Aéza France Paris Shared AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D anti-DDoS VPS Test and Review
In our latest review, we tested the performance of the shared virtual server from Aéza, based in Paris, France. This server has an AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 16-core Processor, 4 CPU cores, 8 GB of RAM, 120 GB of SSD storage, 1 Gbps internet connection, and unlimited data traffic. It also comes with both an IPv4 and an IPv6 address, which ensures better connectivity.
We’re going to carry out several tests to measure its performance:
– Basic Benchmark, Yabs, and Unix Benchmark: These tests gauge key stats, like how fast the server can process tasks.
– Global Node Test: This extensive network test checks how well the server communicates with different parts of the internet.
– Global Ping Test: This test measures the delay, or ‘latency,’ between sending a request to the server and receiving a response.
Additionally, we will also test:
– Media Unlock Test: This checks whether the server can access content that might be geographically restricted in some areas.
– CloudFlare Internet Test: This evaluates the quality of the internet connection.
– PageSpeed Insights and GTmetrix Performance tests: These tests measure how quickly websites hosted on the server load for users.
By the end of this review, we’ll clearly understand this server’s capabilities and performance.
About aéza
Aéza is a modern web hosting company that offers cloud-based Virtual Private Servers (VPS) and Virtual Dedicated Servers (VDS) for rent. They have a unique pricing structure with which you can get 1 virtual CPU and 8 GB of RAM for just 109 rubles per month. They also have heavier-duty servers available for rent, featuring the top-of-the-range AMD Threadripper 3990X processors, which can run at speeds up to 4.3 GHz.
Aéza takes pride in its state-of-the-art equipment and swift communication lines. They provide a technical support team to assist with setup and other needs. Their website is accessible in Russian, and they can be reached at this contact number: +7 (800) 200-60-13.
However, user reviews of Aéza on Trustpilot are mixed. Some customers have expressed satisfaction with their VPS offerings and the technical support provided. However, others have reported problems with their services and customer support.
One user warned that the site might be fraudulent and maintains all its servers in Russia, despite its claims of having servers in other locations such as Sweden and Germany. Another user expressed dissatisfaction after buying a server with an Austrian IP address but received a Russian IP address instead.
Official Website: https://www.aéza.net
BasicBench: Server Profile, I/O Speed, Upload and Download Speed
CPU Model : AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 16-Core Processor
CPU Cores : 4 @ 4192.120 MHz
CPU Cache : 512 KB
AES-NI : ✓ Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ✗ Disabled
Total Disk : 119.0 GB (2.2 GB Used)
Total Mem : 7.8 GB (65.3 MB Used)
Total Swap : 1024.0 MB (0 Used)
System uptime : 0 days, 0 hour 11 min
Load average : 0.00, 0.00, 0.00
OS : Debian GNU/Linux 11
Arch : x86_64 (64 Bit)
Kernel : 5.10.0-21-amd64
TCP CC : bbr
Virtualization : KVM
IPv4/IPv6 : ✓ Online / ✓ Online
Organization : AS210644 AEZA INTERNATIONAL LTD
Location : La Celle-sous-Gouzon / FR
Region : Nouvelle-Aquitaine
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I/O Speed(1st run) : 696 MB/s
I/O Speed(2nd run) : 1.9 GB/s
I/O Speed(3rd run) : 1.7 GB/s
I/O Speed(average) : 1460.8 MB/s
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Node Name Upload Speed Download Speed Latency
Speedtest.net 704.22 Mbps 743.73 Mbps 11.02 ms
Los Angeles, US 420.16 Mbps 32.88 Mbps 174.94 ms
Dallas, US 497.23 Mbps 191.62 Mbps 147.05 ms
Montreal, CA 475.39 Mbps 497.53 Mbps 165.59 ms
Paris, FR 776.93 Mbps 745.50 Mbps 17.10 ms
Amsterdam, NL 814.57 Mbps 725.90 Mbps 19.16 ms
Shanghai, CN 318.79 Mbps 374.46 Mbps 246.69 ms
Hongkong, CN 391.11 Mbps 580.25 Mbps 205.83 ms
Mumbai, IN 648.43 Mbps 280.06 Mbps 115.07 ms
Singapore, SG 225.91 Mbps 634.18 Mbps 312.51 ms
Tokyo, JP 55.29 Mbps 222.30 Mbps 253.57 ms
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Finished in : 5 min 36 sec
Timestamp : 2023-10-31 03:35:17 MSK
YabsBench: Disk Speed, iperf3 Network Speed, Geekbench 6 Benchmark
Basic System Information:
---------------------------------
Uptime : 0 days, 0 hours, 18 minutes
Processor : AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 16-Core Processor
CPU cores : 4 @ 4192.120 MHz
AES-NI : ✔ Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ❌ Disabled
RAM : 7.8 GiB
Swap : 1024.0 MiB
Disk : 118.0 GiB
Distro : Debian GNU/Linux 11 (bullseye)
Kernel : 5.10.0-21-amd64
VM Type : KVM
IPv4/IPv6 : ✔ Online / ✔ Online
IPv4 Network Information:
---------------------------------
ISP : Aeza International LTD
ASN : AS210644 AEZA INTERNATIONAL LTD
Host : Aeza Group LLC
Location : Paris, Île-de-France (IDF)
Country : France
fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50):
---------------------------------
Block Size | 4k (IOPS) | 64k (IOPS)
------ | --- ---- | ---- ----
Read | 40.00 MB/s (10.0k) | 656.51 MB/s (10.2k)
Write | 40.10 MB/s (10.0k) | 659.96 MB/s (10.3k)
Total | 80.11 MB/s (20.0k) | 1.31 GB/s (20.5k)
| |
Block Size | 512k (IOPS) | 1m (IOPS)
------ | --- ---- | ---- ----
Read | 2.09 GB/s (4.0k) | 2.11 GB/s (2.0k)
Write | 2.20 GB/s (4.3k) | 2.25 GB/s (2.1k)
Total | 4.29 GB/s (8.3k) | 4.36 GB/s (4.2k)
iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
---------------------------------
Provider | Location (Link) | Send Speed | Recv Speed | Ping
Clouvider | London, UK (10G) | busy | 140 Mbits/sec | 18.6 ms
Scaleway | Paris, FR (10G) | 806 Mbits/sec | 156 Mbits/sec | 15.2 ms
NovoServe | North Holland, NL (40G) | 767 Mbits/sec | 713 Mbits/sec | 19.0 ms
Uztelecom | Tashkent, UZ (10G) | 702 Mbits/sec | 45.9 Mbits/sec | 112 ms
Clouvider | NYC, NY, US (10G) | 642 Mbits/sec | 91.8 Mbits/sec | 153 ms
Clouvider | Dallas, TX, US (10G) | 323 Mbits/sec | 22.0 Mbits/sec | 302 ms
Clouvider | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 584 Mbits/sec | 75.4 Mbits/sec | 161 ms
iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv6):
---------------------------------
Provider | Location (Link) | Send Speed | Recv Speed | Ping
Clouvider | London, UK (10G) | 648 Mbits/sec | 113 Mbits/sec | 18.6 ms
Scaleway | Paris, FR (10G) | busy | 124 Mbits/sec | 17.5 ms
NovoServe | North Holland, NL (40G) | 653 Mbits/sec | 675 Mbits/sec | 18.9 ms
Uztelecom | Tashkent, UZ (10G) | 662 Mbits/sec | 36.0 Mbits/sec | 113 ms
Clouvider | NYC, NY, US (10G) | 596 Mbits/sec | 48.2 Mbits/sec | 153 ms
Clouvider | Dallas, TX, US (10G) | 507 Mbits/sec | 8.95 Mbits/sec | 302 ms
Clouvider | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 484 Mbits/sec | 21.7 Mbits/sec | 161 ms
Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
---------------------------------
Test | Value
|
Single Core | 1923
Multi Core | 5698
Full Test | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/3324960
YABS completed in 12 min 24 sec
UnixBench: CPU Performance, A score higher is better
Benchmark Run: Tue Oct 31 2023 03:55:57 - 04:23:53
4 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 59268599.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 9519.2 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 7636.4 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1681231.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 492416.1 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 4440918.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 3337277.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 77297.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 14627.7 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 13139.9 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 4796.3 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 3907506.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 59268599.2 5078.7
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 9519.2 1730.8
Execl Throughput 43.0 7636.4 1775.9
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 1681231.8 4245.5
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 492416.1 2975.3
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 4440918.4 7656.8
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 3337277.3 2682.7
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 77297.2 193.2
Process Creation 126.0 14627.7 1160.9
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 13139.9 3099.0
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 4796.3 7993.8
System Call Overhead 15000.0 3907506.4 2605.0
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 2496.6
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Tue Oct 31 2023 04:23:53 - 04:51:53
4 CPUs in system; running 4 parallel copies of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 230148934.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 37556.4 MWIPS (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 22507.8 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1715921.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 432192.7 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5053396.7 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 12594373.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 1068685.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 62970.2 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 41819.1 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 5849.7 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 7143232.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 230148934.1 19721.4
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 37556.4 6828.4
Execl Throughput 43.0 22507.8 5234.4
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 1715921.9 4333.1
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 432192.7 2611.4
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 5053396.7 8712.8
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 12594373.8 10124.1
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 1068685.2 2671.7
Process Creation 126.0 62970.2 4997.6
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 41819.1 9863.0
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 5849.7 9749.4
System Call Overhead 15000.0 7143232.2 4762.2
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 6350.5
======= Script description and score comparison completed! =======
Looking Glass
None
Global Node Test
## CDN Speedtest
CacheFly : 92.85 MiB/s | 742.80 Mbps | ping 5.746ms
Gdrive : 0 B/s | N/A | ping 5.770ms
## North America Speedtest
Softlayer, Washington, USA : 759.23 KiB/s | 5.93 Mbps | ping 157.709ms
SoftLayer, San Jose, USA : 961.55 KiB/s | 7.51 Mbps | ping 157.343ms
SoftLayer, Dallas, USA : 0 B/s | N/A | ping error!
Vultr, New Jersey, USA : 377.02 KiB/s | 2.95 Mbps | ping 158.816ms
Vultr, Seattle, USA : 9.11 MiB/s | 72.85 Mbps | ping 181.868ms
Vultr, Dallas, USA : 11.92 MiB/s | 95.37 Mbps | ping 150.535ms
Vultr, Los Angeles, USA : 13.02 MiB/s | 104.15 Mbps | ping 151.670ms
Ramnode, New York, USA : 12.58 MiB/s | 100.63 Mbps | ping 159.027ms
Ramnode, Atlanta, USA : 13.03 MiB/s | 104.24 Mbps | ping 156.186ms
OVH, Beauharnois, Canada : 188 B/s | N/A | ping 14.742ms
## Europe Speedtest
Vultr, London, UK : 75.30 MiB/s | 602.41 Mbps | ping 18.695ms
LeaseWeb, Frankfurt, Germany : 660.07 KiB/s | 5.16 Mbps | ping 5.783ms
Hetzner, Germany : 2.90 KiB/s | 0.02 Mbps | ping 8.945ms
Ramnode, Alblasserdam, NL : 75.93 MiB/s | 607.44 Mbps | ping 28.835ms
Vultr, Amsterdam, NL : 71.74 MiB/s | 573.89 Mbps | ping 19.095ms
EDIS, Stockholm, Sweden : 2.46 KiB/s | 0.02 Mbps | ping 30.348ms
OVH, Roubaix, France : 3.23 KiB/s | 0.03 Mbps | ping 16.280ms
Online, France : 47.59 MiB/s | 380.71 Mbps | ping 15.085ms
Prometeus, Milan, Italy : 2.99 KiB/s | 0.02 Mbps | ping 17.731ms
## Exotic Speedtest
Sydney, Australia : 904.23 KiB/s | 7.06 Mbps | ping 369.580ms
Lagoon, New Caledonia : 202 B/s | N/A | ping 310.318ms
Hosteasy, Moldova : 53.73 MiB/s | 429.88 Mbps | ping 39.686ms
Prima, Argentina : 121.03 KiB/s | 0.95 Mbps | ping error!
## Asia Speedtest
SoftLayer, Singapore : 241.51 KiB/s | 1.89 Mbps | ping 240.273ms
Linode, Tokyo, Japan : 1.42 MiB/s | 11.39 Mbps | ping 288.560ms
Linode, Singapore : 1.48 MiB/s | 11.85 Mbps | ping 336.724ms
Vultr, Tokyo, Japan : 3.60 MiB/s | 28.81 Mbps | ping 278.876ms
Benchmark finished in 88 seconds
Global Latency Test
Query: ping 45.15.157.111, interval: 5s, dense mode: no
Probing 45.15.157.111 – RIPENCC /24 AS210644 AEZA – France, Île-de-France, Paris
Media Unlock Test
** Test Starts At: Tue 31 Oct 2023 03:52:57 AM MSK
** Checking Results Under IPv4
--------------------------------
** Your Network Provider: Aeza International (45.15.*.*)
============[ Multination ]============
Dazn: Yes (Region: FR)
HotStar: No
Disney+: Yes (Region: FR)
Netflix: Yes (Region: FR)
YouTube Premium: Failed
Amazon Prime Video: Yes (Region: FR)
TVBAnywhere+: Yes
iQyi Oversea Region: FR
Viu.com: No
YouTube CDN: GIGANET in Kiev
Netflix Preferred CDN: Stockholm
Spotify Registration: No
Steam Currency: EUR
ChatGPT: Yes
=======================================
** Checking Results Under IPv6
--------------------------------
** Your Network Provider: Aeza International (2a12:5940:f04f:*:*)
============[ Multination ]============
Dazn: Failed (Network Connection)
HotStar: No
Disney+: Yes (Region: NL)
Netflix: Yes (Region: FR)
YouTube Premium: Yes (Region: GB)
Amazon Prime Video: Unsupported
TVBAnywhere+: Failed (Network Connection)
iQyi Oversea Region: Failed
Viu.com: Failed
YouTube CDN: Budapest
Netflix Preferred CDN: Paris
Steam Currency: Failed (Network Connection)
ChatGPT: Yes
=======================================
Testing Done! CloudFlare Internet Test
PageSpeed Insights
GTmetrix Performance
Admin Control Panel
Server Pricing
Official Website: https://www.aéza.net
Payments
Aéza offers various payment options to accommodate a diverse customer base across bank cards, online payments, electronic wallets, and cryptocurrencies. However, it’s important to note that most payment methods are subjected to processing fees ranging from 0% to 10%.
When using bank cards from the Russian Federation or international cards via Stripe, a nominal fee of 5% is applied. Online payments through СБП attract a lesser fee of 1%, whereas Yandex Pay and SteamPay charge 5%.
Among electronic wallets, options like FKWallet (RUB and USD) and LAVA come with no processing fees. QIWI wallet users will see a 5% charge, while the highest fees in this category are associated with ЮMoney and WebMoney at 8% and 10%, respectively.
As for cryptocurrencies, the charges remain consistent across all the currencies accepted, including Bitcoin, Binance BNB, Ethereum, Litecoin, Dash, Doge, and others, at a rate of 7%. Remember that specific cryptocurrencies might have additional network fees not dependent on Aéza’s payment handling.
All these fees should be considered while choosing your preferred payment method with Aéza.
Coupon
The merchant did not provide
Customer Support
Aéza International Ltd, based in Sheffield, England, provides multiple channels for Customer Support to ensure its users’ queries and concerns are addressed efficiently.
The company can be reached directly through their dedicated phone line at 8 800 200-60-13. Additionally, customer support is accessible via email at [email protected]. They also have a designated customer support bot, @aezasupport_bot, which can handle support requests through messaging.
Regarding social media visibility, Aéza maintains accounts on Telegram and Instagram, which can be helpful sources for updates and more informal interaction. The Telegram bot is another resourceful channel for support and problem-solving.
This customer support structure exhibits Aéza’s attempt to be easily accessible and responsive to customers’ needs. However, as with any service, customer experiences may vary, and it is advised to go through the user reviews better to understand the quality and responsiveness of their customer support.
Conclusion
In the Basic Benchmark test, the server showed impressive performance with an average I/O (input/output) speed of 1.46 GB/s. It also exhibited strong Upload and Download speeds across various international nodes, showcasing its global reach and ability to handle dense web traffic.
The Yabs Performance Bench revealed robust disk speed in reading and writing tasks. With a total data handling capability of around 4.36 GB/s for larger blocks, it’s clear that this server can efficiently manage large data volumes.
The server’s CPU performance was tipped in the Geekbench 6 test, scoring high in single-core (1923) and multi-core (5698) processing. This ensures the ability to handle multiple tasks and requests simultaneously, a critical aspect of web hosting.
The UnixBench test score was 6350.5, highlighting the server’s excellent capabilities in various tasks, including processing speed, file copying, throughput, and more.
Lastly, the Media Unlock Test indicated that the server could effectively unlock many media services such as Dazn, Disney+, Netflix, Amazon Prime Video, and TVBAnywhere+. Some services, such as HotStar and Viu.com, were unavailable, but this could be more applicable for specific geographic regions.
In conclusion, the Aéza shared virtual server based in Paris, France, performed admirably under intensive testing. It showcased high-speed performance, impressive data handling, strong CPU processing, and solid content accessibility. This makes it a compelling option for anyone seeking a robust virtual server for their web hosting needs. However, as always, it would be wise to consider your specific needs and compare services before making a final decision.
Official Website: https://www.aéza.net
Related Posts
