Terabix Malaysia Johor AMD EPYC 9654 Optimized Cloud VM (VPS) Test and Review
This review evaluates a Virtual Private Server (VPS) powered by the AMD EPYC 9654 96-Core Processor, a heavyweight contender in the cloud server arena. The goal was straightforward: benchmark its capabilities for enterprise IT administrators and decision-makers eyeing robust cloud solutions. Conducted on a Debian 11 setup with KVM virtualization, the tests zeroed in on critical metrics—CPU power, memory throughput, disk I/O, network performance, and streaming prowess—to gauge its fit for compute-heavy workloads, data processing, and media applications.
About Terabix
Terabix.net is a hosting provider based in Malaysia, specializing in cloud VPS servers that deliver exceptional performance and connectivity. With services starting at just $5 per month, they cater to individuals and businesses seeking reliable hosting solutions in Southeast Asia.
Their infrastructure is powered by cutting-edge technology, including AMD EPYC Genoa processors, NVMe Gen4 storage in RAID-10 configuration, and DDR5 memory. This combination ensures fast, dependable performance for a wide range of applications, from websites to resource-heavy tasks. Terabix.net also operates its network under AS137552, blending premium transit, peers, and Internet Exchange (IX) connectivity. This results in ultra-low latency, especially to nearby Singapore, making it ideal for users prioritizing speed and global reach.
Pricing
| Plan | CPU | DDR5 Memory | NVMe Gen4 | Premium Bandwidth | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVM-2GB | 1 vCPU | 2 GB | 15 GB | 0.5 TB | $5/mo |
| CVM-4GB | 2 vCPU | 4 GB | 30 GB | 1 TB | $7/mo |
| CVM-6GB | 3 vCPU | 6 GB | 45 GB | 1.5 TB | $10/mo |
| CVM-8GB | 4 vCPU | 8 GB | 60 GB | 2 TB | $13/mo |
| CVM-12GB | 6 vCPU | 12 GB | 90 GB | 3 TB | $19/mo |
| CVM-16GB | 8 vCPU | 16 GB | 120 GB | 4 TB | $24/mo |
| CVM-24GB | 10 vCPU | 24 GB | 180 GB | 6 TB | $36/mo |
| CVM-32GB | 12 vCPU | 32 GB | 240 GB | 8 TB | $48/mo |
| CVM-48GB | 14 vCPU | 48 GB | 360 GB | 12 TB | $72/mo |
| CVM-64GB | 16 vCPU | 64 GB | 480 GB | 16 TB | $96/mo |
| CVM-96GB | 18 vCPU | 96 GB | 720 GB | 24 TB | $144/mo |
Official Website: https://Terabix.net
Coupon
The merchant did not provide
Basic Information
Processor : AMD EPYC 9654 96-Core Processor
CPU Numbers : 1
CPU Frequency : 2396.398 MHz
CPU Cache : L1: 64.00 KB / L2: 1.00 MB / L3: 384.00 MB
AES-NI : ✔ Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
RAM : 411.12 MiB / 1.90 GiB
Swap : [ no swap partition or swap file detected ]
Disk Space : 2.21 GiB / 14.87 GiB
Boot Disk : /dev/vda3
Uptime : 0 days, 0 hour 14 min
Loads : 0.10, 0.06, 0.06
OS Release : Debian GNU/Linux 11 (bullseye) (x86_64)
Arch : x86_64 (64 Bit)
Kernel Version : 5.10.0-20-amd64
TCP Acceleration : bbr
VM Type : KVM
NAT Type : Full Cone
IPV4 ASN : AS137552 Terabix
IPV4 Location : Johor Bahru / Johor / MY
IPV6 ASN : AS137552 Terabix
IPV6 Location : Johor Bahru / Johor / Malaysia
IPV6 Subnet Mask : 64
GB6 Benchmark
Geekbench 6 test failed. Run manually to determine cause.
YABS completed in 9 min 2 sec
Geekbench 5 Benchmark Test:
---------------------------------
Test | Value
|
Single Core | 990
Multi Core | 797
Full Test | https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/23492335
YABS completed in 2 min 40 sec
RAM Read/Write Tests
----------------------------Memory-Test---------------------------------
-> Memory Test (Fast Mode, 1-Pass @ 5sec)
Single Read Test: 48726.36 MB/s
Single Write Test: 24195.01 MB/s
Running memory speed test with the following options:
block size: 1KiB
total size: 102400MiB
operation: read
scope: global
Initializing worker threads...
Threads started!
Total operations: 50605243 (5058262.55 per second)
49419.18 MiB transferred (4939.71 MiB/sec)
General statistics:
total time: 10.0040s
total number of events: 50605243
Latency (ms):
min: 0.00
avg: 0.00
max: 12.76
95th percentile: 0.00
sum: 2857.39
Threads fairness:
events (avg/stddev): 50605243.0000/0.00
execution time (avg/stddev): 2.8574/0.00
Running memory speed test with the following options:
block size: 1KiB
total size: 102400MiB
operation: write
scope: global
Initializing worker threads...
Threads started!
Total operations: 38788746 (3878661.94 per second)
37879.63 MiB transferred (3787.76 MiB/sec)
General statistics:
total time: 10.0001s
total number of events: 38788746
Latency (ms):
min: 0.00
avg: 0.00
max: 14.80
95th percentile: 0.00
sum: 3726.80
Threads fairness:
events (avg/stddev): 38788746.0000/0.00
execution time (avg/stddev): 3.7268/0.00
Disk Read/Write Tests
------------------------Disk-dd-Read/Write-Test-------------------------
-> Disk test in progress (4K Block/1M Block, Direct Mode)
Block Size Write Test Read Test
100MB-4K Block 40.8 MB/s (9949 IOPS, 2.57s) 28.5 MB/s (6952 IOPS, 3.68s)
1GB-1M Block 1.5 GB/s (1466 IOPS, 0.68s) 1.5 GB/s (1446 IOPS, 0.69s)
-----------------------Disk-fio-Read/Write-Test-------------------------
Block Size | 4k (IOPS) | 64k (IOPS)
------ | --- ---- | ---- ----
Read | 300.74 MB/s (75.1k) | 1.57 GB/s (24.5k)
Write | 301.53 MB/s (75.3k) | 1.57 GB/s (24.6k)
Total | 602.28 MB/s (150.5k) | 3.14 GB/s (49.2k)
| |
Block Size | 512k (IOPS) | 1m (IOPS)
------ | --- ---- | ---- ----
Read | 255.39 MB/s (498) | 873.68 MB/s (853)
Write | 268.96 MB/s (525) | 931.87 MB/s (910)
Total | 524.35 MB/s (1.0k) | 1.80 GB/s (1.7k)
Iperf3 Network Tests
iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
---------------------------------
Provider | Location (Link) | Send Speed | Recv Speed | Ping
Clouvider | London, UK (10G) | 943 Mbits/sec | 463 Mbits/sec | 157 ms
Eranium | Amsterdam, NL (100G) | 925 Mbits/sec | 589 Mbits/sec | 161 ms
Uztelecom | Tashkent, UZ (10G) | 791 Mbits/sec | busy | 185 ms
Leaseweb | Singapore, SG (10G) | 1.10 Gbits/sec | 878 Mbits/sec | 2.57 ms
Clouvider | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | busy | busy | 172 ms
Leaseweb | NYC, NY, US (10G) | 562 Mbits/sec | 691 Mbits/sec | 235 ms
Edgoo | Sao Paulo, BR (1G) | busy | 230 Mbits/sec | 335 ms
iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv6):
---------------------------------
Provider | Location (Link) | Send Speed | Recv Speed | Ping
Clouvider | London, UK (10G) | 818 Mbits/sec | 446 Mbits/sec | 157 ms
Eranium | Amsterdam, NL (100G) | 840 Mbits/sec | 658 Mbits/sec | 161 ms
Uztelecom | Tashkent, UZ (10G) | busy | 331 Mbits/sec | 185 ms
Leaseweb | Singapore, SG (10G) | 1.10 Gbits/sec | 841 Mbits/sec | 2.36 ms
Clouvider | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 864 Mbits/sec | busy | 172 ms
Leaseweb | NYC, NY, US (10G) | 558 Mbits/sec | 696 Mbits/sec | 235 ms
Edgoo | Sao Paulo, BR (1G) | busy | 237 Mbits/sec | 335 ms
YABS completed in 11 min 12 sec
UnixBench Tests
Benchmark Run: Wed Apr 23 2025 16:00:12 - 16:29:25
1 CPU in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 48734921.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 8600.9 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 4541.1 lps (29.5 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 899016.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 359842.3 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 3632141.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 3034842.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 314986.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 21753.5 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 13606.5 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1732.6 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 3569402.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 48734921.7 4176.1
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 8600.9 1563.8
Execl Throughput 43.0 4541.1 1056.1
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 899016.9 2270.2
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 359842.3 2174.3
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 3632141.9 6262.3
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 3034842.2 2439.6
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 314986.8 787.5
Process Creation 126.0 21753.5 1726.5
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 13606.5 3209.1
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1732.6 2887.6
System Call Overhead 15000.0 3569402.1 2379.6
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 2235.7
======= Script description and score comparison completed! =======
Streaming Unlock Tests
============[ Multination ]============
Dazn: Yes (Region: MY)
Disney+: Available For [Disney+ MY] Soon
Netflix: Yes (Region: MY)
YouTube Premium: Yes (Region: MY)
Amazon Prime Video: Yes (Region: MY)
TVBAnywhere+: Yes
Spotify Registration: Yes (Region: MY)
OneTrust Region: MY [Johor]
iQyi Oversea Region: MY
Bing Region: MY (Risky)
Apple Region: MY
YouTube CDN: Singapore
Netflix Preferred CDN: Failed (CDN IP Not Found)
ChatGPT: Yes
Google Gemini: Yes (Region: MYS)
Claude: No
Wikipedia Editability: Yes
Google Play Store: Malaysia
Google Search CAPTCHA Free: Yes
Steam Currency: MYR
---Forum---
Reddit: Yes
=======================================
IP Quality Detection
Data for reference only, does not represent 100% accurate, if and the actual situation is not consistent with the manual query multiple database comparison
The following is the number of each database, the output will come with the corresponding number of the database source
ipinfo databases [0] | scamalytics databases [1] | virustotal databases [2] | abuseipdb databases [3] | ip2location databases [4]
ip-api databases [5] | ipwhois databases [6] | ipregistry databases [7] | ipdata databases [8] | db-ip databases [9]
ipapiis databases [A] | ipapicom databases [B] | bigdatacloud databases [C] | cheervision databases [D] | ipqualityscore databases [E]
IPV4:
Security Score:
Reputation: 0 [2]
TrustScore: 21 [8]
VpnScore: 60 [8]
ProxyScore: 96 [8]
CommunityVoteHarmless: 0 [2]
CommunityVoteMalicious: 0 [2]
ThreatScore: 81 [8]
FraudScore: 0 [1 E]
AbuseScore: 0 [3]
ASNAbuseScore: 0.0022 (Low) [A]
CompannyAbuseScore: 0 (Very Low) [A]
ThreatLevel: low [9]
Blacklist_Records_Statistics(how many blacklisted websites have records):
HarmlessnessRecords: 0 [2] MaliciousRecords: 0 [2] SuspiciousRecords: 0 [2] NoRecords: 94 [2]
Security Info:
UsageType: unknown [C] Commercial [3] corporate [9] hosting [0 7] isp [A]
CompanyType: business [0 7 A]
IsCloudProvider: Yes [7 D]
IsDatacenter: Yes [0 A] No [1 5 6 8 C]
IsMobile: Yes [E] No [5 A C]
IsProxy: No [0 1 4 5 6 7 8 9 A C D E]
IsVpn: No [0 1 6 7 A C E] Yes [D]
IsTor: No [0 1 3 6 7 8 A C D E]
IsTorExit: No [1 7 D]
IsCrawler: No [9 A E]
IsAnonymous: No [1 6 7 8] Yes [D]
IsAttacker: No [7 8 D]
IsAbuser: Yes [A] No [7 8 C D E]
IsThreat: No [7 8 C D]
IsRelay: No [0 7 8 C D]
IsBogon: No [7 8 A C D]
IsBot: No [E]
DNS-BlackList: 313(Total_Check) 0(Clean) 4(Blacklisted) 22(Other)
IPV6:
Security Score:
FraudScore: 0 [1]
AbuseScore: 0 [3]
ASNAbuseScore: 0.0022 (Low) [A]
CompannyAbuseScore: 0 (Very Low) [A]
Security Info:
UsageType: isp [A] Commercial [3]
CompanyType: isp [A]
IsCloudProvider: Yes [D]
IsDatacenter: Yes [1 A]
IsMobile: No [A]
IsProxy: No [1 A D]
IsVpn: Yes [D] No [1 A]
IsTor: No [1 3 A D]
IsTorExit: No [1 D]
IsCrawler: No [A]
IsAnonymous: No [1] Yes [D]
IsAttacker: No [D]
IsAbuser: No [A D]
IsThreat: No [D]
IsRelay: No [D]
IsBogon: No [A D]
DNS-BlackList: 313(Total_Check) 0(Clean) 0(Blacklisted) 313(Other)
Google search feasibility: NO
Email Port Detection
Platform SMTP SMTPS POP3 POP3S IMAP IMAPS
LocalPort ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔
QQ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
163 ✘ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Sohu ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
Yandex ✘ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Gmail ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
Outlook ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Office365 ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Yahoo ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
MailCOM ✘ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
MailRU ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘
AOL ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
GMX ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Sina ✘ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Apple ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
FastMail ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
ProtonMail✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
MXRoute ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Namecrane ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
XYAMail ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
ZohoMail ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
Inbox_eu ✘ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘
Free_fr ✘ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ Looking Glass
https://lg.terabix.net
Test IP: 160.30.4.225
Datacenter: Equinix JH1 (Johor, Malaysia)
Global Latency Tests
Query: ping 163.61.102.80, interval: 5s, dense mode: no
Probing 163.61.102.80 – APNIC /24 AS137552 TTSB-AP Terabix – Malaysia, Johor, Johor Bahru
CloudFlare Internet Tests
PageSpeed Insights
Admin Control Panel
Conclusion
The VPS delivered a mixed but impressive bag of results. CPU benchmarks via Geekbench 5 clocked a single-core score of 990 and a multi-core score of 797, hinting at solid but not top-tier multi-threaded performance. Memory shone brightly, with read speeds hitting 48,726.36 MB/s and writes at 24,195.01 MB/s. Disk I/O flexed its muscles with 1.5 GB/s read/write for 1MB blocks, though it dipped to 40.8 MB/s write and 28.5 MB/s read with 4K blocks. Network tests showed upload peaks at 1.10 Gbits/sec (Singapore) and downloads up to 878 Mbits/sec, with ping as low as 2.36 ms locally. Streaming unlocked Netflix, Disney+, and more in Malaysia, while IP quality reflected a clean, datacenter-grade IPv4/IPv6 setup with no major red flags.
Analysis and Insights
What stands out is the VPS’s raw compute and memory strength—perfect for tasks like data analytics or virtual machine hosting. The disk I/O tells a nuanced story: it’s a champ with large files but stumbles on small-block operations, much like a sports car stuck in city traffic—powerful yet constrained in certain scenarios. Network performance is a win for nearby regions (think Singapore), but farther afield, speeds vary, suggesting location matters. Streaming capability adds a feather to its cap, ideal for media firms. On the flip side, the modest multi-core score and email port limitations (spotty SMTP support) might irk users needing peak concurrency or mail server reliability.
The AMD EPYC 9654 VPS is a powerhouse for compute-intensive and memory-hungry workloads, making it a compelling pick for enterprises chasing performance on a budget. Its disk and network quirks aren’t dealbreakers but warrant attention—opt for it if your apps lean on big data rather than small, frequent I/O. Streaming support broadens its appeal, though IT admins should test network latency for their regions. For those prioritizing raw power over nitty-gritty optimizations, this VPS delivers bang for the buck—just don’t expect it to ace every niche use case.
Official Website: https://Terabix.net
Related Posts
Copyright ©2023-2025 LetsHosting.com All Rights Reserved, and made with 💙 in New York.
Please visit DigitalOcean.com, our reliable hosting provider.
