IntoVPS United States Dallas OpenStack Cloud VPS Hosting Test and Review
We’ve tested IntoVPS‘s cloud VPS hosting service in Dallas, USA. Their server runs on an Intel Core processor and offers a package with 4 CPU cores, 16GB of RAM, 120GB of SSD storage, a fast 1Gbps internet connection, 6TB of data transfer, and one IPv4 address.
Our review covers a range of tests: we start with the Basic Benchmark, Yabs, and Unix Benchmark to measure core performance. Then, we check network performance globally with the Node Test and latency with the Ping Test.
We also checked if you can access different media through the Media Unlock Test. To assess connection quality, we do the CloudFlare Internet Test. Finally, we use tools like PageSpeed Insights and GTmetrix for website speed.
About IntoVPS
IntoVPS is a reputable Virtual Private Server (VPS) hosting service provider offering robust and reliable solutions to customers worldwide. The company was launched in June 2009 to provide powerful, secure VPS systems at affordable prices. Over the years, IntoVPS has served thousands of satisfied customers from six locations in Europe and the USA.
OpenStack, a popular open-source cloud orchestration project, powers the company’s hosting services. This platform is trusted by many of the world’s largest brands, making it a reliable choice for businesses of all sizes. IntoVPS also utilizes KVM (Kernel-based Virtual Machine) technology, which allows for the creation of virtual servers with their operating systems, offering users more control and flexibility.
IntoVPS’s servers run on high-performance Intel Xeon and AMD EPYC processors. These servers have full SSD storage, providing minimal latency and many operations per second. This powerful hardware and advanced software combination ensures IntoVPS’s servers deliver top-notch performance.
One of the standout features of IntoVPS is its uptime commitment. The company offers a 99.9% uptime guarantee, ensuring that your website or application is always available to your users. This level of reliability is crucial for businesses that depend on their online presence.
IntoVPS offers a range of hosting plans to suit different needs and budgets. KVM, OpenStack, and Fleio power these plans, all featuring full SSD storage. The plans vary in terms of RAM, monthly traffic, vCPU cores, and price. This variety allows customers to choose a plan that best fits their requirements.
Official Website: https://www.IntoVPS.com
BasicBench: Server Profile, I/O Speed, Upload and Download Speed
CPU Model : Intel Core Processor (Broadwell, IBRS)
CPU Cores : 4 @ 2399.990 MHz
CPU Cache : 16384 KB
AES-NI : ✓ Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ✓ Enabled
Total Disk : 118.1 GB (1.5 GB Used)
Total Mem : 15.6 GB (209.4 MB Used)
System uptime : 0 days, 0 hour 14 min
Load average : 0.00, 0.16, 0.19
OS : Debian GNU/Linux 11
Arch : x86_64 (64 Bit)
Kernel : 5.10.0-9-cloud-amd64
TCP CC : bbr
Virtualization : KVM
IPv4/IPv6 : ✓ Online / ✗ Offline
Organization : AS13354 zColo
Location : Dallas / US
Region : Texas
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I/O Speed(1st run) : 343 MB/s
I/O Speed(2nd run) : 361 MB/s
I/O Speed(3rd run) : 327 MB/s
I/O Speed(average) : 343.7 MB/s
YabsBench: Disk Speed, iperf3 Network Speed, Geekbench 6 Benchmark
Basic System Information:
---------------------------------
Uptime : 0 days, 0 hours, 14 minutes
Processor : Intel Core Processor (Broadwell, IBRS)
CPU cores : 4 @ 2399.990 MHz
AES-NI : ✔ Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
RAM : 15.6 GiB
Swap : 0.0 KiB
Disk : 118.1 GiB
Distro : Debian GNU/Linux 11 (bullseye)
Kernel : 5.10.0-9-cloud-amd64
VM Type : KVM
IPv4/IPv6 : ✔ Online / ❌ Offline
IPv4 Network Information:
---------------------------------
ISP : zColo
ASN : AS13354 zColo
Host : Elvsoft Corp
Location : Dallas, Texas (TX)
Country : United States
fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50):
---------------------------------
Block Size | 4k (IOPS) | 64k (IOPS)
------ | --- ---- | ---- ----
Read | 135.50 MB/s (33.8k) | 308.27 MB/s (4.8k)
Write | 135.86 MB/s (33.9k) | 309.89 MB/s (4.8k)
Total | 271.37 MB/s (67.8k) | 618.17 MB/s (9.6k)
| |
Block Size | 512k (IOPS) | 1m (IOPS)
------ | --- ---- | ---- ----
Read | 397.52 MB/s (776) | 421.94 MB/s (412)
Write | 418.64 MB/s (817) | 450.04 MB/s (439)
Total | 816.17 MB/s (1.5k) | 871.99 MB/s (851)
iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
---------------------------------
Provider | Location (Link) | Send Speed | Recv Speed | Ping
Clouvider | London, UK (10G) | 320 Mbits/sec | 70.4 Mbits/sec | 103 ms
Scaleway | Paris, FR (10G) | 326 Mbits/sec | 48.5 Mbits/sec | 111 ms
NovoServe | North Holland, NL (40G) | 311 Mbits/sec | 336 Mbits/sec | 110 ms
Uztelecom | Tashkent, UZ (10G) | 239 Mbits/sec | 63.0 Mbits/sec | 207 ms
Clouvider | NYC, NY, US (10G) | 357 Mbits/sec | 303 Mbits/sec | 34.5 ms
Clouvider | Dallas, TX, US (10G) | 368 Mbits/sec | 366 Mbits/sec | 1.14 ms
Clouvider | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 357 Mbits/sec | 330 Mbits/sec | 31.6 ms
Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
---------------------------------
Test | Value
|
Single Core | 798
Multi Core | 2505
Full Test | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/4644005
YABS completed in 12 min 51 sec
UnixBench: CPU Performance, A score higher is better
Benchmark Run: Mon Jan 29 2024 08:24:19 - 08:52:24
4 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 26009282.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 5245.1 MWIPS (9.8 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 2627.4 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 415408.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 109772.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1176889.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 595170.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 68075.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 5207.0 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 6544.6 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 2223.1 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 342325.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 26009282.9 2228.7
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 5245.1 953.7
Execl Throughput 43.0 2627.4 611.0
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 415408.0 1049.0
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 109772.9 663.3
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1176889.9 2029.1
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 595170.6 478.4
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 68075.2 170.2
Process Creation 126.0 5207.0 413.3
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 6544.6 1543.5
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 2223.1 3705.2
System Call Overhead 15000.0 342325.1 228.2
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 810.6
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Mon Jan 29 2024 08:52:24 - 09:20:36
4 CPUs in system; running 4 parallel copies of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 105392869.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 21298.5 MWIPS (9.8 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 9554.4 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 811086.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 208710.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 2439173.2 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 2383646.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 413983.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 23219.3 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 19188.1 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 2907.3 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 1307021.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 105392869.2 9031.1
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 21298.5 3872.5
Execl Throughput 43.0 9554.4 2222.0
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 811086.5 2048.2
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 208710.9 1261.1
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 2439173.2 4205.5
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 2383646.9 1916.1
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 413983.8 1035.0
Process Creation 126.0 23219.3 1842.8
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 19188.1 4525.5
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 2907.3 4845.5
System Call Overhead 15000.0 1307021.9 871.3
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 2497.7
======= Script description and score comparison completed! =======
Looking Glass
Server Location: Dallas (US)
Test IPv4: 74.117.153.23
Test files: 100MB 500MB 1000MB
Global Node Test
## CDN Speedtest
CacheFly : 25.75 MiB/s | 206.03 Mbps | ping 1.182ms
Gdrive : 18.26 KiB/s | 0.14 Mbps | ping 1.983ms
## North America Speedtest
Softlayer, Washington, USA : 14.40 MiB/s | 115.22 Mbps | ping 31.734ms
SoftLayer, San Jose, USA : 19.29 MiB/s | 154.34 Mbps | ping 39.102ms
SoftLayer, Dallas, USA : 0 B/s | N/A | ping error!
Vultr, New Jersey, USA : 2.30 MiB/s | 18.39 Mbps | ping 35.356ms
Vultr, Seattle, USA : 31.07 MiB/s | 248.52 Mbps | ping 50.564ms
Vultr, Dallas, USA : 42.59 MiB/s | 340.72 Mbps | ping 1.430ms
Vultr, Los Angeles, USA : 35.88 MiB/s | 287.05 Mbps | ping 31.584ms
Ramnode, New York, USA : 10.74 MiB/s | 85.95 Mbps | ping 37.555ms
Ramnode, Atlanta, USA : 27.04 MiB/s | 216.31 Mbps | ping 18.059ms
## Europe Speedtest
Vultr, London, UK : 21.93 MiB/s | 175.42 Mbps | ping 102.701ms
LeaseWeb, Frankfurt, Germany : 33.78 KiB/s | 0.26 Mbps | ping 119.622ms
Hetzner, Germany : 237 B/s | N/A | ping 126.292ms
Ramnode, Alblasserdam, NL : 3.13 MiB/s | 25.04 Mbps | ping 112.238ms
Vultr, Amsterdam, NL : 20.19 MiB/s | 161.51 Mbps | ping 109.885ms
EDIS, Stockholm, Sweden : 527 B/s | N/A | ping 133.917ms
OVH, Roubaix, France : 351 B/s | N/A | ping 112.309ms
Online, France : 575.25 KiB/s | 4.49 Mbps | ping 110.683ms
Prometeus, Milan, Italy : 389 B/s | N/A | ping 134.882ms
## Exotic Speedtest
Sydney, Australia : 5.99 MiB/s | 47.89 Mbps | ping 175.469ms
Lagoon, New Caledonia : 241 B/s | N/A | ping 233.403ms
Hosteasy, Moldova : 2.40 MiB/s | 19.23 Mbps | ping 154.092ms
Prima, Argentina : 2.09 MiB/s | 16.72 Mbps | ping error!
## Asia Speedtest
SoftLayer, Singapore : 1.09 MiB/s | 8.69 Mbps | ping 215.490ms
Linode, Tokyo, Japan : 3.15 MiB/s | 25.18 Mbps | ping 141.922ms
Linode, Singapore : 1.58 MiB/s | 12.66 Mbps | ping 207.709ms
Vultr, Tokyo, Japan : 14.96 MiB/s | 119.71 Mbps | ping 135.815ms
Benchmark finished in 139 seconds
Global Latency Test
Query: ping 74.117.153.87, interval: 5s, dense mode: no
Probing 74.117.153.87 – ARIN /22 AS13354 ZC38-AS1 – United States
Media Unlock Test
** Test Starts At: Mon Jan 29 09:03:38 UTC 2024
** Checking Results Under IPv4
--------------------------------
** Your Network Provider: Databank zColo (74.117.*.*)
============[ Multination ]============
Dazn: Yes (Region: US)
HotStar: Yes (Region: US)
Disney+: No
Netflix: Originals Only
YouTube Premium: Yes
Amazon Prime Video: Yes (Region: US)
TVBAnywhere+: Yes
iQyi Oversea Region: US
Viu.com: No
YouTube CDN: Dallas, TX
Netflix Preferred CDN: Dallas, TX
Spotify Registration: No
Steam Currency: USD
ChatGPT: Yes
Bing Region: US
Instagram Licensed Audio: Yes
=======================================
No IPv6 Connectivity Found, Abort IPv6 Testing...
Testing Done!CloudFlare Internet Test
PageSpeed Insights
GTmetrix Performance
Admin Control Panel
IntoVPS provides users a robust and user-friendly Admin Control Panel for managing their VPS services. The control panel offers users high control and flexibility over their virtual servers.
In addition to these hosting control panels, IntoVPS also offers a tool called Fleio. Fleio is a control panel specifically designed for OpenStack and for managing cloud services. It allows users to create, resize, rebuild, and delete virtual servers, among other things.
Server Pricing
Another advantage of IntoVPS is its flexible pricing. Customers can pay per hour, which can be more cost-effective for businesses with fluctuating traffic levels. This pay-as-you-go model significantly benefits startups and small businesses that must carefully manage costs.
Official Website: https://www.IntoVPS.com
Payments
One of the key features of their billing system is the pay-per-hour model. This allows customers to only pay for the exact amount of resources they use, making it a cost-effective solution for businesses with fluctuating needs.
Customers must log in to their Fleio account and navigate to the Billing History section to view their billing history. Here, they can see how much credit their VPSs have consumed during the month. If they want to see the consumption for the previous months, they can use the arrows provided. Detailed information about the hours of credit consumption can be viewed by clicking on the instance.
In case of any issues with the payment process, IntoVPS provides a comprehensive knowledge base. For instance, they provide solutions for common errors like “Processing error. -19 Authentication failed”, which usually occurs due to card authentication issues.
Coupon
The merchant did not provide
Customer Support
IntoVPS is known for its excellent customer support, which is available 24/7. The support team comprises highly skilled industry veterans ready to assist customers with their needs.
Customers can reach the support team via email or telephone. This ensures that help is always available, regardless of the time or day. Whether it’s 7 P.M. on a Wednesday or 2 A.M. on a Sunday, the support team is always ready to answer in just a few minutes.
The company’s commitment to providing top-notch customer service is reflected in the numerous positive testimonials from satisfied customers. Customers have praised IntoVPS for its quick response times and the quality of its support.
Conclusion
Our initial tests focused on the server’s ability to read from and write to its solid-state drive. Across three runs, the I/O speeds hovered around 343 MB/s, which falls into the category of good performance. It’s not top-of-the-line, but it’s up to the task for most applications. The Yabs performance tests mirrored this, with mixed read/write operations delivering speeds well over the 500 MB/s mark when dealing with larger blocks, which demonstrates the drive can efficiently handle larger files and applications.
The Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test was revealing as well. The server’s single-core performance was somewhat standard, just shy of 800. However, its multi-core score, at over 2500, was impressive, indicating that the server can effectively handle parallel processing tasks in more demanding applications and workloads.
UnixBench scores, which reflect the server’s CPU performance, showed exceptional results, particularly when all cores were utilized. The system indexed well above the baseline across all tests, with particularly high scores in the multi-paralleled test scenarios, showcasing that the server will likely excel in multi-threaded processes.
In conclusion, the IntoVPS Dallas VPS service demonstrates well-rounded performance. Its SSD speeds are good, suggesting snappy day-to-day operations. CPU capabilities are particularly strong in multi-core scenarios, making this service a solid choice for multitasking and demanding applications. While its single-core performance isn’t breaking any records, it maintains a standard many users will find sufficient. Overall, this VPS offers a reliable infrastructure that could suit various hosting needs.
Official Website: https://www.IntoVPS.com
Related Posts
