OneQode Guam Latency Optimized High Performance Cloud Server Test and Review

Tests2~weeks ago~Updated LetsHosting
167 0
OneQode Guam Latency Optimized High Performance Cloud Server Test and Review

We recently tested the OneQode Guam Latency Optimized High-Performance Cloud Server (Plan: xer.medium). Powered by an Intel Core Processor (Skylake, IBRS), the server features a dual-core CPU, 4 GB of RAM, 76 GB of SSD storage, a 1 Gbps internet port, and 10 TB of free traffic.

In our review, we implemented several tests. We used the Basic Benchmark, Yabs, and Unix Benchmark to check performance. We conducted the Global Node Test to evaluate network speeds across different locations and measured latency with the Global Ping Test.

Our review also included the Media Unlock Test to check media accessibility and the CloudFlare Internet Test to examine the connection quality. Additionally, we assessed web performance using PageSpeed Insights and GTmetrix.

About OneQode

In the digital world, where latency can make or break an experience, OneQode stands out as a beacon of high performance. This Brisbane-based company is revolutionizing the gaming industry with its low-latency digital infrastructure. Let’s dive into the world of OneQode and explore what makes it a game-changer.

Firstly, OneQode is not your average hosting provider. It’s a high-performance gaming infrastructure provider. This means it’s designed to handle the demands of modern gaming, where every millisecond counts. OneQode’s servers are powered by the world’s fastest CPUs, providing more power than your standard setup.

But what truly sets OneQode apart is its network. It’s built specifically for real-time applications, such as multiplayer gaming. This network is optimized for low latency, ensuring smooth and responsive performance. In other words, it’s a network built for gamers, by gamers.

OneQode’s reach is impressive. With central hubs in strategic locations across the Asia-Pacific region, including Guam, it can connect billions of users at low latency. This means that whether you’re in Singapore, Hong Kong, Tokyo, or Manila, you can enjoy a seamless gaming experience.

Moreover, OneQode offers custom solutions tailored to your exact requirements. Whether you need blazing-fast cloud instances or dedicated servers, OneQode covers you. It’s trusted by brands prioritizing performance, making it a reliable choice for your hosting needs.

Official Website: https://www.OneQode.com

BasicBench: Server Profile, I/O Speed, Upload and Download Speed

 CPU Model          : Intel Core Processor (Skylake, IBRS)
 CPU Cores          : 2 @ 3696.000 MHz
 CPU Cache          : 16384 KB
 AES-NI             : ✓ Enabled
 VM-x/AMD-V         : ✓ Enabled
 Total Disk         : 150.7 GB (1.4 GB Used)
 Total Mem          : 3.8 GB (227.7 MB Used)
 System uptime      : 0 days, 0 hour 27 min
 Load average       : 0.03, 0.14, 0.10
 OS                 : Debian GNU/Linux 11
 Arch               : x86_64 (64 Bit)
 Kernel             : 5.10.0-26-cloud-amd64
 TCP CC             : bbr
 Virtualization     : KVM
 IPv4/IPv6          : ✓ Online / ✗ Offline
 Organization       : AS140627 OneQode
 Location           : Sydney / AU
 Region             : New South Wales
----------------------------------------------------------------------
 I/O Speed(1st run) : 107 MB/s
 I/O Speed(2nd run) : 102 MB/s
 I/O Speed(3rd run) : 108 MB/s
 I/O Speed(average) : 105.7 MB/s
----------------------------------------------------------------------
 Node Name        Upload Speed      Download Speed      Latency     
 Speedtest.net    881.87 Mbps       939.34 Mbps         65.11 ms    
 Los Angeles, US  737.76 Mbps       933.59 Mbps         109.71 ms   
 Dallas, US       597.21 Mbps       885.89 Mbps         137.58 ms   
 Montreal, CA     458.27 Mbps       937.67 Mbps         176.01 ms   
 Amsterdam, NL    272.81 Mbps       876.49 Mbps         291.34 ms   
 Shanghai, CN     46.88 Mbps        46.49 Mbps          74.90 ms    
 Hongkong, CN     830.71 Mbps       938.35 Mbps         60.85 ms    
 Mumbai, IN       572.04 Mbps       915.83 Mbps         147.16 ms   
 Singapore, SG    272.82 Mbps       934.15 Mbps         65.95 ms    
 Tokyo, JP        660.44 Mbps       935.67 Mbps         96.81 ms    
----------------------------------------------------------------------
 Finished in        : 5 min 47 sec
 Timestamp          : 2024-04-23 01:33:01 UTC

YabsBench: Disk Speed, iperf3 Network Speed, Geekbench 6 Benchmark

Basic System Information:
---------------------------------
Uptime     : 0 days, 0 hours, 40 minutes
Processor  : Intel Core Processor (Skylake, IBRS)
CPU cores  : 2 @ 3696.000 MHz
AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
RAM        : 3.8 GiB
Swap       : 0.0 KiB
Disk       : 150.7 GiB
Distro     : Debian GNU/Linux 11 (bullseye)
Kernel     : 5.10.0-26-cloud-amd64
VM Type    : KVM
IPv4/IPv6  : ✔ Online / ❌ Offline

IPv4 Network Information:
---------------------------------
ISP        : Oneqode Assets PTY LTD
ASN        : AS140627 OneQode
Host       : OneQode Assets Pty Ltd
Location   : Singapore, North West (03)
Country    : Singapore

fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50):
---------------------------------
Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
Read       | 49.49 MB/s   (12.3k) | 107.66 MB/s   (1.6k)
Write      | 49.57 MB/s   (12.3k) | 108.23 MB/s   (1.6k)
Total      | 99.07 MB/s   (24.7k) | 215.90 MB/s   (3.3k)
           |                      |                     
Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
Read       | 100.54 MB/s    (196) | 99.04 MB/s      (96)
Write      | 105.88 MB/s    (206) | 105.64 MB/s    (103)
Total      | 206.43 MB/s    (402) | 204.68 MB/s    (199)

iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
---------------------------------
Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping           
Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | busy            | 248 Mbits/sec   | 242 ms         
Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (10G)       | 506 Mbits/sec   | 643 Mbits/sec   | 254 ms         
Telia           | Helsinki, FI (10G)        | busy            | busy            | 259 ms         
Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 771 Mbits/sec   | 521 Mbits/sec   | 154 ms         
Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | busy            | 772 Mbits/sec   | 65.7 ms        
Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 736 Mbits/sec   | 626 Mbits/sec   | 109 ms         
Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 734 Mbits/sec   | 632 Mbits/sec   | 171 ms         
Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 371 Mbits/sec   | 234 Mbits/sec   | 322 ms         

Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
---------------------------------
Test            | Value                         
                |                               
Single Core     | 1469                          
Multi Core      | 2608                          
Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/5824164

YABS completed in 14 min 31 sec

UnixBench: CPU Performance, A Score Higher is Better

Benchmark Run: Tue Apr 23 2024 02:02:47 - 02:30:47
2 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables       54247552.4 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone                     8510.3 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput                               5482.5 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks       1207029.3 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks          353552.8 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks       2791794.8 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput                             2789540.8 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching                 205931.9 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation                              11223.4 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                  15107.9 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                   2799.1 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead                        3209941.5 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values               BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0   54247552.4   4648.5
Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0       8510.3   1547.3
Execl Throughput                                 43.0       5482.5   1275.0
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0    1207029.3   3048.1
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0     353552.8   2136.3
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0    2791794.8   4813.4
Pipe Throughput                               12440.0    2789540.8   2242.4
Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0     205931.9    514.8
Process Creation                                126.0      11223.4    890.7
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4      15107.9   3563.2
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0       2799.1   4665.2
System Call Overhead                          15000.0    3209941.5   2140.0
                                                                   ========
System Benchmarks Index Score                                        2163.5

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Tue Apr 23 2024 02:30:47 - 02:58:50
2 CPUs in system; running 2 parallel copies of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables      106692875.9 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone                    16971.2 MWIPS (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput                              10040.5 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks       1569770.9 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks          436864.3 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks       4414963.6 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput                             5503821.4 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching                 630793.0 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation                              24541.9 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                  21056.3 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                   2886.5 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead                        5092303.0 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values               BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0  106692875.9   9142.5
Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0      16971.2   3085.7
Execl Throughput                                 43.0      10040.5   2335.0
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0    1569770.9   3964.1
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0     436864.3   2639.7
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0    4414963.6   7612.0
Pipe Throughput                               12440.0    5503821.4   4424.3
Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0     630793.0   1577.0
Process Creation                                126.0      24541.9   1947.8
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4      21056.3   4966.1
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0       2886.5   4810.9
System Call Overhead                          15000.0    5092303.0   3394.9
                                                                   ========
System Benchmarks Index Score                                        3660.3

======= Script description and score comparison completed! ======= 

Looking Glass

https://lg.oneqode.com

Global Node Test

 ## CDN Speedtest

 CacheFly :     164 B/s |      N/A       | ping  43.325ms
 Gdrive   :   2.03 KiB/s |    0.02 Mbps  | ping  29.240ms


 ## North America Speedtest

 Softlayer, Washington, USA : 122.29 KiB/s |    0.96 Mbps  | ping 226.181ms
 SoftLayer, San Jose, USA   :       0 B/s |      N/A       | ping error!
 SoftLayer, Dallas, USA     :       0 B/s |      N/A       | ping error!
 Vultr, New Jersey, USA     : 290.56 KiB/s |    2.27 Mbps  | ping 168.640ms
 Vultr, Seattle, USA        :  12.39 MiB/s |   99.11 Mbps  | ping 137.664ms
 Vultr, Dallas, USA         :  13.24 MiB/s |  105.94 Mbps  | ping 139.181ms
 Vultr, Los Angeles, USA    :  18.49 MiB/s |  147.91 Mbps  | ping 109.034ms
 Ramnode, New York, USA     :   9.82 MiB/s |   78.56 Mbps  | ping 169.609ms
 Ramnode, Atlanta, USA      :  11.32 MiB/s |   90.53 Mbps  | ping 168.156ms


 ## Europe Speedtest

 Vultr, London, UK            :   5.00 MiB/s |   40.00 Mbps  | ping 243.317ms
 LeaseWeb, Frankfurt, Germany :  10.68 KiB/s |    0.08 Mbps  | ping 256.159ms
 Hetzner, Germany             :      49 B/s |      N/A       | ping 355.569ms
 Ramnode, Alblasserdam, NL    :   5.36 MiB/s |   42.86 Mbps  | ping 256.407ms
 Vultr, Amsterdam, NL         :   4.36 MiB/s |   34.91 Mbps  | ping 256.170ms
 EDIS, Stockholm, Sweden      :      86 B/s |      N/A       | ping 260.714ms
 OVH, Roubaix, France         :     215 B/s |      N/A       | ping 245.582ms
 Online, France               :   4.48 MiB/s |   35.87 Mbps  | ping 245.759ms
 Prometeus, Milan, Italy      :      73 B/s |      N/A       | ping 293.915ms


 ## Exotic Speedtest

 Sydney, Australia     :  30.27 MiB/s |  242.13 Mbps  | ping  70.606ms
 Lagoon, New Caledonia :     239 B/s |      N/A       | ping  95.611ms
 Hosteasy, Moldova     : 783.53 KiB/s |    6.12 Mbps  | ping 291.458ms
 Prima, Argentina      :  75.25 KiB/s |    0.59 Mbps  | ping error!


 ## Asia Speedtest

 SoftLayer, Singapore :   2.53 MiB/s |   20.23 Mbps  | ping 114.764ms
 Linode, Tokyo, Japan :  30.19 MiB/s |  241.55 Mbps  | ping  57.486ms
 Linode, Singapore    :  23.38 MiB/s |  187.01 Mbps  | ping  79.481ms
 Vultr, Tokyo, Japan  :  71.74 MiB/s |  573.89 Mbps  | ping  28.982ms


 Benchmark finished in 167 seconds

Global Latency Test

OneQode Guam Latency Optimized High Performance Cloud Server Test and Review OneQode Guam Latency Optimized High Performance Cloud Server Test and Review

Query: ping 156.247.204.79, interval: 5s, dense mode: no

Probing 156.247.204.79 – AFRINIC /22 AS140627 ONEQODEASSETS-AS-A – Singapore, Singapore [residential]

Media Unlock Test

 ** Test Starts At: Tue Apr 23 01:15:56 UTC 2024

 ** Checking Results Under IPv4 
--------------------------------
 ** Your Network Provider: OneQode (156.247.*.*) 

============[ Multination ]============
 Dazn:                                  Yes (Region: SG)
 HotStar:                               No
 Disney+:                               No
 Netflix:                               Yes (Region: SG)
 YouTube Premium:                       Yes
 Amazon Prime Video:                    Yes (Region: GU)
 TVBAnywhere+:                          Yes
 iQyi Oversea Region:                   SG
 Viu.com:                               Yes (Region: SG)
 YouTube CDN:                           Tokyo 
 Netflix Preferred CDN:                 Singapore  
 Spotify Registration:                  No
 Steam Currency:                        SGD
 ChatGPT:                               Yes
 Bing Region:                           SG
 Instagram Licensed Audio:              No
=======================================
No IPv6 Connectivity Found, Abort IPv6 Testing...

Testing Done! 

CloudFlare Internet Test

OneQode Guam Latency Optimized High Performance Cloud Server Test and Review

PageSpeed Insights

OneQode Guam Latency Optimized High Performance Cloud Server Test and Review

GTmetrix Performance

OneQode Guam Latency Optimized High Performance Cloud Server Test and Review

Admin Control Panel

OneQode Guam Latency Optimized High Performance Cloud Server Test and Review OneQode Guam Latency Optimized High Performance Cloud Server Test and Review

The Cloud Admin Control Panel gives you complete control over your cloud environment. You can programmatically launch and manage your environment through a friendly RESTful API or command line. This gives you a powerful automation layer to manage your infrastructure.

Moreover, the Cloud Admin Control Panel is built on an open-source foundation. This means it’s broadly interoperable with existing DevOps toolkits. It also brings a wide ecosystem of developers, documentation, and projects.

In addition, each vCPU in the Cloud Admin Control Panel represents a dedicated CPU thread. This thread is exclusive to you and not shared with other customers. This ensures that you get the maximum performance from your cloud environment.

Lastly, the Cloud Admin Control Panel is a network built for gaming and real-time applications. This means you can experience smooth and responsive performance. It’s like having a supercomputer at your fingertips.

Server Pricing

OneQode Guam Latency Optimized High Performance Cloud Server Test and Review

Official Website: https://www.OneQode.com

Payments

OneQode operates on a simple pricing model. They offer the same price in every location, so you don’t have to worry about fluctuating costs based on your or your users’ location.

Moreover, OneQode provides a generous amount of data transfer with its services. The first 10 TB of data transfer is free, and the pricing for additional data follows a tiered model. This structure allows you to estimate your monthly data costs easily.

In addition, OneQode offers various storage options. These include image storage for OS images and instance snapshots, volume storage that you can attach to one or more instances, and S3-compatible object storage ideal for large media. Each of these storage options comes with its own pricing.

OneQode also provides IP addresses as part of its services. Each instance comes with one ephemeral IP address. If you need a floating IP address, that’s available for an additional cost.

Now, you might be wondering about the currency and billing cycle. OneQode Cloud pricing is in USD. As for the billing, it’s important to note that OneQode operates on an hourly billing system. This means you’re only billed for the hours your instances are running.

Coupon

Sign up for a cloud account today and get $20 free credit.

Customer Support

OneQode’s customer support is accessible and responsive. They understand that in the world of gaming and real-time applications, every second counts. Therefore, they strive to provide timely and effective support to their customers.

Moreover, OneQode’s customer support team is knowledgeable and experienced. They are well-versed in the intricacies of their services and can provide detailed and accurate information. This ensures that customers can get the help they need when they need it.

In addition, OneQode values feedback from its customers. They encourage customers to share their experiences and suggestions. This feedback not only helps them improve their services but also helps them understand their customers’ needs better.

Furthermore, OneQode’s customer support extends to its online resources. They have a comprehensive documentation site and a blog that provides valuable information and insights about their services. These resources can help customers understand and maximize OneQode’s offerings.

Conclusion

During our tests, the Basic Bench revealed I/O speeds hovering around 105.7 MB/s across multiple runs. While these speeds are adequate, they fall below the ideal mark of 200 MB/s, indicating room for improvement in data handling efficiency. On the networking front, the server exhibited strong upload and download speeds across various global nodes, with slight decreases in performance at farther distances like Amsterdam and notable bottlenecks in Shanghai. Meanwhile, the Yabs performance metrics were more robust, with disk speeds on larger blocks (512k and 1m sizes) reaching over 200 MB/s, pointing to good capacity for handling mixed read/write operations.

The server’s CPU and overall system performance, assessed through Geekbench and UnixBench tests, showed excellent results. The Geekbench 6 scores were commendable, with a single-core score of 1469 and a multi-core score of 2608, indicating good overall processing power. The UnixBench scores further substantiated this by showing high performance in various benchmarking tests, particularly in file copying and pipe throughput, clearly benefiting from running multiple parallel operations.

In conclusion, the OneQode Guam server stands out regarding CPU power and network throughput, which is especially beneficial for applications requiring high-performance computing and efficient data handling. However, there is a notable need for improvements in I/O speeds to maximize the hardware’s potential. Businesses looking for a capable server solution in Asia-Pacific would find this product appealing, provided the I/O performance gap is addressed in future optimizations.

Official Website: https://www.OneQode.com

Related Posts