Tiktalik Poland Warsaw CPU-hog Hourly Billing Virtual Instance Test and Reviews

Tests6~months ago~Published LetsHosting
1.3K 0
Tiktalik Poland Warsaw CPU-hog Hourly Billing Virtual Instance Test and Reviews

Today, we will evaluate Tiktalik Poland Warsaw‘s virtual server, which you can pay for by the hour. It’s quite a powerful server, sporting an Intel Xeon CPU E3-1230 V2 processor that can reach speeds up to 3.30GHz. It also comes with 4 CPU cores, 4 GB of RAM, 40 GB of SSD storage, a fast 1 Gbps internet connection, and an IPv4 address.

We’ll put this server to the test using various industry-standard methods. The Basic Benchmark, Yabs, and Unix Benchmarks will measure important performance indicators. We’ll also be conducting the Global Node Test for a thorough network check and the Global Ping Test to measure how long it takes for data to travel, more commonly known as ‘latency.’

Furthermore, we’ll run the Media Unlock Test to evaluate how accessible the server is from different geographic locations. To gauge the quality of the server’s internet connection, we’ll run the CloudFlare Internet Test. Lastly, to see how fast webpages load on the server, we’ll use tools such as PageSpeed Insights and GTmetrix Performance.

About Tiktalik

Tiktalik.com is a cloud hosting service that offers cheap, reliable, and scalable Virtual Private Servers (VPS) with Solid State Drives (SSDs). It’s designed to provide simple and universal hosting in a cloud environment.

Tiktalik guarantees resources with top-class server hardware, reliable Intel Xeon processors, and up to 16GB of RAM. They offer an extremely high Service Level Agreement (SLA) level of 99.9%, ensuring your applications run smoothly.

One of the standout features of Tiktalik is its fast server setup. You can have a fast server with SSD, its IP address, and root access in just 90 seconds. You don’t have to wait for an administrator and can create applications faster.

Tiktalik also prioritizes data safety. They provide a simple backup of images of your VPS server as often as you need it. They also have their server room in Warsaw city center, equipped with high-power cooling, power generators, and full UPS protection.

In terms of billing, Tiktalik operates on an hourly basis, meaning you only pay for what you use. This makes it a cost-effective solution for businesses of all sizes.

Innovation is at the heart of Tiktalik. Their team of professionals is constantly looking for new solutions to make your work faster and easier. They use BlockStore technology to make your drives even faster, and their Load Balancer helps better manage the load on your servers.

Official Website: https://www.Tiktalik.com

BasicBench: Server Profile, I/O Speed, Upload and Download Speed

 CPU Model          : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1230 V2 @ 3.30GHz
 CPU Cores          : 16 @ 3292.615 MHz
 CPU Cache          : 8192 KB
 AES-NI             : ✓ Enabled
 VM-x/AMD-V         : ✗ Disabled
 Total Disk         : 36.6 GB (1.9 GB Used)
 Total Mem          : 3.8 GB (283.0 MB Used)
 System uptime      : 0 days, 0 hour 13 min
 Load average       : 0.00, 0.02, 0.01
 OS                 : Ubuntu 20.04 LTS
 Arch               : x86_64 (64 Bit)
 Kernel             : 5.4.0-40-generic
 TCP CC             : bbr
 Virtualization     : Xen-DomU
 IPv4/IPv6          : ✓ Online / ✗ Offline
 Organization       : AS198717 Techstorage sp. z o.o.
 Location           : Warsaw / PL
 Region             : Mazovia
----------------------------------------------------------------------
 I/O Speed(1st run) : 129 MB/s
 I/O Speed(2nd run) : 180 MB/s
 I/O Speed(3rd run) : 163 MB/s
 I/O Speed(average) : 157.3 MB/s
----------------------------------------------------------------------
 Node Name        Upload Speed      Download Speed      Latency     
 Speedtest.net    99.44 Mbps        778.12 Mbps         0.92 ms     
 Los Angeles, US  110.90 Mbps       208.40 Mbps         158.68 ms   
 Dallas, US       104.08 Mbps       23.37 Mbps          130.68 ms   
 Montreal, CA     101.22 Mbps       427.52 Mbps         104.58 ms   
 Paris, FR        99.46 Mbps        859.03 Mbps         31.45 ms    
 Amsterdam, NL    98.89 Mbps        356.94 Mbps         22.13 ms    
 Shanghai, CN     104.80 Mbps       266.39 Mbps         266.09 ms   
 Hongkong, CN     103.96 Mbps       278.44 Mbps         242.48 ms   
 Mumbai, IN       99.28 Mbps        296.32 Mbps         147.92 ms   
 Singapore, SG    105.60 Mbps       550.85 Mbps         286.15 ms   
 Tokyo, JP        105.77 Mbps       263.84 Mbps         252.31 ms   
----------------------------------------------------------------------
 Finished in        : 6 min 16 sec
 Timestamp          : 2023-11-01 01:45:33 CET

YabsBench: Disk Speed, iperf3 Network Speed, Geekbench 6 Benchmark

Basic System Information:
---------------------------------
Uptime     : 0 days, 0 hours, 30 minutes
Processor  : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1230 V2 @ 3.30GHz
CPU cores  : 16 @ 3292.615 MHz
AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ❌ Disabled
RAM        : 3.8 GiB
Swap       : 0.0 KiB
Disk       : 36.6 GiB
Distro     : Ubuntu 20.04 LTS
Kernel     : 5.4.0-40-generic
VM Type    : XEN
IPv4/IPv6  : ✔ Online / ❌ Offline

IPv4 Network Information:
---------------------------------
ISP        : Techstorage sp. z o.o.
ASN        : AS198717 Techstorage sp. z o.o.
Host       : Techstorage sp. z o.o.
Location   : Warsaw, Mazovia (14)
Country    : Poland

fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50):
---------------------------------
Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
Read       | 46.87 MB/s   (11.7k) | 99.77 MB/s    (1.5k)
Write      | 46.92 MB/s   (11.7k) | 100.29 MB/s   (1.5k)
Total      | 93.79 MB/s   (23.4k) | 200.07 MB/s   (3.1k)
           |                      |                     
Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
Read       | 95.27 MB/s     (186) | 91.88 MB/s      (89)
Write      | 100.33 MB/s    (195) | 98.00 MB/s      (95)
Total      | 195.60 MB/s    (381) | 189.89 MB/s    (184)

iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
---------------------------------
Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping           
Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 104 Mbits/sec   | 87.2 Mbits/sec  | 25.9 ms        
Scaleway        | Paris, FR (10G)           | 105 Mbits/sec   | 69.3 Mbits/sec  | 28.5 ms        
NovoServe       | North Holland, NL (40G)   | 105 Mbits/sec   | 626 Mbits/sec   | 19.6 ms        
Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | busy            | 14.0 Mbits/sec  | 96.4 ms        
Clouvider       | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 99.9 Mbits/sec  | 32.7 Mbits/sec  | 95.0 ms        
Clouvider       | Dallas, TX, US (10G)      | 85.8 Mbits/sec  | 6.96 Mbits/sec  | 248 ms         
Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 93.8 Mbits/sec  | 34.1 Mbits/sec  | 165 ms         

Geekbench 6 test failed. Run manually to determine cause.

YABS completed in 11 min 58 sec

UnixBench: CPU Performance, A score higher is better

Benchmark Run: Wed Nov 01 2023 02:31:10 - 02:59:10
16 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables       42827614.6 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone                     6093.0 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput                               4566.5 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks        689667.1 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks          183625.4 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks       1980049.0 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput                             1019733.2 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching                 106657.4 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation                               9347.7 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                  11996.9 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                   3877.0 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead                         740331.9 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values               BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0   42827614.6   3669.9
Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0       6093.0   1107.8
Execl Throughput                                 43.0       4566.5   1062.0
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0     689667.1   1741.6
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0     183625.4   1109.5
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0    1980049.0   3413.9
Pipe Throughput                               12440.0    1019733.2    819.7
Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0     106657.4    266.6
Process Creation                                126.0       9347.7    741.9
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4      11996.9   2829.5
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0       3877.0   6461.7
System Call Overhead                          15000.0     740331.9    493.6
                                                                   ========
System Benchmarks Index Score                                        1364.6

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Wed Nov 01 2023 02:59:10 - 03:27:28
16 CPUs in system; running 16 parallel copies of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables      176664888.4 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone                    42000.0 MWIPS (9.0 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput                              19494.3 lps   (29.9 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks        948540.3 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks          246585.9 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks       2852519.0 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput                             5225773.7 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching                 316907.1 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation                              43570.0 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                  36474.6 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                   4800.8 lpm   (60.1 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead                        4357023.3 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values               BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0  176664888.4  15138.4
Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0      42000.0   7636.4
Execl Throughput                                 43.0      19494.3   4533.6
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0     948540.3   2395.3
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0     246585.9   1489.9
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0    2852519.0   4918.1
Pipe Throughput                               12440.0    5225773.7   4200.8
Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0     316907.1    792.3
Process Creation                                126.0      43570.0   3457.9
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4      36474.6   8602.5
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0       4800.8   8001.4
System Call Overhead                          15000.0    4357023.3   2904.7
                                                                   ========
System Benchmarks Index Score                                        4078.2

======= Script description and score comparison completed! ======= 

Looking Glass

None

Global Node Test

 ## CDN Speedtest

 CacheFly :  96.15 MiB/s |  769.23 Mbps  | ping   0.846ms
 Gdrive   :       0 B/s |      N/A       | ping   0.802ms


 ## North America Speedtest

 Softlayer, Washington, USA :   1.34 MiB/s |   10.73 Mbps  | ping 108.687ms
 SoftLayer, San Jose, USA   :   2.33 MiB/s |   18.67 Mbps  | ping 172.172ms
 SoftLayer, Dallas, USA     :       0 B/s |      N/A       | ping error!
 Vultr, New Jersey, USA     :   6.72 MiB/s |   53.79 Mbps  | ping error!
 Vultr, Seattle, USA        :   6.20 MiB/s |   49.56 Mbps  | ping 145.493ms
 Vultr, Dallas, USA         :   7.86 MiB/s |   62.92 Mbps  | ping 126.683ms
 Vultr, Los Angeles, USA    :   5.84 MiB/s |   46.70 Mbps  | ping 150.110ms
 Ramnode, New York, USA     :   5.16 MiB/s |   41.24 Mbps  | ping  99.839ms
 Ramnode, Atlanta, USA      :   6.29 MiB/s |   50.29 Mbps  | ping 113.823ms


 ## Europe Speedtest

 Vultr, London, UK            :  42.70 MiB/s |  341.59 Mbps  | ping  26.469ms
 LeaseWeb, Frankfurt, Germany : 232.97 KiB/s |    1.82 Mbps  | ping  22.108ms
 Hetzner, Germany             :   1.32 KiB/s |    0.01 Mbps  | ping  22.003ms
 Ramnode, Alblasserdam, NL    :  28.10 MiB/s |  224.79 Mbps  | ping  22.495ms
 Vultr, Amsterdam, NL         :  45.58 MiB/s |  364.63 Mbps  | ping  17.942ms
 EDIS, Stockholm, Sweden      :   1.67 KiB/s |    0.01 Mbps  | ping  26.786ms
 OVH, Roubaix, France         :   1.88 KiB/s |    0.01 Mbps  | ping  25.157ms
 Online, France               :  20.01 MiB/s |  160.10 Mbps  | ping  28.378ms
 Prometeus, Milan, Italy      :   1.22 KiB/s |    0.01 Mbps  | ping  31.765ms


 ## Exotic Speedtest

 Sydney, Australia     :   2.65 MiB/s |   21.16 Mbps  | ping 254.328ms
 Lagoon, New Caledonia :     209 B/s |      N/A       | ping 296.027ms
 Hosteasy, Moldova     :  12.56 MiB/s |  100.49 Mbps  | ping  38.175ms
 Prima, Argentina      : 321.36 KiB/s |    2.51 Mbps  | ping error!


 ## Asia Speedtest

 SoftLayer, Singapore : 399.42 KiB/s |    3.12 Mbps  | ping 260.765ms
 Linode, Tokyo, Japan :   1.18 MiB/s |    9.40 Mbps  | ping 251.313ms
 Linode, Singapore    :   1.26 MiB/s |   10.10 Mbps  | ping 249.845ms
 Vultr, Tokyo, Japan  :   2.78 MiB/s |   22.24 Mbps  | ping 228.698ms


 Benchmark finished in 108 seconds

Global Latency Test

Tiktalik Poland Warsaw CPU-hog Hourly Billing Virtual Instance Test and Reviews Tiktalik Poland Warsaw CPU-hog Hourly Billing Virtual Instance Test and Reviews

Query: ping 37.233.102.74, interval: 5s, dense mode: no

Probing 37.233.102.74 – RIPENCC /20 AS198717 TECHSTORAGE – Poland, Mazovia, Warsaw

Media Unlock Test

 ** Test Starts At: Wed Nov  1 02:13:58 CET 2023

 ** Checking Results Under IPv4 
--------------------------------
 ** Your Network Provider: Techstorage sp. z o.o. (37.233.*.*) 

============[ Multination ]============
 Dazn:                                  Yes (Region: PL)
 HotStar:                               No
 Disney+:                               No
 Netflix:                               Yes (Region: PL)
 YouTube Premium:                       Failed
 Amazon Prime Video:                    Yes (Region: PL)
 TVBAnywhere+:                          Yes
 iQyi Oversea Region:                   INTL
 Viu.com:                               No
 YouTube CDN:                           ATMAN in Warsaw 
 Netflix Preferred CDN:                 Warsaw  
 Spotify Registration:                  No
 Steam Currency:                        PLN
 ChatGPT:                               Yes
=======================================
No IPv6 Connectivity Found, Abort IPv6 Testing...

Testing Done! 

CloudFlare Internet Test

Tiktalik Poland Warsaw CPU-hog Hourly Billing Virtual Instance Test and Reviews

PageSpeed Insights

Tiktalik Poland Warsaw CPU-hog Hourly Billing Virtual Instance Test and Reviews

GTmetrix Performance

Tiktalik Poland Warsaw CPU-hog Hourly Billing Virtual Instance Test and Reviews

Admin Control Panel

Tiktalik Poland Warsaw CPU-hog Hourly Billing Virtual Instance Test and Reviews

Tiktalik’s Admin Control Panel is designed to provide users with a simple and efficient way to manage their cloud hosting services. Here are some key features:

  • Fast Server Setup: With Tiktalik, you can have a fast server with SSD, IP address, and root access in just 90 seconds. You don’t have to wait for an administrator and can create applications faster.
  • Guaranteed Resources: Tiktalik guarantees resources with top-class server hardware, reliable Intel Xeon processors, and up to 16GB of RAM.
  • Data Safety: Tiktalik prioritizes data safety. They provide a simple backup of images of your VPS server as often as you need it.
  • Innovation: Their team of professionals constantly looks for new solutions to make your work faster and easier. They use BlockStore technology to make your drives even faster, and their Load Balancer helps better manage the load on your servers.

Server Pricing

Tiktalik Poland Warsaw CPU-hog Hourly Billing Virtual Instance Test and Reviews

Official Website: https://www.Tiktalik.com

Payments

Tiktalik operates hourly for billing, meaning you only pay for what you use. This makes it a cost-effective solution for businesses of all sizes. For more specific information about their payment methods and options, it’s best to check out their official website or contact their customer service. They will be able to provide the most accurate and up-to-date information. Please note that the payment methods may vary depending on your location and chosen services.

Coupon

The merchant did not provide

Customer Support

Address and company info
Techstorage. Sp z o.o.
Hoża 51, 00-681 Warsaw
(+48) 22 100 57 69, [email protected]
NIP 5272652587,
REGON 142884724,
KRS 0000382249, District Court for the Capital City Warsaw, XII Commercial Division

Conclusion

The preliminary tests included network speed and IO performance checks. From the Basic Benchmark test, the server depicted impressive Input/Output speeds, averaging 157.3 MB/s, suggesting solid performance for applications that need to read and write data continuously. Network speeds via various global nodes were also commendable, with notable Download/Upload speeds and latency in several global locations.

The Yabs Performance Bench test, which measures disk speed, reported solid read/write metrics for different block sizes. For example, for a block size of 4K, read and write speeds stood at an acceptable 46.87 MB/s and 46.92 MB/s, respectively, signifying the server’s robustness for hard disk-dependant tasks.

The UnixBench CPU Performance test assessed the server’s processor strength. The server produced impressive results, particularly when running 16 parallel copies of tests, indicating that the machine could handle multiple tasks concurrently without significantly dropping efficiency. The high index scores suggest that this server will perform well in CPU-intensive operations.

In the Media Unlock Test, the server had mixed results for access to various streaming services. It successfully unlocked Dazn, Netflix, Amazon Prime Video, and TVBAnywhere+. However, it failed to unlock Disney+, HotStar, and Viu.com. Thus, depending on the needs of the applications you plan to host on this server, compatibility with these services may require further consideration.

In conclusion, if you’re seeking a robust, scalable server that can handle tasks requiring high CPU or I/O performance, Tiktalik’s Poland Warsaw virtual server is a worthy consideration. While it delivers a strong performance in network speed tests and handles various streaming services, its compatibility with some media services leaves a bit to be desired. It’s an impressive piece of gear, especially for the reasonable pay-by-the-hour rates.

Official Website: https://www.Tiktalik.com

Related Posts