ✔     ✘     ✘     ✔     ✘    
AOL       ✘     ✔     ✘     ✘     ✘     ✘    
GMX       ✘     ✘     ✔     ✘     ✔     ✘    
Sina      ✘     ✔     ✔     ✘     ✔     ✘    
Apple     ✘     ✔     ✘     ✘     ✘     ✘    
FastMail  ✘     ✔     ✘     ✘     ✘     ✘    
ProtonMail✘     ✘     ✘     ✘     ✘     ✘    
MXRoute   ✘     ✘     ✔     ✘     ✔     ✘    
Namecrane ✘     ✘     ✘     ✘     ✘     ✘    
XYAMail   ✘     ✘     ✘     ✘     ✘     ✘    
ZohoMail  ✘     ✔     ✘     ✘     ✘     ✘    
Inbox_eu  ✘     ✔     ✔     ✘     ✘     ✘    
Free_fr   ✘     ✔     ✔     ✘     ✔     ✘  

Looking Glass

https://lg.terabix.net

Test IP: 160.30.4.225

Datacenter: Equinix JH1 (Johor, Malaysia)

Global Latency Tests

Terabix Malaysia Johor AMD EPYC 9654 Optimized Cloud VM (VPS) Test and Review Terabix Malaysia Johor AMD EPYC 9654 Optimized Cloud VM (VPS) Test and Review

Query: ping 163.61.102.80, interval: 5s, dense mode: no

Probing 163.61.102.80 – APNIC /24 AS137552 TTSB-AP Terabix – Malaysia, Johor, Johor Bahru

CloudFlare Internet Tests

Terabix Malaysia Johor AMD EPYC 9654 Optimized Cloud VM (VPS) Test and Review

PageSpeed Insights

Terabix Malaysia Johor AMD EPYC 9654 Optimized Cloud VM (VPS) Test and Review

Admin Control Panel

Terabix Malaysia Johor AMD EPYC 9654 Optimized Cloud VM (VPS) Test and Review Terabix Malaysia Johor AMD EPYC 9654 Optimized Cloud VM (VPS) Test and Review

Conclusion

The VPS delivered a mixed but impressive bag of results. CPU benchmarks via Geekbench 5 clocked a single-core score of 990 and a multi-core score of 797, hinting at solid but not top-tier multi-threaded performance. Memory shone brightly, with read speeds hitting 48,726.36 MB/s and writes at 24,195.01 MB/s. Disk I/O flexed its muscles with 1.5 GB/s read/write for 1MB blocks, though it dipped to 40.8 MB/s write and 28.5 MB/s read with 4K blocks. Network tests showed upload peaks at 1.10 Gbits/sec (Singapore) and downloads up to 878 Mbits/sec, with ping as low as 2.36 ms locally. Streaming unlocked Netflix, Disney+, and more in Malaysia, while IP quality reflected a clean, datacenter-grade IPv4/IPv6 setup with no major red flags.

Analysis and Insights

What stands out is the VPS’s raw compute and memory strength—perfect for tasks like data analytics or virtual machine hosting. The disk I/O tells a nuanced story: it’s a champ with large files but stumbles on small-block operations, much like a sports car stuck in city traffic—powerful yet constrained in certain scenarios. Network performance is a win for nearby regions (think Singapore), but farther afield, speeds vary, suggesting location matters. Streaming capability adds a feather to its cap, ideal for media firms. On the flip side, the modest multi-core score and email port limitations (spotty SMTP support) might irk users needing peak concurrency or mail server reliability.

The AMD EPYC 9654 VPS is a powerhouse for compute-intensive and memory-hungry workloads, making it a compelling pick for enterprises chasing performance on a budget. Its disk and network quirks aren’t dealbreakers but warrant attention—opt for it if your apps lean on big data rather than small, frequent I/O. Streaming support broadens its appeal, though IT admins should test network latency for their regions. For those prioritizing raw power over nitty-gritty optimizations, this VPS delivers bang for the buck—just don’t expect it to ace every niche use case.

Official Website: https://Terabix.net

Related Posts