Melbicom Japan Tokyo AMD EPYC 7702P High-Performance KVM VPS Test and Review
In an era where Asia-Pacific businesses demand low-latency infrastructure to support expanding digital footprints, Melbicom’s KVM-8-TYO Cloud Server emerges as a compelling option for enterprise IT teams. This test evaluates a shared vCPU VPS plan hosted in Tokyo, Japan, powered by an AMD EPYC 7702P 64-core processor with 8 allocated cores, 16 GB RAM, 160 GB NVMe SSD storage, and up to 1 Gbps bandwidth (throttled to 100 Mbps beyond a 5 TB monthly quota).
Benchmarks reveal robust compute and storage: Sysbench scores hit 1,627 (single-thread) and 12,915 (multi-thread), with Geekbench at 1,241/6,377 single/multi-core. Memory blazes at 42,768 MB/s read, 19,578 MB/s write; NVMe delivers 249 MB/s (4K, 62.3k IOPS) to 4.41 GB/s (1M, 4.3k IOPS).
Network peaks at 946 Mbps upload but dips to 74 Mbps receive in the US; pings range 109-336 ms. Streaming partially unlocks (YouTube, Amazon Prime), but Netflix/Disney+ falter. IP quality scores 56/100 trust, with low abuse but a 65 fraud score.
The VPS excels for regional workloads—like a sprinter on a short track—perfect for Tokyo-centric apps. Network lag and IP reputation may hinder global or compliance-heavy use. It’s a cost-effective pick for APAC-focused IT teams.
About Melbicom
Melbicom.net stands out as a premier hosting provider, delivering robust solutions tailored for businesses, developers, and high-traffic websites worldwide. Established in 2005, Melbicom has evolved from a niche bandwidth specialist into a full-spectrum hosting powerhouse, headquartered in New York with a global footprint. Committed to innovation and reliability, the company leverages cutting-edge technology to ensure seamless connectivity and optimal performance, serving over 10,000 clients across various industries, including e-commerce, gaming, and enterprise IT.
At its core, Melbicom.net offers an impressive array of services designed to scale with your needs. Virtual Private Servers (VPS) start with flexible plans powered by KVM virtualization, featuring SSD storage, unlimited bandwidth, and root access for customization. For demanding applications, dedicated servers provide bare-metal power with Intel Xeon processors, up to 1TB RAM, and RAID-configured NVMe drives—ideal for databases or media streaming.
Colocation services excel in their state-of-the-art facilities, offering secure racks, 24/7 power redundancy, and direct carrier access in key hubs such as New York, Amsterdam, and Hong Kong. What sets Melbicom apart is its IP transit prowess: as a Tier-1 provider, it boasts peering with over 500 networks, delivering low-latency global reach at speeds up to 100Gbps. DDoS protection is baked in, with unlimited mitigation to safeguard against threats.
Pricing
Official Website: https://www.Melbicom.net
Coupon
The merchant did not provide
Basic Information
Processor : AMD EPYC 7702P 64-Core Processor
CPU Numbers : 8
CPU Frequency : 1996.250 MHz
CPU Cache : L1: 256.00 KB / L2: 4.00 MB / L3: 2048.00 MB
AES-NI : ✔ Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
RAM : 456.01 MiB / 15.63 GiB
Swap : 0 KiB / 1024.00 MiB
Disk Space : 5.34 GiB / 157.39 GiB
Boot Disk : /dev/vda1
Uptime : 0 days, 12 hour 4 min
Loads : 0.43, 0.15, 0.04
OS Release : Ubuntu 22.04.1 LTS (x86_64)
Arch : x86_64 (64 Bit)
Kernel Version : 5.15.0-46-generic
TCP Acceleration : bbr
VM Type : Microsoft Hyper-V
NAT Type : Full Cone
IPV4 ASN : AS8849 Melbikomas UAB
IPV4 Location : Tokyo / Tokyo / JP
CPU Benchmark
---------------------------CPU-Sysbench-Test----------------------------
-> CPU test in progress (Fast Mode, 1-Pass @ 5sec)
1 Thread(s) Test: 1627 Scores
8 Thread(s) Test: 12915 Scores
Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
---------------------------------
Test | Value
|
Single Core | 1241
Multi Core | 6377
Full Test | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/14444679
YABS completed in 6 min 29 sec
RAM Read/Write Tests
----------------------------Memory-Test---------------------------------
-> Memory Test (Fast Mode, 1-Pass @ 5sec)
Single Read Test: 42768.39 MB/s
Single Write Test: 19578.80 MB/s
Running memory speed test with the following options:
block size: 1KiB
total size: 102400MiB
operation: read
scope: global
Initializing worker threads...
Threads started!
Total operations: 64626887 (6461755.11 per second)
63112.19 MiB transferred (6310.31 MiB/sec)
General statistics:
total time: 10.0001s
total number of events: 64626887
Latency (ms):
min: 0.00
avg: 0.00
max: 1.77
95th percentile: 0.00
sum: 3198.99
Threads fairness:
events (avg/stddev): 64626887.0000/0.00
execution time (avg/stddev): 3.1990/0.00
Running memory speed test with the following options:
block size: 1KiB
total size: 102400MiB
operation: write
scope: global
Initializing worker threads...
Threads started!
Total operations: 54447287 (5444156.99 per second)
53171.18 MiB transferred (5316.56 MiB/sec)
General statistics:
total time: 10.0001s
total number of events: 54447287
Latency (ms):
min: 0.00
avg: 0.00
max: 2.65
95th percentile: 0.00
sum: 4227.13
Threads fairness:
events (avg/stddev): 54447287.0000/0.00
execution time (avg/stddev): 4.2271/0.00
Disk Read/Write Tests
------------------------Disk-dd-Read/Write-Test-------------------------
-> Disk test in progress (4K Block/1M Block, Direct Mode)
Block Size Write Test Read Test
100MB-4K Block 33.7 MB/s (8235 IOPS, 3.11s) 36.6 MB/s (8932 IOPS, 2.87s)
1GB-1M Block 1.2 GB/s (1139 IOPS, 0.88s) 1.3 GB/s (1212 IOPS, 0.82s)
-----------------------Disk-fio-Read/Write-Test-------------------------
Block Size | 4k (IOPS) | 64k (IOPS)
------ | --- ---- | ---- ----
Read | 124.59 MB/s (31.1k) | 1.78 GB/s (27.8k)
Write | 124.92 MB/s (31.2k) | 1.79 GB/s (27.9k)
Total | 249.52 MB/s (62.3k) | 3.57 GB/s (55.8k)
| |
Block Size | 512k (IOPS) | 1m (IOPS)
------ | --- ---- | ---- ----
Read | 2.06 GB/s (4.0k) | 2.13 GB/s (2.0k)
Write | 2.17 GB/s (4.2k) | 2.27 GB/s (2.2k)
Total | 4.24 GB/s (8.2k) | 4.41 GB/s (4.3k)
Iperf3 Network Tests
iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
---------------------------------
Provider | Location (Link) | Send Speed | Recv Speed | Ping
Clouvider | London, UK (10G) | 619 Mbits/sec | 272 Mbits/sec | 238 ms
Eranium | Amsterdam, NL (100G) | 767 Mbits/sec | 778 Mbits/sec | 253 ms
Uztelecom | Tashkent, UZ (10G) | 740 Mbits/sec | 334 Mbits/sec | 257 ms
Leaseweb | Singapore, SG (10G) | 946 Mbits/sec | 763 Mbits/sec | --
Clouvider | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 697 Mbits/sec | 74.2 Mbits/sec | 109 ms
Leaseweb | NYC, NY, US (10G) | 847 Mbits/sec | 772 Mbits/sec | 165 ms
Edgoo | Sao Paulo, BR (1G) | 639 Mbits/sec | 336 Mbits/sec | 336 ms UnixBench Tests
Benchmark Run: Tue Oct 14 2025 07:31:43 - 07:59:42
8 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 38729086.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 7331.4 MWIPS (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 3681.3 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1068580.1 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 291620.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 2871961.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 1612105.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 55796.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 7464.2 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 11223.2 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 4513.3 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 1777899.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 38729086.9 3318.7
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 7331.4 1333.0
Execl Throughput 43.0 3681.3 856.1
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 1068580.1 2698.4
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 291620.9 1762.1
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 2871961.9 4951.7
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1612105.8 1295.9
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 55796.3 139.5
Process Creation 126.0 7464.2 592.4
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 11223.2 2647.0
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 4513.3 7522.1
System Call Overhead 15000.0 1777899.4 1185.3
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 1570.6
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Tue Oct 14 2025 07:59:42 - 08:27:43
8 CPUs in system; running 8 parallel copies of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 305656772.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 59193.8 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 16604.3 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1081607.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 320221.7 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 2785495.1 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 12955148.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 692378.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 32582.3 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 46669.2 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6607.3 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 3638505.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 305656772.0 26191.7
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 59193.8 10762.5
Execl Throughput 43.0 16604.3 3861.5
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 1081607.4 2731.3
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 320221.7 1934.9
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 2785495.1 4802.6
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 12955148.6 10414.1
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 692378.4 1730.9
Process Creation 126.0 32582.3 2585.9
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 46669.2 11006.9
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 6607.3 11012.1
System Call Overhead 15000.0 3638505.6 2425.7
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 5186.2
======= Script description and score comparison completed! =======
Streaming Unlock Tests
============[ Multination ]============
Dazn: Failed (Error: )
Disney+: No (IP Banned By Disney+ 1)
Netflix: Originals Only
YouTube Premium: Yes (Region: JP)
Amazon Prime Video: Yes (Region: LT)
TVBAnywhere+: Yes
Spotify Registration: No
OneTrust Region: JP [Tokyo]
iQyi Oversea Region: INTL
Bing Region: JP (Risky)
Apple Region: LT
YouTube CDN: Tokyo
Netflix Preferred CDN: Tokyo
ChatGPT: Yes
Google Gemini: Yes (Region: JPN)
Claude: Yes
Wikipedia Editability: Yes
Google Play Store: Japan
Google Search CAPTCHA Free: Yes
Steam Currency: JPY
---Forum---
Reddit: No
---Game---
SD Gundam G Generation Eternal: No
=======================================
IP Quality Detection
Data for reference only, does not represent 100% accurate, if and the actual situation is not consistent with the manual query multiple database comparison
The following is the number of each database, the output will come with the corresponding number of the database source
ipinfo databases [0] | scamalytics databases [1] | virustotal databases [2] | abuseipdb databases [3] | ip2location databases [4]
ip-api databases [5] | ipwhois databases [6] | ipregistry databases [7] | ipdata databases [8] | db-ip databases [9]
ipapiis databases [A] | ipapicom databases [B] | bigdatacloud databases [C] | dkly databases [D] | ipqualityscore databases [E]
IPV4:
Security Score:
Reputation: 0 [2]
TrustScore: 56 [8]
VpnScore: 3 [8]
ProxyScore: 33 [8]
CommunityVoteHarmless: 0 [2]
CommunityVoteMalicious: 0 [2]
ThreatScore: 97 [8]
FraudScore: 65 [E]
AbuseScore: 0 [3]
ASNAbuseScore: 0.0025 (Low) [A]
CompannyAbuseScore: 0 (Very Low) [A]
ThreatLevel: low [9]
Blacklist_Records_Statistics(how many blacklisted websites have records):
HarmlessnessRecords: 1 [2] MaliciousRecords: 0 [2] SuspiciousRecords: 0 [2] NoRecords: 94 [2]
Security Info:
UsageType: business [8] hosting [0 7 A] corporate [9] DataCenter/WebHosting/Transit [3] hosting ASN [C]
CompanyType: hosting [0 7 A]
IsCloudProvider: Yes [7]
IsDatacenter: Yes [0 A C] No [5 6 8]
IsMobile: Yes [E] No [5 A C]
IsProxy: No [0 4 6 7 8 9 A C] Yes [5 E]
IsVpn: No [0 6 C] Yes [7 A E]
IsTor: No [0 3 6 7 8 A C E]
IsTorExit: No [7]
IsCrawler: No [9 A E]
IsAnonymous: Yes [7] No [6 8]
IsAttacker: No [7 8]
IsAbuser: No [7 8 A C E]
IsThreat: No [7 8 C]
IsRelay: No [0 7 8 C]
IsBogon: No [7 8 A C]
IsBot: No [E]
DNS-BlackList: 315(Total_Check) 0(Clean) 5(Blacklisted) 310(Other)
Google search feasibility: NO
Email Port Detection
Platform SMTP SMTPS POP3 POP3S IMAP IMAPS
LocalPort ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔
QQ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
163 ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Sohu ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Yandex ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Gmail ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
Outlook ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Office365 ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Yahoo ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
MailCOM ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
MailRU ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘
AOL ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
GMX ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Sina ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Apple ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
FastMail ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
ProtonMail✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
MXRoute ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Namecrane ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
XYAMail ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
ZohoMail ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
Inbox_eu ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘
Free_fr ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ Looking Glass
- CityTokyo
- CountryJapan
- LocationAsia
- Space–
- Electricity
- Capacity–
- Network1-100 Gbps (per server)
- CertificationsTier III
Test IPv4: 203.190.0.130
Download File: 1000MB
Global Latency Tests
Query: ping 203.190.0.90, interval: 5s, dense mode: no
Probing 203.190.0.90 – RIPE NCC /22 AS8849 MELBICOM-EU-AS – Japan, Tokyo, Tokyo [hosting]
CloudFlare Internet Tests
Admin Control Panel
Conclusion
Key metrics from the benchmarks paint a picture of solid, if regionally nuanced, capabilities. CPU performance shines in Sysbench tests, hitting 1,627 scores on a single thread and scaling impressively to 12,915 on eight threads, while Geekbench 6 clocks in at 1,241 single-core and 6,377 multi-core—adequate for parallel workloads. Memory throughput impresses with 42,768 MB/s reads and 19,578 MB/s writes, backed by low-latency figures under 2 ms. NVMe storage delivers brisk speeds: fio tests show 249 MB/s total for 4K blocks (62.3k IOPS) and up to 4.41 GB/s for 1M blocks (4.3k IOPS), ideal for database ops.
Network tests via iPerf3 reveal upload peaks of 946 Mbps to Singapore and 847 Mbps to New York, though receive lag at 74 Mbps to Los Angeles; pings hover around 109-336 ms globally. Streaming partially succeeds—YouTube Premium and Amazon Prime work in JP/LT regions, but Netflix limits to originals, and Disney+ blocks the IP. IP quality scores a 56/100 trust rating, with low abuse (0.0025) but a 65 fraud score, flagging minor proxy risks; email ports favor local but falter on Gmail/Yahoo.
Delving deeper, these results underscore Melbicom’s strengths in compute and storage, where the EPYC processor’s multi-threading muscle handles bursts like a well-tuned engine in a rally—efficient for dev/test cycles or e-commerce backends. Worth noting, the NVMe’s IOPS rival pricier rivals, suggesting it’s no slouch for I/O-intensive apps. Yet, network inconsistencies emerge as a soft spot: that 74 Mbps receive to the US feels like a sports car idling in traffic, potentially bottlenecking cross-Pacific data syncs for hybrid teams.
In wrapping up, the Melbicom KVM-8-TYO VPS delivers respectable value for Asia-centric deployments, blending EPYC-driven grunt with NVMe zip at an accessible price point—think reliable workhorse for mid-tier IT stacks. For administrators prioritizing Tokyo latency under 250 ms, it’s a smart pick, especially with unmetered transfers post-quota. That said, if your ops span continents or crave flawless streaming compliance, pair it with a CDN or scout alternatives for polished IP hygiene. Prospective buyers should trial it for workload-specific fits; in a crowded VPS market, this one’s edge lies in unpretentious power—grab it if APAC agility tops your list.
Official Website: https://www.Melbicom.net
